michael rasmussen and your next round of questions. ms. altmann, americans largely wind up with the policy options that are put forth by political parties. so what are the ideas you see being championed by either party that you think ought to be part of the solution on immigration and the border? would it be more effective to move troops currently stationed overseas to the u.s. mexico border or to shutter the border if illegal crossings reach a certain average threshold? or should we raise the requirements for immigrants to receive political asylum? or are there different policy options that you'd prefer to be part of the solution? mike, as you know, i've never stayed within the bounds of what political parties were offering. when i was in trenton, i worked hard to do things that no one ever thought were possible, like abolish the line. but i will move with your premise for the sake of conversation on the issue of immigration, we need to increase the amount of border security. we need to invest in security at the border. and i do think the

we're going to go to michael rasmussen. we have time for one or two more questions. michael, to you. mr. kane, ten years ago, you voted with most of the rest of the new jersey legislature to move to cashless bail. has that worked as you hoped it would? i think that the intent was good in that regard, but there are new reforms that have to happen. there have to be consequences associated with an individual right now. too many people are being let out of jail who are repeat offenders. and when you talk to police officers, there are not one probation. and that that bill, too, that needs to be improved, changed a bit. but second thing is also you need to make every other issue that kept the streets safe have actually been weakened by the by the murphy administration. so when you look at the truck driving down the fact that there are, in fact, as you know, phil murphy trying to make sure that people under 18, if they commit a violation, the parents wouldn't know. we need to make sure that we have the get back the funding for the cops, funding for the for these judges syst