. >> well, michael hanlan is a senior fellow with the brookings institute and michael tomasky.hat do you make of the neocon argument? it's an ideological war, we admit it, we never really did believe in the wmd, we're glad we fought it, because we got rid of saddam hussein. >> yeah, well, look, saddam hussein was a really bad guy, chris. nobody argues with that. but the the world better off now? no. the world is not better off now. some portions of the iraqi population are probably better off. the kurds are probably better off. there's no complete black and complete white here. it's a very complicated picture. so, yeah, some people are better off because saddam hussein is gone, saddam hussein was a complete monster. is the world overall better off because iraq exploded like this and because they went in there and thought iraqis were going to throw rose petals at our feet and they didn't plan for what kind of regime they were going to build. they didn't plan on replacing or maintaining the security constitutions of that country, when they tore that country apart? no, the world's