michael watson. ..against michael watson in 1991, where michael watson received such a pasting that afterwards you are putting young men in the ring, knowing that their lives could be lost, and you are making a tidy profit out of that. where is the morality in that? well, i mean, i could take instance with you on several... the michael watson fight, of course, michael was winning every round and didn't take any punishment until one punch — which shows you, you know, what the slight difference is between victory and defeat. and secondly, by the way, that show lost a fortune of money, never sold enough tickets, and it's probably ended up being the worst day of my life — nothing to do with money, but purely because michael watson was injured. we all have to take responsibility for being involved in that, but it is a balancing act between the right of the individual to pursue the career they want — they want a career. you know, i could quote you thousands of instances where far more people lose their lives each year mountaineering than even remotely gets close to boxing, for example. and there is

marilyn watson, bob michaels, and jean put it so --gene panuzzo are still with us.ene: there is definitely froth in the market. bond yields are plummeting to the lowest levels ever. it speaks to the backdrop we just talked about, central banks are causing yields to evaporate from markets. investors are finding yield wherever they can find it. right now, there is a shortage of income producing assets. the asset class has been a beneficiary in a bit but sweet spot. fundamentals are strong. default rates are coming down quickly. it is amazing in an asset class like i yields how allowing companies to extend maturities can reduce the default rate. we have built a bridge. now, earnings are coming down. i think investors have become comfortable with high yields. but, history would tell us that investing in high-yield companies, particularly credit -- triple c's with these credit spreads tends to have about outcome -- a bad outcome, particularly after 12 months. we have been cautious in the triple c segment. what we own their tends to be significantly under yielding broad m

michael jordan was at the track. he is the owner owner owner own wallace, bubba watson say golfer. et lost in michael jordan land your mind goes all over the place. that was great stuff. the grand marshal. that is the best time we got to get that gig. >> yeah, totally. >>> they are not fast enough for nascar but some classics were on display today in the east bay. guess what all of these struggling to manage my type 2 diabetes was knocking me out of my zone, but lowering my a1c with once-weekly ozempic® helped me get back in it. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic® ♪ my zone? lowering my a1c and losing some weight. now, back to the show. ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get me