. >> reporter: michael wilson has four kids, two boys and two girls. he finds it hard to believe that no one heard or saw the attack. he said around this neighborhood, fear keeps mouths shut. >> if they tell you to scream fire they would have looked and see what happened. people don't know what these kids are capable of these days and i don't blame them. >> reporter: police did search in and around the vacant homes. no arrests have been made just yet. anyone with information is asked to contact police. >>> reporting live in hunting park, jeanette reyes which i ch6 "action news." >> sarah. >>> we have an update to a story "action news" brought back on friday, the man stabbed multiple times along with his wife inside their point breeze home on friday is charged with her murder. 67-year-old anthony potter attacked robin potter with a knife along the 1500 block of south 19th street. the couple's son discovered the two in a second floor bedroom. >>> three delaware girls are going on trial for a deadly fight at the howard high school of at technology in wilm

michael ohman is president of wilson children's hospital in jacksonville, florida, part of the multi-hospital baptist health system., er kirstin sloan is vice-president for policy at the american cancer society's cancer action network where she leads a team of seven focused on access to care, emerging science and prevention. keisha davis is a family physician at okay see health institute a primary care practice in gate thursday burg,e maryland, she also serves as a consultant for the center of applied research advising on practice improvement and payment reform and andy chazen is policy director for blue shield of california which covers about 4 million people in the state. previously, andy served as health policy council to the senate public committee where he worked on the affordable health care act. >> we are in the midst of reviewing what is the fate of the zombie health care bill on theou hill. it is obviously a very contentious debate about the current law and what the future holds. let's go down here and talk about what's wrong with the debate we are having right now about health care?

. >> thank you very much, michael kaufman is a center use with the woodrow wilson international center in despite his young age he is already very well established and respected as the russian military. and whether we like it or not when we are with the relationship today the military component is becoming increasingly important. we thought it was important for michael's perspective. >> we really appreciate the introduction for all of us in the fantastic panel. i'm probably going to talk a bit less for what russia wants since we covered that brilliantly. i will probably focus on what russia gets what it wants and water take we should be. for russia the military is a critical instrument of national power. without much of what it's been going on the last couple of years and the crisis would not be possible, think economics in general have made a poor foundation for the international system wallets military has made up for in so i will talk you through a little bit about how russia got to where it is today without getting into the weeds and or takeaways. so, russia spent pretty little if

last but not least, michael kaufman, at the center for naval analysis. a fellow at the woodrow wilson information center. , he is his young age already well-established and theected as an expert on russian military. like it or not, addressing the issue today, there's a military component that has become increasingly potent. we thought it was very important to have michael's perspective. [whispering] there you go. -- thanks, dimitri -- mr. kaufman: thanks, dimitri. i'm probably going to focus more on how russia gets what it's more what it wants and what the takeaway should be, right? for russia, the military is a critical instrument of national power. i think that the economy, economics in general, have driven to be of poor foundation for the international system, while the military often makes up for it. i am going to talk you through a bit of how russia got us here today without getting into the weeds, and then, or takeaways. so, after the collapse of the soviet union, nuclear weapons for russia were a principled turned against the united states. they were kind of a key component of

wilson center. and for all the hard work that went into this. want to say a few words in addition when michael and i had the idea in spring of 2016 about possibly bringing this conference here, it doesn't seem very long ago, but now looking back, it feels very far away. to me, at least. because the recent political changes we have had here on the side of the atlantic. in 2016, most of us, certainly myself, we took the transatlantic intelligence community for granted. i did. i saw it as something that would probably be with us in some form or another for a long time. greatere is no much degree of uncertainty about the future of the transatlantic intelligence community. we just don't know what is going to happen. when future historians look back on the present in 10, 20, 30 years, it is yet unclear on what they will see. merely at see this as deviation from the organic evolutionary path of the transatlantic intelligence community. a blip on the radar. or they may see it as an inflection point, or the beginning of something completely know -- of something completely new. we are historians, obviou

michael kaufman, michael is a research scientist at the center for naval analysis, he's a fellow at the woodrow wilson international center and despite his young age he is already very well-established and much respected as an expert on the russian military. and because weather like it or not, and we are addressing us russian relationships today, the military component is increasingly important. we thought this was very important from michael's perspective. >> thanks dimitri. i appreciate the introduction and hosting all of us at this fantastic panel. i'm probably going to talk a bit less about what russia wants, some panelists cover that. i'm probably going to focus more on how russia gets what it wants for how does the military try to get what it wants. >> and for russia, the military is radical instrument of national power. >> without much of what's been going on in the last couple years, it obviously would not be possible but i think that the kind of economics in general have proven to make a poor foundation for russia's position in the international system while his military is often made up for