attorney was not rolling over for the dna case. >> jerry burns is not guilty of the killing of michelle martinkothey handled the evidence over four decades. he argued key items like michelle's dress word jumbled with or other clothing, tainting them forever. >> when you opened the original packaging of the dress, panties, and pantyhose, with a items bundle together? >> as far as i recollect they were. >> there was another reason to question the defense attorney said. something called dna transfer. he quizzed his own expert witness. >> is it a plausible explanation the dna of jerry burns found on the dress or the gearshift could have come about by a transfer? >> yes. that is a distinct possibility. >> the dna expert told the court that burns might've left his dna on a door or a bench. after all, he told investigators he had visited the mall. >> the defense argued he was a victim of coincidence and sloppy police work. >> ladies and john wick, the evidence has been submitted to you. >> after eight days, the jury got the case. when it goes to the jury, what are you thinking? >> we are hoping for the