finally, you made the ceqa exemption on the last microcell that went on to the board of supervisors and they upheld that ceqa appeal meaning this site similar to it should be exempt under ceqa and there are no cumulative effects or master plan effects that should be considered on the cell by cell basis and the planning department reached out the industry in terms of how to work bet we are the city and in response to the board president chiu's request and t-mobile looks forward to doing that and encourage you to focus on the one building permit and not take discretionary review. thank you very much. >> speakers in support of the project sponsor. [call i [calling speakers] is there any public comment in support of project sponsor? i called all those names and people should be coming up to the mike. we do have a 5:00 time certain item and we are trying to get through this item. and if you get up, start speaking, please. >> hi. i am a native san francisco resident and born and raised and actually born in north beach. i am a real estate professional and i think it's very important that you p

blocks is deemed to be a significant gap in san francisco and was said, these are low wattage, microcells and the whole point is to have a multiplicity to provide the coverage and capacity that obviously the community needs and we encourage you not to accept discretionary review. thank you. president olague: thank you. public hearing is closed. commissioner sugaya. commissioner sugaya: yes, project sponsor, i have a question about the antenna itself. i assume the antenna is going to be capable of handling whatever your version of 4g is at the moment. i don't know if t-mobile is on that track and i assume that the antenna is capable of handling future technology in terms of whatever comes along. >> it will be, yes. and actually, we have a managing engineer for t-mobile and if you have anymore specific technical questions, he would be better to answer those for your review. commissioner sugaya: it is just a question i have because as the multiplicity of antennas, i understand why that is necessary and why certain carriers have more than others. and there is the whole question of improving t

avenue, supervisor david chiu directed the planning department with a request that they require microcell sites to meet the same permitting review as macro cell siteses as they did before 2006. [bell ringing] president olague: thank you. i have only one -- we're going to limit public comment to two minutes. is there any public comment in support of the d.r. requester at this time? secretary avery: state your name for the record. >> i am a 14-year resident of north beach, julie long, and i live at grant avenue and also at the d.r. hearing in february. this is the latest list by at&t even though we are dealing with t-mobile about 55 new antennas they are going to install and this is in "the chronicle "of may 1 to increase network coverage and capacity. what it feels like here