now to type back, you know, the middle east than china and so this organization is actually and. c us participation and i think is actually running out counter to us interests and because of his up bureaucratic out no running him, i really is go back to brussels piri menu. well, i me, i haven't just put it perfectly. i me do a reverse nixon goes to china here. i mean, as an edge in looking at it geopolitically. and historically, if in europe the european union wanted to position itself in a valuable place, it would be to, in to be in the middle of russia. the united states and china that, that, that has, that has assets that has capital to it. and it seems to me, there hostile attitude towards russia negates that they've just taken themselves off the chessboard. what do you think? go ahead in brussels. yes, exactly. then if you lose the geography of your rock, of course, or the idea positioning of the european project, it will be in better balance between do you atlantic a neural asian seekers and there are about so much was the position a classic was ation of friends for example