the midstream includes reduction of chinese source anodes and cathodes and turn them into modules.the downstream includes fabricating the cells and modules and integrating them into batteries. with a boost in state and federal incentives, we've seen a number of plants open up in the united states. however, the impression of growing thomistic battery manufacturing industry is misleading. in reality, central parts of the battery or materials that originate in china, recognizing we can to do everything at once to secure this entire vital supply-chain, we started at the point of maximum chinese control and that is maximum western vulnerability. this is the critical but often neglected upstream, mineral extraction, mineral processing and the early stage of the midstream, fabricating materials into positive and negative electrodes, electrolytes and separators. at the upstream, china is the world dominant processor of copper, nickel, manganese, cobalt, lithium, i could go on. that's despite the fact they have limited geological deposits in their borders. in the midstream, chinese enemies

public attention on batteries aims to reslice slices of the midstream and downstream phases of the batterymanufacturing. the midstream includes a production of you take chinese sourced anodes and turn them into cells and chinese sourced materials and turn them to modules and integrate the packs into a finished battery. with a boost in state and federal incentives over the past few years, we've seen a number of battery cell impact plants open up around the united states. however, the impression of a growing domestic battery manufacturing industry is partially misleading. in reality, the central parts of the battery of subcomponents and materials that originaten china. recognizing that realistically we cannot do everything at once to secure this entire vital supply chain, the place to start is the point control and that is maximum western vulnerability. and this is the critical but often neglected upstream, mineral extraction and mineral processing and the early stage of the midstream, fabricating refined materials to positive and negative electrodes and electrolytes and separators. at the u

. >> tyrus: making him forget midstream sentences. he could be 86.et a 92-year-old woman that had every joke. take the number off the table. it is his brain, pudding period. >> greg: we must move on. up next, chills when trump said pay your bills. so, i use my freedom unlimited card. earning on my favorite soup. aaaaaah. got it. earning on that éclair. don't touch it, don't touch it yet. let me get the big one. nope. -this one? -nope. -this one? -yes. no. what? the big one. they're all the same size. wait! lemme get 'em all. i'm gonna get 'em all! earn big with chase freedom unlimited. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. katherine harris >> kat: kat timpf dra dra mike and jana>> m ... ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq and learn how abbvie can help you save. >> greg: all right. all right. okay. when trump says america should get paid, media hears russia should invade. media might have found new russia hokes. trump said any nato member that doesn't pay their fair share. >> sir if we don't pay and attacked by russia would we pr

. >> it's rare for a party to change horses midstream, lbj had the nighttime address saying i will not i'm not sure if that is going to happen. the senate bill was flawed it would've taken away u.s. states powers, states like texas, their power to fight against bad policies in court, it would guarantee a steady stream of 2 million border crossings annually and that's when obama white house said those levels were a crisis. it would put the u.s. border governance at the discretion of the ideologically compromised d.c. court system, that is where the complaints would've funneled through is a d.c. circuit court, what did you think of the media coverage, did they pick up on that? >> no they didn't, the 2 million immigrants allowed legally, that was a minimum there was a whole bunch of exemptions that the media did not cover so the number would've been quite higher. , i don't think the media covered it very well, it wasn't going to go anywhere here in the house and it died its rightful death in the senate where it should have died, i'm sure there's good well-meaning republicans who are part

was made, they demonstrated a powerful determination to carry it through, not to change course in midstream. because as we all know, you never step in the same stream twice. thank you. and good. we we've about 12 minutes for question. so again, please come to the microphones so that the audience on c-span can hear your question. thanks, james. candy. hi. how are you? i'm great. good. i'm candy hooper and author here. and great fan of craig's. and i wondered whether you might enlarge on the theme of loyalty here. one time i saw on c-span you talking about the difference navy, naval officers and. army officers, in terms of taking sides in the civil war. yeah. thank you. that's a thank you. that's a great question. i have argued elsewhere and i think it's mostly true. in fact, that army officer in the 19th century, we are often associated with their communities. regiment you remember even in the civil war were named for their states 24th you know maine, the 20th, massachusetts or whatever. whereas officers had a tendency to represent the entire nation abroad to foreign countries, to third worl

are you going into the oilfield services companies, some of the oil players and some of the midstreams we -- we're dealing with what i consider to be circle of competency and i -- i don't think that you won't make really good money in the oil services side of the thing, but with the major european and international oil companies in kind of an esg coma, it's not as good relatively, i think. see, to us, the oil and gas especially making electricity out of natural gas the next ten years is the addictive legal drug. so we look back at peter lynch's great record and philip morris being the best-performing stock from 1970 and 2010 on the entire nyse as the people divested the tobacco business and that's where we see us. we are just a part of the way into a wonderful era where the resource is very much needed regardless of whether you see a quick transition to elected vehicles or not, and the prices are going to go way higher over the next ten years as the scarcity issues kick in. >> by the way, this is what saudi arabia's been saying. it's most of what opec has been saying which is this unde

. >> >>> shares of western midstream are spiking. owns 49% of this natural gasline operator is exploring a sale of western main stream. we reached out for comment and we'll let you know if we have an update. >>> elsewhere, real estate has been an underperformer lately. no surprise. but the potential rate cuts on the horizon, are there opportunities starting to grow in the sector? dom chu has a look. >> so real estate, of course, being hit hard because of aspect tied to what's happening with interest rates. if you look at the sector overall, it's been an underperformer in the past year, down roughly 3% to 4% versus a 23% gain for the s&p 500. so are there ways to screen out from where there are possible opportunities? if you look at this particular way that we approached it, you look at the sector overall. we decided to ask the pro team to take a look at their stock screens, and look for opportunities. they looked at the s&p 500 real estate sector and momentum to the upside and above average dividend yield, right around 3.5% for the s

order, including a citation from a case to the 1980's, with no notes, no revisions, and no detours midstream. she asked me to check the citation, but of course she had it correctly. second, the justice worked tirelessly. the justice recognized that each case before the court was significant, not only to a litigant, but to every person would be affected by the court's decision. she painstakingly reviewed facts and analyzed legal arguments, dedicated to truth and perception. she also -- precision. but she also focused on how the law operates in the real world and how it impacts the lives of real people. that's what kept her up until all hours of the night. sometimes leaving telltale red marks on the page as she nodded off while editing at 2:00 a.m. nothing was more important than the -- to the justice than the work of this court, and she expressed that through her superhuman work ethic. third, the justice was humbled, although she was a national hero before she even became a judge, i never heard the justice tout her own accomplishments. instead, she credited those came before her. as the gener

history to be dumped by his own caucus midstream. how high. that weakness, right there. and, then it's preventing the u.s. from doing its work right now. and, of course there's president biden. he is suffering from the lowest approval rating, really, out of any incumbent in the history of pulling as this time heading into a reelection. he's not in the position to muscle through legislation. and here he is, having to hold late night press conferences and defended himself from the charge of being a well-meaning elderly gentlemen. it's a crisis, unfortunately, of leadership in our system. >> mike, peter pointed out in the last segment, he agrees with the critics that this white house keeps the president under wraps, doesn't let him out. and we'll peters right, heat has not done an interview with major newspapers. i can, stay off the top of my head, i can see the president in the last year interview with -- david newer, john harwood and yours truly. but, coming this sunday, the white house has an opportunity for the president to speak to

and western midstream halted just now after earlier jumping.perator according to reuters. it's worth close to $20 billion and people familiar with the matter. now neither company has responded to request for comment. scott? >> all right, pippa, thank you. >>> still ahead, palo alto network surging nearly 40% over the past three months. that leads up to the company's result in overtime tonight. we'll break down what to watch for when those numbers hit the tape. closing bell is coming right back. ah, these bills are crazy. she has no idea she's sitting on a goldmine. well she doesn't know that if she owns a life insurance policy of $100,000 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com. as the head of hr, i help lead a successful home security firm. our teams work hard to secure our customers' most valuable assets. and while they do that, i work ha

primary sanctions, no carveouts and they should have secondary sanctions, we could be the ships the midstream, enemy as - this traders run in circles around and i think that is pretty pathetic, and other point rick very before i lose you guys, and a rick, your big advocate of nuclear there's a good soaring the wall street journal, how canada is going nuclear. you know i never will the green who say they like renewables of never seem to like nuclear. here's another example of what the united states should be doing but is not doing it energy. rick: absolutely and down in south texas earlier in the month, free project on their some of the largest uranium reserves in north america or along the texas gulf coast. and again giving a message that we ought to be given incentives, to companies, to be able to develop the uranium right out with the percentage of them uranium that we rely upon, russia forbade it is a substantial percentage in the idea that three are waiting on the russians to make sure that we have uranium, this is a fools errand, so absolutely we need to be focus on small modular reactor

that come into play in terms of after the people have voted that the state can't change the rules midstream. i'm not sure. i'm not aware of this court addressing. >> let's change it so it's not after the election. it's three days before the election based on the fact the polls in the state look bad. can they do it? >> i think they probably could under this court's decision where this court emphasized for much of american history state legislatures picked their own electors themselves. it would be much more extraordinary than what we have here, simple application of normal state ballot access principles to say that we're only going to put on the ballot an individual qualified to assume the office. >> can i ask you the question the justice gorsuch asked to which you responded by citing the defact owe officer doctrine. let's look at that going forward rather than judging the validity of an act committed between the time when a president allegedly engages in an insurrection and a time when the president leaves office. during that interim period would it be lawful for military commanders and oth

that come into play in terms of after the people have voted that the state can't change the rules midstream on. >> and so, tom, while the facts of these two cases are obviously different, can you help but view today through the lens of bush v. gore? >> i don't think you can, and look, there's no question that the shadow of bush v. gore was hanging over the com today, and you could see it in a lot of the justices' questions, and frankly, wait that the court has a whole, i think, approached this case. you heard so many questions today, not just about the meeting of constitutional text, and what you can need for our nation's history. but also about the practical consequences of ruling in either favor. we have heard questions from other justices, saying if we were to adopt your understanding of how the 14th amendment works, what would that mean and all sorts of crazy hypothetical situations, battles to come, all of which i think is because the supreme court wants to make sure that whatever rule it establishes in this case, however it decides it, it's articulating a rule of law that can be appli

play in terms of after the people have voted that congress-- that the state can't change the rules midstream. i'm not sure because i'm not aware of this court addressing it. >> let's change it so it is not after the election. it is three days before the election, by the fact that the polls in that state look bad. can they do it? >> this court emphasized for much of american history state legislatures picked their own electors and assigned their own electors themselves. but that would be much more extraordinary than what we have here, which is simple application of normal state ballot access principles to say that we're only going to put on the ballot an individual who is qualified to assume the office. >> can i ask you again the question that justice gorsuch asked, and you -- to which you responded by citing the de facto officer doctrine, look at that going forward, rather than judging the validity of an act committed between the time when a president allegedly engages in an insurrection and the time when the president leaves office. during that interim period, would it be lawful for militar

. >> they are saying, let's change the rules midstream to suit us. >> this is the anti-democratic threat i want to make sure -- we started to capture this. this is a nationwide trend that we are seeing in michigan and ohio, anti-abortion activists, working to keep the initiatives from going into affect. in michigan, they are claiming it creates a super right to an abortion. they are saying the quiet part out loud. >> they are cheating because they know they can't win. ultimately, that's -- this is not how this works. they took this right away. it's wildly unpopular. the base, the republican base wants more. they want a federal ban. they are in a very tough political spot. they put themselves in that. >> help me understand, charlie, what the incentive structure is here. what it is that is motivaing -- is it a fear of anti-abortion rights money flooding in? why be here when -- you guys won. you did it. congratulations. you have done enough. step away. especially when they are saying the voters aren't with them. >> i think molly nailed it. they are doing this because this is what the base w

by elon musk, are there protections in your corporate struck thur that would prevent that change midstream just of ownership but of direction and values of the company the way we saw with twitter becoming x? i would hope the answer is yes but it would take planning. guest: yeah, excellent question. right now the co-founder and i are majority owner of the company. that gives us flexibility with how things are ran. i think it's really important that with regards to what has happened on twitter, that we have some kind of alternative or some kind of place where people can gather and have good conversations. you are absolutely right. i think the changes there -- i don't know they're necessarily the changes that i would have wanted to make. host: you said when it comes to the trusted sources, who determines what a trusted source is and also what criteria is used to determine that? guest: yeah, so if you go on to about hedgehog.com we have a list of our trusted sources disclosed on there. that list comes from a professional team of editors that we have who look at what the most factually accurate

elon musk, are there protections in your corporate structure that would prevent that kind of change midstreamnot just of ownership but direction and values of the company the weight we saw with twitter becoming ex? x? i hope the answer is yes they do take a lot of planning. >> excellent question. right now, jared the cofounder and i are the owner of the country that gives us flexibility on how things are ran. it's very important that we have some kind of alternative or someplace are people and some gather and have good conversations for your absolute right. the changes they are -- and i don't know they are necessarily the changes i wanted to make. >> when it comes to the trusted sources who determines what a trusted source is a? what criteria is used to determine that? >> if you go to about hedgehog.com we have a list of our trusted sources disclosed on their transparency. because you're a professional team of editors we have at hedgehog when is the most factually accurate and high quality journalism where that's coming from in the united states. our teamns transparently publiss all of that o

principles that come into play after the people have voted that the state cannot change the rules midstreamd i am not sure, because i am not aware of the court addressing it. >> well, change it is not after the election, but three days before the election, based on the fact that the states' polls look bad? >> i think they could based on chakolo, because much of the state's electors are picked and assign them, and that would be much more extraordinary than we have here which is simple state ballot access to say that we will only put on the ballot an individual who is qualified for office. >> can i ask you a question, which justice gorsuch asked about the de facto office, and looking at the and going forward rather than you judging the validity of an act that the presidentially allegedly engages in insurrectionist, and the time he leaves office, and that interim period, would it be okay for the military officers ignore the orders of the president in question? >> i am not sure that anything gives military officers the authority to disobey the president. >> why you say that, because you say def

president biden, the other thing he had to think about is that, you know, is changing horses in midstream war happening in ukraine. you have the middle east on fire. and you have a defense secretary who is on top of these situations, who is known by and who knows all the players and all these different theaters. that's one reason i would have been reluctant to make any sort of change at this point, even though it was a clear mistake. and kind of a close call. i would have certainly kept secretary austin on. >> gene is right, willie. so many things going on right now, and no guarantee that joe biden wouldn't be stuck with an acting secretary through the end of this term because he might not be able to get anybody else confirmed in congress. >> by all accounts, excuse me, the president was with secretary austin from the beginning. he said, he screwed up. you have to tell me this stuff, but we're good. looks like they're moving on. >>> meanwhile, on capitol hill, senate majority leader chuck schumer says the text of the bipartisan bill on the border likely will be released before the end of