so i don't see how it contradicts mieses. they are him and also doesn't contradict them because even though because it has no industrial uses in the outside world, because it does have one non-monetary use which is unique bitcoin to pay the transaction fees of the bitcoin network. and that's the only, that's the only unsensible network in the world. so, you know, if it's, does the suez canal have values the only place where you can go from europe to asia without having to go around africa. it's a scarce resource. and if you want to go through it, it's valuable. people pay for that. but what about this is being unimpeachable. the fact that big point separates money from the state and that would seem to be in the history of money the 1st time we've really had that. and i mean, you could say gold is not necessarily bad gold. 'd there are less a centralized by the state. your thoughts, you know, to be fair, like the gold under a gold coin standard before a gold standard than the one when when people just using the physical coins,