mike clark, aon. i will screen share momentarily.i will be presenting the hartford fully insured 2023 rates and contributions for life insurance ad and d and long-term disability. the first renewal of the rates and benefits. recommendation summary and introduction including prior background, talk through the recent plan experience and influence on the rates for the 2023 plan year in the document for each plan listed. provide overall summary of expected 2023 premiums based on current insurance volumes and present my recommendation for the health services board action. i will not review the appendition. there is a recent loss ratio for each coverage we talk about today. it is recommended the health service board accept renewal of all life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment that are included in this presentation for the 2023 plan year. all rates reflect reduction in 2022 plan year rate levels. insurance rates for 2023 from hartford represent first year of new three year rate for 23, 24, 25. specifically today's health service

point, anderson, they're getting no answers from clark, who they consider to be an important witness in this investigation. >> what about the former aides to mike pence who talked. >> mark swartz and greg jacob both met with the committee between six and eight hours. unlike the lack of cooperation they're getting from jeffrey clark, it seems to be that the committee is learning quite a bit from both of these gentlemen. they did draw some red lines. they said they were not going to talk about anything that trump's legal team considered to be areas that could be called into executive privilege. so, that meant specifically conversations that the president may have had with the vice president or with either of these two gentlemen. but the committee believes that that was still a cooperative interview and that they were able to get a lot of information from both of these men. obviously the role that mike pence had on the days leading up to january 6 on january 6th itself is so important to their investigation. and both of these gentlemen were in that orbit during that period of time. of course short, his chief of staff, was with him in the capitol o

mike pence. we've got new deiltas on when and what maybe could stop it. >>> plus our team there when jeffrey clark arrived on the hill. what we know about what exactly the former trump doj official said or didn't say. i'm hallie jackson in washington with a lot going on this afternoon. shannon pettypiece is outside the white house and matt bradley live for us in ukraine. at the end of the remarks i think folks watched here live on msnbc, president biden discussing a different topic on this cancer moon shot. i think he took a couple of questions i know it wasn't on camera about this troop deployment. >> reporter: this wasn't any sort of formal address or remarks he was making. this was basically it appeared to be a response to a question from a reporter as she was walking out of the room from this cancer event. what the president said from those brief remarks is that this troop deployment is consistent what he's been saying and telling putin since really the beginning of this escalation that if putin continues to act aggressively, u.s. is going to be there to support and back up its allies and to a

here's a transcript of kimberly clark's last earnings call a few weeks ago. c.e.o. mike shu stated the company took, quote, decisive action to offset the impact of higher costs with significant pricing actions. he wasn't kidding. the price of n-95 masks more than doubled from $23.19 to $57.15. from last october to january. and the company's plan for the future is not to deliver relief to consumers but to resume stock buybacks, quote, as soon as we get the excess cash flow. it's amazing to seek profit from behinding -- from behind the issue of inflation. are you seeing this in other industries? >> this is highly -- dr. bernstein: this is highly elevated for firms across many sectors of the economy. that's a short answer to your question. i guess putting it in the context of our discussion, and by the way, i did want to correct something that senator toomey said. actually while you're correct about the year-over-year numbers, last month, real numbers actually beat inflation. i wanted to talk about this in the context of wage growth and inflation. it is commonly argued that

mike pence. the people that signed fake electoral votesa at the behest of the tru campaign. is it legitimate political discourse for john eastman and jeffrey clark to basically make fake theories overruling the constitution and 12th amendment and electoral count act of 1887. those two guys. is it legitimate political discourse, those two that pled the fifth amendment before the january 6 committee? i don't think so. if somebody was engaged in that they have nothing to fear from the january 6 committee or anything else. >> that mitt romney is now such an outlier in the party, a man that was the nominee for the party is extraordinary. bill cassidy speaking out against the censure of cheney and kinzinger. it is stunning. >> stunning and sad. we have gone from, you know, cowardice to depravity really in the republican party in the rnc. it is horrific. >> george conway, i appreciate you think with us as always. >> thank you, anderson. >> coming up new exclusive cnn reporting establishing what one january 6 figure has been reluctant to pin down. when did congressman jim jordan speak with the former president on january 6th and what to make economicall

clark told me. a look at the threat of trump ally mike flynn is where we start this hour.k. also joining us, dan goldman, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york, former league counsel for the democrats' first impeachment trial, not to be mixed up with the second impeachment trial and "new york times" editorial board member mara gay is here, all three msnbc contributors. i got through the draper piece, and i remember flynn being talked about as a vp and i actually remember i was interviewing jeb bush and people were covering threads of flynn. i think he was on "morning joe" one morning when you and i were both there, john heilemann, sort of cleaning up his positions on issues like abortion and whatnot. and then i saw mike pence give a speech today and i want to play what he said, and i wondered if it's beyond rational to wonder if pence and flynn could face off should trump sit it out. here's pence saying donald trump is wrong. >> and i heard this week that president trump said i had the right to overturn the election. but president trump is wr

mike pence. we have two principal pence advisers who have been there. and then i saw that the committee met with the former doj official, jeffrey clark, as well. confirm that? >> i cannot talk about specific interviews and depositions that we have had. what i can say is that we continue to make progress each and every day in this. and the investigative team is working hard and we are learning more every day from these interviews, some voluntary and some depositions, obviously, that we are taking. we have had 475 interviews that have been conducted. >> do you have expectations about the compliance of ivanka trump? >> i do not have any expectations. what i can say is that i have not heard any communication back. we will wait and see. but those seemingly closest to the president are more likely to evade and not comply to date. we have gleaned important details from that, they from january 5th and january 6th. but it seems that the presidents closest advisers seem intent on not wanting to cooperate. but i can tell you that that is not stopping the committees progress and we are making significant progress. because this is an important to the story

clark outside of congress. that's what happened with ollie north, most famously. so, yes, i think it should be considered. >> and gloria, several aides to former vice president mike have been talking to the committee, but we're learning they're not answering questions about direct conversations with trump. is this about executive privilege, do you think, or is there a political calculation involved? >> i think it's probably about both. i think that they made it very clear to donald trump's attorneys that if the attorneys thought certain conversations were privileged, then they would honor that. and i think that's the way they approached it. when they were interviewed by the committee. but i was told the interviews were not contentious. so what this means to me is that the committee lawyers knew this was going to be an issue and found ways to get around it or to not ask certain questions that they knew would be privileged or asked them in a different way. and so i don't think there were a lot of arguments about it. they testified for hours. and so they were able to give their information without seeming to be in conflict with the former president. >> but it just s