mike clarke from aon.g to talk about benchmarking in comparing with hss, planned designs and contributions into a number of different benchmarks that we evaluate. you are talking about two things, plan design features, co-payments, deductibles, as well as contributions and plan sponsors could certainly vary where they put their emphasis on the cost-sharing. you see the pages on the plan and the majority of the average cost-sharing is through a number of contributions. page 12, this is a chart reproduced from our annual health initiative marketing study that was part of the executive director's report in april to the board. we focus on hmo's because 97% of hhs employees are enrolled on the hmo plan versus the ppo. you can see where i have indicated in the rectangles, where hss falls on the employee plan design out of pocket overall average $608 for 2023. relative to a set of national comparing to labor market which is northern california for hss as well as the full study of 600 employers. you will see that

future consideration: (discussion) presented by anne thompson, senior account executive, aon, and mike clarke, lead actuary, aon. >> good afternoon. >> we'll be presenting today. just as reminder, before we start just for background, this has been a ongoing education process throughout the lete summer and fall months and just reminder of what those 2023 requested topics were and how a lot of what we'll talk about today brings the last three discussions into focus for the future. and that is the title of our discussion today. opportunities for future consideration. we'll go through the just brief overview of the overall board education modules that commenced in august and conclude today as well as the key take-aways from the august, september and november discussions. the strategic goals are embedded throughout the duration of the discussion today, including conversation about driving high value in healthcare ann will go through, opportunities for future consideration that both ann and i will discuss and then anne closing with concluding thoughts on take-aways from today's discussion and previ

. >> i spent hours with mike turner and mike clark, he and i drive around. >> how did her dad take it strong, proud man. he was in my car cry. >> looking for the remains of his daughter? hard to say. >> yeah, hard to see. hard for him to deal with. and there's nothing i could have done to make it better. >> detectives followed every lead, went down every rabbit hole. like this reservoir or sandoval used to take target practice. >> we searched this area among many other places and we're running out of tips and leads. you know, i really did feel like we were never going to find tina sandoval. i was so afraid that without findings tina sanibel, no one would take this case on. >> nobody, no case. right? >> no body, no case. >> after spending so much time in big 12, and places around greatly, we dug up more places than you can shake a stick at. nobody. >> back at the hospital routine a word, they kept hope alive as long as they could. >> we had a book. if you had an ex that day, you worked. i think it was true three months before finally some of that, i guess we should take our name off of

future consideration: (discussion) presented by anne thompson, senior account executive, aon, and mike clarke actuary, aon. >> good afternoon. >> we'll be presenting today. just as reminder, before we start just for background, this has been a ongoing education process throughout the lete summer and fall months and just reminder of what those 2023 requested topics were and how a lot of what we'll talk about today brings the last three discussions into focus for the future. and that is the title of our discussion today. opportunities for future consideration. we'll go through the just brief overview of the overall board education modules that commenced in august and conclude today as well as the key take-aways from the august, september and november discussions. the strategic goals are embedded throughout the duration of the discussion today, including conversation about driving high value in healthcare ann will go through, opportunities for future consideration that both ann and i will discuss and then anne closing with concluding thoughts on take-aways from today's discussion and preview of

stephen miller, rick grenell, kash patel, mike davis, jeffrey clark, vivek ramaswamy, maybe even ted cruz having cabinet-level positions. you bring up the point that requires senate confirmation. how worried do you think the country really needs to be about kash patel running the cia? how feasible is that? >> so, it's a good question. i asked a number of people in trump's orbit about this. some of the names that are being floated for these positions seem pretty unpalatable to, you know, senate confirmation process. what they told me was, look, maybe that is true. if we can't get stephen miller, for example, confirmed as head of department of homeland security, we can just install him as white house chief of staff, and he can take over a lot of the same rules that he would have in that role. they're already gaming out ways to get around the challenge of confirmation to ensure that the people who are most loyal to trump, most obedient to trump, are the ones who will have the power. you're going to see a pretty broad restructuring of government in a second term. you mentioned this at th

and you know, he said people like mike flynn will be the national security adviser potentially. jeff clark possibly the attorney general. >> mike flynn is selling t-shirts and making outrageous statements at conventions. >> right. >> those are the people who will be around him if he were to be elected again. the other thing that people have to realize is what it means if a president of the united states won't enforce the rulings of our courts and that is absolutely what he said he will do. he's gone to war with the rule of law. and a president who won't enforce the law creates a situation where things just unravel. and he will have people around him who will help him do it. he will i'm sure offer pardons to people if they're concerned about their own criminal liability. >> pardon january 6th? >> certainly. i think he's been very clear repeatedly about his glorification of that day and again, that's a, you know, the republicans were almost unanimous in the days just after january 6th, recognizing you know, he bore responsibility and he had to be held accountable. very quickly though that be

mike taibbi (voiceover): a six man, six woman jury was all that stood between christian gerhartsreiter, aka, clarkat stood between christian karl gerhartsreiter, aka, clark rockefeller and freedom. he was nearing the end of his prison sentence for kidnapping 's daughter in boston. now, reasonable doubt, what the defense called an old, cold and still untold murder case seemed within reach. >> that is not spin, that is not smoke. >> his defense team conceded right off, the client was a fraud and an oddball. >> this man used different names since coming to the united states in 1978. >> but attorney brad bailey said none of that made a murderer. >> this had nothing to do with covering up a 28-year-old homicide, and everything to do with perpetuating this recreation. >> in court, he attacked the forensic evidence as weak, and mostly nonexistent, i got the prosecution's own experts to admit that. not a single fingerprint respective dna to tie the defendants to the victim, the bloodstains or even those university book bags. >> that is correct, i did not detect a dna profile. >> the defense also challenge

mike is michael stonewall. your name is -- brother clark. all black farmers need to be treated fairly. >> the lesser-known candidate forum posted at saint anselm college in manchester, new hampshire, every four years since 1972 provides a platform for democratic and republican and independent candidates who might otherwise lacked a way to reach larger numbers of voters. here's some of the evenings best moment. >> mr. supreme. >> remember there are two typesm of people on this planet. those that love ponies and those that will not survive the transition times.su the road will not be easy. not all of us will make it. there will be hardships. it will be sacrifices, human sacrifices. but let's assume this. the road will be paid with the schools of our vanquished enemies. >> got to wrap it. want to mention the website? berman 2024. >> gotcha. appreciate it. >> thank you for hosting this event. this really great. appreciate the opportunity. cycladic at this in between these two guys. [laughing] i don't know how i got so lucky on that. >> you did g

mike johnson, whose spacious legal arguments for unfortunately election gave cover to his 146 republican colleagues, who voted against certifying joe biden's win. and now, the guy who almost got to be trump's attorney general, jeffery clark among those criminally charged in georgia and is named as one of the six unindicted coconspirators in the federal criminal case against donald trump. as a turns, out trump had a lot of other coconspirators in the united states congress. joining me now is devlin barry, national security and law enforcement reporter for the washington post. devin, thanks so much of being here. scott perry, very much of the sort of where's waldo in the scene of inside the capital and out of the capital, unfolding in and around january 6th. can you talk about the role he played in choosing jeffery clark and helping to elevate him to be a potential a. g.? >> right, so one of the ways in which the time period we are talking about was a strange, which it, was people were really confused. people within the justice department were really confused. how did jeffery clark come to the presidents attention? jeff clark was essentially an environmental lawyer and it wasn't clear even to people run at the department w

so to is the campaign by jeff clark to send this proof of concept letter to states begging them to somehow defer their judgment on who the electors should be until after mike pence can make a ruling on january 6th. so i don't know that the ef dench yar presentation changes that much and deprivation of civil rights is essentially what jack smith and his team are saying they tried to take the right away from millions of americans the right to choose their president. again, i don't know how that really changes if you were to remove an obstruction charge. >> all right. no one is going anywhere because when we come back, happening now in court, ruby freeman is testifying against rudy giuliani. >>> plus, the supreme court picking up another important case with huge implications. this time, the very common abortion pill. >>> and later in the show, the evidence free fishing expedition against joe biden will be put to a full house floor vote in the next hour. this as the president's son in a rare public statement called the republicans' attempt to link his behavior to his father's shameless. all that and more continues after this. do not go anywhere. e continues af