download snapfix for free. >>> abel villegas came face to face with superintendent mike dempsey and the release committee to prove he was ready to go home. >> you need to be truly committed to do away with those gang affiliations that you have. i don't believe that you're anywhere near that. >> unfortunately for him, though, they weren't convinced. >> when it comes to looking at harm you caused to others and your victims, it seriously concerns me. >> it's like parole board for juveniles, and so it's a high stakes process where the juvenile offender has to convince the board that they are ready to go back into society. that they've completed their program and that they've learned something that they can use when they leave. >> they have absolutely no empathy in regards to them that i can detect. even in the most minute trace, there isn't any. >> and as you saw, as we went through that, there were some concerns. >> back in his unit villegas contemplates another month at pendleton. >> it makes you miss your family a lot and you just -- you don't have that much freedom in here. you always -

according to superintendent mike dempsey, jacob has no one or no place to take him in. >> it could be there being no parent, to there being no guardian, no relative that's willing to take the offender in. it could be that they've exhausted all of the other community placement treatment programs that were out there, and we're having to dig and try to find as best we can somebody else to take him. >> in his final comments about what he sees for his future, jacob reveals one last wrenching detail about the life he left behind. >> normal, good life for me? going back to school so i could finish my high school diploma, take care of my little girl, get married to my girl's mama. take care of them. pretty much normal. >>> due to mature subject matter, viewer discretion is advised. >> america's prisons. dangerous. often deadly. there are 2 million people doing time every day. it's a battle to survive and to maintain order. >> down on your feet, down. >> pendleton juvenile is the last stop in indiana forng

andrea, mike, back to you. >>> dempsey straytors from around thworld urged policy makers to take action on climate change. >> hundreds of thousands took part in marches all ahead of tuesday's meeting at the united nations. >> wendy gillette has the latest. >>> demanding action on climate change. >> it is amazing. i have never seen anything like it. i'm so glad something like this is happening in my lifetime. >>> the people's march was planned just before the march at the united nations on tuesday. >> members of 34 different religious denominations, all of them making the same demands. >> i want people to pay attention that we are destroying ourselves. >> they came from all over the world to be part of the biggest climate demonstration in history, clogging much of midtown. there were marches in 160 other countries in cities like london and paris. former vice presidential gore, one of the first to sound the alarm on the climate crisis, held a moment of silence, calling for change, along with many elected officials. >> what effect can this march have in. >> consciousness. the global denier

chuck hagel and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff martin dempsey, they will both testify in minutes. mikemanuel is live on the hill. what do we expect? >> we expect them make the case this will be less shock and youk and awe. the arm services committee, you can expect they will talk about efforts to train up the syrian opposition forces and efforts to better organize and get the iraqi forces back into the fight. chuck hagel and general dempsey initially sounded the alarm to the american people. >> isil is as sophisticated and well fund as any group we have seen. they are beyond just and terrorist group. >> they can be contained. this is an organization with an apocalyptic end of days strategic decision which will eventually have to be defeated. >> you can expect they will get questions about if no american boots are on the ground are realistic and what if this coalition isn't very big. bill: part of job is selling the committee on the president's plan and if the president's plan will work. >> reporter: we heard from a variety of lawmakers on capitol hill who are worried that the president

estimate, and there will only be 5,000 of them, and even dempsey and top officials say that won't be nearly enough to get the job done. >> mike can i jump in for a second here? >> yes, please. >> doesn't this sound like an incremental training and arming strategy? if we're talking about a year before they are ready to fight, if you go back to what secretary kerry said in the hearing yesterday, it is isil first, isil fist in iraq, and we know that some of those isil fighters will fall back into their strong holds in syria, and at that point, since it's going to take a while for the peshmerga and the iraqi forces to route out isil in iraq, by that time, maybe you had enough syrian opposition fighters in place to take the fight to isil in, isis, in syria? >> yeah, but the problem with that is if in fact it is expanding its grip on parts of syria as david reported military advances against what we presume are syrian kurds in the north, then they are building their forces there. i had a chance to ask josh earnst about this report today, and whether or not these military gains by isil would be a precipitating factor to bring on air

dempsey, they might get more sophisticated weapons. and this is a very long timeline we're talking about for this operation, john. >> all right, mike, thank you very much. >> . >> while washington talks about how to handle isil, forces are fighting isil every day. sue turk reports from wanted front line. >> reporter: military hardware heading west to help kurdish forces shore up their defenses, but the russian artillery tanks are not enough to hold the line for much longer. on the front line, we talked to the field commander for the area operations from mosul to the border, the general is worried. peshmerga forces are 10 kilometers from the main border crossing from syria to knows you'll. and the general says they're backing against a of superior force. >> as an army, we need everything from a to z, everything from uniforms to small weapons, and body armor, heavy machine guns, and night vision goggles. even if we have mortar, we don't have night vision goggles, we can't see where the enemy is or what he's doing, we need the whole package. >> he might just get his wish. after the head of the u.s. military revealed on tuesday that he could

joint chiefs of staff general dempsey won't recommend air strikes against isis in syria just yet. that's a far cry from what people like former cia director mike morell has been saying about isis. take a look. >> i think there's three things we have to worry about. two are short-term, one is long-term. the two short-term pieces are, number one, will they inspire somebody here to conduct an attack? the second is there's a number of americans, a number of canadians and a number of west europeans who went to syria to join isis so fight with them. any one of those could be directed back at the united states to conduct a small scale attack. over the long-term, two and a half, three years, we need to worry about a 9/11-style attack by isis. >> here with reaction is former director of the cia, ambassador james woolsy is with us. >> good to be with you. >> who do you tend to agree with? in fairness i have to say chairman dempsey changed his view a couple of times now. but i tend to agree with morell. who do you agree with? >> oh, definitely. and with the early dempsey. these people are not just terrorists. they're much worse than that. they're thee ka

press,ay, on meet the admiral mike mullen was asked about his disagreement and here is a bit of his reaction. dempsey,k when general our current chairman, anticipated a question at a hearing that he would be asked about ground troops, took it off the table in his opening standpointrom the of, if the circumstances back.ted it, that he go that is a natural part of the discussion in this debate about how to execute a mission. there should not be any question in the end of who decides this and that is the president. i think what general dempsey was trying to do is certainly understand, explain to some degree how the process works. i think it has been blown way out of proportion in terms of the disagreement between the military and the president. do you agree? has it been blown out of proportion? guest: i would say yes, to a degree. this is a natural debate that takes place when you go in with any kind of strategy. most of the time, i would say when you come out of the national security council meeting, the president has made a decision. you have got pretty much an agreement across the board. in this case

mike, what's your view? caller: i keep seeing this climb of dempsey making the statement of he would recommend to the president boots on the ground. he says he does not recommend that at this time, and then also he goes through this three faced description of how he views the whole situation. and that is we can either go in there and clean that place up ourselves, which hasn't worked, or try to form a coalition, or we can get the people there to do it themselves. right now that's what he's recommending, getting the people there to do it themselves, not sending in more ground troops. it seems like the news is misrepresented exactly what he said. host: and like i said, mike, earlier we covered that hearing, so if you want to watch it unfiltered -- >> watched it. they're showing one statement that he made, that contradicts what obama had said, and it's -- they're making a big deal out of nothing. host: go to our web site if you missed it, if others missed it. caller: i watched the whole thing. host: you did. i'm saying for others, if they missed it and seen what other media is showing you. this is from the "washi

press,ay, on meet the admiral mike mullen was asked about his disagreement and here is a bit of his reaction. dempsey,k when general our current chairman, anticipated a question at a hearing that he would be asked about ground troops, took it off the table in his opening standpointrom the of, if the circumstances back.ted it, that he go that is a natural part of the discussion in this debate about how to execute a mission. there should not be any question in the end of who decides this and that is the president. i think what general dempsey was trying to do is certainly understand, explain to some degree how the process works. i think it has been blown way out of proportion in terms of the disagreement between the military and the president. do you agree? has it been blown out of proportion? guest: i would say yes, to a degree. this is a natural debate that takes place when you go in with any kind of strategy. most of the time, i would say when you come out of the national security council meeting, the president has made a decision. you have got pretty much an agreement across the board. in this case

mike: visit safefare.org to learn more - and remember& everyone: we're all on the same team! announcer: a public service message from food allergy research and education. ross: clint dempsey of soccer's list of elite players. we know the u.s. men's national team captain can score, but few know he can also act. man: rolling, rolling. ross: clint invited game changers to watch the seattle sounders star film his new commercial in london, england. man: action. michael: this is a story about a guy who's playing in his apartment, and he's just got the winning goal, and he's pretty excited, but he's only as excited as this particular guy gets, which is not very much, and then clint dempsey miraculously appears alongside him in his apartment, basically, to say, "you can do better than that." clint: that's your goal celebration? ross: but here's the problem, and it's a big one, when we got to london, the crew was there, but clint dempsey was not. man: action. michael: today's monday, and on friday night, we heard that clint wasn't going to be either on the shoot or even in our hemisphere. ross: at the last minute, dempsey had to be with his team, so the crew went to plan b. michae

the sunday shows retired navy admiral mike mullen was asked about this disagreement and here's a bit of his reaction. >> well, actually -- i think when general dempsey our current chairman anticipating a question at a hearing that he would be asked about ground troops took it off the table in his opening statement from the standpoint if the circumstances warranted it that he'd go back and he recommended the president the possibility or the option of using ground troops. i think that's a natural part of the discussion in this debate about how you execute a mission. there should not be any question in the end of who decides this. and that's the president. so i think what general dempsey was trying to do was certainly explain to some degree how the process works. i think it's been blown way out of proportion in terms of the disagreement between the military and the president. >> general shelton, would you agree it's been blown way out of portion? >> yes i think to a degree it has been because this is a natural debate that takes place when you go in with any kind of strategy. most of the time i would would say when you come out of the national security