was mike fossum is one fact like so basically you compare the d.n.a. data of the unknown individual and use all the reference data for a joint analysis in that effort and start one show it done and then you can see whether the unknown individual ends up in the data cloud for europe or africa or asia. in the case of milica fund or in the key was to associate predicting visible features of the suspect to a certain geographical region. vas nish so does the. that one of his if the d.n.a. analysis said it was likely someone with turkish roots to question the call and so on and. what the analysis suggested was that it was somebody with roots in a region that includes turkey. as well as a number of other countries nearby. all men with turkish roots who had lived in the same neighborhood as the victim at the time were asked to come for a d.n.a. test one of them was a close match for the d.n.a. found at the crime scene a relative of the perpetrator. 2 men did not submit to a test one of them became the key suspect. the judge ruled he had to do a test. at 1st he