. >> mike malone was a long-time fbi expert.nd he said it was indistinguishable from duckett's hair. >> marshall frank wasn't so sure. and what he soon learned about fbi expert make malone would further convince him that duckett was innocent. >> overall, it stunk to high heaven. the whole thing stunk. so what we're looking for is a way to "plus" our accounting firm's mobile plan. and "minus" our expenses. perfect timing. we're offering our best-ever pricing on mobile plans for business. run the numbers on that. well, unlimited talk and text, and ten gigs of data for the five of you would be... one-seventy-five a month. good calculating kyle. good job kyle. you just made partner. our best-ever pricing on mobile share value plans for business. now with a $100 bill credit for every business line you add. wait, wait, wait, it's wait, wait, wait...whoa, does she have special powers when she has the shroud? no. guys? it's the woven one the woven one. oh, oh that gives her invincibility. guys? no, no, no... the scarlet king is lord vic

and we asked them to take a look at it. >> mike malone is the fbi expert.e tested it and he comes up and says oh, yeah, this is jim duckett's hair, microscopically consistent. so you have the preeminent investigative agency in the country saying it's jim duckett's hair. that's powerful evidence to a jury. there is no question they're going to believe that. >> with advance dna science not yet available at the time of the trial, the prosecution relied on inexact hair testing methods yielding results that would not be accepted in a court of law today. >> i consulted a couple of forensic experts myself who you knew and there was no way anybody, fbi, no matter where they're from, could say that that pubic hair belonged to james duckett. there's no way they could say that. >> as it turned out, the fbi's hair and fiber analyst, mike malone had a long history of controversial findings. >> over the years mike malone in many cases has given evidence that through dna testing we've discovered is just simply incorrect. recently, the fbi hired an independent expert to re