bobby scott and mike quigley, to come talk to you, sit down, and i want you to show me how you don't come to that conclusion and i'd like to show you why i think there's a preponderance of evidence that would lead one to believe that, yes, indeed, the department of justice did know about this. is that fair? could you make yourself available? >> chairman, parliamentary -- >> continue to inquire. >> mr. chairman, i know the attorney general's about to answer, but the -- is it appropriate -- is it appropriate for members to refer to sealed documents in this vijudiciary committee room and suggest the attorney general makes a personal visit to members on what is sealed and what should not be provided during a criminal investigation? >> i simply ask if, again, please mr. chairman, this should not count toward my time. i'm simply asking, there's a dispute here. this has gone on for a year and a half. most members on this side asked about fast and furious. we're trying to resolve this, get to the end of it. it's hard to do in five minutes. just asking for personal time to show now what we've

bobby scott and mike quigley to come talk to you, sit down, and i want you to show me how you don't come to that conclusion, and i'd like to show you why i think there's a preponderance of evidence that would lead one to believe that, yes, indeed, the department of justice did know about this. is that fair? could you make yourself available? >> chairman, a parliamentary inquiry. >> mr. chairman, please. >> continue to inquire. >> mr. chairman, i know the attorney general's about to answer -- >> just -- >> but the, is it appropriate, is it appropriate for members to refer to sealed documents in this judiciary committee room and suggest that the attorney general makes a personal visit to members on what is sealed and should not be provided during a criminal investigation? >> i simply asked if, again, please, mr. chairman, this should not count towards my time. i'm simply asking, a dispute here. this has been going -- this has gone on for a year and a half. most members on this side asked about fast and furious, we're trying to resolve this, get to the end of it. it's hard to do in five min

bobby scott and mike quigley, to come talk to us, sit down, and i want you to show me how you don't come to that conclusion, and i would like to show you why i think there is a preponderance of evidence that would lead one to believe that yes, indeed, the department of justice did not about this. is that fair? could you make yourself available? >> chairman -- >> mr. barnes, you may inquire -- [talking over each other] >> i know the attorney general is about to answer, but is it appropriate -- is it appropriate for members to refer to sealed documents in this judiciary committee room and suggest that the attorney general makes a personal visit to members on what it feels and should not be provided during a criminal investigation? i simply ask. >> again, please, mr. chairman -- this is not counting towards my time. >> there is a dispute here could this has gone on for a year and a half. most numbers on the side asked about "fast and furious." we are trying to resolve this, get to the end of it. it is hard to do. i am just asking for personal time to show you what we have seen and for you t

bobby scott and mike quigley to come talk to you and sit down. i want you to show me how you don't come to that conclusion and i would like to show you why i think there is a preponderance of evidence that would lead one to believe that yes, indeed, the department of justice didn't know about this. is that fair? could you make a. >> what? >> i have sat down with you on eight different occasions. >> i'm asking for more time, more than just five minutes and go through this? give us two hours. two members of the democrats, too on the republican side and go through this. >> with all due respect i gave you for hours at a crack on the eighth several occasions. i'm not sure there's an awful lot more have to say but there's one point i would say. you and i have no thread materials that senior people in the justice department as they went through those approval process did not read. as we know -- does he let me go on please. so the answer is no. >> you are being up my time and i only have about three and a half minutes left. by would like more time and yo