could be a disaster for his country but we discover very quickly but it will be absolute disaster mikkel disaster for the ovals arab countries around survey have to stop is sanctions so no. syria is able to resist very long time to be. pressured from the top do you think the president is that they now has the capability the capacity to remain in power of course and. the problem is that the people who try to destabilize assad. stronger are sort of the that they are creating the meat they have already. they will have. said at the beginning of a wrong evolution of the program they think it would be very simple walk to the grave . if. conversational civil war but they make a mistake a very great. we've dealt a number of off we put didn't in libya when they created this leak in your eight mainly because he became very thinly behind in syria. they have a lot of weapons from the beginning because they seized from the army not to leave in the same smuggling underworld you know but they have very big stocks so very can have a basis to extend the civil war in the country but here they think that a

such an insult to -- >> mikkel gorbachev. warriers that worked with ronald reagan to win the cold war. newt gingrich was a back pincher. >> 26, 48 hours after saying i didn't need the money to lobby because i may so much money. shades of lobbying at the very least. forget the lie. to be so disconnected from the -- very people that you're appealing to. >> i'm afraid he believes it. and that's the most frightening. let's move on. let's stop talking about newt. let's let somebody else talk about newt. >> ron paul is talking. >> let's see ron paul. i haven't seen this yet. >> i'll show it to you. it's the latest attack on newt gingrich coming from texas congressman ron paul. paul is taking aim at what he says is gingrich's changing record and ties to washington insiders. in a scathing web video, the paul campaign labels gingrich a, quote, serial hypocrite. >> beyond the words, there's a real question of policy and a real question of values and a real question of seriousness. the real question of policy. >> we don't always see eye