mi'ra gtelfu thathe t milarity took decisive anctio whenhe ty did and howhe tyid d but we obslviouyave issues here a>>nd the issues with espnaioge you iicndated g ionto a nbeumr due t niol surecon cs bnetiktok, r foliaapp,n o vice yourom hete sta of new jyerse also put rtresictions in place. t you sllti use it persalonly. do teshat mean ttha you think 's too leat to go ahead and ban isth?it 's already on 200 million amaneric videces. is it just so integrated that espionage iset somhi wngeav he ivto le with? >> .no absolutely not. two ways to approach isth. one,ro pct aive step bnganni it onov gernment devices is thsomeing that the united states federal government'sdo ing. stes, even locitalies are doing. her way to go about this going directlyo tthe compy.an now working w uith.s. in teigllence f tolkso tryo t make sure ttha the proper precauti aonsre taken so the chese can gnotet access and use itor f spngyi. so thiss i something we have to take seriously. >> i want to a yskou abouthe t meet ug had with fellow demos cratathe t white house urthsday ineg rard to police reform. at agreem

has already rushed more than 1 milar tillery shells and nearly 40 long-range rocket systems into a wary duel between two dug-in armies. >> the russians have had enormous stockpiles of artillery, munitions over the years, and they have depleted those stockpiles in a major way. we see them reaching out to countries like north korea and iran for additional kmunitions. that tells us that they are hurting in a major way. >> reporter: but even with the backing of the american defense industry, volodymr zelenskyy cannot count on outlasting russia, which has three times the population. so the u.s. is now shipping bradley infantry fighting vehicles to the battle. >> what you are seeing efforts to support them with offensive capability on the ground and ability to maneuver under fire. >> reporter: 100 bradleys armed with a rapid fire cannon and anti-tank missiles are on their way to ukraine along with tanks promised by ten other countries. still if russian soldiers stand and fight, ukraine will be hard pressed to break through their elaborate network of trenches and tank traps. >> now russia is

the overall she t district, the argument on the other site is, well that looks milar to shape to other districts that are in the states landasell. -- plans as well. you do not have county lines being split more. you can respond to this if you want. split more than the state plan already. why is this district not reasonably compact? i would be candid for both sides. i do not know how to measure reasonably compact. i read a lot. it is very hard to measure. county lines are one of the asures. mr. lacour: three of the plan split more counties than nessy. the cooper plans keep them together. >> why is it not recently compact? mr. lacour: they ignoring traditional principles. -- they ignoring traditional principles. that is a legitimate goal in redistricting. the district court said, you do not have to account r that traditional principal because that would make it really hard to satisfy jingles. the point of the principal inquy to not make it easy. it is to make sure that what they come up with is planned by mir rules as the state. they have to set aside the ones that they did not like. tha

what you say about the mita is something, you represent the entire executive branch including the milar and we presume that you are reflecting the views of the military buthado we do with the fact that the united states was on the opposite side in the harvard case when the case was in the lower court? and what do we make of the arguments made by the predecessor? were ty sensitive to the needs of the military? only you have it accurately reprented? >> it's true that the united states participatebew on the side of the petitioner but only with respect tthfactual record and what we thought the evidence showed in the case on the factual issues. we didotake a different position on the legal interest here or assert a different interest on behalf of the military. with respect to the case whether diversity coulquify the compelling interest in this context instead the participioof the united states was confined to the narrow tailoring prong of the analysis. my predecessor asked spifically whether he thought that the military and the academies race conscious admissions were unconstitutional and he