in fact, milgar was able to encourage, at least in his 1st experiments, i think close to 70 percent, to go on to apply highly dangerous and sometimes fatal shocked. i'm not going to get that mad. think it, there is, i mean, there, i mean, i mean, i want to learn a lice in a not, we must go on until he's done wrong. i refuse to take the responsibility and get her. i mean, he's under our end it's actually essential. as you continue teacher, there are still many left here. i mean, ged going get wrong. good us to learn in last. i mean, i'm going to take the responsibility apparently had was reginald, i'm responsible for anything that happens here. continue with an actual slow wow. dance truck music answered glaze wrong. ah 95 old dance? yes, you did this simply with a very simple thing. putting the person behind the wall and having a person with a white lab coat, telling them that they needed to continue. very ordinary people can be influenced by situations. and it's one of the implications of both the milligram experiment is embargo. the stanford prison experiment was i think, a unique

in fact, milgar was able to encourage, at least in his 1st experiments, i think close to 70 percent, to go on to apply highly dangerous and sometimes fatal shocks. i'm not going to get that man's name is learner likes it or not. we must go on until you all refuse to take the responsibility and get that all right, intentionally essential as you continue teaching. still many left here. i mean j going get draw good as to last. i mean, i'm going to take the responsibility if anything happens that i'm responsible for anything that happens here continue. i'm actually slow. wow. dance truck. music. answer. blaze wrong. i know 90 my votes. dan. yes, you did this simply with a very simple thing. putting the person behind the wall and having a person with a white lab coat, telling them that they needed to continue. very ordinary people can be influenced by situations. and it's one of the implications of both the milligram experiment is embargo. the stanford prison experiment was i think, a unique attempt to answer that question of what makes some people behave in good way. but what makes some

one, not all the research we've been describing is the impact of interrogation upon the subject. milgar had another agenda, the impact of interrogation upon the interrogator. if he were to indicate the wrong answer, you would say wrong. then tell him the number of rolls you going to get him. then give him the punishment and read the correct word pair. once he got in an ordinary people who fit by all the regular scales, very normal americans. and then he subjected them under false color to just to doing what he called an educational experiment in try to encourage people to apply ever higher voltages. as a false patient kept on getting, making mistakes. i didn't fact milgar was able to encourage, at least in his 1st experiments, i think close to 70 percent, to go on to apply highly dangerous and sometimes fatal shocks. i'm not going to get that man 2nd there i there i want to learn. i liked it now we must go on until he's done wrong. i refuse to take the responsibility and get her. i mean, he's under our end, it's actually central. as you continue teacher, there are still many left here a

in fact, milgar was able to encourage, at least in his 1st experiments, i think close to 70 percent, to go on to apply highly dangerous. and sometimes fable shocked. i'm not going to get that mad. think it? there it is. i mean there no, i mean, i mean i liked it or not. we must go on until he's done wrong. i refuse to take the responsibility and get her. that means under, all right, let me, it's absolutely essential. as you continue teacher, there are still many left here. i'm eager to get wrong good as to learn in last. i mean i'm going to take the responsibility. if only have was a gentleman responsible for anything that happens here, continue with an actual slow wow. dance truck music answer glaze wrong. ah 95 volts dance. i did this simply with a very simple thing. putting the person behind the wall and having a person with a white lab coat, telling them that they needed to continue. very ordinary people can be influenced by situations. and it's one of the implications of both the milligram experiment there's embargo. the stanford prison experiment was i think, a unique attempt t

i know supervisor chan has comments and supervisor milgar. before turning it over to comments and just comments and no additional questions, director carol and as the presenters and callers pointed out, this is an area where there's widespread agreement, the city of the need to move the c-level calls to a different approach and the board was unanimous in supporting cart and the police and police chief and mayor supported alternatives and yet we see this not moving forward. or not moving forward as quickly as we would like. you know, i just want to observe at a time when i think we want to shift gears and look forward and i think that there is a commitment to moving forward here that is, that i'm pleased to see and i want to really commend all the advocates and melgar for calling this hearing which helped move the conversation along but i can't help that -- but noticing that you know, time and again and in our city government that this, city hall can act very quickly and the administration can act quickly when something is a priority and can m

i know supervisor chan has comments and supervisor milgar. before turning it over to comments and just comments and no additional questions, director carol and as the presenters and callers pointed out, this is an area where there's widespread agreement, the city of the need to move the c-level calls to a different approach and the board was unanimous in supporting cart and the police and police chief and mayor supported alternatives and yet we see this not moving forward. or not moving forward as quickly as we would like. you know, i just want to observe at a time when i think we want to shift gears and look forward and i think that there is a commitment to moving forward here that is, that i'm pleased to see and i want to really commend all the advocates and melgar for calling this hearing which helped move the conversation along but i can't help that -- but noticing that you know, time and again and in our city government that this, city hall can act very quickly and the administration can act quickly when something is a priority and can m

during the hearing, supervisor milgar recommended the modifications which passed unanimously. it was one speaker in favor of the proposed ordinance. after public comment, the item was forwarded to the full board as a committee report with a positive recommendation. at the full board this week, the board voted on whether or not to override the mayor's veto of supervisor mandelman. the mayor vetoed this and it passed on a 7 to 4 vote which wasn't enough to sustain the veto. this week the sponsor of the ordinance, they gave forceful defenses traffic ordinance in an attempt to persuade one more supervisor to vote for the bill. supervisor peskin (indiscernible) the mayor's veto and saying he was frustrated the mayor didn't say what about the ordinance she objected to. supervisors walton, dorsey and safai spoke against the ordinance. it was the same 7 to 4 in no change how the supervisors voted. killing the ordinance. the grouping house -- it's dead as it was tied to the four flex ordinance as the sud could be interpreted as a down zoning. and then, i'm sorry, the mayor's electric v