party of great britain the socialist workers party the workers' revolutionary party and the militant tendency but the right wasn't alone on the right the national front and the british national party these were all things get you rejected needless to say on my fives and b.b.c.'s collusion on hiring practices has not gone over too well with reporters who were who were rejected by b.b.c. during that time including journalist isabel hilton who stated quote i felt that the b.b.c. had betrayed public trust by promoting a system in the u.k. by which the secret police were licensing and blacklisting journalists whenever i hear the b.b.c. boasting about it spying traditions of journalism i feel a minor stab of outrage. as should we all because when asked if m i five was still vetting potential employees today the b.b.c. simply stated we do not comment on security issues think on that one as we start watching the hawks. to. get the. real thing. at the bottom. like you that i got. this. week so. welcome aboard watching the harks i am tyrrel but that's out of the last wow i'm not really a rapidly and th

party of great britain the socialist workers party the workers' revolutionary party and the militant tendency but the right was alone on the right the national front and the british national party these were all things get you rejected needless to say on my fives and b.b.c.'s collusion on hiring practices has not gone over too well with reporters who were who were rejected by b.b.c. during that time including journalist isabel hilton who stated quote i felt that the b.b.c. had betrayed public trust by promoting a system in the u.k. by which the secret police were licensing and blacklisting journalists whenever i hear the b.b.c. boasting about it spying traditions of journalism i feel a minor stab of outrage. as should we all because when asked if m i five was still vetting potential employees today the b.b.c. simply stated we do not comment on security issues think on that one as we start watching. the. real thing. as you get to the bottom. like you that i got. this. week so. welcome aboard watching the harks i am tyrrel but that's out of the last wow i'm not really a rapidly and they're not

communist party of great britain the socialist workers party the workers revolutionary party and the militant tendency but the right was alone on the right the national front and the british national party these were all things gets you rejected needless to say on my fives and b.b.c.'s collusion on hiring practices has not gone over too well with reporters who were who were rejected by b.b.c. during that time including journalist isabel hilton who stated quote i felt that the b.b.c. had betrayed public trust by promoting a system in the u.k. by which the secret police were licensing and blacklisting journalists whenever i hear the b.b.c. boasting about its fine traditions of journalism i feel a minor stab of outrage. as should we all because when asked if m i five was still vetting potential employees today the b.b.c. simply stated we do not comment on security issues think on that one as we start watching the hawks. what. it looks like. it's like. the bottom. like you that i got. with. this. week so. welcome aboard watching the harks i am tired robot and i'm tired of the last while i'm not really a r

and therein lies a lesson that it was the upsurge of a militant organized working class that overcame for a while the tendency of capitalism to polarize. but the lesson here was better learned by the business andnd the ricich than by the wog people because the business and the rich went to work. no sooner was the war over, they went to work to undo what had been done in the 1930s. the economic history of the united states in the last 30, 40, 50 years has been the undoing of the new deal. that was the name roosevelt gave to what he did in the 1930s. from which the following lesson canan be further distilled. the problem for corporations and the rich, who keep running a system that plunges us into crisis after crisis, who have really no effective way to prevent them, who likewise tend to polarize into rich and poor, the problem for corporations and the rich is this--they've got an economic system that constantly provokes the mass of people intnto thinkg that they might be able to use the political system to offset the effects of the economic system. the danger for capitalism has been, if you actually give every