what i can speak about is custom and what the law, millet permits in the application of fair use andhave defined fair use. so is the choreographer rate? it doesn't matter for my example because my example is you have a right to you beyonce sawyer. the french choreographer making an argument about french thought we don't have to worry about the legal issues. she raised this point, creates a moment when i want to say something about beyonce and don't figure out who her agent is to do this. but i have a right to make that comment. in fact, the law is designed to encourage me anyway it can to make new culture. the law says in part, we're going to provide you a perk. if you make the culture come you cannot cannot fully rates for a while. and those who made on this interview, you can have them for a while. you can hunt them for 70 years after your dad. but if those notes are available to me elsewhere, i wanted to say, look at the questions i've been asked by a television interviewer. this is the kind of question i was asked in an e-mail by a print reporter. i want to compare that to you. i

let's say that they are planting millet or they're threshing.d of situation where you have got large numbers of people, you need to coordinate their efforts, you can use music to do that. [folk music] (man) music is something that people can dance to. it can move them out of one frame of mind into another. it can move them from being separate people to being one group of people. it can remind them of who they are. it also can get them out of the state that they're in now into some other state. it transforms them. why it's powerful we can't say. we just know that music moves people. in the middle of a church service, somebody will fall out, and a lot of that has to do with the build-up that's been achieved through the music. there are many ways in which it's powerful. it's not necessarily powerful in a good way. [drum roll] [trumpet fanfare] hitler used music brilliantly to organize people ,, so the power of music is not exactly something we can put our finger on scientifically. but we can observe it, and we can talk to people and have them tell

a speech to millet -- in a speech to military commanders, iran's supreme leader rejected any bilateral talks, saying the u.s. offer was an attempt to improve its poor standing in the region. >> last week at the munich security conference, the u.s. vice-president said washington was open to negotiations. the u.s. has accused tehran of seeking nuclear weapons. iran says its research program is solely for peaceful purposes. we will go to egypt now where leaders of 57 muslim nations have called for serious dialogue between syria's government and the opposition. >> capping off a two-day summit in cairo, the organization of international cooperation urged syrian officials to pave the way for a political transition to put an end to the syrian civil war. the statement comes as the country yet again saw more fierce violence. in europe, the european central bank chief mario draghi says the recent rise in the value of the european currency, the euro, shows markets are indeed confident in the currency's stability. he pledged to keep a close eye on the economic impact of a strong euro. that pushed

think it's hamdi versus rumsfeld both of those cases stand for the proposition that at best that that millet militants don't deserve all the due process than an american citizen deserves that doesn't give us the right to go kill him though there is nothing that gives this president the right to go kill americans on foreign soil the authorization for military for use of military force is almost a joke if you look at it it's so a loser e. that says any high level official is that the president is that the cia director is that a political advisor can go after anyone an american citizen a political militant want any foreign soil is that mexico is it canada hell it could be texas or mississippi for all i know is long as there are in imminent threat no definition to any of this stuff at all and they talk about these things called the law of war principles have you looked at that what is it necessity proportionality distinction and humanity then it's a joke that listen what anybody who's gone to law school would look at that entire bill and say it's a loser or a garbage it's a loser a garbled up la

if you try to piece millet, you will find yourself 20 years from now. i believe legislation should include enhanced the border security, enhanced interior security. >> would you support the proposal for a national i.d.? " i would support using technology to ensure people who are here the say they are here legally. whether it is that or something like it, there are people are qualified to speak on that. i would say including an ability for employers to verify. the legal status that is better -- >> we tried to do that and it failed. you are still going to have the underground employers if you have people overstaying their visas. you have answered different variations time and time again. how by granting a generous pathway to citizenship -- >> how do we avoid creating an incentive for people to come here? that is what my constituents and most people and talking about -- that is the big stumbling point. >> you solve the issue you have in front of you. you improve the ability to keep people at this and that be here. and sure people do not overstayed their vi

the day they left, the village in eastern tibet, mushy cooked date millet dumplings and better to you. the last taste of home before noong his brother mounted horses and headed west. the blackness of the suitcase, noong could tear in the tall grass waving goodbye. the dalai lama fled in 1959, tens of thousands of tibetans had followed his path to india. noong had heard about the men and women who cross the himalayas, died of starvation or getting trapped in the ice. are you as his father had planted some escaped and he was the first of noong family to flee, arriving in america into the three. a few months later he sent for his two sons. noong headpieces whenever they came back the nearest district. noong on their fathers from that ride that horse or they would word it busted a county and get on a truck headed for the capitol. after getting their bearings come and they are supposed join up with a paid guide to make a trek across the mountains to the border of nepal. if they admit that fire, a nepali man would greet them. for 2500 yen per boy, he opposes the grandfather and be waiting w

think it's hamdi versus rumsfeld both of those cases stand for the proposition that at best that millet the militants don't deserve all the due process than an american citizen deserves that doesn't give us the right to go kill him though there is nothing that gives this president the right to go kill americans on foreign soil the authorization for military for use of military force is almost a joke if you look at it it's so lose really that says any high level official is that the president is that the cia director is that a political advisor can go after anyone an american citizen a political militant want any foreign soil is that mexico is it canada hell it could be texas or mississippi for all i know is long as there is an imminent threat no definition to any of this stuff at all and they talk about these things called the law of war principles have you looked at that what is it necessity proportionality distinction and humanity then it's a joke that listen what anybody who's gone to law school would look at that entire bill and say it's a loser or a garbage it's a loser a garbled u

in 2006 going forward, mali and millet -- the mali military has never engaged with the guys coming acrosshe border. they allowed that to fester in the north. it begs the question, why did we miss that? lessons learned moving forward. >> i have to apologize, we are running down to the wire here. i think we have time for one more question. right here, you. >> thank you. i am with the woodrow wilson center. i would like to push you a little more because it seems to me that listening to you about what we should do -- i am not saying you are wrong, i'm not advocating for putting puts -- boots on the ground, or a heavy footprint, but what i hear is that we have to continue to do what we have and try to do with the trans-saharan initiative and all the previous initiatives i can never keep straight in my mind and so on and so forth -- we have always talked about this region like this. we have never looked at separate problems in separate countries. what we see from the outcome -- -- thet pointing fingers results have not been particularly good. the country is still bleeding, though we might have