in the case of milly durrant the key was to associate predicting visible features of the suspect to a certain geographical region it might if i don't find it vas snitched or does the . then one of them is if the d.n.a. analysis said it was likely someone with turkish roots to question the call and so i don't use up his art what the analysis suggested was that it was somebody with roots in a region that includes turkey. as well as a number of other countries nearby. all men with turkish roots who had lived in the same neighborhood as the victim at the time were asked to come for a d.n.a. test one of them was a close match for the d.n.a. found at the crime scene a relative of the perpetrator. 2 men did not submit to a test one of them became a key suspect. the judge ruled he had to do a test. at 1st he refused but then he did a perfect match to the d.n.a. found at the scene of the crime after a quarter of a century the murder case was solved the new method may be very promising but the analysis of biogeographical ancestry is not permitted in germany. as a sociologist and also works on e