why indicts milosevic you don't indict him because he's an individual milosevic because he's the head of state of serbia and then head of state of yugoslavia say when he indicts carol she doesn't indict him as an individual because he's had a slate of bosnia and the same thing with the croatian subs i mean it's totally disingenuous to say that we goes off the individual who are these individuals individuals or heads of state ok lawrence i want to ask another gear before we end the program is it a deterrent to the i.c.c. to people to commit crimes. you think it were it's working but i don't think we. my own view is that international criminal law the justification for the international criminal law is not so much that it deters future leaders for. similar kinds of atrocities it might but deterrence is a negative effect it's very very difficult to prove it's very difficult to prove even in a domestic law model so i look at the justification for international criminal prosecutions more as a symbolic gesture on the part of the global community that certain acts are just beyond the pale an

why indicts also if you don't indict him because he's an individual you think it's milosevic because he's the head of state of serbia and then head of state of yugoslavia say when he indicts. he doesn't indict him as an individual because he's had a slate of bosnian serbs and the same thing with the croatian i mean it's totally disingenuous to say that we goes off their individual who are these individuals individuals or heads of state ok lawrence i want to ask another gear before we end the program is it to turn to the i.c.c. . justification for international criminal prosecutions more as a symbolic gesture on the part of the global community that certain acts are just beyond the pale and i think it performs extremely important symbolic function though again i wouldn't necessarily offer as a prime justification deterrence it might deter we simply don't know and the fact of course that the i.c.c. is such a young institution also suggests that if there's going to be any kind of deterrence effect that's likely not to kick in in told it has a much more robust rationale may they have to

revolutions in eastern europe, the two palestinian uprisings, the street demonstrations that brought down milosevic, you know the continueder is there. i spent the last two years in the poorest pockets of it country from camden, new jersey, to the pro douse fields in florida and the coal fields in southern west virginia, you know the continueder is there. you don't know what is going to set it off. it's usually something relatively benign. an elderly woman gets foreclosed if her home in utah or something. i know it's coming. will it look like occupy? will it be called occupy? you can never know. i think it's better to think of occupy not as a movement, but as a tactic. rosa parks refuses to move on the bus. it's five years until we see the freedom rides. and because the state has not responded rationally, because the state has proved paralyzed, because it not only cannot address the grievances but essentially allows corporations to extract more and more and more in this reconfiguration too a form of neithero feudlism, all i can tell you as a reporter is that something is coming. >> thanks, we'll mo

revolutions in eastern europe, the two palestinian uprisings, the street demonstrations that brought down milosevic, you know the tinder is there. i spent the last two years in the poorest pockets of it -- of this country from camden, new jersey, to the produce fields in florida and the coal fields in southern west virginia, you know the tinder is there. you don't know what is going to set it off. it's usually something relatively benign. an elderly woman gets foreclosed if her home in utah or something. but i know it's coming. will it look like occupy? will it be called occupy? you can never know. i think it's better to think of occupy not as a movement, but as a tactic. rosa parks refuses to move on the bus. it's five years until we see the freedom rides. and because the state has not responded rationally, because the state has proved paralyzed, because it not only cannot address the grievances but essentially allows corporations to extract more and more and more in this reconfiguration too a form of neofeudalism, all i can tell you as a reporter is that something is coming. >> thanks, we'll move

eastern europe, the palestinian uprising sort the street demonstrations that brought down slobodan milosevic, you know the tinder is there. i spent the last two years in the poorest pockets of the country from camden new jersey to the produce fields in florida, the fields of southern west virginia to the you know the tinder is there but you never know what's going to set it off. it's usually something relatively benign. an elderly woman gets for close to her home in utah or something. but i know that it's coming. will it look like occupy? will it be called occupy? you may never know. i think it's better to think of occupy not as a movement, but as a tactic. rosa parks refused to move on the bus. it's five years until we see the freedom runs. because the state hasn't responded rationally, because the state has proven paralyzed coming because it not only cannot address the grievances, that essentially allows corporations to extract more and more in this reconfiguration to the form of the neo feudalism the only thing i can tell you as a reporter is that something is coming. ischemic thank you v