finish, mimi. >> no. i was going to say those who want to see the mueller investigation be completed, you know, that was probably a wise choice. >> yeah. i'm very much agreeing with mimi, there's a big part of me that wishes he had said, no. but i think -- and that we're not going to do anything here, and the precedent this sets isn't great. on the other hand, under the circumstances, he did the right thing, because what would be worse at this point is to create an excuse for trump to fire him, to mess around with mueller. what he's done with this move is, he's made it harder for the president to do what the president might like to do, and so in this case, pragmatism turns out very likely to be principled, although we'll see how it plays out. >> yes. and trying to figure, take one part of this, about energizing the base. where does he think the base is going to go? number one. number two, i -- i'm curious what your thought is that if we are indeed moving closer and closer to whether it's a saturday night

and mimi rocha, former u.s. assistant attorney for the southern district of new york. welcome to you all. again, ashley, fantastic detail by you and the members of your team. what struck you most? and allow me to call it about the trump method and the mueller method? >> what struck us most was just how different they were. both sort of in temperament and goal. you have mueller, who is methodical and disciplined and leak-free, and you have the president, who is loud and blustery and defiant. and as we started doing these interviews and reporting, we also realized that they are making two very different cases. mueller's team is building, again, methodically a legal case. and the president, while he has a team of lawyers and he may need a legal defense, is building a political case and a p.r. case that he's taking to the public. and it is sort of an open question of which one of these will win out and rule the day and which one will be more important or, if in some ways, a good p.r. case in the court of public opinion can help combat what is going to be a very airtight le

mimi roca was a prosecutor in the southern district of new york.our heads together and tell me why i'm wrong when i saw rudy giuliani on television, to my mind, confessing that the president committed obstruction of justice and fired the fbi director because of the fbi director's role in the russia investigation into the president. when rudy giuliani said he fired comey because comey wouldn't say he wasn't a target of the investigation, me, as a civilian, as a nonlawyer, i was like, oh, game over, we can all go home early. this is done. this is toast. this is confessing to what we've all been assuming that mueller is trying to nail the president for. that's how i see it as a layperson. how did you see it as lawyers? >> so -- >> please. >> one issue, though, is this is giuliani's statement, so, a kind of threshold issue is, what's the value of, you know, what your lawyer says on tv -- >> he says he's speaking on the president's behalf. >> right. so, but -- it would definitely be something -- if you were trying to get these admitted in court, you wou

mimi, why does mueller need an interview with the president. say it this way and i asked him whether he would view the president as a credible witness under oath or not. and he said no. my guess is considering the president's pags history with the truth, one would understand that. -- past history with the truth one would understand that. is there any downside of mueller basically saying i don't need the interview from him? >> it has been debated a lot. init depends which area of the investigation we are talking about. my opinion has been that as to the russian interference aspect he doesn't need it as much because he's clearly -- even from those questions, whoever those questions came from exactly, you can tell, he already has a lot of information. >> it is immaterial evidence. he may not need motive at that point. >> right. and he already seems to know a lot about what different actors were doing at the time of the campaign and right around -- now, what he wants to get at is what did donald trump know? because conspiracy law is very brad. this

mimi i want to start with you. one question that i think is on everybody's mind, essentially, does this plea deal mean anything for the president? if so, what? >> it is a great question. i think the most direct line to the president obviously is through michael cohen. this is going to have an impact on the case against michael cohen. no question. clearly, prosecutors in the southern district already had a lot of evidence on michael cohen in order to get that search warrant that we all talked so much about a couple of weeks ago and how extraordinary it was that they got it. so they must have had some good evidence on him already. but there is nothing like having a cooperator. now we don't know obviously yet sort of the full outline of what this taxi king had provide, how much he was involved in all of the different aspects of michael cohen's businesses. from everything we are hearing he was very much a gateway between michael cohen and sort of some more nefarious people who were involved in this industry, like the r

everything that mimi and dan said, spot on. don't play an open hand with a defendant in this subject in a criminal investigation which is what trump is. but in some ways even more seriously as the reddest of red lines, you don't give information about a longstanding confidential informant who we're now reading all about in the newspapers what all it means for him and future fbi recruits. it was stunning. as a matter of principle of the real sort of dna of what the department does, i agree with you. that second one, that giving up of a confidential informant seemed awfully close to a point where you have to say, enough already. every sort of appeasement has brought an encroachment in short order and a more serious one. but, look, we also know that rosenstein and wray are doing the highest of high-wire acts with principle on one hand but really practical concerns about mueller on the other and wins coming in in every direction. there are things we don't know about what they're trying to safeguard with mueller. if you look at resi

with us here in new york, mimi roc rocca, a former u.s.southern district of norng. now a distinguished fellow and criminal justice at the pace university school of law. and peter zeidenberg is back with us. counselors, welcome to you both. mimi, you're sitting here in our studio. you get to go first. what just happened tonight? >> so many things. and it's hard to know which one to start with. but let's start with what michael avenatti is doing a dance about right now, which is by acknowledging that trump paid cohen back in a way that -- first of all, it just shows that trump has been lying, but it also really will damage their civil case, the defendant's civil case. it will be -- i mean, avenatti has a much better case now than he did an hour ago. but it's bigger than that, i think. it's not just about this civil case with stormy daniels. there's a couple of things. first of all, i think the purpose of what giuliani is say -- i think he was trying to do away with the idea of a campaign finance violation. i'm not sure why he's focused on th

everything that mimi and dan said spot on.ou don't play an open hand with a defendant in this subject in a criminal investigation which is what trump is. but in some ways even more seriously as the reddest of red lines, you don't give information about a long-standing confidential informant who we're now reading all about in the newspapers what all it means for him and future fbi recruits. it was stunning. as a matter of principle of the real sort of dna of what the department does, i agree with you. that second one, that giving up of a confidential informant seemed awfully close to a point where you have to say enough already. every sort of appeasement has brought an encroachment in short order and a more serious one. but look, we also know that rosenstein and wray are doing the highest of high wire acts with principle on one hand but really practical concerns about mueller on the other and wins coming in in every direction. there are things we don't know about what they're trying to safeguard with mueller. if you look at res

thank you, mimi rocah. >>> up next, a guide for surviving the trump presidency.coming here. his new book takes a look at how our country has survived even the most divisive eras how we got this far without trump. now we have to figure out to get farther with him. this is "hardball," where the action is. called audible. you can listen to the stories you love while doing the things you love, outside. everyone's doing it she's binging... they're binging... and... so is he. so put on your headphones, turn on audible and binge better. my digestive system used to make me feel sluggish. but those days are over. now, i take metamucil every day. it naturally traps and removes the waste that weighs me down. so i feel... lighter. try metamucil and begin to feel what lighter feels like. and try new metamucil fiber thins, made with 100% natural psyllium fiber. a great-tasting and easy way to start your day. you can do it. we can do this. at fidelity, our online planning tools are clear and straightforward so you can plan for retirement while saving for the things you want to

mimi rocha from the southern district of new york. and a legal analyst.e have new reporting at nbc that rudy giuliani said the special counsel is quote engage us on several points. so the lines of communication are still open. and he reiterated again what donald trump has apparently told a lot of people, he want to talk. take a listen. >> you have to understand, the president wants to testify, he wants to give his side of the case which he believe is the truthful one. about obstruction of justice what he says is simply i'm expressing my opinion. i can't say that comey is doing a bad job? i am obstructing just if i decide that the director of the fbi is doing a bad job? that's ridiculous. he wants to express that. on mueller's side, everything he says they believe they can examine his motives. so if they had an open mind, we would be inclined to maybe let our client do what he want to do. >> you have a situation, mimi, where we are now in a position where it seems like, again, new things are coming out every single day. one of the thing that michael avenat

and mimi rocha. mimi, let me start with you. i want to pick up on the different types of surveillance a federal prosecutor can get. what does it take to get the monitoring of e-mail versus the monitoring of phone calls, versus the recording of phone calls. can you walk us through a little bit. >> there is important distinctions here. i will start with what we now believe to be the surveillance at least some of the surveillance that occurred of michael cohen, custom is the pen register. that is one of the least intrusive forms of surveillance. all it does is really records calls coming in to a certain phone and calls going out in realtime. so it is like a real time toll analysis. prosecutors can get historical toll analysis from a phone company but if they want to get things happening as they happen they have to get a pen register. it requires an application to a magistrate judge. it is not a probable cause threshold, though. it's something lower than that that's hard to articulate. because you are not getting content it is a lit

mimi roker, john allen, and kimberly, an msnbc analyst. what do you think of the news and why is it coming out so late at night. >> why would it be so different than breaking news that breaks on another day. i think there has been a bit of a scramble to put together exactly how this meeting that the president has demanded and which was apparentlyset up by rod rosenstein to placate the president who seemed ready to take a more drastic action against this investigation. this is something that is not normal. normally when there is an ongoing investigation by federal authorities, the oversight doesn't come in the middle. it comes once it's complete, once there's conclusions, and then if there's questions about the process then the folks go in and take a look at it so the investigation itself is not compromised so there are no problems. so yeah there's no real protocol as to how to do this. so it's small wonder that there is some confusion, that there's changes in the plan, different statements coming from differing agencies about how exactly t

mimi, you're sitting here in our studio. you get to go first. what just happened tonight? many things. and it's hard to know which one to start with. but let's start with what michael avenatti is doing a dance about right now, which is about acknowledging that trump paid cohen back in a way that, first of all, just shows that trump has been lying, but it also really will damage their civil case, the defendant's civil case. so, it will be -- i mean, avenatti has a much -- a much better case now than he did an hour ago. but it's bigger than that i think. it's not just about this civil case with stormy daniels. there's a couple things. first of all, i think the purpose of what giuliani was saying, i think he was trying to do away with this idea of a campaign finance violation. not sure why he was focused on that so much because that seems to be the least of trump's problems in some ways. but he didn't even accomplish that. by saying -- a campaign finance violation is defined as to whether the payment is to influence the election, to put it in its simplest terms. nothing giuli

and joining our discussion now, nick akerman, assistant watergate prosecutor and mimi rocca, a former prosecutor and former u.s. assistant attorney in the southern district of new york and a fellow at pace university law school now. and david corn, washington bureau chief for mother jones and he is also an msnbc political analyst. and nick, i want to go to the first -- i want to go in reverse order. the president's last tweet there about how strange it would be to have an obstruction of justice case about a case at the beginning of which there was no crime. >> well, first of all, i don't know where he gets the idea that there was no crime. there certainly are crimes that are being investigated. there is the hacking into the democratic national committee, the theft of those e-mails to be used to help get trump elected. there is probably a quid pro quo involved in that deal where the russians agreed to help trump in the campaign, and the campaign agreed that if elected. that would drop the sanctions that were imposed for ukraine and by obama. secondly, there is the whole conspiracy rela

joining the discussion now, mimi rocah, former federal prosecutor. she is a fellow at pace university. and david corn, washington bureau chief for mother jones and co-author of the new best-seller "russian roulette: the inside story of putin's war on america and the election of donald trump." he is also an msnbc political analyst. and let's just begin, michael avenatti, the $99,980 you show monthly payments from novartis to michael cohen's llc totalling $399,920. we have a statement tonight from that pharmaceutical company. that's company that of everyone who has been revealed making payments to michael cohen in your report today, this is the company that seems most completely embarrassed by it. their statement is simply "any agreements with essential consultants were entered before our current ceo taking office in february of this year and have expired." so that's one company that's not at all proud of what they were doing there, and i'm sure we're going hear from them what they were doing there. >> well, you may be sure of that. i'm not sure of tha

the mimi music app works in a similar way and has been around a few years. earprint, it aims to optimise the music you listen to through any wired headphones. here i have the nurophone headphones which look pretty interesting for a start as they're sort of in—ear and over—ear. but they work differently. instead of asking you whether you can hear something, they do the test for you, and they do it in just 60 seconds. they claim to do so by sending sound waves into your ear which will trigger a reaction, sending electrical impulses to your brain and sound waves back out your ear. it's through measuring them that the app will create what it calls your hearing signature. in my not—very—scientific experiment here, i am noticing a much bigger difference between the generic and the personalised in these headphones. the music sounds totally different. it's different parts of the music that sound louder. and that's mixed in with just a real clear, crisp sound. but our expert had some questions over this upgrade of sound quality. they do give you the opportunity with

jonathan: joining mimi -- joining the in new york are our guests. great to have you with us. threen with handle on unemployment. there are no inflationary consequences seemingly in wage growth. why not? keeping wagety is inflation low. we have been seeing good payroll numbers, but until you see real -- thecomes growing question for the fed is, do they need to accelerate here? to got think they need three times necessarily because there is no inflation pressure. let's see the economy heat up a little. do they really need to go three times more? let inflation pick up before they try to get to neutral. jonathan: looking at the statement from the federal reserve, it doesn't sound like it is in a hurry. that statement is one thing and that is symmetrical. two mentions of one word, the clearest evidence in fomc statements that said it is happy ofh the continued course inflation, willing to let it move above the 2% target and continue on their merry way toward however many more hikes may be this year. jonathan: do we have to say we don't really know what is going on in the labor mar

asha, mimi, shimon, appreciate it. a lot to dig through. >>> coming up, he says he didn't call the president an idiot, but reports indicate that chief of staff john kelly isn't on great terms with his boss either. we'll get the latest from the white house on the central relationship in the west wing. >>> plus, the one letter with massive implications. why a typo from the white house raised eyebrows around the world and could have dramatically changed the status of iran's nuclear program if even for just a few minutes. we'll be right back. patrick woke up with back pain. but he has work to do. so he took aleve. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve. all day strong. ♪ with expedia you could book a flight, hotel, car and activity all in one place. ♪ searching for answers may feel overwhelming. so start your search with our teams of specialists at cancer treatment centers of america. the evolution of canc

mimi announced she's returning to caesar's palace las vegas for a new residency. ♪ we belong together'll probably get some music that will be even more revealing. >> ex nick cannon gushed to us about mariah after she revealed her bipolar struggle. starting july 5th, the diva promises a more intimate performance for her show, dubbed, "the butterfly returns." >> i always told her i felt like this is a new butterfly moment. row have been able to free yourself again in way that brings your audience in. >> you know what i love? nick and mariah are still really cool. >> they're making it work for the kids. >>> how about beyonce and jay z. they were at game one of the western conference semifinals. checking out the golden state warriors. they rolled in the first game over the pelicans. >> i knew you were going to add that. >> old sports guy. >>> coming up -- >> dancing returns tonight. how this new season is like no other. >> it's terrifying. >> we're inside the last minute rehearsals. >> the little girls are just laughing at me the whole time. >>> then -- ♪ when i wake up in the morning ♪ >

the two women, ana suda and mimi hernandez, both american citizens recorded the stop on a cell phone.the reason i asked you for your id is because i came in here, and i saw you guys were speaking spanish. soledad: the incident happened within a day of another video showing an attorney in new york city on a rant because restaurant workers were speaking spanish. >> you are speaking spanish to the customers. soledad: the attorney threatened pto contact immigration and have them deported. both videos went viral and are renewing the debate over immigration and assimilation. congresswoman norma torres is a second term representative from california's 35th district. she came to the united states from guatemala at the age of five. it is so nice to have you with us. this isn't a new conversation. i feel like we have it in waves every few years. rep. torres: we absolutely do. anytime there is a downturn in the economy or there is a high profile personality who rants against immigrants, this is the first thing. it is latinos, spanish-speaking people who are first to feel the pain. soledad: it's

mimi, thank you so much. and, of course, as for lawrence, he's an author, screen writer and play write and staff writer for the new yorker magazine. author of many books including the looming tower which won a pulitzer surprise and going clear, scientology, hollywood and the prison of belief which was made into a wonderful hbo documentary and a book that got him into no shortage of trouble, of course. [laughter] >> his play cleo finished successful run at ally theater in houston and for our own purposes tonight, of course, a texan, he wasn't born here but like so many of us he came here and just never seemed to leave. his new book god save takes on goal to explain texas to the rest of the country. for this task there's nobody i would trust more, please join me in welcoming mimi swartz and lawrence. [applause] >> hello, thank you for coming. i think we should come with the basic question, how did you come to write this wonderful book. >> when david asked me, i reminded him, i get paid by the word and he just a

we'll speak to nicholas scarr, whose daughter, mimi, died after suffering an eating disorder as a teenagerand at10:1i0pm, we'll take a first look at tomorrow's headlines in the papers. that's all ahead on bbc news. now on bbc news, it's time for sportsday. hello, i am olly foster. these are our sportsday headlines tonight: a top—20 hit. kyle edmund is still on the rise, knocking novak djokovic out of the madrid open. i kept calm, ijust realised my game is enough, i don't have to do more against a top player. there's still so much at stake in the premier league, especially at stamford bridge. we'll look ahead to chelsea against huddersfield. and it's tata to yaya. toure tells us what he's going to miss about manchester city. good evening, we will look ahead to tonight's football in just a moment but we are going to start in spain because — in the words of novak djokovic — "kyle edmund is playing the best tennis of his life". the british number one knocked out the former world number one in three sets to reach the last 16 at the madrid open and edmund who reached a career high of 22 in the w

. >> mimi, i got to tell you, this is all very head spinning but i'm mostly floored by rudy giuliani counsel to the president suggesting now that jeff sessions should get involved and begin an investigation into the southern district of new york, attorneys who are investigating. th trump's personal lawyer michael cohen. that doesn't sound like the kind of thing we do in america. it sounds like we've got a constitution that's supposed to protect us from that sort of thing. that's wild. >> i agree. completely. it's wild. and it seems like any time any type of investigatory agency or prosecutorial agency gets close to the president or anyone around him in terms of finding out that they've committed crimes, the answer is let's prosecute those people. >> right. >> that's not how it works here. the southern district of new york is conduct iin ining a per legitimate criminal investigation of a man named michael cohen. he happens to be a lawyer. he happens to have had some, some lawyer/client relationship with trump but that is not the -- does not seem to be the focus or the bounds of that i

well, we can speak now to nicholas scarr about the case of his daughter mimi, who committed suicide threeics argue that the system didn't, and still doesn't offer enough support for young vulnerable people, like mimi, after they turn 18. nicholas joins me in the studio. thank you for having me on.“ thank you for having me on. if you could, just tell us about the circumstances of your daughter's death, and where you feel that she could have been helped more?” death, and where you feel that she could have been helped more? i think the first thing to say is that this whole area of mental health is neglected massively. thousands of children are caught up with disorders, and is recommended that there are1.2 disorders, and is recommended that there are 1.2 million people offering from eating disorders every year. those women that were interviewed, what they said really resonated with me, because as a pa rent resonated with me, because as a parent trying to get help from a child, we found it impossible. it was an absolutely shocking, shocking mess, the whole system. but she did receive some help

sector i would yes consent that statements from refugees international and catholic relief services mimi part of our record that objection secretary let me just follow up on north korea for one moment and that is in response to senator johnson you indicated that you're trying to convince the north koreans that their security is going to be better served without nuclear weapons and i fully support that. it's very possible that diplomacy is successful it will require action by the united states congress in order to deal with some of these issues during the discussions on their rand nuclear agreement all republican colleagues thought that this should be a treaty type or an arranged. which would require the two thirds vote of the united states senate my question to you is how do you intend to keep congress informed during these negotiations considering the questions that senator menendez asked were ones that i would have asked also and we had not had the in-depth type of briefings that would be i think required in these types of negotiations so how do you envision keeping us informed recogni

the mimi music up works in the same weight and has been around a few years, it optimises the music you impressed by the way you could twea k more impressed by the way you could tweak the sound around you. here i have the headphones which look pretty interesting because they are in the airand pretty interesting because they are in the air and over a year that they worked differently, instead of asking you whether you can hear something, nurophone earphones to the test for you and they do it in 60 seconds. they claim to do so by sending sound waves into your ear which will trigger a reaction, sending political impulses to your brain and sound waves back out your year. it is through measuring them that the app creates what it calls or hearing significant. in my not very scientific test, i am noticing the different between normal headphones and speakers, music sounds different, different parts of the music sounds louder. that is mixed in with a real clear, crisp sound. but our expert had some questions over this upgrade of sound quality. they give you the opportunity with the headphones to

. >> reporter: ana suda says she and her friend, mimi, who are both u.s. citizens, were talking to each other in spanish at a convenience store when the uniformed border patrol agent interrupted them. >> he asked where i was born. so i look at -- i look at him and i say, "are you serious?" he's like, "yes, i'm serious." >> reporter: the store, in montana, is 30 miles south of the u.s./canada border. border patrol agents have a broad authority to operate within 100 miles of any u.s. border, though they cannot initiate stops without reasonable suspicious of an immigration violence or crime. the aclu says suda has reached out to them. customs and border protection says they are reviewing the incident and that the agent used a poor choice of words. david? >> kayna, thank you. >>> next this evening, to celebrity chef mario batali. tonight, police sources saying the nypd is investigating, after two women accused him of drugging and assaulting them. he denies the allegations. here's linsey davis. >> reporter: tonight, police sources tell abc news the nypd is inve

we'll speak to nicholas scarr, whose daughter, mimi, died after suffering an eating disorder as a teenagerahead on bbc news. now on bbc news, it's time for sportsday.

attorney in the southern district of new york and now nbc and msnbc analyst mimi rogers.ing two more legitimate clients getting payments from donald trump? >> that's what it sound like. of course this would not be surprising in the least because this is apparently what michael cohen did. he took care of these kinds of problems for the president. and of course it raises more questions about this discrepancy between what the president put in his financial disclosure form yesterday saying that what he reimbursed cohen was about $100,000 to $200,000. and what giuliani had said, which is that the president actually reimbursed michael cohen roughly $470,000. so was this money to pay him back for other payments to other women? that seems to be what michael avenatti may be foreshadowing. >> so, mimi, just ask you to respond to what avenatti said. he is talking about two women, much larger payments -- correct me if i'm remembering it. >> right. >> they are turning out to be on very solid ground in terms of the vetting. i'm not sure he was clear on the timing of the payments. what

this will be the one in a few, mimi the only one for some -- maybe the only one for some rick it's that kind of a pattern. i think it carries into june. there's little bit of a patchy fog bank on the san mateo coast. it's very shallow and i think it gets wiped up rather quick. nothing that's going to call anybody down. 50s and 60s on your terms. around the bay. 50s as well. mid 50s san francisco is 55. richmond is 55. so everyone is very close. some of the fog will be back tomorrow. but then it really comes charging back. today is the day to warm up. not something we've said much of back to the desk. >>> 5:01. federal investigators are in sonoma county. they are investigating a deadly plane crash. two people died. >> it happened about a half a mile from the petaluma airport, where a homemade plane crashed right near old adobe road. rob malcolm reports witnesses say the plane had just left the airport. >> reporter: the petaluma fire department, local police, and that's sheriff's department investigating the scene. a witness reports hearing the planes butter and crash a half a mile before

i think mimi is right. i think it's a fallacy to think any one person is such a lynch pen that if you got rid of them then everything would be okay. i think the justice department is used to it from the hill and the white house that they are keeping their heads down and doing their thing. i don't think that repeated tweets from the president are going to make any difference here. >> phil, what about the policy, the political impact as we head into the midterms. ? >> i was at that focus group and the president's language is definitely getting through to his base, to his voters. i think that's the whole strategy here with the way he's tweeting and the way rudy giuliani is making this a public relations battle with mueller. they are waging a public campaign to try to convince the kpanl this investigation has gone on too long. it's going into areas they are not supposed to be looking into. they need to get to the matter of russian collusion. render some sort of judgment and be done with it and put it away. that

mimi. >> that's true if they were spying. that's not what happened. he just keeps doing this talking point. there's some people who will just listen to the talking point. what happened is exactly as you said. a source was sent in. the least intrusive means to figure out why is this foreign power trying to get into the campaign. why are there all these people there having all these unexplained meetings with russians. they were trying to do something protective and he's turning it into something nefarious and it's just backwards. >> jeremy, with this coming to a head, it does seem some of this is taking hold with the president's political base when peter heart did a recent focus group. they were repeating back in question, the phrase witch hunt. it's having an impact politically. >> i think public opinion will be governed by the facts. the only way the get the facts is to low the investigation to proceed. if we have political interference in a legitimate counter intelligence investigation, we'll not be able to get the facts and protect the country. >> t

what he did was to compare and fbi agents in the southern district of new york where mimi once worked as an assistant prosecutor. >> the question there was only possible violation was was it a campaign finance violation. it usually result in a fine. not the storm troopers breaking down the apartment or apartment. >> that's unacceptable when the nation leaders attack the constituti institutions of justice. we have to speak out because we need those institutions. the notion that the fbi is made of nazi storm troopers is wrong and dangerous. >> frank, you work for so many years, i believe 25 years in fbi, how does that make you feel? what are you hearing from others in the bureau? >> it's a shameful assertion and characterization by someone who the fbi enjoys a great rep. now adopting the posture of his client which has him down in the same gutter that the president resides in. rudy giuliani is a regular speaker at fbi charity vent, raising funds for fbi families who have lost their loved one in the line of duty. i've got to tell you what i'm hearing amongst the troops is that rudy may n

army specialists and he actually climbed on a garbage pit, and he tried to bring the puppy mimi back. it sounds simple but it is not, it's expensive and complicated. they help bring them joy for all that they do, and you can go to because of war.org to check out more about it and get involved. i'd like to invite you to do >> and we will just dumb i could join her to discuss more on the details of the eric schneiderman case the best thing you can do, this happened to me when i got a bunch of cats in my apartment. i turned on my rumba and it's going to happen just about now. >> this group was trying to raise money for their sons and daughters which ended up throwing each other across the corn hole tournament on. >> what happened to corn hole? >> i don't know, you should get corn hole. >> okay. he's tough and fair, his name is bret baier. up next. >> bret: some transitions are better than others. president trump says good riddance to the iran nuclear deal as he announces the president is withdrawing. congress considers the request to cut 15 billion in unused funds, and a champion of the