jess jess at the level i might miss a stick demo them in this very seriously quote ae truthfully mindel. also sources on the school. our we had an unusual slime libel that said donald trum. right right changing home only as as his book book high you. can get it to his. next next week. in a. land mine. has rented. was a moving. every year above the but otherwise a reason checks excluding any real rules will lead lead restoration if you're hearing this is without thousand sixteen the language and. and the investigation into a tribe riley male miller. lite by dentention didn't really read clinton is dealing. with just a a an alley allegations about about restaurants from his youth that colin powell says that. is the usually which is an international of awarding winning nobel prize project has been censored enterprise actually from. off also sees it was changing. you should you should you should you should not cut because the house out of nobel prize. yeah from a month this week because it has been an oil oil is extremely. until now it state also has been down these movies comer circles. he

. >> in your principal response to the establishment clause claim is to cite mindel ones to say once the government comes forward with a legitimate reas reason, national security is the most importantly someone could come forward with, the game is over. i want to press on that a little bit i want to ask if that means he started talking a lot about the process of this proclamation. i take it that argument would be irrespective of the processes. he would've use the same mandel argument or would you have not? >> we would've made a mandel argument but it stronger give you the process irish this was based. >> when i read mandel i don't see anything about process. you say reason in this court stops. >> i think in addition to that you have the extensive worldwide process you have in a cabinet level recommendation that has a neutral baseline it concluded that almost all of the world but a tiny number of countries to. whether you fly mandel or mccreary makes a constitutional case overwhelmingly strong. >> let me give you hypothetical. there's ways to distinguish mandel but in terms of thinkin