brennan: we're coming up on anniversary of the global financial crisis, you were key at the time as f minisrgloba response. do you see a direct line between what happened then and the kind of dislocation and anger that you're seeing now? >> yes, i do. i do, because i think that the legacies of the crisis have not yet been completely healed and the wounds are still there, number one. number two, i think that some people have lost out of that time have not been able to recover and some have been able to recover, there is that inner sentiment of unfairness. and we have done our best at the imf. we've really put a lot of money on the table to rescue countries in particular. because this is our job. the job of the imf, a bit like if you have family and somebody in the family is gambling all the time and nobody is rs.ntually going so as fami unit trustee says, i need money. what are you going to do? you're going to lend. because i can't operate, i can't work out, i can't feed the family. but you lend on the basis that he's going to be de-addicted that's what we did since ten years ago. we've been

. >> i was one of the members who would support the a prime minisr still but i have to say it's coming back to me from business from industry fromm the city is that we are now hemorrhaging support and investment on a daily basis that's getting worse which is why i asked the memberp to say please think again and holding this vote and standalone resolutions which mean that we can move on. i understand the concern he's expressing and i still think they are taking that approach. he refers to it as indicative of the emotions before the n house and can i just say to my honorable friend and members of this house what is necessary for the house to reflect on what the members want in terms of their responsibility to come to a decision on this matter and at the moment there are a number of you around the house from the second referendum some would support other arrangements. arrangements would require a way to draw agreement to make clear that basis in the european union. there are many people in the house that would take issue with the word meaningful because there's nothing meaningful that for

i was also th is also the minisr copenhagen and the agreements as necessary as they are are insufficient and we are not meeting the challenge. i am representing a climate challenge and to urge you to look at climate transparency.org we have a color-coded chart of the countries that are responsible for the three quarters of global emissions and ocliniciansand of course there't diversity in the performance of those in saudi arabia and the united states. i am also the proud grandfather of a less than two month old. there's nothing that raises your feminism more than to see the world that this beautiful lady is going to have to live in. [laughter] we are bequeathing this future generation a huge carbonyl for greenhouse gas that can be measured in parts per million and tons of carbon. it's the largest transfer of wealth in human history and the ones who will pay to not create the problems. even the islands like puerto rico and what is happening there. so my question is what is the role of litigation in all of this? they are responsible for 80% of the historic global greenhouse emissions and p