you have to coordinate, there's international harm -- harm minnization, there needs to be a spectrum, and the government needs to be that maker. it's a debatable point, but that's the better argument. the third way is the status quo. you wait for a crisis, and then the government by administrative fiat takes it away from whoever had it to begin with. you know, i'm okay with that other than that's crisis response. it's ineffective and basically leads to years and years of litigation. what incentive options do is create it with the moorgt base. that's what i'm for. >> host: are the broadcasters sitting on underutilized capital? >> guest: well, i think some are and some are not. what's interesting about the debate is the broadcasters continue to say things that assume that all broadcasters are the same, that if we allocate spectrum to any broadcaster, it has to be the same to all broadcasters. we have 25 broadcasters in new york, 32 in language, many others many many other cities. that was done before there was cable, before there was internet. do we really need that many? now, i'm -- i