in the end i don't think the average iranian is as consumed by the minutia of negotiations as with the potential for sanctions being lifted. you mentioned the ability to manage the sanctions, we understand there's a lot of internal pressure on iran to reach a deal. there's a number of reports that iran has a water crisis and needs an embargo lifted. other parts are in desire need of technology. what kind of pressure does that put on the iranian side to reach a deal. it's a lot. we are at an auto parts factory, these are the things that these industries can do better if they are able to buy technology, you can't shop for the best technology when you can buy it from a few people, and sometimes the best technology comes from the west. you don't get to choose if you are an iranian, you build it here or buy to those that will sell it to you. there's pressure on the government. the government of hassan rouhani was elected - you can argue about how - how much of a democracy iran is, they had an election, and he was elected on the basis of opening up to the west, creating a dialogue, bridging

but he does not have to deal with the minutia of all this.

but he does not have to deal with the minutia of all this. rachael: the republicans control both houses. the government is going to run out of money eventually. october 1, they do a short-term cr, it will be late november. the government will run out of money. that would be on the republicans watch. they would be the ones controlling both chambers right now. they would likely get the blame. i think the white house does have the upper hand. susan: so it is not going to be a dramatic week ahead, but we are just going to let the clock run out? daniel: we still have the highway bill to deal with. the house is doing their thing the white house said they would pass a short-term bill. my guess is that they would do a short-term bill and go home. rachael: they will also talk about planned parenthood before they go home, that's very big right now. that is a redmeat issue for republicans. they will continue to dig in on that, maybe the iran deal. but appropriations for now -- susan: thanks for both of you for your questions this week. we appreciate it.

let's talk about the minutia of the details. pages with -- and it is all about that critical language now. guest: yes. it began with 80 pages and now , 20 inbecome 100 pages the main draft and 80 in annexes . it is the language of what it comes down to. each party here have to present to the public and the u.s. has to present it to congress. the security council, the supreme leader will have the final say. the language of the documents is key and that could be what they are haggling on right now. angie: at the end of the day, are we moving closer to a deal? it is expected. that is the buzz. would it surprise you that word of a deal is not done? or is the expectation that the deal is done and we are waiting to hear about it? i would personally not bank on anything or bet on anything right now. both sides -- i mean, this is these that scenario that happened in april before the draft agreement came out, the framework came out. a little bit of buzz. it was a negative buzz and then they were out there in a press conference saying the

. >> critics say despite all of the details and the minutia in this contract, that iran won't stick to it. >> that's of course always a possibility. i watched north korea very closely, a far more dangerous state than iran. and we seem to be virtually ignoring it. i watched how they looked at congress's inability to fill the agreed framework provisions from our side of the agreement. and i watched how north korea cheated and ultimately produced a bomb. it can be done. i want to hear the alternatives. and the alternatives really boil down to war. and that's not in my opinion a very good idea. tom cotton recently said a war with iran would last a few days. that reminds me of the people who said in iraq we'd be met with flowers in the streets in 2003. >> thank you so much. appreciate the perspective as always. >> thanks for having me. >>> the deal has another big obstacle and that is of course to clear congress. will u.s. lawmakers approve this deal. ♪ irresistible moments deserve irresistibles treats. new from meow mix with real salmon chicken or tuna. the only treat cats ask for by name.

in general, when it's this far out, people aren't into the minutia of the issues. kennedy: that's a big word. >> big for me. >> well, i think chris christie is trying to throw anything against the wall and hope it sticks. spaghetti or lasagna or meaty calzone. kennedy: i can feel will ron's charisma bouncing off his blazer, we are going to service that in moments. >>> clinton campaign staff used rope from keeping the press to get too close to hillary, because she's the most transparent in the race and so see through. we're going to talk about that. >>> plus shark week, a shark diver is here to tell us if it's safe to hit the beach or hit the couch and watch this show on repeat. admit it, you're a little scared. stay right here. ♪ we all feel the calling to build something great. ♪ ♪. kennedy: that's right, how you doing? happy 6th of july! and speaking of the 4th of july, hillary clinton marched in a july 4th parade in new hampshire, it was on saturday, and her campaign staff decided to keep the press in line. literally. two staffers lassoed the press behind the ro

the minutia is interesting, a child's slide, christmas decorations and a fondness for may mayonnaise.om. and this is where he fled to into this bedroom and bathroom where there is another escape hatch underneath this bathtub. the marines discovered this network when they arrested the head of chap poe guzman's security and he gave them this information. it underlines the central role of intelligence in the arrest of one of the world's most-wanted men. nick parker cnn. >> fascinating. >>> donald trump has made headlines again on sunday with comments about the escape of el chapo. he said corrupt mexican officials obviously let him go a second time. he's possibly in the u.s. and his drugs and drug dealers freely cross into the united states through our pathetic border. this is just one example of the many instances of mexico taking advantage of the united states. >>> trump's camp pain has been full of insend air comments. another candidate, senator lindsey graham tells cnn that party leaders should reject trump's views. >> i think that he has hijacked the debate and is a wrecking ball wit

the minutia is often interesting.hild slide, christmas decorations and a fondness for mayonnaise. this safe house is perhaps the most significant of all of them. this is where chapo guzman escaped from while being pursued by mexican marines. they broke down this door and found out they had missed minimum by eight minutes. this is where he fled to through this bedroom and into this bathroom where as you can see, there is another escape hatch underneath this bathtub. mexican marines tell us they discovered this entire network of underground tunnels and safe houses when they arrested the head of chapo guzman's security and he gave them this information. it underlines the intelligence in the arrest of one of the world's most wanted men. >> wow, fascinating detail. now let's talk about this person "el chapo" and his ability. cnn contributor casey jordan with us now. criminologist, behaviorist and an attorney. good to see you. >> great to be here. >> we see as a result of the escape the number is about 18 guards are now bei

they're going to go after clinton -- >> we know there's some of the minutiae here.d to first go through the bill clinton foundation router. whatever, look, this is all the e-mails from the secretary of state of the united states. the reason you have a secure system that when you send them out before anything is declared classified, because you're developing material at the time. you're moving -- we should presume that everything a secretary of state sends out is going to be classified. keep in mind the classified e-mails, they've determined was from a batch of 40. and they found four. that's 10%. extrapolate that over the dynamic but ultimately you've got to presume that somebody in that position is going to be sending classified information you know, from the moment she sits down to type it. jon: doesn't it -- >> that's quite a presumption, by the way. jon: why alan? this is the nation's top diplomat. she did not use apparently ever -- >> i've said all i long, she needs to explain why she used a privacy server. and i've said -- >> they'll say because she's paranoid

i don't want to get so much into the weeds and the minutia of what we're talking about, but more so the who are watching these conversations take place and reading the op-eds that so many smart investors are writing about need to be more worried than perhaps they are. >> well, again, the idea of taking bonds and inventory for the wall street firms, it's really a regulatory dictate. it's not by choice. thus far again, i think most of the near has been projected forward into what could possibly happen. for those of us who were around in 2008, i mean, it's a pretty scary thing when you're trying to sell a seven-day piece of ibm commercial paper an you get no bid, no bid. >> but then that goes to the crux of the issue. because the person that gets hurt the most, the institution, are the small investor because you don't want to be pimco, but yet you are an important player in the street. when you call up and ask for a bid -- you get it. if you're a smaller manager with individuals as your investors you're not getting that bid. if you are, it's so far away from the market. so once again, good

but he does not have to deal with the minutia of all this. rachael: the republicans control both houses. the government is going to run out of money eventually. october 1, they do a short-term cr, it will be a -- late november. the government will run out of money. that would be on the republicans watch. they would likely get the blame. i think the white house does have the upper hand. susan: so it is not going to be a dramatic week ahead, but we are just going to let the clock run out? daniel: we still have the highway bill to deal with. the house is doing their thing the white house said they would pass a short-term bill. i guess we could do a short-term bill and go home. rachael: they will also talk about planned parenthood before they go home, that's very big right now. that is a light -- redmeat issue for a public is. they will continue to dig in on that, maybe the iran deal. but a probation for now -- susan: thanks for both of you for your questions this week. we appreciate it. >> the u.s. senate will be in session this afternoon to con

all that minutia or a parent especially a mom, you're in control and make sure they have everything they need. that is part of reality once they it had that door, there is nothing else that i can do that is going to prepare them anymore than i already have. and now it's up to them. and that was for me very difficult, because, i waned to be able to do everything that i needed to do for them to be successful but the apron strings were cut. but i say they're not just cut. they're hacked with a machete. now it was up to him. and he was going to sink or swim based on his passion and his ability to survive. that was, it was an immediate he is out of the nest moment. >> how much after hands-on parent were you prior? would you describe yourself as a helicopter mom? >> no. i call myself an eagle mom. we did a lot of things to have them be independent and to help them soar. and so, we didn't run interference for them when they had different you'lls. it was -- difficulties. you signed up for this. you're not quitting the team. you need to work it out. you need to show the coach what you can do. any

i don't think they want you know minutia and specifics from him. >> but ronald reagan -- >> they goting from jimmy carter and they went the other way. >> after ronald reagan failed to win the nomination in 1976 he spent years studying foreign policy studying -- and let me tell you, he may have been a democrat long before he became a republican nominee for president, but donald trump is no ronald reagan. >> the other thing, this is no longer ronald reagan's america. this america is more diverse, younger, and, you know, i don't understand how you're just going to preach to the choir without realizing the congregation has changed. so i appreciate the ronald reagan analogies, but donald trump is not ronald reagan. >> well the choir has beenis going to select the nominees to use your phraseology here. i mean he's pitching to the republican electorate first. >> that's correct. >> that's what anybody has to do. >> >> brett, what would you tell the other candidates about dealing with -- it's one thing trump has to do. i'm very curious to see what all the others have to do about donald trump.

. >> this is more minutia. but if someone voted for this amendment, that doesn't necessarily mean they have to vote fort bill at the end. it could stand on its own. it is doing something for both sides, both parties. would you agree with that? >> that's my hope. that's my hope. >> all right. thank you srefplt very much. >> recognized for a question. >> thank you, mr. speaker. mr. quinn let me, if i may, just ask you a couple of questions based on on your amendment. and thank you for allowing the tour yesterday. >> i appreciate your time doing it. >> sir? >> i appreciate you giving the time. >> yes, sir. >> i know we're all busy. >> did we have a conversation at the relic room yesterday about your amendment and the concept of your amendment? >> we did. we were very honest about it. >> and did we reach consensus pretty much yesterday what what you are trying to do is a very good thing and that we supported that? >> that was my feeling from you, yes, ma'am. >> did we also say to you, though, that because we are co

your team has done a great job of gaining the minutia with a major picture.he fed right now? do they have a vision? alan: i think they have a vision of where the data will go which will lead them to the point of tightening this year. it's very data dependent. a couple of weak employment reports, that changes the picture. tom: will we stay measured 18 months from now. we remember mr. greenspan. are we going to do it again? alan: i think the new word is gradual. i think if you look at what janet yellen has said in the past -- brendan: there was a time when we thought she might do an experimental pop up and see what happened. now we're looking at a staircase? alan: i think you act. you see how the markets responding you get the feedback from the markets in terms of what bonds and equity does. as long as it doesn't tighten financial things too much, you can tighten again. brendan: should they also be pricing in some kind of collapse or downturn? alan: it would not be a central forecast. the chinese have numerous weapons. there is clearly a meltdown. that is one o

they understand the minutiae of a lot of issues. so you have fox on the one hand, hedgehawks. hedgehawks know bat few very, very important things, profoundly important things. so i put, for example, ronald reagan as a hedge hog. he was not a technocrat, not a detailed guy. but he understood human freedom he understood human schooling blown it okay. to -- human psychology when it came to freedom and that made the difference for the worldand type of leader has was. >> host: on sunday, august 2nd become tv is live with the cofounder of the political advocacy group code pink on "in depth," our live monthly call-in show. she is the author of nine books clegg "investigation into the use of drones for military purposes," "drone warfare. "other titles include" the growning of he revolution "and" stop the next war now how to crete political change through activism. other books cover topics such as how to aid people living in the third world profiles of women; live on booktv, sunday, august 2nd on "in depth." you can send your questions or comments to facebook.com/booktv, on twit ex,@bo

you had time to dive into the minutia of the report.ike the bank of american press report, this needs translation. ed: the main take away is the way this company is going to be managed. tom: it is about egos. ed: all egos. this is played a ridiculously over the last month. the companies have been talking for a year. a month ago they announced that we have agreed that we can basically do a deal. today's price is a bump of $4.00 a share. very little. they had agreed that was not huge amount of overlap. the antitrust is overcome able. they could not agree who would run the company. joe sewedish, the anthem chief executive says that i want to do those jobs. they have come to a happy medium. mike: here is the question i have. you have got anthem and cigna at night and humana. we have gone from five companies to three. the hhs folks were already concerned about how much these companies were going to raise premiums. what does this mean for americans? are premiums going to skyrocket? ed: if it goes through, that is possibly the case. the doj ha

stephen short writing about the minutia of pipelines full every barrel is in the united states.er hughes oil rig/by 60% however, despite this purge, u.s. production peak at the highest level in april 9.7 whatever barrels, whatever million, bazillion barrels. the eighth highest level ever. we need to speak with the next word, francisco blanch with us from bank of america merrill lynch. the chart is stunning, and i think it is a chart most americans do not know. it is a moonshot of oil production, and it has not turned around, has it? francisco: no, it continues to go up. it has kind of flattened out in the last weeks. we were around 9.6 million barrels a day. we will go lower, however, by the end of the year, we will be closer to 9 million barrels a day. tom: everyone is talking $65, $70, with the new rollover -- francisco: remember, right now we are seeing the decline because just last weekend was the peak of the season for gasoline. as you hit that july 4 weekend the amount rolls over, typically prices do rollover right? we also have the iran deal, we have the greek story we ha

>> the best thing the media can do is not get overly focused on the minutia of the market. ..nt that people can understand. when we get caught up in the details of puts and calls and options and daytrading and things that we really don't need in order to achieve financial security, the media might be trying to garner additional ratings, i don't think we're doing people a great service. >> andy, let me turn to you. i want to say thank you to be okay and merrill lynch because they've been incredibly helpful partners in our efforts moving forward and you have been an industry leader and want to thank brian moynihan and also ceo of merrill as well who i've met personally for your work on these issues. you've really been very very helpful. you mentioned about longevity, and so did vicki. my memory serves serves me, the of his been doing a fair amount of work with usc longevity center. can you tell us what you've learned from the work that you're doing regarding the evolving needs of the population that is living longer and what that means for financial security and what proactive s

>> i think the best thing the media can do is to not get overly focused on the minutia of the market.ed to do over and over and over again to achieve financial security are relatively simple. all right? we have to have basic emergency cushions. i'm not talking about the three to six-month kind i'm talking about a couple thousand dollars that can prevent you from sinking into credit card debt, or prevent you from pulling money out of your 401(k). we've got to get into retirement accounts, whether they're 401(k)s, mrias, and we have to stay in them for years and years and years and years. and we have to be invested which means we've got to be defaulted into a target date fund. or to some other low-cost, relatively simple investment that people can understand. when we get caught up in the details of puts and calls and options and day trading, and things that we really don't need in order to achieve financial security, the media might be trying to garner additional ratings. but i don't think we're doing people a great service. >> thank you. andy, let me turn to you. at the outset i want t

. >> this is more minutia. but if someone voted for this amendment, that doesn't necessarily mean they have to vote fort bill at the end. it could stand on its own. it is doing something for both sides, both parties. would you agree with that? >> that's my hope. that's my hope. >> all right. thank you srefplt very much. >> recognized for a question. >> thank you, mr. speaker. mr. quinn let me, if i may, just ask you a couple of questions based on on your amendment. and thank you for allowing the tour yesterday. >> i appreciate your time doing it. >> sir? >> i appreciate you giving the time. >> yes, sir. >> i know we're all busy. >> did we have a conversation at the relic room yesterday about your amendment and the concept of your amendment? >> we did. we were very honest about it. >> and did we reach consensus pretty much yesterday what what you are trying to do is a very good thing and that we supported that? >> that was my feeling from you, yes, ma'am. >> did we also say to you, though, that because we are co

i do not think a president should be made -- making decisions in the minutia of handling a crime scene. the issue is, what is appropriate to get some level of control of a situation? in some cases, frankly, when it looks like a war, you need the police to be equipped for what is, in essence, a war. you do not want them underprepared, understaffed, underequipped. i would always say the decision needs to be what is necessary. what is the most significant level of force necessary for the police to get control in a short a time as possible? there will be times where it requires a military presence. if people are burning down stores and throwing molotov cocktails and shooting guns police officers better be as well-equipped as rioters and the people burning down the city. one thing i am currents -- concerned about is when federal agencies develop their own swat teams at every level. even the federal trade commission with a swat team. i call attention to what happened at the gibson guitar company in nashville. i know the ceo and i know what happened. they were accusing the federal trade commi

they understand the minutia of a lot of issues. so you have fox on the one hand, the hem hoggs on the other. hedge hoggs are people who know about a few very, very important things profoundly important things. so i would put, for example ronald reagan as a hedge hog. he was not a technocrat, not a detailed guy but he understood human freedom he understood human schooling when it came to freedom and that made all the difference for the world and the type of leader he was. >> host: one significant moment in his second term was his meeting with mick kell gorbachev in like vic. >> guest: the meeting was to come to an arms controlled agreement. possibly seeking the elimination of nuclear weapons which had been a concern of ronald reagan's for a while. a lot of people fail to recognize he had profound moral concerns about nuclear weapons so he was prepared to potentially come to some sort of agreement on the eventual limits limits and elimination of nuclear weapons. the problem is that gorbachev's real going was to end the u.s. strategic

they understand the minutiae of a lot of issues so you have foxes on the one hand, hedgehogs on the other. hedgehogs are people who know about few very important things profoundly important things so i would put for example ronald reagan as a hedge hog. he was not a technocrat, was not a detail guy but he understood human freedom, he understood human psychology when it came to freedom and i think that made the difference for the world's and the type of leader he was. >> what significant moment, his meeting with mchale gorbachev, he walked away from that meeting why? >> guest: he walked away from that meeting because the meeting is sensibly was to come to an arms control agreement, possibly seeking the elimination of nuclear weapons which had been a concern of ronald reagan's for a while. a lot of people who understandably see him as very hawkish failed to recognize he had profound moral concerns about nuclear weapons. he was prepared to potential in come to some sort of agreement on the eventual limits and elimination of nuclear weapons. the problem is mchale gorbachev adds real goal at r

about a lot of things that you can look at somebody like richard nixon and say they understand the minutia of a lot of issues is that you have the foxes and the one hand, hedgehog on the other created they are people who know about a few very profoundly important things, so i would put ronald reagan as a hedgehog. he wasn't a technocrat or detailed guide that he understood human freedom is human psychology and i think i made all the difference in the world into the type of leader that he was. >> host: one significant moment was his meeting with mikael gorbachev in reckoning and he walked away from that meeting. why? >> guest: he walked away from the meeting because ostensibly it was to come to an arms control agreement. possibly seeking the nuclear weapons which had been a concern of ronald reagan for a while. a lot of people who understandably see him as very hawkish failed to recognize that he had concerns about nuclear weapons and said he was prepared to potentially come to some sort of an agreement on the eventual limits and elimination of nuclear weapons. the problem is that the mikae