>> obscure fictional minutia that nerds can argue endlessly about online.a-- no matter your race or qeed you're all equally wrong about the thrust speed of an x-34. >> trevor: calm down, you're getting really upset. >> i'm a sci-fi nerd. we're always upset. normally it's about blasters and whether costumes should have nipples on them. >> trevor: i think that's fairly obvious. you always go with nipples. >> always go with the nipples, yeah. >> trevor: anyway, jordan, culturally this is now an issue and a lot of people say you can't have a black storm trooper. >> that's ridiculous. they were cloned originally, so while it might not initially make sense, the emperor began recruiting a variety of ethnic temp plates. it's cloneically fine. >> trevor: i didn't understand any of that. but is it fine ethically? >> to cast a black person? yes. science fiction is powerful because it envision aid future for all of us, an allegory of the people we can become that en compasses a multitude of voices and perspectives. >> trevor: that's a really beautiful thought, jordan.

think that bringing in yet another set of folks who need to be brought up to speed and understand the minutia of what we need to delay this process even more. i'm just putting it out there, i just really don't see the need for it. what i do see the need for is for folks to just, you know, keep through -- i am actually very convinced kupb byron by ron tom. you've only been at it a year and you need to keep going. i think there is a possibility that we're going to need more resources and i'm actually pretty comfortable with that. i think weighing the risks versus the investment, bringing us up to 21st century technology, it's a risk we have to take. sorry, guys, i don't think we should be either pausing nor bringing in a third party, i think we need to keep going. i am swayed also by the consultants who have advised us to be a little tighter on our testing systems to make sure that people who are testing different components, put a box around it, does this meet the requirements, yes/no, i mean i do think that we could get tighter on the management of the testing of the project. but we should ju

has spent many years diving into not only the this ise minutia -- exxon in his report this morning.ut also what they are doing within the dynamic of upstream and downstream. we are caught midstream with peter pulikkan with bloomberg intelligence. downstream is where all the glory is right now. you and i know that always ends in tears. are we going to have overproduction, a screwup in refineries again? peter: there is definitely a possibility for that. the refining business has been bolstering all of these businesses. will really see pain is in the upstream business. that is where these companies have a massive funding gap. for several years their operational fences and cap -- their operational expenses and capex have been more than their balance flow. tom: where is exxon, down to the littlest guy you know, going to adjust their balance sheet? peter: march of -- what happens with the bike refinancing from the rollovers? -- the bank refinancing from the rollovers? they have great assets in terms of reserves, and a lot of these loans are based on reserve-based lending. the smaller play

if there's anything that should jump at you, and we'll get to the minutia in a minute, is that the ten-yeary market is definitely compressing. it soochlsz as though in our rear view mirror we leave the 4 hers trade or higher, the 3% trade or higher. what we find we can go back to the end of 2008 and come back with five moves that will help us have a clue as to the sixth and seventh moves. the first major top on that chart you looked at was basically a double top at 4%. now i'm rounding off. a couple of basis points. june of 2009 and april of 2010 basically we hit 4%. when was the next top? september and january. september of 13, january of 14. where of the top there? 3%. it compressed. lower highs. when was the most recent top? well, it was june of this year at 2.5%. once again. fudging a couple of basis points. we went from four, three, to two and a half. not's lo at the bottoms. first major bottom was july of 2012. we should all remember that. it's historic. lowest closing yield at least in modern trading times, when was the next one? well, it was this year. 164. a very significant level.

they're so divorced generally from specific issues and minutia we get involved in. really need to swing that bat really for the stands and try to get everybody into the fold that we can and that's how you build lasting majorities and that's what we need to do on the state level. >> awesome. >> i want to address the same issue from a more tact kl perspective. in o orr, one of the things we did in our house races, i went to individual donors in the tech world and said will you invest in us testing this tool. will you give us the money to do pandora targeting and then collect data on it and figure out whether or not it works. because for young people, women, targeted voters, the ability to know what work, you have to direct the data and be disciplined enough to have a data driven campaign. we have a large tech community near portland and so, going to some of those folks who really believe e in data general ly wa really helpful because we weren't taking money out of traditional mail and calling and all of that. so, it was much easier when you had earmarked dollars to sa

political institutions to the ecb, the bank of england, to the fed -- two they have to react to the minutiaby moment? hans: the exchange rates are in the context of what boosts for central banks. it is clear to me that the fed -- then it is about the deflation risk for the central bank. inflation rates are coming down. the deflation risk in europe -- the central bank, what is going to be the outcome on their plates for the next few months? we should not forget that in the next few months you will have significant bass effects kicking in at the euro. the inflation rate is going to move higher. noticed that european , holdings were rising strongly in the fourth quarter and the first quarter of this year. holdingseuropean banks , it is not accelerating as much as it should be to do business with euro weakness. that is the reason the euro goes up. the inability of european export capital. what does the ecb need to do? do they need to expand stimulus now to make sure that euro does not go too high? i was at a press conference in was sayingr. draghi once again they have two left that they can sti

trying to reach down from washington and dictate to every local department how they should handle the minutia of record-keeping. we are stressing to them these records must be capped. a lot of times it is a resource issue. the average size of a police department in this country is 55 people. a lot of them are very small. you minister pala these are challenge -- municipalities or challenge. it is a very important tool for tracking interactions. we encourage it. we are looking to encourage consistency of standards. you can get information from one department but if you can't match it up or married to other information it may not give you a true picture. the real issues here, statistics are important but the real issues are what steps are we all taking to connect communities that often feel this in franchise and disaffected with the police and government? >> the rising crime rate. we have seen it here, a select number of cities here. milwaukee, 76%. murder rates. baltimore, 56%. have you found a trend yet? i know you are doing a summit in .week in is something happening out there? ms. lynch: eve

tothis job stay, we need bring your perspective not only on the minutia of market reaction, but just the state of the american economy. there is no one better to speak to than the former chairman of president obama's council of economic advisers alan krueger. he joins us from princeton. professor krueger, you and i talked about two americas before. are you seeing jobs formation for those that have been left behind? are the people that have suffered for seven years, are they even doing better now? prof. krueger: they are doing better but certainly not well enough. we are continuing to see polarization of the workforce. job growth at the bottom and at the top, but not so much in the middle. i think what we need in the near term is a stronger economy overall to help lift wages. in the longer term i think we need to have more of a balance in favor of workers. tom: the money question, alan krueger, is we have wonderful second quarter 6% plus nominal gdp. then all of a sudden now we are worried about exports. can we run an academy -- an economy with a diminished trade economy or is that of

reevaluation in the hands of someone who certainly has a record of -- i would say not dealing with the minutiae of dealing with a governmental agency and although he is very passionate about saving the historic fabric and everything else the project was pretty well booted by his application that was not really listened to by the staff, and i know the staff is inundated with all sorts of requests and projects, but so i request that -- and you have already heard it today. we were hoping to get a continuance so that we could fix the difficulties in the application, et cetera, so thank you. >> thank you. jackie [inaudible] >> good afternoon commissioners. my name is jackie braver of dm development san francisco. we're the property owners, and san francisco bay's project sponsors for the fully entitled redevelopment of 815-825 tennessee street and acquired the property in 2015 and in the letter of support the dna supported the redevelopment plan for this property. we have shared that letter as an exhibit in the staff report and to the commissioners. on september 18, 2014 the cpe was published and ap

sometimes we here on capitol hill get lost in the minutia.country overwhelmingly supports some form of immigration reform, you would look to a guy like paul ryan who just came off a vp loss in 2012. working with luis gutierrez, a very prominent latino immigration activist within the democratic caucus in 2013 is probably something that's good for the country. right? the country wants both sides to work together. however, when it comes to the politics of the house gop conference, specifically the house freedom caucus, nothing could be worse for paul ryan than to be seen in the pbs frontline documentary last night with luis gutierrez. nothing could be worse than having a harry reid endorsement yesterday from the united states senate. that is the current reality of washington. but also the current reality of the house gop conference for their far right, is that even if you're too friendly with democrats, you may not be able to be trusted and we just don't know what you're going to do. that is what the litmus test is right now and that is why paul

they are so divorced generally from specific issues and the minutia that we get engaged in and we really need to swing that back really for the stands and try to get everyone into the fold. that tell you build lasting majorities. >> i went to address the same issue. in oregon, one of the things we did in our house races was i went to individual donors and said will you invest in us testing this tool, so will you give us the money to do pandora targeting ended in collect data on it and figure out whether or not it works because for young people, women, targeted of voters, the ability to know what works, you have to collect the data and then be disciplined enough to have a data driven campaign. so, we have a large tech community near portland, so going to some of those folks who really believe in data generally was really helpful because then we weren't also taking money out of traditional male and calling in all that and so it was much easier when you had earmarked dollars to sow would love to put this in your mail program, but the donor once it to go into targeted new media. >> you could

they're so divorced generally from specific issues and minutia that we get engaged in. we need to swing that bat really for the stands and try to get everybody into the fold that we can and that's how you build lasting majorities. that's what we need to do on the state level. >> awesome. >> so i want to address the same issue. from a much more tactical perspective. in oregon one of the things we did in our house races is i went to individual donors in the tech world and said, will you invest in us testing this tool? so will you give us the money to do pandora targeting and then collect data on it and figure out whether or not it works? because for young people, women, targeted voters, the ability to know what works you have to collect the data and then be disciplined enough to have a data driven campaign. so we -- you know, we have a large tech community near portland, so going to some of those folks who really believe in data generally was really helpful. because then we weren't also taking money out of traditional mail and calling and that. it was much easier to say i

reevaluation in the hands of someone who certainly has a record of -- i would say not dealing with the minutiae of dealing with a governmental agency and although he is very passionate about saving the historic fabric and everything else the project was pretty well booted by his application that was not really listened to by the staff, and i know the staff is inundated with all sorts of requests and projects, but so i request that -- and you have already heard it today. we were hoping to get a continuance so that we could fix the difficulties in the application, et cetera, so thank you. >> thank you. jackie [inaudible] >> good afternoon commissioners. my name is jackie braver of dm development san francisco. we're the property owners, and san francisco bay's project sponsors for the fully entitled redevelopment of 815-825 tennessee street and acquired the property in 2015 and in the letter of support the dna supported the redevelopment plan for this property. we have shared that letter as an exhibit in the staff report and to the commissioners. on september 18, 2014 the cpe was published and ap

reevaluation in the hands of someone who certainly has a record of -- i would say not dealing with the minutiae of dealing with a governmental agency and although he is very passionate about saving the historic fabric and everything else the project was pretty well booted by his application that was not really listened to by the staff, and i know the staff is inundated with all sorts of requests and projects, but so i request that -- and you have already heard it today. we were hoping to get a continuance so that we could fix the difficulties in the application, et cetera, so thank you. >> thank you. jackie [inaudible] >> good afternoon commissioners. my name is jackie braver of dm development san francisco. we're the property owners, and san francisco bay's project sponsors for the fully entitled redevelopment of 815-825 tennessee street and acquired the property in 2015 and in the letter of support the dna supported the redevelopment plan for this property. we have shared that letter as an exhibit in the staff report and to the commissioners. on september 18, 2014 the cpe was published and ap

reevaluation in the hands of someone who certainly has a record of -- i would say not dealing with the minutiae of dealing with a governmental agency and although he is very passionate about saving the historic fabric and everything else the project was pretty well booted by his application that was not really listened to by the staff, and i know the staff is inundated with all sorts of requests and projects, but so i request that -- and you have already heard it today. we were hoping to get a continuance so that we could fix the difficulties in the application, et cetera, so thank you. >> thank you. jackie [inaudible] >> good afternoon commissioners. my name is jackie braver of dm development san francisco. we're the property owners, and san francisco bay's project sponsors for the fully entitled redevelopment of 815-825 tennessee street and acquired the property in 2015 and in the letter of support the dna supported the redevelopment plan for this property. we have shared that letter as an exhibit in the staff report and to the commissioners. on september 18, 2014 the cpe was published and ap

think that bringing in yet another set of folks who need to be brought up to speed and understand the minutia of what we need to delay this process even more. i'm just putting it out there, i just really don't see the need for it. what i do see the need for is for folks to just, you know, keep through -- i am actually very convinced kupb byron by ron tom. you've only been at it a year and you need to keep going. i think there is a possibility that we're going to need more resources and i'm actually pretty comfortable with that. i think weighing the risks versus the investment, bringing us up to 21st century technology, it's a risk we have to take. sorry, guys, i don't think we should be either pausing nor bringing in a third party, i think we need to keep going. i am swayed also by the consultants who have advised us to be a little tighter on our testing systems to make sure that people who are testing different components, put a box around it, does this meet the requirements, yes/no, i mean i do think that we could get tighter on the management of the testing of the project. but we should ju