. >> if deputy city attorney mirena burns. if i can clarify one of the amendments that was discussed regarding the temporary uses i believe the intent not if there is a temporary use not to replace that but rather than let's say a site with pdr use it is vacate for a year and a temporary imply pop up the idea then the next permit uses proposed will still have to replace the pdr use if it intends to demolish the building so the temporary use in between wouldn't wipe the slate clean that is the intent as i understand it. >> thank you for your clarification. >> okay all right. supervisor cowen >> thank you very much good afternoon, everyone so last time we heard in committee you heard from me i had several concerns i want to thank the folks for speaking take into consideration i want to talk about the amendments proposed sforp the removal of the m category i'm in support of as i said, i didn't see a reason m would be included and now we've scaled back the scope of the measure any reference in zoning a requirement so thank you for

. >> if deputy city attorney mirena burns. if i can clarify one of the amendments that was discussed regarding the temporary uses i believe the intent not if there is a temporary use not to replace that but rather than let's say a site with pdr use it is vacate for a year and a temporary imply pop up the idea then the next permit uses proposed will still have to replace the pdr use if it intends to demolish the building so the temporary use in between wouldn't wipe the slate clean that is the intent as i understand it. >> thank you for your clarification. >> okay all right. supervisor cowen >> thank you very much good afternoon, everyone so last time we heard in committee you heard from me i had several concerns i want to thank the folks for speaking take into consideration i want to talk about the amendments proposed sforp the removal of the m category i'm in support of as i said, i didn't see a reason m would be included and now we've scaled back the scope of the measure any reference in zoning a requirement so thank you for

. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. don't know the specifics of that but the suicide is whether or not indians the building need a new civil right of occupancy it is made pits the department of building inspection and then when the rent board considered something to rent control that's what we look at it is really that question fails more in the jurisdiction of the department of building inspection and the rent board. >> thank you mr. lindsey do you thinks whether or not the new project is a alteration of the building code demolition. >> exemplary david lindsey department staff it is an alteration permitted through the department of building inspection. >> great so. >> from the section 317 the planning department considers it to be demolition. >> your understanding the the state rent stabilization the building the result of the building permit that - >> the certificate of appropriateness. >> an alteration didn't require a new one so my issue you know, i read this at the grinning of the hearing there are 3 issues loss of

. >> i'll hand that to mirena burns to talk about the ceqa law deputy city attorney mirena burns.he standard that ceqa requires you to look at when our gotten to the step of doing an eir is whether this is substantial evidence in the record to support the planning commission and now this board commission with regards to the experts even if constitutional evidence in the record to support the conclusion that as resource as long as substantial evidence in the record to support the planning commission conclusion that the property is not a holistic resource than the board what rely on that. >> okay thank you, ms. burns i have another question about the cumulative impacts naive experienced an unprecedented level of development can you walk us through the number of units that was crawford where we are in terms of approving the projects and the follow-up question the crux of the agreements they have we hit the threshold in the eastern neighborhoods eir. >> through the chair wade planning department first, i'm. >>. i'm sorry. >> can you repeat our name and position >> wade senior planner

. >> if deputy city attorney mirena burns. if i can clarify one of the amendments that was discussed regarding the temporary uses i believe the intent not if there is a temporary use not to replace that but rather than let's say a site with pdr use it is vacate for a year and a temporary imply pop up the idea then the next permit uses proposed will still have to replace the pdr use if it intends to demolish the building so the temporary use in between wouldn't wipe the slate clean that is the intent as i understand it. >> thank you for your clarification. >> okay all right. supervisor cowen >> thank you very much good afternoon, everyone so last time we heard in committee you heard from me i had several concerns i want to thank the folks for speaking take into consideration i want to talk about the amendments proposed sforp the removal of the m category i'm in support of as i said, i didn't see a reason m would be included and now we've scaled back the scope of the measure any reference in zoning a requirement so thank you for

. >> i'll hand that to mirena burns to talk about the ceqa law deputy city attorney mirena burns.he standard that ceqa requires you to look at when our gotten to the step of doing an eir is whether this is substantial evidence in the record to support the planning commission and now this board commission with regards to the experts even if constitutional evidence in the record to support the conclusion that as resource as long as substantial evidence in the record to support the planning commission conclusion that the property is not a holistic resource than the board what rely on that. >> okay thank you, ms. burns i have another question about the cumulative impacts naive experienced an unprecedented level of development can you walk us through the number of units that was crawford where we are in terms of approving the projects and the follow-up question the crux of the agreements they have we hit the threshold in the eastern neighborhoods eir. >> through the chair wade planning department first, i'm. >>. i'm sorry. >> can you repeat our name and position >> wade senior planner

. >> if deputy city attorney mirena burns. if i can clarify one of the amendments that was discussed regarding the temporary uses i believe the intent not if there is a temporary use not to replace that but rather than let's say a site with pdr use it is vacate for a year and a temporary imply pop up the idea then the next permit uses proposed will still have to replace the pdr use if it intends to demolish the building so the temporary use in between wouldn't wipe the slate clean that is the intent as i understand it. >> thank you for your clarification. >> okay all right. supervisor cowen >> thank you very much good afternoon, everyone so last time we heard in committee you heard from me i had several concerns i want to thank the folks for speaking take into consideration i want to talk about the amendments proposed sforp the removal of the m category i'm in support of as i said, i didn't see a reason m would be included and now we've scaled back the scope of the measure any reference in zoning a requirement so thank you for

mirena burns any other business before us today >> madam president that collects the agenda for toengs and10:305 thank you we're adjourned and happy birthday supervisor yee all right. on 5 2, 1 you innovation on or was on over 200 years they went through extensive innovations to the existing green new metal gates were installed our the perimeter 9 project is funded inform there are no 9 community opportunity and our capital improvement plan to the 2008 clean and safe neighborhood it allows the residents and park advocates like san franciscans to make the matching of the few minutes through the philanthropic dungeons and finished and finally able to pull on play on the number one green a celebration on october 7, 1901, a skoovlt for the st. anthony's formed a club and john then the superintendent the golden gate park laid out the bowling green are here sharing meditates a permanent green now and then was opened in 1902 during the course the 1906 san francisco earthquake that citywide much the city the greens were left that with an ellen surface and not readers necessarily 1911 it had th

. >> doorstop mirena burns through the president i think i want to address one point and more directly the pot about the land value the first point i want to address is that the alternatives feasibility studies way part of the planning commission decision making around approving the project the ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where you're looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. >> maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. >> the board is looking at the reasonable range of feasible alternatives to the projects under consideration like the project approval decision maker was the planning commission had enough options to look at it and the eir actually did not reject any of the

. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. the litigation is not relevant to the approval actions before you today i'll recommend that the commission just move forward with not an approval action sorry it is an in violation of those planning code amendments i'll recommend you move forward with the planning code initiation for the calendar for today and if the commission is interested in an update on the pending litigation we can certainly work with staff to have a closed session. >> i agree and more general are terms everyone is asking for mitigation of housing units lost or presumably lost when the academy of art university changed them from what is presented as residential units into student housing without permitted and the laws were different in those days but a process that should have gone forgot even then so i think the important thing that we have to somehow quantity this number it is a little bit vague when from what i understand the amendments before us deal with one and 60 units that includes the 3 units that staff

. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns i think under supervisor peskin proposed legislation which will be before you on your calendar later no, no, no. >> this is regarding the policy statement for the city oh, i'm sorry. >> i think the way both versions read if i'm not mistaken they're requesting that the legislation not allow the use of streamline program onsite right. >> supervisor peskin is. >> only supervisor peskin okay. so if it there's existing hours not allowed. >> so on the oosdz not all of the historic conservation buildings are residential so - >> right. >> correct. >> interesting. >> that will definitely effect the historic preservation. >> commissioners there was no board of appeals yesterday which will place us on this item 8 and market street this is an informational presentation to comply with our conditions of approval. >> good afternoon jeff planning department staff for the variance for 12 market street it was approved on the employed figured out planning commission with conditions of approval the approved project for a 7 story mixed use with 62 units the conditions

mirena burns any other business before us today >> madam president that collects the agenda for toengs and 10:305 thank you we're adjourned and happy birthday supervisor yee >> hi everybody, we down here at the /ep is a center which is our pop up space down here in san francisco where we operate a store front to educate the policy from the home owner who has center which is our pop up space down here in san francisco where we operate a store front to educate the policy from the home owner who has never done anything in the house to the most advanced structure engineers we have working around here. we we're going to here from kelly to talk a little bit about san francisco. how are you doing kelly? >> very well, thank you for having us here. >> in front of us, we have a typical soft story building. when i see this, i think this is some of the most beautiful architecture our city has. a lot of people don't know these are problematic buildings. why don't you tell us about some of the risks he we have in these buildings? >> soft stories are vulnerable in past earthquakes and the northridge