in which the same shelters are on the balance sheet, because they went public and they said we like mirne, let him resign and so on, the people who were appointed, they don't like me, first of all, kyivans must decide whether they like it or not , firstly, and secondly, there is a clear mechanism if they don't like the peace, it's an election, and in which they can others by some force to compete and have a representative. and if the representative of the community is, well, they are not taking away the powers from klychka , they are taking away the powers from the communities, and this is the very governance of self-government - this is the key base , it is the foundation of democracy in any democratic country, and this tendency is when local self-government they take away their powers when mayors are suspended for a year on such far-fetched grounds, you know, the mayor of chernihiv for taking a woman and children to communal cars at those moments when the city was surrounded by russians well, suspending for a year is a question. what do you think? this trend can theoretically affect you