in south mississippi. she doesn't have any connections within the community. if you know anything about 19th-century america it's all about your connections and she's writing saying we are literally starving and no one will help me. again this is where 19th-century americans see the governor as someone who's going to be the protector, who will help them. these are the types of letters you will see this one in particular code in books all the time but is not necessarily dissent. this is a desperate woman who needs help. she is desperately pleading for assistance, but you get enough of this, this could be problematic but this is what a mean when i want folks to think through the question of dissent and how problematic it can be. this one i want to share with you all is from may of 1864. this is another case of the woman by the name of sarah. by the way y'all i don't know if we have -- we do. see bush as a mark? she had some coffee today. a little shaky. that's what i meant when you can hear from people from

from north mississippi.en conscription was passed as you can see william t rowland flat upset i would not get conscripted i will not serve the confederacy soo they found a federal unit and they are listed. so the favorite part of my document that it appears in august 1865 because william t rowland by is required to pledge his loyalty to the united states government in writing to theor governor the thing i just fight for the last three years and if yout can read this but please send us information on the subject of what it takes to constitute a loyal citizen from 62 through 65 i served in the calvary. this is what i i mean it is a clear example of the mississippi and from the very beginning originally serving for the confederacy but then chose to resist it.ir he's an example of the firm unionist to take up arms serving the federal cause. by the way you see my note at the top of the screen. the quote you will always here. i told you i was out of practice. it is about 500 white mississippians that the problem w

that case is all about a mississippi law where mississippi passed a law saying at 15 weeks a child in development in the womb can be protected after that time period. it strikes right at the heart of roe v. wade, where in the arbitrary ruling from the supreme court in 1973, they made up a new rule saying when a child is viable. not something that's in law at any spot -- created that out of whole cloth. tomorrow morning the supreme court will reopen that conversation about viability. it's an important discussion for us to be able to have as a nation, and it's vital that we talk about it here as well. as it's being discussed across the street at the supreme court, there are things we should discuss here as well. so for the next few moments there are multiple different senators are going to speak on this one issue. when is a child a child and when should states have the rights to protect their own citizens' lives. the supreme court made that murky and has the option tomorrow to be able to make that clear. this conversation, though, will circle around what should that legal standard be an

they left mississippi.ome of the leaders in mississippi went on to organize in a different way than hammer was organizing. people to plant gardens, grow their own food, raise hogs so they would have meat for the winter time. and health care, she wanted healthcare for everybody. it was not good healthcare and accessing it was very difficult and expensive. she wanted universal preschool for every child. she was struggling for all the issues we are still struggling for that. she understood those basic things in her community could be replicated throughout the country. but her support system really fell away and it is tragic anyway. but a lot of those people went on to do great things in other parts of the country. that left her still in mississippi struggling with that economy, that environment. and it still in the bottom five for healthcare. and for education et cetera in the country so mississippi is still struggling. >> is there a landmark to show her she's from and recognize her? >> yes there is a monument

if roe is overturned and this 15-week ban in mississippi is allowed to go into effect, mississippi will still have a law on the books in which 39 countries -- 39 out of 42 in europe have more restrict irv abortion laws than what i believe to be one of the most conservative states in the united states. 39 countries in europe restrict abortions earlier than 15 weeks. so the reality is that the u.s. abortion laws are not in conformity or not even in the realm of what we see in other parts of the country. when you look at, for instance, abortion laws in california and new york, they are much more similar to those abortion laws in china and north korea than they are to europe or many other countries around the world. >> i want to play something you said about the vaccine mandate and ask you why the same philosophy doesn't apply here. let me play what you said. >> this is a power grab by the federal government. we've seen this time and time again by the biden administration, and now we're seeing their strong desire to try to make decisions on behalf of individual americans. we believe in free

>> so i didn't make it to mississippi because of covid and floods. which is the bad thing about this epidemic, that i had to cancel trips down to mississippi. and that mighty mississippi river flooding didn't help a couple of years ago. so i was not able to go and see that landscape. i watched lots of documentaries and videos online about the environment and, of course, family members of hers and people who knew her that lived there so that i could fill in those gaps. but i did not go, but they all said the same thing. it's still very much a depressed area. >> well, throughout the conversation, we have noted just how much violence that was a part of this history and the story. we've talked about the connections and the relationships that were so important to hamer and tubman. we've talked about exploring activism and the engagement and organizing ways. what kinds of messages can you all, each of you leave the audience as having been inspired by both tubman and hamer in the hopes that people can sort of pick up on that energy, and work to perhaps emul

and davis being from mississippi, and for the lid on that right away. lee said, finally be anymore troops i will have to retreat i can't give these guys up pretty sword sends a pad and happening as long street stays with lee ratably doesn't allow to be with johnson because he didn't look at amazon for his. >> washington dc, i noticed that on senate being appalled at theu mean sherman and johnson. sherman. [inaudible]. when sherman passed away, it was a rainy day and for the funeral and johnston is there uncovered, no hat on in the rain pretty and someone said something like, you should cover yourself and protect yourself a simple sherman would do it for me and i have a lot of respect for each other that really came out of the meaning of the bennett place in the weather twice as for several days. they work through a lot of things political and military they didn't have the authority to do all that they try to work together to end the war and move things forward to get beyond the violence in the unrest in the attention that was still going to linger and i

mississippi has to stand.lp is not coming from california. it is not coming from massachusetts. it has to be you. what are you going to do about it? ut it is struggling to manage your type 2 diabetes knocking you out of your zone? lowering your a1c with once-weekly ozempic® can help you get back in it. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! my zone... lowering my a1c, cv risk, and losing some weight... now, back to the game! ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. st

on the mississippi continues. when mr. on the mississippi continues. continues. hritis. here.creme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme. i've been telling everyone... the secret to great teeth is having healthy gums.o soon. crest advanced gum restore. detoxifies below the gumline... and restores by helping heal gums in as little as 7 days. crest. the #1 toothpaste brand in america. you have always loved vicks vapors. and now you'll really love new vicks' vapostick. it goes on clear and dries quickly. no mess. just the soothing vicks' vapor for the whole family. introducing new vicks vapostick. authorities believe methane gas was the source, and six rescue workers are among the dead. new york's top vaccine regulator approved the pfizer covid vaccine for children ages 5 to 11, this comes as germany battles a surge in covid cases, averaging about 50,000 a day, making europe the epicenter of the pandemic again. european leaders are worried about hospital capacity heading into winter. now

mississippi wants, or asked the court to apply that standard to its 15-week ban.em is that the court has already said, categorically, that 15-week bans are unconstitutional. previability abortion bans are unconstitutional. so there is no need for the court to go into any sort of undue burden analysis. there is no need to look at whether or not abortions are available after a certain weeks gestation in mississippi because, yes, jackson women's health organization does not perform abortions past 16 weeks because they can't because mississippi has made it impossible to. so any idea that a 15-week ban being upheld by the court is going to be a compromise or inure to abortion patients is absolutely false. if we are going to talk about the court siding with mississippi that would mean the court is undoing 50 years of precedent. there is no way to get around that or make it sound better. that's just what the court will have to do in order to uphold this law. >> imani gandy, jessica mason pieklo, we are going to be covering this all week. we appreciate your voices on this

case and they set the arguments for mississippi and the question in mississippi is our all restrictions on fetal viability and constitutional so texas has banned abortion after roughly six weeks. that's the question and six weeks is before viability and we know that 15 weeks is viability in the side from the vigilante stuff about your neighbor can sue your doctor at the heart of the question is can texas restrict access to abortion in this manner? that's a question for the courts to decide. typically when the court has decided something and the question comes up they put that case on hold for an eventual decision to or the first case will be decided so in the normal course what would have happened is in the texas case would have come off and the court would have helped in place that is to say that texas law on the verge of taking effect would not have taken effect that eventually the court would take that case if they felt it was necessary in light of mississippi. the fact that they didn't do that says okay there's an agenda driving a bunch of them. takes only four votes to hear a case

if row is overturned and this 15-week ban in mississippi is allowed to go into effect, mississippi will still have a law on the books in which 39 countries -- 39 out of 42 in europe have more restrictive abortion laws than what i believe to be one of the conservative states in the

you're the first woman attorney general of mississippi. the first republican attorney general in quite some time in mississippi. it my understanding that you raised your family as a single mom, which is hard to do. i believe you have three children. what do you bring from your sperm experience to this fight. >> thank you. it truly has been a challenge as any single mother that is raising children. i was very fortunate. i raised three beautiful children as a single mother. so for me to have the opportunity to step up and empower women and talk about the importance of life and children, it's very humbling and such an honor. >> martha: what would you say to a woman that doesn't share your point of view? she says she believes she has the right over her own body to make that decision and she doesn't want that right to be taken away from her? >> you know, for 50 years, we didn't help those women. we didn't talk about how we could empower them or talk about opportunities. if you look at the statistics now, women are successful. we have been able

he grew up in that mississippi atmosphere. i'm a chicago person. i moved to mississippi. that was my life path to be there with him. we p had a meeting scheduled ani said what am i going to do? i'm not able to come. i'm still standing for his legacy andfo for jerome's legacy because if it had not been for him wanting to do this for his children and for generations of children to understand the plight that got us here today because i've heard so many stories about how african-americans were allowed the women were not allowed to wear lipstick and we could look a white man in the face and all of that. i grew up in chicago and i was always aware of emmett's story because i want to say we but it never died. because of the magazine it never got pushed back. so it's important that the world saw what happened to mamie till's child. it is a kinship to her, emmett's mother and the legacy that she showed is something that many of us tune into and support. some days it gets a little hard and from that i will move on. i just wanted to give you guys a little peak into how we got here t

rob mcduff with the mississippi center for justice argues the u.s.nd reaffirmed that states cannot ban abortions prior to a fetus is viability. >> which is around 24 weeks. you shouldn't be able to go back and over turned settles. lights. >> simply because the composition of the supreme court is change. but that's exactly what anti-abortion advocates want. >> and expect the court's new 6, 3 conservative majority to overturn roe v wade. we have an opportunity say millions and millions of lives in the future. if this is to be ruled favorably. mississippi governor tate reeves shepherded the law in question through the state legislature and fellow republican governors like south dakota's kristi noem support it. we actually got to go out and take actions that offend lives and save lives. the justices are not expected to rule until next summer. >> but if they overturn roe many states, including mississippi and south dakota already have measures in place that would automatically ban abortion in washington. i'm jessi tenure. a jury has been selected in the t

this mississippi law would be enforced by the state of mississippi and is the first time the supremeitutionality of a pre-viability ban since roe v. wade. so, let's talk more about this. joining me to break all this down and what we can expect from those proceedings and the potential fallout is barbara mcquade, msnbc legal analyst and former u.s. attorney in michigan, and joyce vance, msnbc legal analyst and former u.s. attorney as well. the two are co-hosted of the podcast "sisters-in-law." we can think back a couple of months ago to sb-8, it's been about three months or so since sb-8 took effect and when we were having the conversation then, we kept talking about mississippi and saying, is this just a forecast of what is to come? so, i ask you that question again now when we're just three days away from this being heard in the supreme court. was that a forecast to what is to come on wednesday? >> i think it was a forecast of what may come, and we may see something far worse than what we're seeing there. you know, in the oral argument in the sb-8 case, i think we heard some skeptici

down in alabama which was part of the mississippi territory into mississippi, west tennessee where the chickasaws had control of that land. treaty after treaty was signed with the various tribes reserving this piece of land or this piece of land for these tribes. again and again, land hungry settlers came and put themselves there and staked their claim in spite of the fact it was on land reserved for native americans. once the cotton gin gets introduced here you are suddenly going to see land hungry people coming. that intensifies when tennessee becomes a state in 1796 and people are still coming and so they are pushing all the way down to the tennessee alabama border by 1810. imagine this. if you go west from here you will get to the tennessee river but one of the tributaries over there a little itself of where waverley is, one of the tributaries over there is the duck river and a group of settlers had gone over there and planted themselves and were there within the creeks, decided to attack. the creeks attacked the settlement, kill a lot of people, take martha crowley is a hostage th

if they uphold the mississippi law, roe v.is, what do you think the justices will do on the mississippi case? >> i think based on what we know of the history of these new trump appointees to the court and, of course, justice alito and justice thomas, it's very likely that they'll take a hostile position to roe v. wade and find a way to uphold this mississippi law even if that means that they will hold the structure of roe in place. i think essentially they'll be gutting its viability standard as jeffrey mentioned, and it's very likely that we're going to see an extreme rollback if not a complete rollback of abortion in states where states are hostile to that constitutional right. >> wendy davis, jeff toobin, i appreciate you both being here. thank you. >>> up next, from a pilot venting politically on the p.a. system or a flight attendant punched in the face, a look at the state of what increasingly seems like our distinctly unfriendly skies just in time for the holiday travel season. wooo vaporize sore throat pain with vicks v

mississippi is one of 12 states ready to act almost immediately if roe is overturned.o-called abortion trigger laws that would take effect and ban all abortions. good evening to you. this is a complicated issue but probably one that's important for our viewers to understand, and this issue centers around fetal viability. i want to read a segment from the "new york times" and i want you to help us understand what it means. the court could overturn roe entirely while allowing states to ban abortions at any point, but at least some justices may want to find a way to sustain the mississippi law without overturning roe in so many words, requiring them to discard the viability line and replace it with another standard that would allow a cutoff at 15 weeks. it's a well-written article, but what does that mean? >> it has a lot of legalese in that article. let me make it very simple. for most of our viewers' life times, anyone born in 1973 or later, they had a right to guarantee to an abortion under the united states constitution by a 7-2 decision by the united states supreme c

this is a mississippi law we're talking about.the mississippi governor, tate reeves, just this morning. here is what he said. >> i think that this law can be enacted within a changing confinement of roe v. wade but i also believe that roe v. wade was wrongly decided. i believe in a simple reading of the united states constitution, that when roe was decided in 1973, there is no fundamental right in our united states constitution to an abortion. and furthermore, chuck, i believe very strongly that if you read the constitution, there is nowhere in the constitution that prohibits individual states, states like mississippi, to limit access to abortions. >> he is saying the law can be enacted in a changing environment of roe v. wade. what does that mean to you?well we just heard was premiere legal scholarship because we have a lot of rights as americans that aren't specifically mentioned in the constitution. for instance, the constitution doesn't specifically mention that you have a right to vote. it discusses principles that make it cl

mississippi's republican governor was on "meet the press" sunday. i want to play a little bit of what he had to say. >> i believe in a simple reading of the united states constitution that when roe was decided in 1973, there is no fundamental right in our united states constitution to an abortion and further more, chuck, i believe very strongly that if you read the constitution, there is nowhere in the constitution that prohibits individual states, states like mississippi, to limit access to abortions. >> melissa, what's the other side of this argument about constitutionality? >> well, the governor is correct. the right to an abortion or the right to privacy is nowhere explicitly enumerated in the constitution. neither are other constitutional things like the right to marry, and even though there was a period of time when people would have banned interracial or six marriage, the constitution protects those decisions. it is true, it's not explicitly in there, but there are a lot of things that are constitutionally guaranteed that aren't specifically

there's been so much focus on texas, but the mississippi case is really the guts of roe v.e well in how they took the mississippi kate. >> well, that's right. in the book i spend quite a lot of time talking about whatever -- what must have been a heated internal struggle at the court over what to do with mississippi's appeal. so mississippi seeks to ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, something that's flatly unconstitutional under current law. so the only reason that this new court with three trump justices would have even taken mississippi's appeal was because they have some issue with current law or some change they want to make and we're going to find out how drastic that change is going to be. >> and i should have said does not bode well, the implication there, is for the people who believe that roe v. wade was decided and whatever you think about the philosophical or legal justification for using privacy as the justification for it, that it is, you know, precedent and up until now at least precedent has mattered. >> yeah, we had the right to abortion as a constit

the gentleman from mississippi is recognized. mr. guest: madam speaker, i have no additional speakers and i'm prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from -- from new hampshire. mr. pappas: we have no further speakers and are prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from mississippi is recognized. mr. guest: i have no additional speakers, i'm prepared to close at this time i would ask to be yielded time so i can make final statement. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. guest: in closing, h.r. 1917 benefits communities by allowing them to be eligible for federal disaster mitigation assistance for projects started prior to their request for assistance. i believe that this bill is a good bill and i would urge the support of this bipartisan legislation and would yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. the gentleman from new hampshire is recognized. mr. pappas: i want to thank congresswoman fletcher for her help

on the mississippi continues. on the mississippi continues. no, he's not in his room. ♪♪ ♪♪ dad, why didn't you answer your phone? ♪♪ your mother loved this park. ♪♪ she did. ♪♪ ♪ ♪ cases of anxiety in young adults are rising as experts warn of the effects on well-being caused by the pandemic. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ with xfinity home, you can keep your home and everything in it more protected. i can wrangle all my deliveries. thanks, hoss! and i help walk the dog from wherever. *door unlocks* ♪ ♪ well, i can bust curfew-breakers in an instant. well, you all have xfinity home, with cameras to home security monitored by the pros. *laughs* learn more about home security or get our self-monitored solution starting at just $10 per month. >> reporter: the routine of the house was in a tizzy. with cory sick in bed, it had been up to curtis to get the three oldest kids off to school. now he was back. >> when i arrived home, everything was quiet. i assumed that cory was sleeping, resting. she hadn't slept most of the night. i was

so texas' law and mississippi's law are both in violation of roe v.parenthood versus casey which stated states cannot ban abortion before viability. they're similar in that way. they are two distinct challenges. the mississippi challenge was already pending on the court's calendar before they took up this texas challenge in september. >> let me -- i was about to signal to the control room element two, in the petition filed by the mississippi attorney general lynn fitch, last june, this is what they're arguing. roe and casey are strong. the conclusion that abortion is a constitutional right has no basis in text, structure, history or tradition. because the constitution does not protect a right to abortion, it provides no guidance to courts on how to account for the interests in this context. explain that to me, because i thought that's what roe was all about, there is a constitutional right to abortion. but based on right to privacy. >> that's exactly right. i will note and it is important to remember this, when mississippi first petitioned the court t

officially opening the mississippi river as far as memphis. pope will receive credit that his campaign was a bloodless victory. he would claim 7,000 prisoners, 35 pieces of a field artillery, huge quantities of supplies and ammunition and the total loss for pope's member during the entirety of this campaign was 32 men. he would later report that his own success that he had produced was fro profound satisfaction. so everyone has heaping praise for these rl actions in 1862. and pope will once again rely on what he did following that small victory in missouri in december of 1861. he will utilize the victory and the media coverage to resume his petition to his benefactors in the state of illinois for a regular army promotion. pope will write to those benefactors you will see from the papers and the dispatch that we now have a great success. i think if the governor and yourself would telegraph con at once, he will promptly transfer me as a major general to the regular army. independent of the gratification it will enable me to give my staff increas

henry will appoint pope to the command of the army of mississippi february 30, 1962. he would recall pope from his time with his time in st. louis to give commands and as pope is willing to leave and except he talks with his wife to assure her that she would be okay and so he went. pope would be given command of 25000 men, largest command yet, order to clear obstacles on the mississippi river. commanding officer henrik wants to capitalize on parental recent victories to move federal armies deeper into the confederacy itself, he wants to open the river mississippi river as far as memphis cut off retreats of pope garrison from columbus it will lead to one of pope's most successful actions in campaigns to that time, a movement on new madrid and islands number ten. pope would capture new madrid on march 14 and upon so, his commanding officer would heap praise on this already confident general. he would say i congratulate you and your command on the success which has crowned your toils and exposures if given the fatal blow to rebellion in missouri and proved yourselves wer

basically, mississippi has said we are prohibiting abortions after the 15th week. roe v.en the casey decision in 1992 said no state can impose an undue burden on the right to abortion before viability, which is around 24 weeks. so this 15-week law that mississippi passed and is going to be argued on december 1st, is a clear challenge to roe v. wade. and mississippi has filed a brief with the court saying we think you should simply overturn roe v. wade and allow states to ban abortions, like what we're doing. that case is going to be argued december 1st no matter what. what's somewhat unclear at the moment is the texas case, which limits abortion even more to a six-week approximately of pregnancy, whether there will be a ruling on the merits at the same time, before, after the mississippi case. but the mississippi case is quite clear that that is when the court is going to decide whether roe v. wade is still good law in this country. >> again, as i said, an important moment for this court, what we're seeing today, and those oral arguments coming up in one month today, and

it's coming from mississippi. that state passed a law in 2018 to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, but that law was blocked by the lower courts. the high court will now hear arguments beginning wednesday. supporters say the law is intended to regulate, quote, inhumane procedures, and argued that a fetus is capable of detecting and responding to pain by that point. let's bring in our political analyst for more on this case. larry, nice to have you tonight. what's the difference about this case? why do we need to pay attention here in california? >> raj, it's the first challenge to roe v. wade since 1992, and this one has the possibility of going all the way through. remember, we have got a very different supreme court than we had then. in 1992. so this court's got three new justices, all nominated by president trump, all of them that have ruled one way or another against the roe v. wade case. so you put this -- of course, when they were down further on the appellate level, their three votes together a

thompson of mississippi, i inform the house that mr. thompson will vote yes, he will vote yes on h.r. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: control the gentlewoman from of the gentlewoman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on h.r. 75. 1975. the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 397, the nays are 25 and zero recorded as present. 2/3 being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed. and without objection, the motion toreconsider is laid on the table. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the vote on the motion of the the gentlewoman from from new mexico, ms. leger fernandez to pass the bill h.r. 5221 which the yeas and nays are ordered were ordered. the clerk: h.r. 5221 to establish an urban are indian organization for the department ofhealth and human services. the speaker pro tempore: the question is will the suspend the rules and pass the bill. members will record their votes by electronic device [c

justices will hear arguments about a mississippi abortion law.l and talked about decisions in the court's history. correspondent david spunt reports tonight from the supreme court. >> [chanting] >> nearly half a century after women were granted a constitutional right to an abortion, that right may soon look drastically different. >> i was using birth control responsibly. it failed. so i'm devastated. >> barbara phillips incident went the controversial procedure in mississippi in 1973. the same year roe became the law nationwide. over the years, pro-life groups aggressively tried and almost came close to overturning roe but it never happened. this time, thanks to a 6-3 conservative majority. it may. the nine justice also hear arguments over a mississippi state law banning abortions after 15 weeks. according to roe. abortions are legal up to 24 weeks. when a baby is determined to be able to survive outside the womb. the mississippi case highlights states' rights vs. respect for court precedent. in this case, 48 years of precedent. >> the court is g

it's a 15-week ban on abortions from the state of mississippi. roe v.ight to end a pregnancy before viability. that is at about 22, 24 weeks when the fetus can live on its own outside of the woman. and that's what's at stake now with the 15-week ban. now, jim, you referred to other challenges, and i know you're thinking what is happening in texas where there's a six-week ban on abortion that has been allowed to take effect in that state for the last three months, because the justices have not blocked it. that case is specific to texas. it involves a very complicated procedural issue in that that ban in texas. but what happens in mississippi, the case to be argued this week, could be affect women, all americans, across the country. >> getting so much attention. what's also interesting is everyone looking at the makeup of this court now. as you mentioned, not since 1992 have we seen this challenge. you wrote about this. there's a lot of focus on chief justice john roberts. is there any sense today of where he is likely to come out specifically on both mis

in the state of mississippi it is contributing to this longest, anger about getting vaccinated in the first place, the read from that state's governor after this. ♪♪ my retirement plan with voya keeps me moving forward... even after paying for this. love you, sweetheart they guide me with achievable steps that give me confidence. this is my granddaughter...she's cute like her grandpa. voya doesn't just help me get to retirement... ...they're with me all the way through it. come on, grandpa! later. got grandpa things to do. aw, grandpas are the best! well planned. well invested. well protected. voya. be confident to and through retirement. what's strong with me? i know when i'm ready for a rest day. ...so i can be ready for anything... tomorrow. find out what's strong with you with fitbit sense and daily readiness. your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire this is elodia. she's a recording artist. m 1 of 10

roe v wade under direct attack in a battle over a mississippi law. >> if you read the constitution, there is nowhere in the constitution that prohibits individual states, states like mississippi, to limit access to abortion. >>> in a moment i am going to be talking to nina totenberg and planned parenthood president alex his mcgill johnson about the high court showdown. if that is not enough for one week, donald trump's lawyers will be back in court on tuesday fighting to keep key documents away from the january 6th committee that is increasingly focused on what he knew, and when he knew it. >> among the most important questions that we are investigating is the complete role of the former president. that is, what did he know in advance about the propensity for violence that day? the most -- the broadest category of unknowns are those surrounding the former president. and we are determined to get answers. but at this point, i am not in a position to indicate what we know yet. >> by the way, that shouldn't be the former president's only concern. charges could come at any time from the outgoi