. >>> i would prefer staff language and i think if i'm not missustain, it was objective one 1.5 is that correct? language that makes it quite clear that there is a process already gone gun and that is one that we should be focusing on and while we are improving the shrinkage or down zoning of that area in this plan that we have our eyes forward to that and it doesn't say it's a preferred option and it does talk about it being out there in the future and so i would not be supportive of this particular one, i prefer the other. >> commissioner hillis. >> yeah, i prefer the objective one 1.5 and i don't think it talks about advocating for certain results for had a study and that is why we are studying the central corridor area because it's a rich transit area and we are look to go intense 90 use and is this is not something that we have endorsed the planning department and so yeah, i would support the language department. >>> this commissioner has to the supported the plan formally. >> exactly this is not the plan this is saying that we are planning. we approve the budget that has the mean