in 2008 they became the first to commit to amon mizing wide use of data by stripping away information, which included record of web searches, page view and ad clicks that are used to personalize web content and target online advertising. >>> the volkswagen bug is getting an extreme makeover. volkswagen is taking the raps off the 2012 beetle. it has what the company calls a tougher look rather than the bubble-shaped predecessors. the bug has been a big hit with women in recent years and now the company is trying to appeal to the male drivers. manual version gets estimated 29 miles per gallon on the highway. 22 miles per gallon in the city. it goes on sale this fall. the flower base you were wruzed to that used to be on the dashboard is now gone. in the interest of full disclosure, megan marlena drives a rounded bug with the vase. 6:25 now. still ahead, 6:30 -- muni drivers vote whether to authorize a strike if the upcoming contract talks with the city break down. >>> also, why it's becoming easier to get into university of california if you don't live in california. >> i'm terry mcswee

the individual as well by looking into their office and i'm sure you've all got beautiful winning mize. [laughter] >> thank you. [applause] >> lorna, yet to say i'm your kind of person. i don't devotees took the jeter and i've never twittered and i'm the least technologically proficient person probably in this audience. there is a question from jonathan who is watching the webcast here in washington did to you and if i can read it, so organizations and individuals who identified themselves as pro-israel have supported sanctions against settlement construction stating that it is kind of tough love for israel. you also mentioned red lines. sanctions are red line and if so, how should pro-israel activists who believe the settlements are a part of the problem response? >> i had this coming, didn't i? >> you really did. >> one of the difficulties in responding to the d legitimization is the sophisticated manner in which its challenge to us. it is that brings forward issues where alliances can be built deep into groups that are not legitimizes as well as within israel and this is why a lot o

i can only so mize that the true intent of the hearing is to harm the reputation of aarp, to stifle the voice as we move closer to this debate. if there was a plan to provide real oversight today, we would have a force of an organization who shattered fame type status as aarp, like 60-plus. we would have more organizations, american cross roads gps. they all share the same tax status as aarp. they play a major role in the election. if there was a real plan today, we would have before us, we would have a $2.2 billion a year raise and a casino operating in iowa under the same type of status as the aarp. i find this unreal. it is unbelievable. if oversight was a true goal, we would look at the compensation paid by other tax exempt organizations including those that oppose health care reform like the chamber of commerce and nfib, all paid and more than aarp. based on all of this, i believe that this is no plan for oversight today. we have a single witness, a bias report and to use the committee resources to sell a score. there's nothing other than -- this is nothing other than a political w

i can only so mize that the true intent of the hearing is to harm the reputation of aarp, to stifle the voice as we move closer to this debate. if there was a plan to provide real oversight today, we would have a force of an organization who shattered fame type status as aarp, like 60-plus. we would have more organizations, american cross roads gps. they all share the same tax status as aarp. they play a major role in the election. if there was a real plan today, we would have before us, we would have a $2.2 billion a year raise and a casino operating in iowa under the same type of status as the aarp. i find this unreal. it is unbelievable. if oversight was a true goal, we would look at the compensation paid by other tax exempt organizations including those that oppose health care reform like the chamber of commerce and nfib, all paid and more than aarp. based on all of this, i believe that this is no plan for oversight today. we have a single witness, a bias report and to use the committee resources to sell a score. there's nothing other than -- this is nothing other than a political w

after that, the west, mize and defeated muslims and to find a way they have to choose one of two ways way is to restore the past, so they want to restore the power for the set up empire, and this is what they've established in 1745. the other choice left by egypt by the government known as mohammed fer egypt and muslims according to the western civilization, so there are two different ways modernization and it's destroyed that and 8018. the state's need egypt to survive, so the second would reestablish collapse it when the current state established until he gets his name in 1932. it's a stubbles to egypt in three organizations to teach wahhabi is some under the name because he just hated and becomes it becomes wahhabi and [inaudible] and appointed him as the head of muslim brotherhood in 1928. that means the organization created needs egypt to survive and this gives us -- it is the difference between muslim brothers, it is an organization that has its political agenda and they are considered a make up for the middle east and the people who concentrate about the mess and looking after

the individual as well by looking into their office and i'm sure you've all got beautiful winning mize. [laughter] >> thank you. [applause] >> lorna, yet to say i'm your kind of person. i don't devotees took the jeter and i've never twittered and i'm the least technologically proficient person probably in this audience. there is a question from jonathan who is watching the webcast here in washington did to you and if i can read it, so organizations and individuals who identified themselves as pro-israel have supported sanctions against settlement construction stating that it is kind of tough love for israel. you also mentioned red lines. sanctions are red line and if so, how should pro-israel activists who believe the settlements are a part of the problem response? >> i had this coming, didn't i? >> you really did. >> one of the difficulties in responding to the d legitimization is the sophisticated manner in which its challenge to us. it is that brings forward issues where alliances can be built deep into groups that are not legitimizes as well as within israel and this is why a lot o

the individual as well by looking into their office and i'm sure you've all got beautiful winning mize. [laughter] >> thank you. [applause] >> lorna, yet to say i'm your kind of person. i don't devotees took the jeter and i've never twittered and i'm the least technologically proficient person probably in this audience. there is a question from jonathan who is watching the webcast here in washington did to you and if i can read it, so organizations and individuals who identified themselves as pro-israel have supported sanctions against settlement construction stating that it is kind of tough love for israel. you also mentioned red lines. sanctions are red line and if so, how should pro-israel activists who believe the settlements are a part of the problem response? >> i had this coming, didn't i? >> you really did. >> one of the difficulties in responding to the d legitimization is the sophisticated manner in which its challenge to us. it is that brings forward issues where alliances can be built deep into groups that are not legitimizes as well as within israel and this is why a lot o

i can only so mize that the true intent of the hearing is to harm the reputation of aarp, t stifle the voice as we move closer to this debate. if there was a plan to provide real oversight today, we would have a force of an organization who shattered fame type status as aarp, like 60-plus. we would have more organizations, american cross roads gps. they all share the same tax status as aarp. they play a major role in the election. if there was a real plan today, would have before us, we would have a $2.2 billion a year raise and a casino operating in iowa under the same type of status as the aarp. i find this unreal. it is unbelievable. if oversight was a true goal, we would look at the compensation paid by other tax exempt organizations including those that oppose health care reform like the chamber of commerce and nfib, all paid and more than aarp. based on all of this, i believe that this is no plan for oversight today. we have a single witness, a bias report and to use the committee resources to sell a score. there's nothing other than -- this is nothing other than a political witc

after that, the west, mize and defeated muslims and to find a way they have to choose one of two ways. one way is to restore the past, so they want to restore the power for the set up empire, and this is what they've established in 1745. the other choice left by egypt by the government known as mohammed fer egypt and muslims according to the western civilization, so there are two different ways modernization and it's destroyed that and 8018. the state's need egypt to survive, so the second would reestablish collapse it when the current state established until he gets his name in 1932. it's a stubbles to egypt in three organizations to teach wahhabi is some under the name because he just hated and becomes it becomes wahhabi and [inaudible] and appointed him as the head of muslim brotherhood in 1928. that means the organization created needs egypt to survive and this gives us -- it is the difference between muslim brothers, it is an organization that has its political agenda and they are considered a make up for the middle east and the people who concentrate about the mess and looking a

after that, the west, mize and defeated muslims and to find a way they have to choose one of two ways. one way is to restore the past, so they want to restore the power for the set up empire, and this is what they've established in 1745. the other choice left by egypt by the government known as mohammed fer egypt and muslims according to the western civilization, so there are two different ways modernization and it's destroyed that and 8018. the state's need egypt to survive, so the second would reestablish collapse it when the current state established until he gets his name in 1932. it's a stubbles to egypt in three organizations to teach wahhabi is some under the name because he just hated and becomes it becomes wahhabi and [inaudible] and appointed him as the head of muslim brotherhood in 1928. that means the organization created needs egypt to survive and this gives us -- it is the difference between muslim brothers, it is an organization that has its political agenda and they are considered a make up for the middle east and the people who concentrate about the mess and looking a

after that, the west, mize and defeated muslims and to find a way they have to choose one of two ways. one way is to restore the past, so they want to restore the power for the set up empire, and this is what they've established in 1745. the other choice left by egypt by the government known as mohammed fer egypt and muslims according to the western civilization, so there are two different ways modernization and it's destroyed that and 8018. the state's need egypt to survive, so the second would reestablish collapse it when the current state established until he gets his name in 1932. it's a stubbles to egypt in three organizations to teach wahhabi is some under the name because he just hated and becomes it becomes wahhabi and [inaudible] and appointed him as the head of muslim brotherhood in 1928. that means the organization created needs egypt to survive and this gives us -- it is the difference between muslim brothers, it is an organization that has its political agenda and they are considered a make up for the middle east and the people who concentrate about the mess and looking a