segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694,t cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments f and g are strith

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

. >> i think it is good that it is move frgward with mno and think that should move forward as quickly as possible, but everything else you said isn't acceptable and won't fly so happy to call for a hearing at the board of supervisors. i think it is great you are move frgward with the other phase but you need to-it isn't enough to come and say it is priority in the next few years and make it happen. i need to get a specific plan for how you will fund it and start as close to what you are doing with the other phases as possible. >> sure. she didn't necessarily initiate the process. i directed-i asked for this particular study, so perhaps what i can do is work with supervisor elect roanen to really begin to direct if there is new in-tip money. i don't know how that works. >> i dont think it should wait. i'm sure supervise r roanen elect is happy to work with you and will work with you, but i want to see something specific about this before. >> you mean like next month? >> yeah. i'm happy to call a hearing. i'll introduce a hearing request today at the board of supervisors but this has be

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694, 192. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments

segments f and g including design and construction have been estimated at $454, 019 and mno and $694,92. those project cost include design and construction and for mn and o include near term and long term proposed changes. we do have smp funding identified in mta's cip that are earmarked towards mn and o. >> how did you determine that particular allocation for funding would go to segment mn and o opposed to f and g? >> that is in mta plan and because it is close to thumount needed for mn and o and ready to start moving on those segments we started the process move frgward with those segment squz looking for funding for segments f and g. >> my question is, i understand it is probably easier to go with mn and o because the funding matches the amount orphmoney from mta, but i'm unable to determine which is high priority. which of the two segments is higher priority than the other? >> they have relatively equal prioritys. mn and o that funding is coming out of mta, cit budget and it is road work so it makes sense to use that funding for improvements that we are able to manage. segments f