manufacturing wspapers is a business pursuit as the a huge infrastructure t mntain in ple to physicallyeliver the hard py product on th ongoing sis. >> chaie: will the washington post survive? >> the cnges wilbe painful to make bu whe they make them the end result will probably be more vibrant than tod. >> charlie: and they have to do what to survive and be more vibrant. >> they ve to decide the topics they own. the sear rock model with sports re and mens wear here is over. you i'm sure have a sight to check out fincial news, politics i hope us and sports, people establish invidual relations with the sites deded to t our chip in t particular space. the post a any other tropolitan newspaperan'twn multiple spaces they have to died what th're about and go deep andhat matters mo, i think, tn whether you're distributing news print or on e-mail or mobi device. the point of theatters do you own editial space and can you monitize it. >> charlie: are you? >> yes. >> the first six months are defined if theorld can like you more and they hed george bush so aone could haveome and the couries would

it is a mntain. erere'no doubt about it >> ah.ut she's doingg t t right thing if she wants to arrive at that point in 201,1, liberatedd fromom a of this e eths garbage at they'retttaing her onupup in aalaa.a. >> okayay but t wi h h bberion, julian, what if everyolitician d didided to do this? th g get electct r a rtrtn te a andthen they are nonot, eh nonot much, i'm oo. i'oing to bail out shy of th.. what kind of a fever would thah create in politics? wel, teibib. and i t thi tat youmake a omise when you ru for office that you're r really g goi t to serve ththerm, notumump out en the going gets tough. but, i eaean, i think yourr question i is ghght the oney, becacauslolo at thepoliticians ththatave decidededoo quitndnd thenrurun for president. gary hart in 1988, bill bradley in 2000, bobdodolehen he g the nmination in 1996,oohn ededwas when he dididn run for re-election. l l these guys w waed to run, all of these guys waed to run fopresident. they -- they d dpppped out of office and it didn'n'to them very well and ithink this w wi

when you g giv a pay raisese o f stimulus ononeyis that creating m mntaining a j or simpmply lolow sinessayy t governme gornment. >> conongrsmsm, if you i get atataxut there's n n g guantnte wee going to spend i i the united states. we could put it i i our mattres pend it in xxic the'e'no guarantee. >>david, y yorere not talking t ery reubublin. yoyorere talkiking t toonone wh at should have beeeen about shshinforward infrastructure, d there should b bydetailedaxax credits, you d dn't get the crits unless you do something at creates jj. . >> that's areat point, but congressman, you andnd me of yourur colleagues were claiming that it needed to bee shovel-ready projecects that you just couldn't spenendhe moy,y, becaususththen you cocoul't't t thmoney, which isis setetng yorere cplaining about oday. ou want them to o olyly be shshov-ready, they've got as much in thehe stimulusus bill, didn't they? >> the shovel-readydywashehe democratic side insisist -- and objected to iit, becauseyyoror of engineeeers projects, s se them goioing backoo 1969 did n ququaly for shovel-readady. imine prorojes s