>> starbucks business is great thand they're going to sell a lot of holiday mocha latte, 25% in the nextear. >> gary b., bull or bear? >> i'm bearish on it. >> john? pacquiao was the biggest money fight of all time up 25% in a year. >> jonas? >> bear. >> your prediction? >> the mcrib may not be at your local mcdonald's long because of a change in policy but it's good for other rib sellers like chile's. >> you've never had a mcrib. cavuto on business, take it away. >>> so about that whole document thing and the health care law -- >> if you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. period. >> if u are looking for -- if you want coverage from your doctor, a doctor you've seen in the past and want that, you can look and see if there's alan in which that doctor participates. >> we figured you had no heard some of these bites so we figured, you know, maybe the thousandth time is the charm. welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. somebody call the doctor, that is, if you can find your doctor, because the white house is already backtracking on a major part of its health care law.

the revolutionary guard corps are not american consumers who think if they can't debt a double mocha latte at starbucks they will agree to anything. iran came to the table to get relief in the sanctions. bill: dew agree with rogers that we were get together elite in the population and the pressure is getting tighter? >> no, i don't. if you are trying to build a nuclear weapon and somebody is kick you in the knee every minute wouldn't you want them to stop kick you in the knee? iran had two objectives. continuing its nuclear weapons, and getting relief on sanctions. bill: what's the next step in this? >> i think iran has seen they can drive a wedge between europe and the united states on the sanctions. european countries already engaged in discussions with iran to take advantage of any relaxation of the sanctions. once the regime of the sanctions begins to crumbles, it crumbles quickly. i think iran will try to take advantage of that. i think it will shave around the edges of this agreement. it's poorly written. it has lots of am by fewities -s lots of ambiguities and loopholes. bill: why d