darkness every day no fires shine without moma find that moma home.o sunshine when it's gone only darkness every day i know, i know, i know, i know i know, i know, i know, i note no sunshine without moma ♪ president chiu: other members of the public, line up in the center aisle if you wish to speak on behalf of the appellant. >> this is regarding fire station. i am representing the company at 944 folsom st.. this will help improve the vicinity and will bring hard working groups of firefighters to our community. we are a green building, and use natural air ventilation in our building. we have the administration's tough, marketing, and customer service department constantly using phones with open windows. signs and that our windows would be a hardship for our business. noise is a hardship. we want to know what a negation for the sirens when the fire engines are coming out of the building. thank you for the support. we support the relocation and would like to let everybody know that we are looking forward to the quality community relationships. thank you

planning, we would ask for more time to try to reach an agreement with the representatives of the moma on these issues so we can avoid a further dispute. our concerns relate primarily to three physical impact areas. the first is the visual or aesthetic impact. the eir is deficient, in that it does not fully analyze the visual impact of the project. a clear example of this is that the eir's visual analysis does not consider the final product design. within days of the planning commission action on the eir, the moma released as the magic designs showing a building remarkably different from that considered -- released its schematic designs, showing a building remarkably different from the considered in the eir. you have seen it now and heard all the discussion. whether that design is high quality or not is not an issue for visual impact under ceqa. the issue here is that the actual design of the building that was proposed is quite different from the building that was analyzed in the eir, and thus the eir analysis is inadequate under the law. the final design is new information that was no

we are committed to continuing to work with the moma. as far as timing, it took a full month for the museum to respond to our letter from november 22. o request for additional time is legitimate and called for. thank you for your time. president chiu: colleagues, any question to the appellant or any of the parties involved? seeing none, this hearing is closed. the matter is in the hands of the board. supervisor kim: i know that many of the public comments that came forward or very supportive of the project. i want to add that i am also supportive of the project. i think the expansion of the museum and relocation of the fire department will be of great benefit to our city and the south of market neighborhood. but the question before us is whether the eir in front of us is adequate, accurate, and complete. having listened to both of the arguments and having read the planning department response to the appellant, i believe that we have met our obligation under the eir. while the specific design and mitigation was not included, i believe tha

coming up, the bigger, better, brand new redesign moma. gave >> i have been talking to most people were unaware that they did have a reaction. first, here is what is going on, google has launched an online flight fare finder service. global compares airlines to find the cheapest tickets. if you click on the sticker prices york taken directly to the airlines' web sites. the service was great and i thought it was easy to use. now that global has an online travel service there in direct competition with expedient, hot wire, travelogue city, or bits and price line. those web sites claim that when you a basic search on the google, google clouds its flight fear service hire within the results did the other online travel websites. these online travel sites depend on some traffic coming from generic troubles searches through the google's are sites. there are upset and feel it is unfair that they have been pushed down and a list of results. south says this could turn into a department justice antitrust issues. here at sfo as local travelers about a

president miguel: i recently met with people from san francisco moma and it was very interesting. have been talking to people at north beach regarding grocery stores and have met with the people at the metro theater which may finally come to pass. it seems a distant memory when that was before us. i was also at a public meeting at of waterfront the other day on the playground proposed. they have done an excellent job with it and there is great enthusiasm, particularly from a lot of little kids who recognize all of the play equipment and really liked it. yesterday, one of the noontime forums regarding retail fresh food and trying to get more of it into various areas of san francisco was a very interesting forum. >> thank you, commissioners. we can move for to the directors reports, directors announcements and the review of past week's events at the board of supervisors, board of appeals, and historic preservation commission. >> i just wanted to give you a brief review of my talk in seattle last couple of days i was there at the request of an organization that had been called the ca

in federal prison if they stream a film that is illegal to stream online so in wall street at the moma. they're not actually knocking on people's doors and putting them away for five years if you walk away from your mortgage right you can walk away from your mortgage exactly old jingle mail yes but in the u.s. if you download a film even though it's constitutionally protected under your fair use rights of constitution not that matters in america anymore but you would get attacked legally and subject to a felony that's correct five years in prison so let's look at how this happens in industry that is a fraction of the size of wall street how they get this power how copyright industries come on congress so we all know about hollywood accounting ok this is where no hollywood in film in history perhaps actually three or four have ever ever made profit so they never have to pay taxes and they never have to share with the hollywood talent the any income a profit they make well it turns out hollywood is now actually adopting when it's convenient for them wall street accounting industry lobbyi

where's the moma credit unions very limited they can have its customers because they're only allowed a certain subset of the population in each case so we've been talking to quite a lot of credit unions community banks there are banks out there which is triple triple bottom line banks which aim to fulfil social environmental and other ethical criteria as well as run a reasonably sustainable banking enterprise but at the same time what we are thinking about is how the new so we are talking to banks about being the vehicle for doing something different from the current system not just you know a repetition of something that that is already been done well so in your mind in order for something like that to work or to even exist then what has to happen with our current financial system do you have to get get rid of the big banks as they're set up right now or is this supposed to be something that can compete with them it is something that would compete with them and ideally eventually replace them because it would be better not only because it would represent better values of the kind of