monica childers is confident the audit would have caught any meaningful discrepancy, no matter the cause. >> it could be that an election was hacked, it couldbe the programming, it co thatug in the the eye of the scanner got some dirt on it and so it wasn't scanning as well as it was at the beginning of the process, it doesn't matter. any of those things can be the cause of tabulation error, if that tabulation error is great enough that it would havech ged the outcome, a risk- limiting audit will catch it. >> reporter: but will it? georgia ismong 14 states using a hybrid between paper and electronic voting maines-- touchscreen computers that print marked ballots. and with a computer between voter and ballot, there is no true record of what choices appeared on the screen, or whether what's in the q.r. or barcode read by the tabulating scanner matches the voter's choices. >> if ballot marking devices were used to mark the bulk of t the ballotn we're never going to know what the right outcome is, even a full hand count of the paper isn't going to real that necessarily. that said, it's still