nations suffered seriously, and many were even exterminated as part of the implementation of the monroe doctrinebe perceived as one fragment of the foreign policy strategy of the united states, or it can be viewed in a broader sense, and for this purpose, probably, you just need to find those roots, that base on which the american state was generally built, i will not reveal the secret if i say that the american state is a synthetic artificially created country and state, therefore it was built on some specific laws and postulates, one of these postulates is its uniqueness, this is a state that is paradise on a hill, this state has a natural right, and by the way the founding fathers spoke about this, a natural right to tell other states how to behave on this earth. what are the problems associated with doctrine? we very often perceive that it came from somewhere out of nowhere, that there was such a president monroe, and who suddenly put forward the concept, america for americans. this is not entirely true, well , first of all, let's start with the personality, this is a brilliant diplomat when

secretary of state, john quincy adams, who expected that a decade later it would be called the monroe doctrineould become a textbook example of an attempt to establish a sphere of influence. even before becoming the fifth president of the united states, james monroe distinguished himself as an outstanding statesman an activist and diplomat, he participated in the war of independence and studied law under guidance. thomas jefferson, was governor of virginia. in 1802, jefferson, already as president of the united states, sent monroe to paris to negotiate the acquisition of new orleans from france and west florida from spain. as a result, american diplomats on april 30, 1803, signed an agreement to acquire all of louisiana, which almost doubled the territory of the united states at that time. in the place of that louisiana now. there are 15 us states. during the anglo-american war 1812-1814, when the british captured washington and burned the capitol, mundra ensured the evacuation of the state department archives, preserving the original declaration of independence and many other documents. durin

and the name of this history is the monroe doctrine. and today will take a look at its influence in cuba when view through the lens of american history. 1898 marks the start of the 10 week long spanish american war, which gave us control over the newly acquired colonial territories of puerto rico, guam and the philippines from a latin american perspective. however, this wasn't just about a war between the us and spain. it was more about legal interference from washington in the cuban work independence. the u. s. has established more than 70 military bases in the region with varying degrees of permanence as a threat to the sovereignty and interest of the people of latin america and the caribbean. u. s. military base, as he is known as occupied that 117 square kilometers. are drake for 121 years? the gays, the will of the cuban people. this stands is the colonial remnants of the legitimate military occupation of our country. this started in 1998 after the expansionist intervention during the independence will wage by cubans against the sp

was reborn and became so global, we are now we are faced with the fact that the monroe doctrine is, a concept of the global. naturally, we don’t agree with this and we will fight it, we believe that the world is multifaceted, it is multipolar, it has its own centers of power, therefore, celebrating this bicentenary, in my opinion, american politicians should draw the appropriate conclusions if they are capable of them; judging by the commentary , this ability is not very evident in washington, but europe should think about what place in the current interpretation of the monroe doctrine belongs, in particular, to the european union, which it is obviously beginning to suffer from this, both economically and politically and in a number of other areas, so the monroe doctrine existed, but with this doctrine... munroe in a broad interpretation, of course, must be fought, and the international community is understands by creating associations such as brix, the shanghai organization, strengthening its independent ties within the framework of the commonwealth of independent states, and so on

the monroe doctrine is alive, more about this in 2018. said then-secretary of state rex tiller, callingnt element of foreign policy. when the united states proclaimed the doctrine, it sought to create its own sphere of influence in the western hemisphere, but at that moment it did not have the strength to make such a thing a reality. they rather imitated british policy. the maximum they were able to do was the caribbean, and when the forces appeared to implement the monroe doctrine, the united states became global. so now they apply its principles on a global scale, so you need to be on alert in eurasia. as far as the us presence in the caribbean and central america is concerned, the monroe doctrine is in effect, but there are rising regional powers, such as brazil, whose role is growing. venezuela is another example, and these countries do not accept interference in their internal affairs. we are talking about hybrid wars, all in latin america. agree with the inadmissibility of violating the sovereignty of anyone, this may sound idealistic, but brazil proceeds from this, regarding resp

what would become the monroe doctrine, a coolness started, don't you? and that opposed your pin colonialism in the west and having to spend on $200.00. he is late to latin american countries, all still feeling its impact, as well as he's rachel evans explains. on the $200.00 the anniversary of the monroe . dr. countries in latin america are still feeling the impact of its influence. as venezuela recently passed a referendum on a century old territorial dispute with guy in the borders they were fighting over, were influenced by the us back in 1899. that's in washington. invoke the doctrine passed by the james monroe administration in 18. 23, which opposed european colonialism in the western hemisphere. but as the russian embassy in the us know that it was in about opposing colonialism altogether. but rather about making way for the us to take the lead in influencing the region of this and the, the near colorado, a policy of the united states has not disappeared. so after 2 centuries, it has only acquired new phones. its vivid personification is attempts

instead of saving latin america from europe, the monroe doctrine was used as an instrument of u. s. foreign policy, which argue that european involvement in some countries, internal affairs was bad. but when washington carried out similar strategies, it was acceptable because the us was a fellow america as well. those are just a few of the stories that we're keeping an eye on this wednesday. and that's a chance to have something where it's not too hard to reports. out this one it's really liked to walk to find the the kids was only seem to increase with each passing day is counter offensive was an utter failure. continued mass in western support is in doubt. zalinski is popularity is on the decline in the military, essentially has few ideas. how to proceed. kim is running out of options. the the stock of just close. that was what you just keep dice. good exposure. somebody. well, maybe she would leave me up there just so it was. yeah, it's uh, when you get into serious talk about a funeral, what use doesn't this, what is the kind of care? can we just union conditions? do not, the

washington tries to turn to the tenants into its back count, given the same us monroe doctrine, the global reach and illegal unilateral sanctions, the stages of a tool to force solver in countries to comply with its will. instead of saving latin america from europe, the monroe doctor was used as an instrument of u. s. foreign policy, which argue that european involvement in some countries, internal affairs was bad. but when washington carried out similar strategies, it was acceptable because the us was a fellow america i'm fine if the sound, the cope 28 climate. some of that underway right now into by is all about finding a way for which the planet with p sustainable energy. it seems to us as hedging its bets on the field of fusion technology, something extremely hard to attain. a strategy identifies 5 areas of work that will help us to realize the promise of this technology and they are are in the supply chain and marketplace regulation, workforce and education and engagement. however, not all scientists said john kerry's optimism independent new for the expos. damon, mobile and brand it,

instead of saving latin america from europe, the monroe doctrine was used as an instrument of u. s. foreign policy, which argue that european involvement in some countries, internal affairs was bad. but when washington carried out similar strategies, it was acceptable because the us was a fellow america and running on top of us and the top $28.00 climate summit on the way right now. and to buy isn't about finding a way forward for the planet with keen on sustainable energy. and it seems the u. s . is hedging its bets or new to the upstairs in technology, something notoriously hard to attain. a strategy identifies 5 areas of work that will help us to realize the promise of this technology. and they are our de supply chain and marketplace regulation, workforce, and education and engagement. however, not all scientists, china, joan carries optimism, independent new to the ex, but daemon, mobile and brand to the invoice claims. a fun to see i think this proposal is basically nonsense. there really has been no breakthroughs whatsoever on fusion. and in the midst of catastrophic climat

even though it was anything but the plot amendment was the direct result of the more renowned monroe doctrine, arguing that the people of cuba would benefit from being under the control of the u . s. but this claim was highly criticized in latin america. was the president of mexico launching a counter doctrine, calling for sovereignty and non intervention in another nation's internal affairs. however, that didn't stop then president theodore roosevelt from existing policies of the monroe doctrine continued to have a strangle hold on us foreign policy. chronic wrongdoing or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society main america as elsewhere, ultimately required intervention by some civilized nation in the western hemisphere . the appearance of the united states of the monroe doctrine may force the united states. however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrong, doing or impotence to exercise and international police power. and yet, here we are nearly 102 many years softer roosevelt's updated version of the monroe doctrine. as we can say, i looking a

well, according to the deputy director robert gates, it was the monroe doctrine. he also argued that the congress had no chance at over throwing. ortega is government calling their efforts half hearted. and he argued in favor of a more aggressive approach that included the use of air strikes. the fact is that the western hemisphere is the sphere of influence of the united states. if we have decided totally to abandon the monroe doctrine, if in the 1980s taking strong actions to protect our interests, despite the halo of criticism is too difficult, then we ought to say political capital in washington. acknowledge all hell dismissing stop wasting everybody's time. gates was notably a pointed director of the c i it by president george h. w bush in 1991. and he went on to sir, the secretary of defense under president's george w bush and brock obama. a reminder that all this scandal was made possible by numerous members of the us political establishment. they did one of the things they do best. they protected each other from accountability or shifting gears to africa n

well, according to the deputy director robert gates, it was the monroe doctrine. he also argued that the congress had no chance at over throwing ortega's government calling their efforts half hearted. and he argued in favor of a more aggressive approach that included the use of airstrikes. the fact is that the western hemisphere is the sphere of influence of the united states. if we have decided totally to abandon the monroe doctrine, if in the 1980s taking strong actions to protect our interests, despite the halo of criticism is too difficult, then we will to save political capital in washington. acknowledge all hell dismissing stop wasting everybody's time. gates was notably appointed director of the c, i by president george h. w bush in 1991. and he went on to sir the secretary of defense under president sports, w bush and brock obama. a reminder that all this scandal was made possible by numerous members of the us political establishment. they did one of the things they do best. they protected each other from accountability. well that is a little from loss and

i'm finding many hartwell disputes across the americas, all the result of washington's monroe doctrine, which marks 3 centuries this december. now the structure that essentially declared central and south america, the backyard told us, was signed by them. president james monroe. the state is going to fight in europe, pin colonialism, all these rachel blevins looks at one of the many cases of how the policy was used to justify washington's interventions in the western hemisphere. on the rest of the world of the monroe doctrine. just turn 200 years old, but its role as a tool of u. s. foreign policy continues to be used to this day. to argue the u. s. has the right to intervene in latin america as we continue our look at the doctor in the legacy. we turn to the way it was used in nicaragua during the iran contra affair. the scandal occurred back in the 1980s when the administration of ronald reagan secretly sold weapons to a wrong to fund the congress, a group of anti communist finders. nicaragua, president reagan initially signed an executive order in 1981 authorizing a covert ca operat

what across denmark, because all the result of washington's monroe doctrine, which marks 2 centuries at this december, the stripes g, but essentially the kind of central and south america. the fact you all talk to us was signed by them president james monroe with the stated goal of fighting your pin colonialism. i'll teach rachel blevins looks at one of the many cases of how the policy was used to justify washington's interventions in the western hemisphere. and the rest of the world. the monroe doctrine just turned 200 years old, but its role as a tool of u. s. foreign policy continues to be used to this day, to argue as us has the right to intervene in latin america as we continue our look at the doctrines of legacy. we turn to the way it was used in nicaragua during the iran contra affair. the scandal occurred back in the 1980s when the administration of ronald reagan secretly sold weapons to a wrong to fund the congress. a group of anti communist finders in the garage was president reagan initially signed an executive order in 1981 authorized a covert. ca operation just afford the

the monroe doctrine, maybe 200 years old, but his input on u. s. foreign policy is still felt to this day, we can see it in the current administration, and it's continue to approach towards relations with latin america as president. by that noted in 2022, we used to talk about when i was a kid college about america's backyard, americans, backyard. i said everything south of the mexican border is america's frontier. all right. and where equal people, we don't dictate what happens. it any or part of that is that of the economy or the south american con. we have to work very hard on what the trouble it is. we're having great difficulty making up for the mistakes and then made the last 4 years. and it's going to take some time back yard front yard, but still a yard of the us words change. but the idea remains, which is to police and oversee latin american countries. it's not something new as washington has a history of interference in the region. and the name of this history is the monroe doctrine and today will take a look at its influence in cuba

of the monroe doctrine. just turn 200 years old, but its role as a tool of us foreign policy continues to be used to this day. to argue with us has the right to intervene in latin america as we continue our look at the doctrines of legacy. we turn to the way it was used in nicaragua during the iran contra affair. the scandal occurred back in the 1980s when the administration of ronald reagan secretly sold weapons to a wrong to fund the congress, a group of anti communist finders in nicaragua, president reagan initially signed an executive order in 1981 authorized a covert ca operations to support the right wing rebel group, the starter overthrow, the left defendant needs to a government. daniel ortega in nicaragua, i must speak to you tonight about a mounting danger in central america that threatens the security of the united states. this danger will not go away. it will grow worse, much worse if we fail to take action. now. i'm speaking of nicaragua, a soviet ally on the american mainland, only 2 hours flyi

talk about how this fits in with the monroe doctrine and what that was. the monroe doctrine for 200 years has been the basic policy that the united states has pursued in the entire western hemisphere, but especially toward latin america, telling european and other colonial powers, you stay out of the western hemisphere, this is our backyard, in essence, that has been reused repeatedly by u.s. presidents and congress to invade countries in latin america, to foment clandestine or covert operations, to remove leaders that were not sufficiently obedient to the united states. it never has really been repealed or refuted by u.s. leaders. there was a small attempt by john kerry during the obama administration to claim it was over, but president trump backtracked on that and went back to the bullying of the united states and latin america. i am wondering, congressman casar, your sense of the prospects for being able to have a new policy for latin america in the future? >> it is time for us to leave that 200 year monroe doctrine legacy behind us. and i think a sma

one of the touchstones of what will become exploring policy is what will be called the monroe doctrine, which was a message uttered by president james monroe, the fifth president of the united states, in december of 1823. at the tail end of the wars of independence of latin america, where he states that the united states will oppose the recolonization of those new republics of latin america by europe. so it's an anti colonial message, but at the same time, he asserts that the united states will be the main power in the western hemisphere. so he asserts the united states sphere of influence over the western hemisphere and that message will become really crucial for politicians later in the 19th century to once a mid-19th century and late 19th century as a guide to assert that influence. and one of the times when they thought about the monroe doctrine to assert that influence is actually when we talked about our westward expansion right here in the united states, right? yes. and so it was very important for us as co-curator was to to allude to the different ways through which the united

and yet, here we are nearly 120 years after roosevelt's updated version of the monroe doctrine. as we can say, i looking at u. s. foreign policy in latin america. that the original claims by james monroe still ring true in the minds of the political we in washington. all right, be sure to stay with our to international and back in about 30 minutes time. with much more news about the email is based on the printer, which is the street address, but you one with the dock dice. just sent it to me for you the, the to almost the spunk this case is still wishing me something that the little this time of the you on the, on the email cuz i signed it from us. and as i said, it just escal sales and reset process of see what we have the lowest on the by 301941 more than 300 miles. and $1680.00 small money enterprises cooperating in the region, producing on average energy $5000000.00 tons of coal a year. but the war changed everything. attention this is most go calling city actually was yeah. but of the, the, the in the was those months co money continue output was maintained on many male eff

the appearance of the united states of the monroe doctrine may force the united states. however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrong doing or impotence to exercise and international police power. and yet, here we are nearly 120 years after roosevelt's updated version of the monroe doctrine. as we can say, i looking at u. s. foreign policy in latin america. that the original claims by james monroe still ringing through in the minds of the political we in washington. all right, that's gonna do it for me for now, but to stay with us. my colleague union o'neill will be in next in about half an hour's time with more news by the slow the vocal when you come home, i think when you lose this is you have a silver with use of us and most of the stuff they figure it out on the proposal from them for me to come to the left center of the most beneficial with the soldiers that you can associate right now. the colors can cause us as well. so why don't you also think us luck on model? ok, so even when you, when you're from austin, who knows too much, keeps cavities and won't inv

well, according to the deputy director robert gates, it was the monroe doctrine. he also argued that the congress had no chance at over throwing ortega's government calling their efforts half hearted. and he argued in favor of a more aggressive approach that included the use of air strikes. the fact is that the western hemisphere is the sphere of influence of the united states. if we have decided totally to abandon the monroe doctrine, if in the 1980s taking strong actions to protect our interest, despite the halo of criticism is too difficult, then we will to save political capital in washington. acknowledge our helplessness and stop wasting everybody's time. gates was notably a pointed director of the c, a by president george h. w bush in 1991. and he went on to serve as secretary of defense under president sports, w bush and brock obama. a reminder that all this scandal was made possible by numerous members of the us political establishment. they did one of the things they do best, they protected each other from accountability. well, that is old from us, and mo

with exceptions, are cheaper than the chinese, but then they need to focus on returning to the monroe doctrineon, yes, i understand, but they can’t produce anything that would be interesting to southeast asia except hollywood films, well, really, we need to make sure that they can’t buy anything other than american ones, buy iphones, and there is no such thing, the iphone is made in china, well , that means they will have to produce it at home, they can’t, because they won’t fit into any price limits, they won’t be able to deliver, so it’s like becoming hedgehogs, okay, hamsters become no longer necessary to reduce the standard of living, of course, must be brought under control in mexico and el salvador. enough for about 1.2 million km of shelf, sea shelf, moreover, from friends, yes, and from friends who still cannot even say so, give an answer, because the canadians, who and the cooks who prepared this shelf of these arctic islands and were already preparing all the documents for the arctic council and for the un commission to determine the boundaries of the territorial shelf at one point o

the monroe doctrine, 1823, something you have encountered in other history courses. the monroe doctrine, a position that opposed any europe colonization or involvement by european nations in the western hemisphere and the 1840s. the idea of, manifest destiny has really taken among americans manage destiny. the idea that america had a god given right to settle the continental to expand all the way to the pacific coast and settle the continent. not just a right, but a right, a god given right. here we see a famous painting by john gast, american. i'm guessing you have probably encountered this painting before in other courses or other classes. and here, of course, it's a it's a not very subtle depiction, is it, of of manifest destiny, not many hidden metaphors here. right we see columbia female personification of the states leading settlers west bringing light into darkness right. we see a well, let me ask you what do you see in this in this painting are what are some sort of metaphors and things that you see sort of as evidence of of american expansionism and destiny.

the monroe doctrine goes back to the 1820s, but it had not really developed in a way that would suggest a desire for a worldwide sphere of influence and in the 1820s, certainly russia was not conducting its international relations in such a way that would suggest anything broader than simply defending itself. but de tocqueville recognized that one day these two civilized nations may be in tension with each other. jayapal article. and i thought that was a rather remark able thing for for an individual to write 200 years ago or nearly 200 years ago. and this book that you've written containing history, how cold war history explains u.s. russia relations. how did you write it around your work as as the senior district district court judge for the western district of oklahoma, probably a pretty busy schedule week to week for you. well, that's what nights and weekends are for. and yes, my, my, my official duties certainly take up my time all day. and sometimes they take up my time when i'm staring at the ceiling in bed in the middle of the night as well. i'll acknowledge that. but in terms o

the monroe doctrine goes back to the 1820s, but it had not really developed in a way that would suggest a desire for a worldwide sphere of influence and in the 1820s, certainly russia was not conducting its international relations in such a way that would suggest anything broader than simply defending itself. but de tocqueville recognized that one day these two civilized nations may be in tension with each other. jayapal article. and i thought that was a rather remark able thing for for an individual to write 200 years ago or nearly 200 years ago. and this book that you've written containing history, how cold war history explains u.s. russia relations. how did you write it around your work as as the senior district district court judge for the western district of oklahoma, probably a pretty busy schedule week to week for you. well, that's what nights and weekends are for. and yes, my, my, my official duties certainly take up my time all day. and sometimes they take up my time when i'm staring at the ceiling in bed in the middle of the night as well. i'll acknowledge that. but in terms o

the monroe doctrine celebrates its anniversary. who keeps order in latin america?eady to quarrel with guyana. any limited nuclear war can develop into a general one. i suggest we start a war. the question arose only if the soviet union attacks us. if the soviets attack, and we are much more afraid of them than all-out war, they will be able to blackmail the free world until it capitulates. everything i suggest implies that we. henry kissinger, in an interview with tv presenter, kissinger passed away; the world's most famous international affairs specialist ended his earthly journey at the age of 101. for realist conservatives, kissinger is a model of foreign policy sobriety and common sense; for leftists and liberals, a ruthless cynic, whose hands are up to his shoulders... covered in blood, for conspiracy theorists, the head of the world behind the scenes. but there is hardly another person whose opinion you could hardly make out as an almost hundred-year-old man. kissinger's secret is inner integrity. the main book , peace restored, is the best analysis of the 18

and yet, here we are nearly 120 years after roosevelt's updated version of the monroe doctrine. as we can say, i looking at u. s. foreign policy in latin america that the original claims by james monroe still ring true in the minds of the political we in washington to. all right, just stay with us up next on worlds apart. asana discusses with her guest whether it's still possible to find the place for diplomacy and geo politics. the hello and welcome to worlds the part sir henry watson 17th century english diplomatic once described, diplomacy as being about surviving until the next century. while paula takes about surviving until friday afternoon, with wars and crises, constantly raising the danger of human interest, immediate device. is there still a place for diplomacy in today's jewel politics? or to discuss that i'm now joined by john belt director and co founder of the consumer theaters guild. mr. val, it's great to talk to thank you very much for your time. now. your organization is dedicated to excellence in the craft of diplomacy and that's a rather high ambitions or aspi

these are the americans, for whom there is no doubt that they have the right, well, from the monroe doctrine about us, we are all we're going through something, we're embarrassed, excuse me, that's it... that's what, well, well, maybe, maybe really, why? some kind of constant, not so much self-deprecation, well, come rule us, as it was invented for us, and it is not a fact that , by the way, such a phrase was ever heard, as often happens, what is written in history textbooks, describes an event several centuries ago that happened before and no one knows whether it happened on...

the monroe doctrine celebrates its anniversary. who keeps order in latin america?enezuela is ready to quarrel with ggayana. any limited nuclear war can develop into a general one. and we have to ask ourselves, is this is it worth it? i’m not suggesting that we start a war , the question will arise only if the soviet union attacks us, if the soviets attack, and we are much more afraid of them than a general war, they will be able to blackmail the free world , right up to its capitulation, everything i propose implies that we are willing to take the same risks as the soviet union, if this is not the case, we will simply lose. thirty-five-year-old henry kissinger in an interview with tv presenter mike ulles, nuclear deterrence. on thursday, kissinger passed away. the world's most famous international specialist, he ended his earthly journey at the age of 101. for realist conservatives, kissinger is a model of foreign policy sobriety and common sense. for leftists and liberals, he is a ruthless cynic with blood on his hands. for conspiracy theorists, the head of the wo

and it is obvious that latin america, in general america, yes, even there since the time of the monroe doctrinethis is what the united states considers to be, well, to a certain extent its territory, let's say that, and the other thing is that it is a complex country, a complex geography, quite distant from the united states, it will be difficult for them to disperse. focus on ukraine, the middle east, latin america and at the same time think about taiwan, asia and so on, so this is a very difficult situation, i do not know what decision the united states will make in this sense, similarly venezuela can agree with the united states states, where exxon mobil may be nationalized, they may not be nationalized, and hugo chavas had a pretty good relationship with guyana, he did not hinder development. oil in general in fagayan and american companies in particular, so it is very difficult to predict the situation here. well, listen, in any case it will be a violation of international law, but from the point of view of venezuela, guyana, the united states, there is a lot of room to play with this inte