pam moore>>: they are calling for officer philip weiss to be fired. why eat a 20 year veteran of the department apartment. (vo) nourished. rescued. protected. given new hope. during the subaru "share the love" event, subaru owners feel it, too. because when you take home a new subaru, we donate 250 dollars to helping those in need. we'll have given 50 million dollars over seven years. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. female announcer: sleep train's ends sunday.e for 3 event! it's your last chance to get three years interest-free financing on beautyrest black, stearns & foster, serta icomfort, even tempur-pedic. plus, get free delivery, and sleep train's 100-day low price guarantee. but hurry! sleep train's interest free for 3 event ends sunday. ...guaranteed! ♪ sleep train ♪ your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪ pam moore>>: people say they've it identified the one hand the broke into their office using tender. she cleared out this entire building. she got 11 computers and tablets from us. she kept coming back. david peterson is the cofound

moore: mr. speaker, this day is a culmination of a lot of time, a lot of work, a lot of conversations back and forth but, again, it is the best work that we have been able to produce in a bipartisan manner. it's not perfect but i do want to thank all of our partners in this process. representatives cole and hanabusa and heck and kildee and pearce and young have really been just outstanding partners. i really want to thank ranking member waters. she has been supportive and constructive and not to mention exceedingly patient. i also want to thank the native american community, the national congress of american indians, the national american indian housing council and many individual tribes from across the country have provided their expertise, their comments, their education, their energy every single step of the way. my very first meeting in the 112th congress was with one of my wisconsin tribes, and i assured them that i would keep fighting to get nahasda to the floor. this re-authorization that

moore:. item 1, for continuance. 2438 lake street is proposed to continuance for december 11. item 2, 1912, 20th street proposed to continuance january 15, 2015. those are all the continuances i have. >president cindy wu: okay. any public comment? >> public comment is closed. >> i move. >> on that motion, [calling roll] so moved. that motion passes unanimously 7-0 and places you under commission matters item no. 3, draft minutes for november 13, 2014, and november 20, 2014. >president cindy wu: is there any public comment on the draft minutes? >> public comment is closed. >> commissioner moore? >> move to approve. >> second. >> on that motion to adopt the minutes for november 13th and november 20, 2014. commissioner >commissioner michael j. antonini: >commissioner rich hillis: >commissioner christine johnson: >>commissioner kathrin moore: >commission vice-president rodney fong: that motion passes 7-0. item 4. >> i want the commission to know that i met with commissioner fong and talked about

commissioner johnson. >> commissioner moore. commissioner richards and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero commissioners that place you on item 11 dimension and controls for homeless streetcars >> good afternoon planning staff staff before you today is american people organization amending the distinction for the homeless strerlt the mayor has been working with that introduced by mayor ed lee i want to acknowledge dusty the mr. mayor's of hope that will present after my presentation today san francisco planning code into compliance with the state law shelters meaning without a public hearing as in one zoning district this legislation is a part of the 2014 housing update that will come before you if a few weeks currently, the san francisco planning code didn't include a definition for planning code which those are group housing is a hotel use they're not allowed in a zoning district in san francisco therefore in the few cases that homeless shelters are out of planning with t

. >> commissioner moore. >> all the alleys in san francisco people taking shortcuts to get to 280 and the airport all the alleys suffer the same thing i'll agree with with some of the commissioners said the major impact on ralph is not the traffic for people that live there or the current parking and reduced the numbers of the entrances of the garage to ralph but in an ability to enforce the rules those streets are to be assessed by the people that live there you find that in large cities around the world's where there's clear enforcement and including in some communities there are barriers at sentiments of the day only the fire department could a indeed move them where the discredit a quiet residential street if we are serious about looking at the identification of the city relative to the alleys when we talk about then those are the ideas those are not the traffic calming with the suburban bumps or the public works didn't do that in the city their expensive and more noisy and consumerism and people driving down the street tests a consistent enforcement of how we are to transform the

pam moore>>: chronic reached out to the landlord as well.ls have not been returned either. continuing our c strom coverage tonight, residents are still cleaning up the mess left that behind. dear still concerned about the potential for more damage in the next storm. reporter>>: these lines mean that the power in the belmont mobile home park is been restored. building ends expect their stated trains in the areas i hope that the drains well allow people to evacuate faster. charles stone helps create a fund raiser earlier this week to help out parents to have storage children in the area and find a place when they've been displaced. new speaker: and there's another storm on friday. jacqueline bennett>>: the rain continues at this hour but were seen meany's body and light rain. the wet pavement and a drizzle just keep coming down here and the golden gate bridge. so far and, it's been a quarter inch of rain, in other places it's been a bit more. worse still seen rain at this hour, you can see some of that yellow skirt in south, for more modern do

she finished the conversation. >> after calling bill starns, sherman moore continued to contact him.n asked me to get in contact with the warden and ask for his release. but i just feel like if you commit the crime, you should do the time. i just can't bring myself to go about that procedure. it was a bad day in mine and my family's life. i'm sorry he has to stay in prison for what he did, but that's just the way it is. >>> next, on "lockup: extended stay." >> it happened eight years ago on february 24th, 1999. >> sherman moore comes face to face with the mother of someone else's victim. >> i can't say i understand how you feel, but i can understand your loss. it really shook me up. there's no justifiable reason to take a life. >>> for inmates living in the honor dorm, there are many programs available. professor swanson at the university of west florida teaches and empathy class to inmates to help them better understand the devastating impact of their violent crimes. >> it's right for every human being no matter where they are or where they're destined that they have the opportunity

good evening, i'm pam moore. tonight we have team coverage on the storm watch kron4's jeff bush is live in the north bay where its already raining this evening. and kron4's philippe djegal is at s-f-o where delays and cancellations are expected to get worse during the storm. let's first begin with chief meteorologist jacqueline bennett. jacqueline -- how will the impact tomorrow morning's commute? jacqueline bennett>>: and not good tomorrow there's going to be a denuded of rain. we can see about a 10th of an inch of rain to a quarter of an inch of rain and our. people are scrambling to stock up on batteries and water ahead of the powerful storm as it hits the north bay. continuing our team coverage -- kron 4's jeff bush is live in rohnert park. jeff? jeff bush>>: it was rainy year up until about 15 minutes ago and then it just stopped. it was raining cats and dogs completely dumping water, if this is any preview to the bigger flood that's coming through then everybody better watch out. looking into some of those

pam moore>> pam moore>>: scenes that philadelphia man was dressed in uniforms while he was not. this video has gone by role with nearly 3 million use. a third grader and handcuffed in class but the school said it was to help them out. as a toddler, i enjoy three activities. breaking things... spilling things... and just general destruction, in the abstract sense. so i, for one, am not a big fan of nest. you see, the dropcam is always watching... even when my folks are in another room. i rue the day that this product was invented. but i'm not 100% sure what rue means. nest dropcam. welcome to a more thoughtful pam moore>>: the protesters began rallying around 5:00 this evening, just minutes ago the vandalized and at&t store they also say vandalize a deceased a taste 8. as officers were clean the highway reporters said the gas was stored on the highway. larsen tells me he wasn't surprised by the attack - but he was trying to make sense of exactly what was happening i saw geysers going up, i said those ren't shell splashed those are bombs i saw torpedo planes coming over fran jenki

okay seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore >> move to continue items one and two as noted. >> second. >> on that motion to continue items one and two commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you in our consent calendar constitute a consent calendar, are considered the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests, in which event the matter shall consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 3 case at 3330 to 34, 26th street administrative review subdivision and on third street the conditional use authorization i have no speaker cards. >> is there any public comment on the items on the consent calendar? okay public comment is closed >> commissioner fong. >> move to approve items three and four. >> second. >> on that motion then to

>> yes. >> thank you. >> second. >> commissioner moore? >> this is an extreme case and i would still like zoning administrator sanchez to come back and fill us in a little bit of where some of these oversights were or where people come forward and they are not inexperienced people, we have to all admit that, come forward and point to issues in the code, that we are either not using frequently, or aren't versed with? we're very clear about the internal stairs. mr. lindsey, director rahm secretary ionin, commissioner antonini, and all of the commissioners who have been here for the last three, four, five, seven, eight, nine years plus have gone through this internal stair thing many, many times. and we have altered projects or sent them back when that stair was not clearly indicating that indeed an additional unit was being used on its own. and this is basically the issue here. so i would like to go back and have a zoning administrator take us one more time through some of the points raised by mr. vincensi and also be consistent in our attit

commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and we do expect sociocommissioner johnson's and commissioner richards to arrive first on our agenda is for the case for the agenda the 2013 nexus study to december lovingly, 2014 item 2 for case at 1423 oefgs a may or may not discretionary review until 2015 i don't believe i have speaker cards but. >> we'll go ahead is there any public comment for items proposed for continuance? okay seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore >> move to continue items one and two as noted. >> second. >> on that motion to continue items one and two commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you in our consent calendar constitute a consent calendar, are considered the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public,

thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> i want to pick up on what commissioner johnson briefly hinted on i want to see more creative treatment of the fulsome street facade i think the full name street facade is a repetition of rather - god i try to be that i lit it's rather simplistic it is changing the same element and repeating it one bay over the building itself is asking for a exception exception to bulk we need to bring something forward to granting an exception i want to see a more distinction treatment on fulsome street that includes potentially how the building turns the corner onto the ralph the lot which takes a good idea of townhomes coming down rachel h ralph and turning it and occupying two which on fulsome street that's our idea so i champ you to just do a little bit more. >> commissioner johnson. >> i'll support a continuance. >> just to i guess clarify i know that a lot of the language on the architecture is drawing from this mixed industrial for a larger neighborhood so there's i want to make sure we're pulling up a photo on the fuchl street elevation to comment outstand

commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner richards. >> commissioners first at this consideration for items proposed for continuance i have no items proposed for continuance next on our agenda is the consent calendar stem one case at 80 missouri street you conditional use authorization commissioner moore has requested we pull this off agenda. >> yes. commissioner president illig please. consideration of draft minutes for december 4th, 2014, the regular and joint hearing. >> any public comment on draft minutes seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner antonini. >> move to approve the minutes of december 4th. >> second. >> on that motion to daft the minutes for december 4th commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on commissioners questions or comments. >> commissioner antonini. >> like to wish everyone a happy hanukkah and happy new year and

. >> commissioner moore. >> the top floor reduction of 6' would be on the living floor not on the roof deck. i find the roof deck completely and totally inappropriate for the entire area and talking about said the backs, i would assume that the roof deck, which we already pretty much felt uncomfortable last time around would disappear. i think roof deck is highly inappropriate for the overall building forms in the area. people are already on the slope and already have the long views and plenty of windows to do so. so i i think the roof deck, i think if i recall correctly, we all had already advised for that not being part of our discussion today. >> i don't recall that, but i see your point. >> do you remember? >> yes. >> the other thing, which i think we always try to work with is if we have buildings of different depth and different height, that we are using the adjoining buildings connected to lines and ask for the new building not to protrude beyond that line. that is at least one way to create a datum that you are not getting 5', 4' or 6', but basically saking that the building ha

. >> thank you commissioner moore. >> this is an interesting discussion the extension of the t line and the third phase is a kickoff to broaden our transportation system in san francisco i'm happy to sit in on the comments i am supportive of the tuitions of the discussion i want to start with the comprehensive that's it is 2, 3, 4 berlin or any of the cities like new york that successfully operates older yet also expand lower grade systems i'm looking for a prioritization of areas of where we're also expecting as to whether or not in the end this is the beginning point of an capacity system i'm not here to say that i'm asking for more comprehensive evaluation than just using today's thoughts and just so to speak about one small piece of the citywide system that piece will be high appropriate i want to see a boarder discussion i'm not prepared to the going get into another yearlong fight of what doesn't work i think you'll get support if a large sector of the population that is what we need given the costs given the fight for funding including the support we need in washington, d.c. i th

commissioner moore, do you have further comments? >> i would like the commission to have mr. washington explain that and consider that in terms of how we modify the building? i think in order to come to some level of compromise of where not only a large vertical, but horizontal expansion changes the neighborhood to the extent that these new buildings look overwhelmingly large and i think we have the responsibility to modify it in a way that is comparable. my consideration for what i am saying also includes that the rooftop is not being used, because that equits insult to injury. >> as i understand commissioner, remove of the roof deck and on the third floor is how we would be coming with a compromise with a reduction in the depth of that third floor to an average which appears to be 6'3-4". and then the lowerthe second floor reamains at its current depth. >> and if the gain by eliminating the stair creates additional living space, which is automatically will, then any kind of additional variation in modifying of the second floor could be appreciated. there will be changes in

>president cindy wu: commissioner moore? >> >>commissioner kathrin moore: it's easy for know hear the comments because everything we observed has it rights to be only table. what i would like to do is clarify what the public said and what is frequently done. the issue i think here is not that the project down the street is not the same developer. the issue is that the project down the street is designed by the same architect. the architect becomes the face or substitute for developer because in many cases developers are presented by their architect or in this particular case as additional go power as the lawyer who basically takes on the role of explaining the project. so having said that for clarification, i do believe that the project which has been brought forward by this particular architect and i have seen a number of them always basically result around a very similar discussion and it's not in this particular case of rear yard variance but mostly 12 pounds in a 6-pound bag. i'm going to say it very simply and what i be

. >> thank you commissioner moore. >> i support i want to support a continuance into january the holidays including the complete absent ever any material on this eir makes it hard to understand today we've heard the description but the document itself is pretty much avoid of any kind of more explicit delineation of what is proposed i also want to express or pit into my record the comments by the historic preservation they sent a letter all points in the letter are issues which i consider sufficient in the document and want to see them elevated i'm summarize with a little bit more time the rest of my objections in writing. >> commissioner richards. >> i guess i have a question for staff mr. jones and ms. hester talked about this it is this different from the projects we've looked at here. >> commissioner richards for the purposes of this hearing we shouldn't are a back and forth they'll respond in writing and that's one question the other thing i support i don't know if it's legal or not we need to get real when we talk about affordable housing we're talking about creating affordable units

recommendation for approval commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> (clapping.) congratulations. >> commissioners that place you on items 12 a and b at 11 fulsome street this is a conditional use and planned unit development as well as a large project authorization i'd like to remind the commission it hearing has this item has been heard on november 30th and public comment was closed and continued with some correction to the additional outreach we're going to limit the project sponsors presentation to 5 minutes and any additional public comments to one minute because this item has already been heard >> good afternoon, commissioners relinquish from the depth staff it the conditional use authorization and planned unit development for the proposed project on fulsome street the proposed project requires the confusion for development on a lot and merge of lots that creates a street frontage in the zoning district under

antonini: >> i agree with commissioner hillis and moore so they don't look like the same thing. that's probably the easiest and in terms of the variance, mr. sanchez, the variance has to do with the depth of the structures on state and the structures on ord not with the height of the structures. >> both structures are located within the required area of the yard. >> no matter what we do with the height, we know it's going to need a variance. one idea we might propose is we really don't need that lower floor although that doesn't make a heck of a lot of difference because you need the structural elements down there, but perhaps you need a way, the cars would go down a grade and your garage would be somewhat subgrade but that would allow you to have three floors and your grade maybe a few steps from street level, you would lower it significantly but you would still have separation of floors because otherwise you are going further out in the back which would cause more problems trying to take up more of the space in between. while you can explore the possibility of not having a gar

moore and mr. stivers for working with my committee to introduce this compromise language as a stand-alone bill for the house's consideration. almost identical language was included in the agriculture committee's cftc re-authorization bill, h.r. 4413. i'm proud to say that we moved that legislation through the ag committee by voice vote and passed it here on the house floor with an overwhelming bipartisan support this summer. i'm hopeful this bill can receive the same strong bipartisan support. h.r. 4571 will provide american businesses the certainty they need to continue managing their risk in the most efficient manage possible. today, businesses all over america rely on the ability to centralize their hedging activities to reduce their counterparty credit risks, lower costs and simplify their financial dealings. it's important to remember that these transactions between affiliated corporate entities pose no systematic risk. they should not be regulated as if they do. these transactions are used t

commissioner moore? >> >>commissioner kathrin moore: i'm very much for the project and there is no motion attached to my package. that might have been an oversight and if that is the case, i move to approve or move with the intent to approve because >president cindy wu: the agenda says approve with conditions. >>commissioner kathrin moore: so here is the motion. it's being handed to me. times have changed. i will support it. >> second. >president cindy wu: commissioner >commissioner michael j. antonini: >> we have bases for recommendation and the decision. i only have the hard copy, not the electronic one. anyway we have it now so that's all that matters. a few comments on this, one of the items on the paperwork quoted ken garcia from the examiner who said well it's too big for a time capsule. if you want a snapshot of san francisco in the late 1970s it would be hamburger mary's. i think that speaks to the uniqueness of the place and there was a speaker who was afraid of that other outlets are different

out here quickly and the continuance this will be fast or faster so i echo many of the commissioner moore's comments buyout relation of the current building to the streetscape and the surrounding property but i won't repeat those but i will just ask a question of the project sponsor and make one other point the first one is about the parking the counter property has no parking a think about the street parking you can park. >> i'm sorry. >> it's an easy park street. >> okay. i'll still ask my question though right now there's a no off-street parking to put the driveway as populated you need to keep away a parking stott spot did you consider a project with no parking? >> sir, you need to come up to the microphone. >> you're required to have a parking space per unit. >> we can condition it. >> i just asked the question so okay. >> great. >> just the public hearing closed i'm not sure. >> we're in the midst of commissioner comments. >> we've not closed the public hearing and the public hamburger period is closed. >> you're answering because unifying your representing the project sponsor. >> oka

and second to continue to january 8th commissioner antonini commissioner hillis sxhobs commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that passes 7 to zero and place ion general public comment i have no speaker cards. >> any general public comment seeing none, general public comment is closed. - >> i just want to say thank you all of you good evening. >> any additional general public comment seeing none, general public comment is closed. meeting >> good morning, today is november 25, 2014, welcome to the san francisco transportation authority. my name is john avalos, the chair of the authority, and today, this meeting is being clerked by our clerk, steve, if i can get the last name. steve, stamos, thank you and, cell women to your first leading, clerking the transportation authority, the meeting is brought to us by the staff, and hegan and thank you for your service, steve, would you please, call the roll. >> roll call? >> avalos? >> present. >> breed. >> here. >> campos? >> absent. >> chiu. >> here. >> cohen? >> absent. >> fa

was interested in moving in if commissioner moore moves in we'll be happy the choice to have a roof deck it feels different not being able to offer that amenity but there's a lot of things the park is across the street and courtyards that people will be free to use rather than depraif of another amenity the street side nice south facing we think those will be well-used and appreciated amenity and you know we can do what we do given the site - >> before the architect comes up i think you've answered my question the roof deck or no one for building b or c i'll say keep it it adds to the kraks of the building and where people are and the community this and the block i would say that i start noticing that people are not using it going back to my comments put a fan up there or something to ohmmeter those responses. >> i appreciate the comments that is a good comment and suggestion to think about we're as far away the rooftop are 50 feet away from the roof deck it is about a variety of open space with the public and private envelope i think it is tough to do much more in particular from t

top floor there's a series of private terrace with the set back of 15 feet known as to commissioner moore's questions and suggestions about potentially we're a one facade this is a study we've done the element on the right hand we're still proposing to be brick but we've looked at a larger scale element where we stitched the windows together into a horizon more graphic expedition we think it gives it a playful facade is something we feel is contemporary but fits within the neighborhood corner element we are proposing with expected frame here the elevation side by side this elevation was submitted osterman we feel tlooik like we like this and want to move forward with the elevation it is appropriate for the neighborhood we look forward to your questions and comments and discussion about that facade. >> looking down ralph streets on the right hand the entry and the block frame elements we've treated ralph's different and brought the buildings down a smaller grain more proposition all here's the elevation along ralph the horizon articulation terraces and bay windows on fulsome street and the b

november 20th meeting commissioners commissioner johnck's and commissioner antonini and commissioner moore were all basically asked i think there was a meeting including the neighbors to talk about the policies for this particular project for more alternatives thank you. >> thank you. >> 2 points on behalf of the many neighbors first we've been given inform reason; right why it is on ralph and not on fulsome second the developers have a do you believe on ralph but it's in everyone's interest to put a small plaza there instead of it consumes several parking spaces for no public benefit but the bulb out didn't change the interface we have parked cars and that's two fast where the bulb out doesn't nothing driver location the department staff made it clear the transit issues with flegable and their reason for putting out one less curb cut you have to look at the speed of traffic and putting it on fulsome will reduce both of those risks put the driveway on fulsome. >> thank you. (calling names) >> good afternoon, commissioners ralph with the san francisco action coalition speaking on behalf of