i have some good news through tonight you are not hiring in fact because it is morally wrong to use the force of government to impede the free flow of ideas you have the right to copy music movies text software inventions and i was speaking of ideas with copying we have bestselling author and president of soldiers jim wallace here the president gave a speech today about political reform you can reform human rights and nonviolence and apparently meant to keep a straight face while doing it well get jim's take on that and stuff and console us even console a little progress and he joins us from houston texas to tell you how to beat back the twisted logic of intellectual property but that won't stop the government from imposing a twisted morality of stifling innovation on you to make you feel bad for copying things that big corporations don't want you to profit well tough because the internet is here to the rescue and so is adam vs the man. before we get back to the issues of piracy we have some government i receive to discuss and join me now is our guest jim wallace a bestselling author of

the moral high ground is important. americans are not having to believe a campaign speech, they have seeing a strategy being played out big time. what are the republicans doing? they are out in full force. we played the tape for you. the sound machine is out and about. they want you to think it's all about illegal activity, interrogations. it is not. this country is not only taking down more terrorists under the obama administration, this country is gaining the moral high ground. we are not going to put out a death picture. we are not going to throw somebody into the ocean. no. it's been done with respect and with the traditions of the religion. does president obama get any credit for that? no. we have senator graham down in south carolina questioning how this whole thing came down. folks, when it comes to national security, this killing of osama bin laden is the republicans water loom on national security. they don't have the upper hand. their plan didn't work for all those years. they did the illegal activity and it d

>>> coming up, in the wake of osama bin laden's death -- religious reactions and debates about moral issues. >>> also, at gethsemani abbey in kentucky, the trappist monastery made famous by thomas merton, we talk with brother paul, another monk and poet. >>> and holy relics and their elaborate containers, reliquaries. >>> major funding for "religion and ethics newsweekly" is provided by the lilly endowment, an indianapolis based private family foundation dedicated to its founders' interest in religion, community development, and education. additional funding by mutual of america, designing customized individual and group retirement products. that's why we're your retirement company. and the corporation for public broadcasting. >>> welcome. i'm bob abernethy. it's good to have you with us. it's been an emotional week since the dramatic u.s. operation that killed osama bin laden in pakistan. on thursday president obama laid a wreath at ground zero. he met with loved ones of some of those killed on 9/11 and told them he hoped bin laden's death brought them a small measure of comfort. th

his moral compass when it comes to women? i'm not setting him up for -- >> would you take on arnold schwarzenegger right now? would you take on dominique strauss-khan? >> let's separate the two. i mean, arnold isn't accused of a crime. you know, what he has admitted is is fathering a child out of wedlock while he was married. right. so it's very different. look, hollywood has a very short memory. and you have to put the infraction into context as to what it's all about. >> should he come clean quicker than tiger woods did? should he -- >> you can't compare them. they're not comparable. >> i'm not comparing them yet. i'm saying arnold schwarzenegger has been caught in a sex scandal. he's a high-profile guy. there are rumors of other stories. they may or may not be true. should he come on a show like this, lay everything on the table and say, you know what, this is the truth. >> eventually. >> get everything out of the way. >> but the difference is tiger woods had this all-american boy image, right? and he had this super-clean

and moral decay that we have seen and principally among the families that you're asking about nowhere more so than in the american military family with long and marginal say that those those symptoms that i point out within the military are a lot about moral decay the answer is that there are good you'd be saying then the moral decay is worse in the military i would then it is in the general population what here's what i would say i would say the united states of america is a country today where forty percent of all marriages end in divorce seventy five percent of all second marriages end in divorce forty percent of all children in america are born out of wedlock i would say that that is a sign of social and moral decay in an otherwise remarkable country and what i'm saying is that the impact on our american military families is extremely serious and multiple deployed would be what you're teaching them over and i've never met my friends or family my friends let me let me finish my point for a moment what i am saying is that we have focus on the family here from american military famil

it doesn't make a lot of sense morally and you can see the reason why you wouldn't want to shoot people whose regular would discourage them from surrendering that's a practical concern but in terms of the morality of it it certainly seems worse to to actually kill a whole bunch of people who are in the area just to kill one particular person who are in terms of the ban on assassinations of public officials which obama agrees is still in force and so did the bush administration but does it really make any sense morally you know it means you can't kill khadafi for example on purpose by accident would be ok you know if you got like they did over the weekend in fact right before this raid on bin laden's house the nato forces bombed of a residence which they said was also a command post and they killed several of the screenshot. that were of course was quite a very much it was an accident and they may be insisting they did not intend to kill him or she is also somebody who's got a lot of is and quite understands and morally would say you know we didn't kill bin ladin by dropping a bomb on hi

>>catherine: larger groups gathered with items left for the moral. american military reactions with pride and caution. this is the mother of the soldier and the president of the blue star moms. >> it was a very mixed reaction i was excited. i was saddened. i started thinking of all or 911 victims and families that were reliving this entire terrible thing. how happy they might be, and also how said in a peak. i hope this will bring in closure and out-said they might be. happy they might be. and i have to also thank my military. how many have lost? if it is a wreck, afghanistan because of this fight with so many lives lost because of-ra theiraq, and yes, we got a osama bin laden. >>pam: serve on this, and other mothers are keeping the heat on al queda. ce rvantes, and other m military mothers are encouraging to keep the heat on al qaeda. >> kimberlee: twitter had the highest tweet rate ever. it had 5106 suites per second. when the president finished there were 5000- tweets%. let me show you that initially, there were 5106 tweets per second which was th

not fundamentally anti-american i mean it seems to me just would've been a lot cheaper a lot more moral just to go against the real bad guys and then al-qaeda would have just disappeared. well you said two things which i think you're missing a third of probably would have been certainly cheaper from the standpoint of american taxpayers it would have been certainly more moral but would have it would have been more profitable and that's the problem this is this larger system that the u.s. has been so important in creating and sustaining in the last half century of supporting you know these ruthless autocracies dictatorships and monarchies because they support our interests this ultimately is about money it's about oil it's about a gigantic weapons and arms and petroleum complex you know eisenhower first talked about it in the fifty's but it's great it's grown enormously since then and really this is what obama's been up against i think when patricia talk about how he started off with their great speech in cairo and wanting to rebound u.s. policy but it's obvious he came very quickly again

those are two very different moral equation.yet the "this time we win" masker is held up as being diplomatic of our war effort to say here's what we're really up to. this was not what we're up to the we were there to defend south vietnam. and these guys who did the melai massacre were wrong. and what they did was wrong and they were punished. on the other side you communists who their whole plan was we're going to go down and kill anybody that we don't like who's a liberal or a democrat our a shopkeeper or a catholic or whoever they didn't like at the time. so not only was our work a moral class, therefore was profoundly immoral. and could we have one? yes, we definitely have one. the problem was that lyndon johnson didn't want to win. by the time nixon came in, a guy who could have one, the whole equation of the war had changed, and so, and at that point we were pulling up. so there was really no chance. even at the end when we had the paris peace accord framework where we were just going to give air support and material suppor

i believe that ending an innocent life is moralally wrong but i believe it's moralally wrong to take the funds of taxpayers and use it to fund a procedure that they find morally offensive. over 30 years the patchwork of policies have denied federal funding for abortion in america, but today, that exto the yeoman's work of congressman smith of new jersey and congressman dan lipinski, we're bringing a strong and codified message that the american people don't want to allow public funding of abortion at the federal level, and i strongly support it. the man who first brought this idea before the congress was the late henry hyde. i had the privilege of serving with him. his eloquence cannot be matched but it can be peted. henry said, quote, i believe nothing in this world of wonders is more beautiful than the innocence of a child and that little, almost born infant struggling to live as a member of the human family. an abortion is a lethal assault against the very idea of human rights and destroys, along with the defensive baby, the moral foundation of our democracy, closed quote. today,

thirty seven people he suffers from moral hazard that's a euphemism for serial financial murder well if you're looking for an end to this financial repression max the next headline does not bode well inflation jumps again but adds more intel's king to keep rates low so this is george osborne the chancellor of the exchequer in the u.k. and mervyn king the head of the bank of england inflation jumped to four point five percent and is due to hit five percent by the end of the year but despite this they're saying i don't raise the rate this is exactly i'm talking about inflation is rising the price of food and energy is rising but they won't let interest rates or wages rise because they want to keep rates near zero to finance their speculation and whenever they make a bad bet of course they get bailed out by the taxpayer who the. it has to suffer austerity measures to pay off these deaths it is financial repression it's using the globalized financial networks to impose that what i call the casino ghoul leg model of economics and mervyn king is being again like others in the system he's g

he took his feelings about morality very seriously. and, indeed, if you had asked him, are you a christian, he might well have said, yes. but his sense of christianity is very difficult to get ahold of. we just know it wasn't on one of the extremes. well, that's a very powerful image. [laughter] of washington. and this is another powerful image of washington. [laughter] developing in the late 19th century, the early 20th century is the washington mythology -- as the washington mythology gathers strength and develops, and the centennial in 1876 of the revolution, the declaration of independence and beyond that, americans became fascinated with historic homes and buildings. well, now you know if you own a restaurant or if you own a historic inn or bed and breakfast, there's one thing you need to succeed; you have to have a ghost. in the 19th century, you had to have george washington. you had to say that washington slept here. it became a very kind of powerful tour attraction. -- tourist attraction. so people all over the country in thes

does ma mean it's morally appropriate? you could find a way to limit in to strict necessity where you're going to save large numbers of civilian lives, i do think you can make a case for it. what we have to worry about is not the killing of osama bin laden, which most of us are actually relieved. it's rather that we aare ceding the president, the authority of who to decide to be killed. and that's not just the authority of obama who we may like. it's his successor, his succe success successor, his successor. as long as there's a war on terror, there's presidents who will be deciding unilaterally on who to kill. that's something we should talk about and think about very hard. >> you have taken as a premise that bin laden was not operationally involved in al qaeda that he had somehow become a father figure to them and an ideological spokesman perhaps but not day to day involved. has anything that's emerged changed your perspective on that. has it changed your assessment of whether to take him out was appropriate. . >> he was

it should be big for morale and a definite boost to our own morale. >> reporter: he specializes in u.s. action toward terrorists. >> it certainly has an impact on the morale, it certainly has an impact on the symbol of al qaeda, the face of al qaeda terrorism, but i think it also has a bit of an impact practically because it will discombobula discombobulate. >> reporter: he also says bin laden's death may increase the risk of revenge attacks. >> i think more dangerously, if someone or some terrorist group within the united states takes this to heart and over a period of time smolders with anger and perpetuates a very serious attack, that's a possibility. >> reporter: still, he says, killing bin laden is a definite victory for the u.s. there may be other leaders lurking in the wings but he says they lack bin laden's charisma. >> they don't have the same kind of appeal. he was a leader that appealed to people. he spoke to them in a way they understood and he could mobilize them in a way others could not. >> reporter: he says bin laden's death won't end terrorism, but eliminating an elusi

and understand the difference between arbitrary rules like here's where you hang your hat and moral rules like don't hit don't steal as early as fourteen or fifteen months of age and i've certainly found of my own parenting that my daughter is very very clear on what is moral and what is just an arbitrary rule that sort of for convenience and so yeah we should treat them as morally thinking and reasoning human beings they can do statistical analysis is early as eight months old or so i think we should be more in all of them and less in control of them how those are gotten us the fun she is twenty nine months and you've already had some experiences dealing with her expressing her personal preferences and ways it a lot of traditional parents would not have respected tell us about that. yeah i mean there's a kid in a playground not too far from here he's an older kid and he's a little biled a little rough and doesn't really know how much how much or other how much older. i think he was eight or nine times i mean i don't i'm not an expert on its own area and i know he's kind of rough an

morality and ethics.if you want to know the answer to a moral question you go to the issue of what is the most important thing for me to live for. when it comes to politics question is how should we interact with our fellow members of society? what are the principles of human interaction that may be coat of fighting a system of law. those are different but obviously related. one of the things a classical liberal would argue and my friends doug rasmussen and doug i do this in a book called norma of liberty, showed that considering the kind of society you want to live under with millions of others who may disagree with you on many issues, you have to champion one that respects basic rights, dignity, the willingness of everyone to undertake to live a life of his or her own. you cannot impose on others codes of conduct, ethics that they do not freely choose. freedom becomes a vital element of a good society because will leave in freedom is one able to choose the right thing rather than be made to do the right

we need to take a higher moral ground. we need to not celebrate death in this way and instead show people we are humbled by these actions, we are we flective and decide to take a different path than our enemies. >> let me disagree with both of you. i hear the sentiment you're expressing. you're both articulate and persuasive. having said that, this was a moment of joy that sgoomebody w committed the most vile acts in our history was captured and was not in a position to perpetrate more acts. it was not a death as much as it was we who believe in tolerance, freedom and justice -- >> that's true, that's very valid. >> that's why i sympathized and supported those, not every word uttered, but the sentiment down at ground zero. thank you for a fascinating situation. pleasure having you on the show. >> thank you, thank you. >> now e.d. hill joins me. >> you're going to love this. the guy who created s.e.a.l. team six is going to join us. he'll going to tell us the critical reason why even though the military was relaying the det

. >>> más adelante, se da a conocer la suspensión, el castigo de chivas usa, que fracturó a morales,talles al volver.

bomb in anybody anywhere close and as an enemy i'm happy you brought it up actually to how do we moralize a situation like that who came up with those rules to say that it's acceptable you know within the laws of war to drop bombs and you know and then a result in massive civilian casualties but you can't go inside and assassinate one foreign leader or one terrorist group leader you know inside of a compound. it doesn't make a whole lot of sense more than you can see the reason why you want to shoot people who surround you disprove them that's a practical concern and in terms of the reality of it it's certainly seems worse to to actually kill a whole bunch of people who are in the area but it is to kill one particular person . in terms of being on assassinations of public officials which obama agrees the storm force and so to the bush administration but doesn't really make any sense morally it means you can't kill gadhafi for example on purpose by accident would be ok if you drove like they did over the weekend in fact right before this raid on bin laden's house the nato forces bombed of

porque he visto a roberto desde el principio cuando necesitaba toda clase de ayuda, mÁs que todo apoyo moralra tan contento y tan... tan seguro pues me emociona. >> asÍ con el esfuerzo de todos roberto recibiÓ una llamada telefÓnica que le devolvió la

that is the moral point. just because we have done it in the past, we used to hang, drawl, and quarter people. and then displayed the body in public. nobody is suggesting that is a good idea. you are well aware of the power of images. the lasting image of bin laden, otherwise, it is this guy with a beard and turban and a k-47 either in his hand or propped up behind him. is that the image that we one of them? >> well, it it an image of him. i think the more attention you pay to this, the more you create new controversy and the bigger the image of bin laden becomes. that cannot be any bigger than at not being released. >> i think can c, and putting a cap on it and saying, no, let's move on. they have plenty of other things to do. as obama said, i have better things to do. >> that is set for this week. from all of us, goodbye. >> funding was made possible by -- the freeman foundation of new york, stowe, vermont, and honolulu, newman's own foundation, the john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation, and union b

we need to take a higher moral ground. we need to not celebrate death in this way and instead show people we are humbled by these

no matter how popular that morality might be. are the democrats or republican parties that view you as a public/private partnership where in my view you're increasingly the junior partner. and for them the role of the state is to impose morality. >> guest: i agree with you. i don't know exactly what we're going to argue about. [laughter] >> guest: but let me just say this, neither the north koreans, nor a possible libertarian society is going to have everyone conform to the theory that puts them into play. after all, there are people in a relatively and in a fully free society who would be unlikely, who will have impediments, who will need help. i just happen to think that free men and women will provide that help much more readily and efficiently than governments do. as far as north korea is concerned, i'm sure there is a black market in north korea. i'm sure there are men and women who are carved out a little sphere of freedom for themselves, just like we did in hungary, just like people in cuba do, just like people who have be

he is the moral equivalent of farrakhan on the left. host: who are you supporting right now for president? caller: it depends on who is the nomination is for the republican party. divisive, undertone racist type candidates -- i would have to support a re-election of the president who just went and got bin laden and bingm and done several things. actually i am ashamed of my party. i cannot leave it. we are led to believe that maybe we can change the party from within. until the republican finds out the resources it can have an african-american man in the, maybe they will be more objective. host: what you think of your gov. mitch daniels? caller: he is a joke. basicallykly -- planned parenthood to the right wing. if he continues to be divisive i will not continue to vote for him. he has done a great job in the state. getting the horses and order so he can run for president. throwing bones to the tea party and all of these people and i hope he does not compromise his integrity in doing so. as it stands our party has been taken hostage by t

strategy it was a war without any real aims it was something that the west jumped into for reasons of moral grandstanding more than anything else about any real clear sense of who they're doing it on behalf of who the rebels are and what they want to achieve from it so the other is the wrong reasons that you were talking about. yes i think while they were taking this kind of black and white picture that you know you had this theory and it's just a case of getting rid of him and i think it really underestimate they really underestimated the complexities of the situation and they're starting to discover this now but it's not just the three back to my point the reason i think they're being cautious for the wrong reasons here is because they're concerned about who they're dealing with from the rebels it's actually not not that they should have been asking these questions before they actually got into the conflict in the first place but actually because they're nervous there might be extremists in the mix

---a continuacion vemos a "monica morales" quien se graduo de la universidad de sacramento.us datos completos y una pequeÑa descripcion a "tureportas @univision. com". ---en nuestra pagina de internet: "univision14. com" podran ver una fotogaleria completa.. ---¿le gustaría ganarse un "ipad"?--para lograrlo tiene que ver noticias univision 14 a las seis y tomar nota de la pista que presentara "erick morales" locutor de "la kalle". --a la mañanan siguiente, llame a "erick" cuando él se lo indique durante su programa de radio.---si se perdio la pista de hoy, manana a las seis durante "noticias univision 14" se revelara la proxima, para que pueda llamar a "erick" el miércoles. ---...veamos un adelanto deportivo con bernardo osuna. ya esta listo bernardo osuna y los deportes.. ---pasamos con guillermo quiroz con el pronostico. trt 1:04 ---mas adelante en noticias univision 14.......muchos menores de edad que llegan a la sala de emergencia reciben medicamentos que no necesitan... detalles al volver ministración del seguro social. encontrará información muy útil, y lo más importan

. >>> más adelante, se da a conocer la suspensión, el castigo de chivas usa, que fracturó a morales,anchester city se anunció que se enfrentará a galaxy de los Ángeles, el encuentro será el 24 de julio, es un torneo en que varios equipos se medirán a equipos americanos, este partido, se une al duelo de galácticos, y real madrid, el 16 de julio, y hablando de la mls, se dio a conocer el castigo para el jugador de chivas usa para la falta de morales. pagará una multa de 1500 dólares, y estará suspendido por 4 encuentros. >>> rafael márquez, recibieron una clínica de fútbol. >>> que la pase bien, no mucha gente puede estar con gente como nosotros, y yo tambié de chico lo disfrutaba, ojalá lo disfruten. >>> eso es todo, continuamos con más. >>> gracias enrique, y retratos hablados de dos sujetos que pegaron a seguidores de los gigantes, estará a la vista de todos, una empresa donó 300 anuncios. el ataque contra brian ocurrió el 31 de marzo, y desde entonces, no se sabe nada de los paraderose, la víctima está en el hospital, en estado de coma. >>> y una señor cumplió 110 años. >>> doñ dom

thank you, yes, the old language is more judgmental, it makes moral statements and moral judgments and the new language talks about this as a health issue. this is a health issue that we're dealing with and the old language doesn't acknowledge that. and carlos, did that affect you in your path to recovery? it did early on. september is really important because it happens to be my anniversary month... it's also recovery month. it is also recovery month, thank you for pointing that out. but september 23rd will represent my 17th year as a person in long-term recovery. and so i go back to my first opportunity to be in the treatment and some the labels and what was really interesting is that folks in the program themselves were labeling themselves. so the, you could be in a 12-step meeting and it's recommended, a particular fellowship that i attend, that you identify yourself simply as an addict. and folks thought it was real cute to identify themselves as low bottom or a rock star or some of the things. so for as much as society and the public labels us or attaches labels, early in the rec

you've got to make sure you've got the moral high ground you've got to make sure that it is the measure of last resort where all other avenues of negotiations have been exhausted and i'm not sure we met those criteria when it came to libya as well so i think the lesson still need to be learned and repeating past mistakes and you see any progress in terms of learning lessons from the past well i see some progress you will have seen the prime minister has talked to the curating parliament and this year you will have seen the foreign secretary has agreed to review its britain's arm sales policy after every questioning in the foreign affairs select committee these are small positives and i do believe to a certain extent british foreign policy may be at a crossroads in which it seems we've got to become more ethical and moral honest but let's talk about that i mean you say that the prime. it's a speech to the parliament but that was a part of the trip which was essentially to hawk arms around the middle east when the trouble had already started it was that a serious error in judgment i mean

>> educate them. >> glenn: morals, values? >> it's all gone, i mean we used to be able to teach the -- our country was based on god and the bible. that's why they came over here. religious reasons. now we can't tell kids that anymore. we can't tell them about the "ten commandments." thou shall not steal, period. >> glenn: the best way to fix is it a voucher system. >> that would be fantastic. >> i would love a voucher system. >> why? >> i have been paying school taxes and then i send my kids from -- >> glenn: no, no no. no, no, no. i'm talking about how to fix the parents. why would it fix the parents? >> because if they choose to go to a certain school, it's the families and the students that want to be there. i work at a charter school and i see the difference. families want to be there. they choose to go there. >> glenn: look, here is the thing. i mean i'm a recovering slug. before i sobered up, i sent the kids to school, they're going to learn something. what are they teaching you in school? that mentality. i sobered up an