and moral values and not so much about data.ecause i find that, you know, in american politics people often don't respond very well to data. i can show them how it's a money saving thing to provide contraception and that doesn't sway them. but i do think that -- that, and this is partly what i mean by moral property, i think it's an extremely moral act to make clear decisions about when you are going to have children and how many and with what spacing and it has to do with valuing children, with valuing a real hands on parenthood, that you know, that you really have children because you want to give them a lot of love, and to create some kind of family around them. i'm very open about what kind of family, it's fine. i have no objection to families of two women, or families of two men, which we occasionally see, but i see that as a morale value. and i do think that in some ways what goes on with a very religious movement like the christian right is that they seem to be the only people who stand for morality, and i think that we h

but i see that as a moral value. i do think that in some ways what goes on with a very religious movement, like the christian right, is that they seem to be the only people who stand for morality. and i think we have other kinds of moral issues that are important. so i think that's what i would probably talk about and how that has changed over time. >> linda gordon, professor of history from new york university, thanks for joining us on american history tv. >>> jeff city, missouri. lewis and clark stopped here during their expedition. hooegsed by c-span's content vehicles, we visited many sites showcasing the city's rich here. learn more on american history tv. >>> we're going into the stacks where the records are held for the archives. we hold records from all branches of state government. we have at least 338 million documents in our holdings here. 500,000 photographs. video and film library. just a tremendous amount of material that researchers are able to use when they're conducting reserve at the archives. these

i see it as a moral value.o think in some ways what goes on with a religious movement like the christian right is they think they are the only ones who stand for morality. there are other moral issues that are important. i would talk about how that's changed over time. >> linda gordon, professor of history from new york university thanks for joining us. >> you're welcome. >> sopa and pipa are dead. i think that's pretty clear. the effort that was undertaken there ran into a lot of controversy, missed communication. >> cochair of the international internet on anti-piracy legislation in the next congress and other issues tonight at 8:00 eastern on the communicators on c-span 2. all weekend jefferson city, missouri, show casing its rich history. to learn more about local content vehicles and the 2012 tour visit c-span.org/local content. now a further look at jefferson city on c-span 3. >> we're standing in the very heart of the campus of lincoln university in jefferson city, missouri. this institution has a histor

you talk about moral leadership and the lack thereof. what about the morality of debt? >> well, the morality of debt, corporate debt as a nation is a form of thievery. think about it for a minute. when i went to the senate in 2004, the average individual debt on our national debt was under $30,000. it's at almost $60,000 per man, woman and child. second point. if you have an adolescent in your household today, when they were my age, if we don't change things, they will owe, not counting interest, in excess of $1 million per person. that's what they will be responsible for in terms of our accumulated debt and the compounding interest on it. there is a question to ask. i'm doing a big study on disability right now. is it moral to create dependency in individuals? or is it a petter option to nurture them to earn success and raise the lid so they can achieve their god-given abilities? and if you really look at what we've done with many of our, quote, social welfare programs, is we've taken away opportunity. god's gift to these individuals to excel in many ways as we've unde

nos tiene todos los detalles.. 0:02 0:33 0:54 1:17 1:22 daniel morales / londres muchisimas gracias,e, me encuentro en la estacion internacional stratford, lo que podria denominarse tambien como el gran portal al parque olimpico y parada obligada para los turistas internacional es. pkg--- se estima que en este verano, la infraestructu ra de transporte del transporte publico de londres vera un maximo de 800,000 mil pasajeros, muchos pasaran por esta estacion, que combina los tradicionales buses de dos pisos con el moderno sistema de 12 diferentes lineas del tren subterraneo y tren ligero. sot cg: jorge tovar / colombiano las instalaciones. el tren, el metro, o sea ha cambiado totalmente. es muy nuevo y la cantidad de gente que hay ahora es impresionante. la estacion y el adyascente centro comercial westfield, representa una inversion de mas de 2-mil 700 millones de dolares y es hoy el mall mas grande de todo europa. sot cg: juan meneses / turista colombiano yo he entrado y es alucinante no tiene nada que ver con las estructuras en latinoamerica es algo compeltament e europea, muy boni

the other i think is the moral, the moral approach, and i do agree with you, the moral approach is a big thing in this sort of process. it's just one thing more to say, which is i'm afraid to say that all the parties use the public money and use the power they have to go buy votes. how can we manage to know exactly the amount of votes that are bought? how can we manage to know exactly, as francisco said before, if there is some people who change the intention of the vote before and after they have money from the parties? how can the electoral institutions manage in terms of legal terms to know exactly where is the border, between the conscious and the sale, selling of votes. it is a big, big problem, and we are knowing of this problem. you are right. we have a very big moral problem around the political parties in mexico. >> okay. our two panelists want to say something but i'm going to keep you very short because we want to give pab row gutierrez as well a chance. >> i want to quickly defend the prd, something i almost never do and say that under the new leadership of berard and man

pretty far reaching effect mostly because it is a moral accounting of this of this policy. and so in that sense you know you talk about a locking of course who we've heard so much about but then you bring up. his sixteen year old son who was also killed in a strike and yemen and so why did you spend so much time focusing on him well basically to show that there are two sides of the coin i mean most people when on moral ask you was killed applauded i mean there were very few people who are shedding tears for and we're all lucky but two weeks later another american citizen was killed it was a lucky son who was never accused of any crimes who's ever accused of terrorism and who was now in fact looking for his father was you know miles and miles and miles away from home was saying goodbye to friends that he was staying with that night when a drone strike killed seven or eight teenage boys around a fire. so i basically want to show that you know that you know that the you know the obama administration has basically said that this process this program is so precise so surgical so

is that moral or immoral. the fed buys assets like mortgage backed securities which is real estate and part of our national debt which is treasuries which we have to pay tax on in the future like i said with these fraudulent counterfeit checks that borrow currency into existence and in debt s. in the future does he believe that that is moral for it to be able to create currency from nothing and go around buying up pieces of this country it's a great question mike wait before we go i just have a minute left i really want to make sure i got to this because because currency is it's a debt based system and there's not enough currency to pay the debt that's created and i'm curious in this system if you that he said it was live or scandal has anything to do with an assessment of where the monetary system is it was something we're talking about before the show that. the library scandal is all the banks know that this is a sinking ship and they're trying to grab everything they can before the game is over they know th

no, but is it moral? absolutely. >> is it the most moral -- is it the most moral system?ear from the governor and i have my thoughts -- >> 70% of inherited wealth is lost within five years, all right? >> right. >> so, and it's way better -- i mean, when you raise your kids, you raise them to be independent. you want people to have an opportunity. now, it's got to be a fair and level playing field. everybody has the opportunity, has to have the opportunity. i mean, i lived in public housing. i started school living in public housing. my dad had a sixth grade education. so, in america, you have this opportunity. it's harder now, way more regulation, the taxes way different than years ago, but that's what america's been built on, capitalism, the opportunity to get somewhere. >> but when you raise it to a religious level, which is what my colleagues are doing -- >> that's not true at all. >> when you say moral imperative, that speaks to me of religion. i believe what larry kudlow says, that it's the best path to prosperity, but is it -- [ everyone talking at once ] >> you're

it does result in low morale. but it also results in low morale not just because of you're going to have people in the agency that would disagree with the practice or the fact that there's no appropriate accountability for officers who are clearly operating outside professional conduct. it has low morale when the community that we serve then becomes, you know, complaining about us being unprofessional. or about the reputation of the agency being, you know, that of a victimizer as opposed to a protector. so -- and the chief is absolutely right. it starts with the management. it starts with the very top person and the top level people allowing these things to occur in individuals that they won't hold accountable. as a captain in my agency, i believe it's my charge to hold people accountable when they conduct themselves unprofessionally, and i do so. you know. i think some people have said here that you know, well, there seems to be some kind of great thing going on in denver or what have you. i'm just going to tell

had a significant impact on my education in economics by giving an understandable approach for the moral argument for free markets and showed that all you really need to know about free markets and economics you learned in kindergarten. i won't reveal the secret. you can ask him about that afterwards. when dr. richards isn't appearing on "larry king live," lecturing members of the u.s. congress or producing documentaries, he is a contributing editor of the american, which is a publication of the american enterprise institute. he is a visiting fellow at the heritage foundation, a research fellow at the acton institute. he is here today with co-author james robison of their latest book "indivisible: restoring faith, family, and freedom before it's too late." today our society is riddled with fatherless homes and a national debt on the brink of $16 trillion, and a government that has grown increasingly out of control. to quote dr. richards, today we are fight agriculture war, not a civil war. a culture war is unlike ordinary political debates. it's a fight over the fundamental principles on

cinsuc whatd idbeet was an idea of truth and moral absolute. he believed there were just interpretaons. no such thing as age. d osoconsuc. ita rl. there is such a thing as truth. when you abandon common-sense and treat the body like a vessel to be throw everything into it, he h sitybwa usisy dr a ee wereupseto re and looked to him? that is an example because he penalizes the distinction of what the catholic church teaches chngtror mhe istural -- human erody is center of his own ideas and his own morality. that has certain consequences. cuff solecism matters but it h consequences. if we could all follow it, not hold myself up as some begin. cior g society has been around for 2,000 years and we have to stop with this cacophony of catcalls and trying to shut it down. all we want aohnli ono po wtopo we have things to say. my job in the catholic league is to say -- time out. let the catholic voice be heard. want to disagree? fine. do so respectfully andcivilly. wngin o soy icig and left people are out there in an irresponsible way, shout you down. t

, but morales stole the show.els and rangers tied 3-3. a two-run shot from the left side of the plate. angels up 5-3. then with the sacks full, morales, another home run, this time from the right side. the third player in baseball history to hit two homers in an inning from each side of the plate. angels go on to rout the angels 15-8. >>> a couple of guys that have an opinion on almost everything. donald trump and bill o'reilly. wonder when they think of the yanks acquiring ichiro. 100th career home runnd first as a member of the bronx bombers. unfortunately, not enough. orioles win 5-4. red sox with an opportunity to make up a game on the yanks and they take advantage of it. mr. laser show, justin pedroia, the league in the sixth. red sox beat the tigers 7-3. and the cubs expected to make moves before today's trading deadline, rumors doing the cu y cubbies well, bestball of the season. 14 runs on the pirates. win big 14-4 and won five of the last seven. alex rios with a blast to center. high, deep, not deep enoug

simple -- simplicity of it, the moral frankness of it, then the moral complexity, but he immediately arranged a meeting with jeanne. she was standoffish, i don't knoll any republicans, she would say, and that sort of thing. nonetheless there was an immediate kindling between these two people. it was political love at first sight, really, and jeanne actually came back and kind of -- the day after having this big meeting with reagan, had a dinner at george will's house with him, and then later on had a dinner involving people like daniel moynihan, in which she talked about -- and they were aghast. how could you be doing this? he's a right-wing republican? but jeanne had done her homework. she had called jess unruh, the big daddy of california politics, who had actually run against reagan and been the speaker of the house of representatives in california, and reagan -- and unruh said, look, i oppose the guy but he has been an honorable man in california politics. he is somebody you ought to take seriously. so, that was how she got started with reagan. >> host: my guest is peter collier,

those three key moral points are fundamental in the state in this country. thank you. >> in closing the program, i want to thank all of you for coming to the 2012 justice summit. one thing that has distinguished our work in what we have done at these summits is action. if you look at over the past nine years, we have the evidence to prove that. out of our first summit came the call to have a community based collaboration that helped use and families work together on a community-based level. we have developed the programs for growth in our communities. out of the second summit came a call for better coordination of services and from that sprung the re-entry council. the official policy body. what we're looking to achieve this year is to make strides going forward particularly in the area of violence reduction and gangs. we have heard about the strategies today. we have seen the promise of law enforcement being able to work together with community-based organizations dedicated to violence reduction. this is possible but only of you all get involved. so for tho

know it's our moral obligation to. support peaceful. support the iranian people deciding their own future and deciding their own aspirations and not siding with a group that wants to impose its own form of democracy on iran however quixotic this vision may be that is somehow going to take over iran but really we're throwing those values under the bus or throwing the iranian people under the bus and i think you know newt gingrich was quite taken with this group he actually he went to france and there's a video of him bowing to maryam rajavi who is the leader of the group who is considered by the u.s. government a terrorist bowed to her and then criticize the u.s. government on you know on french soil which newt gingrich himself was criticizing president obama for going overseas and supposedly vowing to get to foreign leaders and then he himself is taking money to bow to terrorist leaders so i think that any sort of moral credibility or consistency is probably lost when you have examples like this coming from officials l

sisolamente tienes un antecedente penal de carÁcter moral, no fuiste clasificado como menor yno tienes dichosperdn para ti... cuando termine inmigÓn de redactar los reglamentos paraimplementar la nueva directriz del presidente obama para los cÓnyuges deciudadanos americanos, podra Ás tramitar tu caso. la Ía y en indi.. elli esalvado..e pidi que regunt su s salvad. marisolamey tiens... lido la obama la pudiese ayudar para lograr laresidencia. pienso que los reglamentosestÉn listos para que marÍa comience ese tra mite en octubre o noviembre. suerte. y ahora los depo con oscar para finalizar les cuento que el lanzador de los nacionales no estara en el juego de las estrellas, en el voto final de patocinadores fue para yu darvish de los rangers y el tercera base david freese de los cardenales. hasta aqui los deportes.

s i think the moral simplicity of it, that is the moral frankness of it more than he saw the moral complexityf it let's say but nonetheles immediately ranged ameeting li sof.s ws doknnyubns would say in that and that sort of thing. and nonetheless, there was an imdiate kindling between these two people. i mean it waspolitical love at jeaclycbkdtrely. kind of, the day after having this dinner t george will's house with him a then later on after dinner,involvg pop shlkbondy aann wich t. these are right-wing republican. the gene but jean had done her homework and a man named jess unger who was the big daddy of moicoieu r aire aheak the house of representatives in california. he said look, i oppose the guy but he has been an honorablean seslsody y o to kets. wi reagan. >> host: peter collier is the author o"political woman" the big little life of jeane kirkpatrick. reagan is elected and jeane is ofd and takes a joof tossad te iat both in u.s. policy in august lee and her own political career. now she was rather embattled as u.n. ambassado she was in battle with the united nations, the ureaucracy

number one, the first lady talking about morality. that's a great thing. i think that's to be celebrated. >> bill: really. you are not saying that sarcastically? >> no. i say that in all seriousness. and any time we have a prominent citizen of her stature, then that's great. and i don't personally have a problem with going to a church and talking about those things. the issue, i think arises here with the obamas though because of decades of liberals attacking faith and politics. there is always as you alluded to the separation of church and state, that's supposed to being sack sacrosang. if george bush goes to the a church and talks about marriage. importance of the marriage. traditional family, abortion, any of these types of issues, people on the left will usually say how could you do this you? are politicizing the pulpit and how dare you do this on election year. >> bill: they're moral issues as well. >> they are moral issues to a vast majority, i would submit. >> bill: sure. >> of african-american pastors would think that much of what the obamas have d

those three key moral points are fundamental in the state in this country. thank you. >> in closing the program, i want to thank all of you for coming to the 2012 justice summit. one thing that has distinguished our work in what we have done at these summits is action. if you look at over the past nine years, we have the evidence to prove that. out of our first summit came the call to have a community based collaboration that helped use and families work together on a community-based level. we have developed the programs for

ven, pero tÚ hiciste lo correcto, al cerrar, dije, bueno le enseÑe la moral. >>> tomÁ su familia y noo pueden creer. >>> solo hacÍa su trabajo. >>> te parece injusto? >>> sÍ.not uni-edicion no rpt@@@ Í una celebridadad, prefiere que no le llamen hÉroe, lourdes del rio, univisiÓn. >>> buenvamos a la pausa, en instantes donde hay mÁs de 20 muertos por un aguaardiente cÁrcel para un ex dictador argentino, y un estudiante hispano un verdadero ejemplo, ss @@enÓnot uni-edicion no rptunivn isionerzo, not unicion pt@@univ facebook y twitternot con el uv numera ediciÓn nocturna, vamos a la pausa, y Á yaion noun rionc - n t t d o t ♪. ♪. >>> la policÍa antimotines de bolivia, se enfrentÓ a indÍgenas que evitan ser despojados, desalojados del campamento en la capital del paÍs, utilizaron gases y caÑones de agua, estuvieron varios dÍas acampando por planes del presidente morales por construir una carretera en una reserva natural indigenia. vivir en carne propia la violencia dejaron huella en jÓvenes, algunos se tratan de recuperar, historias recientes, que tienen como escenario, mÉxico, el salvad

it's morale choice. my morale choice to give it away.my morale choice to have it in the restaurant. my morale choice to cook it. >>reporter: above the side dug in their heel unwilling to pwuchblingt at some point the show down may end up in court. for now this controversy is in the court of public opinion. >> it's up positive the consumer to do their education, get their education done and make their own opinion on it. i don't think that they should go just by what they visually see from one person. >>reporter: similar erling controversy may also reach a point where one side is indicating it may back down at least at this restaurant. >> i think if it gets to the point that it is really causing too much trouble we'll stop serving it. >>reporter: owner of shade tj taking that you will in stride. he's out there talking to the protestors. he doesn't seem to be winning very many of them over. there are also 2 supporters out there with signs that say we love shade tj n.mountain view, david lou abc 7 news. >> and the controversy continues. let'

one thing i think maybe we haven't looked at enough is our role as sort of a moral adviser. if the rules don't permit it or demand it, should we at least be counseling our clients about what is right in trying to be persuasive and influential and that doesn't raise kesconcerns about chilling our communications because we might breach their confidentiality. if you look at how the rules have progressed since 1908 with the canons, our role as the moral adviser and moral compass has been diminished more and more as we move toward a more black letter regulatory code for lawyers. it's left less room for that, and that's sort of one thing i think we can think about. >> jim, do you think it would have made a difference? >> the thing i think is important and that john and i talk about a lot is this whole idea of leverage. because lawyers can and a lot of lawyers do counsel their clients to do the right things, and a lot of times they find their counsel is not being followed. so you have to have some leverage to not only counsel them to do the right things but to get them to do the ri