how to increase morality? we would ask you if you want to donate to a task force think about your own morality. but the irs to not do any experiments with us for obvious reasons of a difficult organization they have complexity's to you deal with. but we did it with an insurance company. people say please give us the you odometer reading. because then the premium goes down. we gave this form to 10,000 people and we got them to sign first. the people who signed first or driving 2400 miles more so this suggests when you invoke people's mind set in a more honest way a high degree of honesty will follow. matter what you think it is not easy to change the moral fiber but what we can do is get them to be more honest for two hours when they do their taxes is or if they're professionals to be honest but said the we don't do enough of those interventions. >> host: win a deity is invoked as the increase on the state? >> yes. in multiple ways. that when people think about religion in particular it does bring fox about mor

i think a lot about morality. once the area made the democrats and we discuss off the record things that bother them. so there's all kinds of new things. for example, think about after all. adhd medication. but if you take it it's like 15 cups of coffee. you can basically stay awake all night. it's not supposed to be used for recreational abuse. but the drug companies make it easy to go and say i can't focus in the quickly give you medication. where do you stand on the morality of that? is immoral to lie to a doctor should get the medication? we all have some focus problems. is it okay to exaggerate? and if your friend exaggerates, to exaggerate yourself? kinnie virally pilfer non? right now you can go to wikipedia. you can change the value and quality. it's a strange word, ray. there's lots of things like that the grayscale is much more nuanced. finally, dishonesty is much more press than the media. if you think that everybody else is doing that, it creates situations where we situations where we have a sense tha

into civil rights it is like slavery becoming a moral issue. not just an issue of policy but they recognized this ultimately meant war. >> this reminded me that early on, thurgood marshall had no sense of who dr. king was. who is this preacher down south? as late as the 1960s the naacp is worried about him and lax collection of money, taking money out of their coffers etcetera but the strategic difference is such that thurgood marshall is of the opinion that dr. king is a great speaker. he is a wonderful speaker. he can change hearts and do this and do that. you walk away from a king speech and are so enthused you go back to segregated neighborhoods, segregated schools, back to racial inequality on the work site and the only place you make concrete change is if you change the law in terms of congress and the courts. >> thanks. all three of your books address in addition to dr. king lesser-known figures. i wonder if you could choose a story you think people should know more about and share it with the audience. >> we talked about this. >> your t

i think it is also important to remember that the single moral imperative was the civil rights act.important as things like health insurance and immigration reform are today, and i think there are moral components, civil rights, the ending of this segregation, that is something for 100y have put off years, and dr. king had spent a decade already pushing for it throughout the south, and i think you have to look at that singular sort of urgency before you can question whether it could happen today. tavis: so to your point, i will ask you to a compact that. -- to unpack that. the moral imperative, maybe there is something in that answer that is informative for us to wrestle to the ground these issues today that have a moral component to them. >> i think you have to start with the work that was being done by dr. king, and not just dr. king but the whole breadth of the civil rights movement, going back decades before the law was passed in it is funny, when you look at what was happening, the kind of mood of the country, the mood of the movement at the beginning of that year, the beginnin

, and officer morales caught him. >> the baby's safe. a border policeman maces the suspect who keeps going. >> there was a mob of people and they all just waited for him. so he wasn't going to go anywhere. >> price is tackled by the mexican police. >> they got him, captured him going across the border. >> morales hands the child to charmaine rodriguez waiting nearby to rush the baby to safety. >> i grabbed the baby, and i ran into the building. >> fortunately, the toddler is unharmed. officials are stunned to learn the baby is eddie price's own son justin. >> what a terrible situation. this was going to cause a little baby to be without a father and certainly things weren't going to go well for his father. >> things go badly indeed for the father who winds up with a six-year prison term for burglary, evading arrest and child endangerment. >> we were just there, and we did what we had to do. >> for the border police whose crucial decisions and split-second timing were carried out in front of multiple cameras, it's an event they'll never f

we are talking about two men who proved the power of moral leadership. it was -- and all the cardinals and the archbishops. the majesty of the church was awesome. >> pat, you sent back notes on your observations about how powerful the ceremony was in terms of the reach, politically around the world. what does you mean by that? >> i meant that this new pope has touched at least two saints, have touched millions. what is interesting to me is we had we pope john paul ii who, the stories i heard in rome, about how he actually was an effective instrument, and reagan help, and bringing down the soviet union and going to poland and how he broke that and his moral leadership when everyone said that couldn't change, point john xxiii and the catholic church made it better for the common lay people and the new pope touching people all over the world, this is a power of the moral over the material and today was an awesome display of that. >> pat, we have been talking about the numbers of people gathered there. i have been there on easter sunday and i know how packed

moral declineing to answer questions rangeing from why he originally blameed fbi for change could the talking points, altering them and distorting and destroying truck of matters. -- truth of matters. asked wited abouted his knowled' roller benghazi. >> i don't remember. the timing of my awareness of that investigation. i did not know anything about what was going to with general petraeus. >> i don't remember, i i don't remember saying that there was briefings, again i i don't remember, but as i said, i would not be surpriseed if i briefed the deputies, on the 13th, that the attack had evolveed, i don't know when ones, you have to ask agency for that, but, it was coordinated. lou: moral claimed he changed what he calls certain quote insignificant editorial words, he admitting, his decision to ignore and e-mail from a station chief in libya. and e-mail that stated, clearly that there was no protests, that no demonstration occurred before the terrorist attack. here is moral telling committee, that his analysts and dc in his judgment quote more compelling evidence than cia station chief

>> so moral hazard and bankruptcy is real. you can see it. for one thing, todd zywicki who's a great bankruptcy scholar at george mason disagreed about that, i was against it precisely because of that entrepreneurship connection. he was for it. and he had said you'll see the rates of bankruptcy drop, and he was right about that, and i was wrong. so -- [laughter] i think we can infer from that that there was some abuse. there were people who didn't need to declare bankruptcy. and yet most people who could benefit don't use it by par the. i mean, many more people don't use it when they could than do use it when they shouldn't. in general, we focus a lot on abuse. we focus a lot on moral has card because it really ticks off a deep concern and correctly, right? bernie madoff, we should be really angry at him. he did something really terrible. but the on the much level of abuse -- optimum level of abuse is not zero. you talk to banks, well, they don't really say this, but it is sort of widely known that they just tolerate some level of embezzlemen

so moral monday has emerged. >> that's from one of the organizers. in february, the naacp estimates that up to 100,000 people rallied in the state capitol. it's the largest civil rights rally in the south since the march on selma that we were just talking about with the lbj legacy. voting rights has become a key issue, particularly a new set of laws in north carolina that will be put into practice for the first time in the may 6th primary. north carolina isn't the only state grappling with this voting rights issue. several other southern states are dealing with changes to their election rules as well. that comes on the heels of that landmark supreme court decision to lift requirements that were put in place by the voting rights act itself in '65. nine states and parts of six others are required to get federal permission before changing voting laws. the states have been identified as having laws on the books that restricted voters' opportunities to register or vote. laws that typically targeted minorities. that included 40 counties in the state of nor

i believe in moral clauses. you see this in the corporate world as well. ithe club maintains the right to dissociate itself with corporate entities, a great example is enron. but that is not with the players. the commissioner said as a nba family. this is a refrain adopted by the league. when you have this notion of a family, it really does blur the lines between what is purely legal in business and what is customary and the type of practice encouraged informally. that's the piece that i think will put the nba in position of putting their money where their mouth is, either they're family where you respect the rights of the each person within that unit, or you're a business. they really have tried to blur that a little bit . >> we're going to take a short break. when we come back we'll delve further into that very question versus what's legal and what's customary. what you can do and what you should do in the business from >> you're watching "inside story." i'm ray suarez. on this edition of the program we've been talking about the fallout from remarks alle

be moral, what's the point in saying it? in the geopolitical world a little less religion would be better don't you think? >> it was good to get your take on it doctor, thank you for coming in. that's it for london, back to adrian. >> many thanks. a memorial is to be held for the leader gks. are gabriel garci gabriel garci. al jazeera gabe allesandro are joins us from credit the town. gabe. >> what he captured in his words, aracataca. the home where he was born and he lift until he was eight years ol ld. people are celebrating his life, playing traditional music from the caribbean coastal community the region he was from. there are songs about him, whether people are young or old in his home town one thing for sure, they all have been touched some way or another by the famous writer. >> she's 97 years old and her memory is fading but magdaleno can still remember when she was a toddler with a nanny and gabriel garcia marquez. >> he was an envious kid. if he saw another child had something he wanted he would try to get it for

those are moral and spiritual issues like table manners. you have to be taught not to interrupt adults at the table. when i was growing up not to mix your peas with their mashed potatoes and ordered to e them with an eye for a spin. you have to be taught certain things. these manners are things that have to be taught. i think personal responsibility and integrity looking out for yourself looking to government as a last resort not a first resource is what will improve in the life and improve our country. >> host: somehow i get the impression that you think liberals are people who in fact who are openly reliant on government don't have some of these virtues that you just described, personal responsibility, wanting to work in wanting to succeed and american wanting to contribute. >> guest: i know many liberals including yourself who have these character qualities but the problem is so many of my liberal friends even though they may have those character qualities looked to government to repair what is wrong with people who don't have those char

this is wrong morally. black people were entitled to the same rights for lunch counters, restrooms, jobs, housing, whatever it is. not because the government is going to give it to them or should that because they enjoyed the same and analytical rights to separate a human being. >> host: you understand government had to enforce treatment. not for segregation. government was an important instrument. >> guest: it was. i don't want to be misunderstood here. not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. government needs to be straight with the theologians call sinful vote will not be constrained by a higher power. that is the purpose of government. government is a biblically established institution, but it has its limitations. the founders wanted government to be restrained so people would be unlimited. that's where the preamble starts with the people, not to the government. >> host: cal thomas, thank you for coming. the new book is called "what works: common sense solutions for a stronger america." you'll noti

another feature of political environment is our moralism. moralism derived from both our religious convictions and the strongly religious basis of our social values and the nature of our politics which lends itself to political moralizing partly because it's mimicking the religious convictions of the american people and partly for other reasons. another important political constraint is social diversity, and what that implies is that a uniform federal law cannot be nimble enough and flexible enough and variegated enough to reflect the underlying needs and desires of the population. again, we are unique in our social diversity in any modern liberal democracy for a variety of reasons. not simply for reasons of immigration, but also because of our religious diversity and our economic system. another important constraint on the effectiveness of policy making is populace suspicion of technical expertise and official discretion. public opinion, very powerful in the united states, more powerful, i dare say, than in other liberal democracies which i

or die need a spiritual and moral dimension to buttress that. i think that's what's is missing in government schools. >> host: harvard is not a government stool. >> guest: i'm talking about public school do. >> host: you said in your oak -- >> guest: harvard, dartmouth, yale, princeton, founded on biblical principles, some to train preachers or missionaries. now all of it's gone. i remember him saying it, when pussy -- pucy said the least to be expected of a harvard graduate was to say the name of god without embarrass. >> host: we'll be right back with cal thomas. his new book "what works: men sense solutions for a stronger america." >> host: we're back with cal thomas, the author of a new become, what works, comment sense solution for a stronger america. cal, at the end of the book you write, i'm quoting here, let's have the equivalent of testimony time in church where we can start show kaying people who on live in poverty and despair, now self-sufficient because they embrace the conservative and historically sound principles of -- kansas. kan

the franklin and algier advice about hard work, firm moral character, prudential habits of saving and thrift, all of this, i think, seemed irrelevant in many ways in this new society where, in people's daily lives, in bureaucratic settings, they were involved in interactions on a daily basis with dozens and maybe even hundreds of people over and over again. the old standard of hearty individualism just did not do much for them. in this new environment. carnegie's book, "how to win friends" dressed the situation directly and printed an irresistible messaging that people responded to very enthuseaticly, and that messaging was, quite simply, one could find success in the modern world by developing attractive personal traits, by developing and displaying self-confidence, by developing skills in human relations, and, most simply, as carnegie would put it, by getting people to like you. that was the game. carnegie insisted, and as some of you may know if you have head this book -- insists over and over again that getting ahead in life, securing a better job, making more money, enjoying the

that is not moral.t conservative. >> noah in the back. >> this is part of a really cyclical process. we had a movement, which gave way to prohibition, and a culture now celebrates alcohol. you're in danger of it going too far and pushing too hard one way or the other, the people who are pot activists. >> if we legalized the drugs, all drugs like gavin is saying that means we walk the streets with people in crack induced psychosis. >> people say i don't really care either way, then again if i live to a dispensary or next to denver park i might have a different point of view. >> sean, we have alcoholism, and people drinking too much. killing people. my point now, we legalize pot in colorado. we have to now -- law enforcement be able to test them on the spot like you do an alcoholic. because if somebody is stoned out on pot it is as bad as being stoned out on alcohol. >> we have to take a break, we'll be right back here on hannity. >> you can take a look at it. see what the bud looks like. you can open it

. >> guest: we could go on for an hour about that but slavery, denial of civil rights are moral issues primarily. yes lyndon johnson to his everlasting -- credit helped force that particular part of the country not just the south. you had race riots there too so it isn't just a southern thing, into an attitude and with the pictures on television. i was working during that period for nbc and i was with reporters and charles went down with the freedom riders in mississippi put film on the air that helped steer the conscious of the american people that this was not just wrong legally. this was wrong morally that black people were entitled to the same rights in the lunch counters restrooms jobs housing what a rat is not because the government was going to give it to them or should that but because they enjoy the same endowed inalienable rights as any other human being. >> host: you understand government had to enforce treatment.enforce segregation so government was an important instrument. >> guest: it wasn't again juan i don't want to be misunderstood here. i'm not throwing the baby out w

so now, what we are talking about now is about morality and how to deal with moral responsibility. >>r: german law puts a 30- year statute of limitations on stolen property, so the works, by law, remain the property of cornelius gurlitt. as for the art itself, authorities won't explain why they kept the discovery a secret for nearly two years. how strong is the government's criminal case against him? >> tido park: they really don't have a strong case. they pretend to have a case because they have, of course, to justify the seizure of the whole collection. >> safer: right now, the collection is in the hands of a task force, which is examining each work for evidence of looting. ingrid bergreen-merkel heads up the task force. uwe hartmann is the chief researcher. he says, even as germany was collapsing in 1945, the nazis were dutifully recording the art thefts. why did they keep these records of the evidence of their own crimes? >> ingrid berggreen-merkel: you mustn't throw public documents away. that's what they learned in... that's what they did. >> uwe hartmann: that's the german gruÜ

philosophyon moral at yale.e is a recent appearance at the ted talks where he talked about eulogies and resumes. >> i have been thinking about this problem. the thing that helps me think about this is a rabbi who wrote a book called "the lonely road faith."f he said there are 2 sides to our natures. the first is the world the external nature of us. the second is the humble side of our nature. not only to do good, but to be good. to live in a way that honors god, creation, and possibility. adam 1 wants to conquer the world. adam 2 wants to hear a calling. adam 1 asks how things work, adam 2 asks why. he argued that the two sides of our nature are at war with each other. we live in perpetual self -confrontation. we live in a society that neglects adam 2. that turned you into an animal. who treats life as a game, a person.lculating creature that slips into mediocrity. there is a difference between your desired self and yourself. >> where have you been? >> i have been busy. trying to write a book. and teach undergra

the budget is actually a moral document, a moral compass of where we want to take this country. i think what needs to be explained to the american public is in tulet, we have been making progress. the deficit has gone down from $1 trillion from the past administration, the bush administration, to now $680 billion. we are making trog, from losing 800,000 jobs a month to imagining close to 200,000. but the document that is on the floor today, the ryan budget, the republican budget chooses to not have the morality and affection for the american people that is desired. when you look at their budget, you will see that $3.3 trillion, 69% of their budget is cuts for programs for people with low or moderate income, the people who need a stair step of opportunity. they give $200,000 in tax cuts to the top 1% and none of us have any challenge to prosperity and opportunity, but how can you have a budget that hits low-income programs or programs that give opportunity, how many have gone to schools because of pell grants, $175 million in cuts. how many people have gotten their health care fr

why is there such a big morale problem there? maybe this whole evil doings went further.ee the irs guy sitting there and giving a check for $1,000, and a revenue agent gets 72k a year, and an irs attorney gets 100k a year, and a specialist gets 88k a year, and didn't they sign up for this stressful time to be, or was it like i never realized april 15th was going to be so stressful! i need more money or i will go work elsewhere! it seems like fair compensation, but all the other stuff they need, and i don't think they need $62 million. >> the workers are not really the problem, are they? >> no, not at all. i agree with emily about this. look, these guys didn't promise themselves these bonuses. somebody promised it to them. it's like the union, the pension problem we have in the united states. these guys are just going to work every single day and somebody is making them promises that the government can't keep or they shouldn't make at all. the problem is they are not just employees, and the problem is the irs. emily talks about a rig system, that's what the irs code system

into civil rights, it's like slavery becoming a moral issue. not just an issue of policy. but they recognized that this really ultimately meant war. >> what todd just said reminded me that early on, thurgood marshall had no sense of what who dr. king was. he thought, who is this preacher down south, making this noise? and as late as the 1960s, naacp is worried about him and lacks collection of money -- lax collection of money, taking money out of their coffers but the thurgood marshall is of the opinion that dr. king is a wonderful speaker. he can change hearts and you walk away from his speech and you so enthused but you go back to segregated schools and neighborhoods and racial inequality on the work sites. and that the only place that you macon crete change is of you macon crete change is if you change the law, both in the congress and the courts. >> all three of your books address lesser known figures in the movement. if you could choose a story you think people should know more about. >> i'll take one and then i'll leave the baltimore end

the moral premise is that wealth is theft.on't just mean wealth of ameri america, your wealth, my wealth, historically and in the present, people have been stealing to get what they get. historically, the argue ament is we stole the country from the indians. america stole the labor of african americans, america took half of mexico by force in the mexico war. american foreign policy based on theft. why? because look, america is very active in the middle east. why? the middle east has oil. notice that america doesn't get involved in haiti or row wanda because they don't have oil. >> do you have a different spin why these events took place? >> the final one is capitol list m. when obama said you didn't build that, he was arguing society collectively creates wealth and greedy entrepreneurs rush in and steal it. this is a central challenge, if you will, that we take on in this film america. we examine the allegations and repeat them one by one. >> take what happened with the ameri america kindians. >> it appears to be obvious, righ

what is the morale of the of that question -- morality of that question? think it is important to note that the people that made the decision to do this, in order to collect intelligence, that they to savethey needed lives, american lives, which turned out to be true. they had all these conversations, charlie. they had conversations about is this the right thing to do, conversations about morality, about the impact on employees. they had conversations about how this is going to come back to haunt the sunday. they had all those. this is not easy. i'm glad i was not put in the situation where i would have to make the decision. if i was put in that situation, i don't know what i would do. that0 minutes" i said these techniques were inconsistent with american values. i was specifically talking about waterboarding. you need to have a moral discussion about each technique. i would have drawn the line at waterboarding. >> you would not have waterboarded? >> i would not have waterboarded. >> i have known people in the cia that said to me, i promise you, it give us

there is a moral imperative to have breakfast. there is a moral imperative to help a disabled child. there is a moral imperative to do all of these things. we all feel that. but just because we spend 8% of the money up here doesn't mean we should substitute our judgment for the local school board and the principal who is accountable to that community for the safety of each child. we ought to think about that before we start assuming these responsibilities here. because if we pass this law and lead people to think that we've solved the problem and another problem happens, then who's accountable for that? the local principal? the local school board? the governor? no. maybe it's the united states senate because we took it upon ourselves to say we're the ones who are going to say to the parents, we've kept your child safe. we should enable parents. we should enable schools. we should enable local school districts to create safe schools, effective schools with high standards, give parents choices of schools with good teachers. but we s

the moral of the story is not just despair, it's also to not take your local newspaper for granted. if you're not paying for your local paying, why respect you? now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. have a great night. >>> the koch brothers are mad as hell and they're not going to take it anymore. today, charles koch wrote an op-ed piece attacking proept president obama and the democrademocrat and one republican senator decided the very best way to prove that he isn't in the pocket of billionaires was to go on to the senate floor and read the billionaire's op-ed piece word for word. >> the biggest story in american politics. >> the gop is addicted to koch. >> the koch brothers could spend hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars to elect right-wing candidates. >> in politic money talks and it just got a whole lot louder. >> now a person can contribute as much as they want. >> allows wealthy donors to contribute to as many political candidates and campaigns as this ept. -- they want. >> did anyone think we needed more money in politics? >> pushes

you are are ready in deep moral trouble. david magnificently as he was solomon the temple but another was the beginning of the end it's so on so they were interested in thinking about really this primordial constitution. they described the sanhedrin in very wishful thinking terms as a kind of senate. it's a lovely book by the harvard bug theorist eric nelson called the hebrew republic. there are many learned among you that might want to follow this up. the tradition by which there was some sort of civil governance which began at mt. sinai and then provided and nonroyal model and the papal model for the rest of the world has an extraordinary kind of life. some of its early writings go to italy and are quickly translated into english in particular and also into french. they influence cromwell secretary john milton. they therefore are transmitted to john locke and locke and james harrington you know are the hard-core theories of moral righteous republicanism in which thomas jefferson who was an assiduous bar were of looks from

he has a morals charge. after the morals charge, in those days, it was illegal to be gay in public, he could never be the leader. ego and,ged his behind the scenes, does so much good for the country, even though he can no longer be the star. that is in active service. -- an act of service. >> this is political affairs with the head chopped off. real power is in the swarm. exception, ihe would say. when i was covering the soviet union collapsed, we had leaders who were dominant figures in the world. reagan, youtcher, would say they were large figures. in is a large figure. obama, i will leave others to judge. the major confrontation is the autocrat versus the village square. we're seeing that in the ukraine, the air spring, lidia -- arab spring, libya. that is the crucial confrontation. giving me square the power to organize is crucial. look at occupy. >> it makes order more difficult. people toe to teach accept hierarchy and authority. you look at occupy wall street and it was not a lasting movement because

impacto sigue en cuidados intensivos estamos con los últimos detalles >> estamos con antonio junior moraleserno que correr a la escena >> al hospital fue a parar miley cyrus justo antes de una presentación le contaremos que le pasó en primer impacto cuando color elixir, el primer barniz labial cremoso, de maybelline new york. color intenso. brillo fascinante. sensación suntuosa. todo lo que los labios desean, en una sola pasada. color elixir. tal vez es maybelline. sus comentarios son siempre bienvenidos!! no deje de por >> lo esperamos en las cuentas personales, estamos pendiente >> esta shaila durcal para dar el último adios falelcio en su hogar a los 70 años >> de madrid miguel manriquez nos cuenta más de funeral de junior >> pese al dolor por la muerte de su padre, shaila y carmen morales mostraron fortaleza para decir que se fue tranquilo sobre todo cuando un hombre pierde a la mujer >> estaba sin vida se sospecha que llevaba de 12 a 14 horas muerto, y se ordeno una autopsia los resultados están disponible >> intentaba sonreír a la vida, ser feliz, sonreirnos, estar con nosotros >> los

no obvious successor that carries the moral authority that he had or the shining beacon of certainty about the future and how it should be conducted. it is very much searching for a way forward. the anc is no longer as popular as it used to be. they look at the failed states to the north, look at zimbabwe. and whether white and black people really worry about that. are they capable of actually doing very much? relative to other parts of africa, they are very fortunate. i don't want to try to critique the two presidents , nobody cana measure up to what he was. >> it feels very good, to be honest. love. critique him and i think in general, they feel that there isn't anybody that's holding on to the same moral compass he had. a sense of where you is headed and where he thought the country should go. theiracial is him and strong tons of nationalism. millions of people that have seen very little. the country deeply divided without a strong sense of leadership to follow. tavis: let me come straight ahead to it. this notion of what the alternative is beyond the anc> . andou are a south afri

todd, you come at this from a moral perspective. you write a lot about that. morally, do you see this as part of america in decline. >> i think absolutely that's the case. what we have here is the case of money over morality. right now, it's really funny. folks were watching these folks doing what they're doing out there and getting a good laugh about it. when the body count starts rising -- it's real funny isn't it? real funny to talk about? this is a classic example of people just not not giving a da anymore. >> hang on a second. i think what you're saying is they start with marijuana and they drink and they snort coke and do blow and they do this. >> where do you draw the line? that's the issue. >> so if you look at cigarettes, right, there's a huge push out there talking about how bad cigarettes are for you. think about pot over and over again, how great it is. it's not -- is medical marijuana helpful? yes. the doctor said so. but is other weed potentially bad for you? maybe, yes. why is there a promotion. >> the cigarettes is a good analogy. you can't smo

paid in morale and attention.you're wondering when the cameras will be rolling, we're told largely during the swing shift and the night shift. coming up tonight at 6:00, the producer of the show "cops" tells us why he chose this city. reporting live in san jose, scott bud hman. >> in the spotlight. >> camera crews everywhere. >>> let's turn things over to jeff ranieri, check on our forecast. >> beautiful day here, guys. check out this picture behind me. fog-free conditions in san francisco. that was the biggest difference over the past two days here throughout the bay area. some cirrus clouds above, a look at the warmest weather today, napa 80, los altos 80, south san jose, 79, half moon bay mild for your standards in 69 and san francisco we did push up to 74 degrees. let's get you outside to the sky camera network. you can see the trend is sunny. notice the 70s still here at 5:19, 76 the average in the south bay. 74 in the peninsula, the evaluate also at 70. check it out in san francisco, still tracking fog-free

the secretary fall of that moral and intellectual even entering the war they had actually not been as liberal. that was something he gave to them posthumously and something that they came to believe in pretty strongly. one of the things you gain a sense of when you read there diaries and letters against their history was that they often missed the significance of events that they had witnessed and participated in in real time they were actors in stirring times, though i hardly realized. in november 1863 the secretaries that the company's lincoln to gettysburg, pennsylvania, where he delivered the memorial address dedicating a soldier cemetery, they did not remember much of it because they had been out drinking and were severely hung over the next morning. they had done so partly because this was a political event and it was their job to go out drinking with the many governors, politicians, congressman, newspaper editors who had converged their commander goal was to work the crowd and work the political crowd in advance of the following years presidential nomination. nevertheless the d

they are not cynically playing mor moral hazard. the explanations are fully complimenting each other. today in the united states, as a result of financial crisis, we have the long-term unemployed and they are keeping their wages high and they are less mobile and they as a group of people haven't found the key to success. and what is the variable that makes them different than say you ended up with a job doing wonderful things? >> part is systemic. i was unemployed for three years. i had little jobs but nothing looking like a full-time employment opportunity. 2001 was bad but not as bad as 2008. if you lost your job after 2012, you are back in the labor mark of 2007. people who lost jobs between 2008-2013 are still stuck. your resume ages and you are in real trouble. even back in 2011, i observed you had two groups of people and this is a bit of a simple equation but you had people freak out and did whatever they could. i knew one guy was working for his uncle's pizza place and opened up frantuochisfranchises. it turned out he liked

is not only a civil right, it is a moral issue. you, madam speaker, for your political and moral leadership for helping those to secure a more advanced protection and benefit, especially in the area of mental health and election. -- interdiction. -- and addiction. thank you, president obama, for providing the politics of hope, rather than the politics of fear. >> find more highlights from 35 years of house floor coverage on our facebook page. by america'sed cable companies 35 years ago and brought to you today as a public service by your local cable or satellite provider. >> this week on "q&a," a talk with participants in the 2014 united states senate youth program, held at the renaissance mayfair hotel in washington dc. >> tell me your name, where you are from, and what his group is all about. >> my name is catherine and i am from the state of michigan. we are at the 2014 u.s. senate youth program. students come together to experience leadership in this nation's capital. >> what did you want to add? >> it is sponsored by the hears

an op-ed columnist at the "new york times" and a regular contributor to pbs "newshour", teaches on moral philosophy at yale and co-teaching weekly seminar studies in grand strategy. a recent appearance at the ted talks in vancouver, canada, in which he talked about eulogies and resumes. >> so i have been thinking about that problem and what was helping me think about it is a rabbi who wrote a book of faith in 1965, said there are two sides of our natures, which he called adam one and adam two. adam one the worldly, ambitious external side of our nature. he wants to build, create, create companies and innovation. adam two is the humble side of our nature, not only the do but to be good, to live in a way internally that honors god, creation and our possibilities. adam one wants to conquer the world, adam two wants to hear a calling ando bay. adam two accomplishment, adam two consistency and strength. one wants to know how things work, two is wonders why we're here. the two sides of our nature are at war with each other where you're living in perpetual self confrontation between the externa

why is it morally wrong he got this comeup tense, morally wrong? we live in a surveillance society? you know, as a society, we all rose up in outrage when the nas was spying on us. and we all looked with sim pale together withes people who lived in eastern europe under the iron curtain with the stasi watching them all the time. the stress of living under a regime where everywhere you go is recorded, viewed and out for public display or to be used against you, do we really want to live in a so i tie like that? there may not have been a law broken here. if there wasn't two-party consent, a law was broken. right now, we have -- we're living in a world where you can take end matt fointimate photosf and the next day somebody can publish them all over the web. have a private conversation in your kitchen with i don't care if it's your mistress or just your friend, but to think at any moment that can be spread around worldwide and used against you. >> and end your livelihood. >> the program here isn't against that. we don't have a tech knnologica fix for t

that we conduct our moral conversations in the vocabulary of human rights, or these other things areoing to crowd human rights out of the way in which we fundamentally structure our conversations? >> jeremy? >> human rights is going to remain an indispensable part of our moral and political and legal vocabulary. the question is what is it looks like after being used in these ways? se ofe losing our sen these trumping natures of rights. pam, rec quite reasonably asked about the situation with the uncompromising demand ran into each other. i think she would agree with me that sometimes people concoct the situations. they announced that people have a right not to be tortured and this must be taken into account along with every thing else, but then also there is a root -- right to security. tohave to balance the right security and a right not to be tortured, so they invent a right to disable the trumping switch on each of the individual rights. he wrote about this in the years he was not is there a dog about human rights and get to rights and moral rights. he said of course there is the

person and dignity. >> has to have morality attached to it all right, mr.lace, last word. >> you have to humanize the market by focusing on the dignity of the individuals and common good and stewardship. the pope says he took saint francis name because is he a man who talked about the poor and peace and the creation itself. the poor and vulnerable and peace and the creation are values often missing in places of power. like washington, d.c. and that's why his voice is so important to and y for paul ridley there's no substitute for advil. it's built to be as fast as it is strong and fights pain at the site of inflammation. and made for people like paul, who believe nothing should stop you from achieving your goals. not doubt. not fear. and definitely not back and shoulder pain. advil has the strength and speed to help you move past pain and make today yours. advil. make today yours. that's why i got a new windows 2 in 1. it has exactly what i need for half of what i thought i'd pay. and i don't need to be online for it to work. it runs office, so i can do sch

then you get to the morality question.ou get to the question of, is it ok to do these kinds of things to other human beings? reasonable people can differ on that. there is a reasonable debate to be had. it is very important, i think, for the american people to understand that when you have that debate, about whether it is ok to do this to other human beings, you have to also have the debate about the flip side of the coin, which is if you do not use these techniques, americans are going to die. what is the morality of that question? i think it is important to note that the people that made the decision to do this, in order to collect intelligence, that they thought they needed to save lives, american lives, which turned out to be true. they had all these conversations, charlie. they had conversations about is this the right thing to do, conversations about morality, about the impact on employees. they had conversations about how this is going to come back to haunt us someday. they had all those. this is not easy. i'm glad

it's a good idea from a moral standpoint i can see many realizations. had no idea i mean i just lose him but not knowing that that's really really gross it's gonna be burned anyway so what's the care of the adidas. i flew through it so. still the crematorium agree saying the have no great concerns about that for . the boy in the heck we had a meeting about the proposal idea and that idiot and didn't even a wee advertising in the paper. the head of the church made a statement in support of the idea so they were no objections to it morally. the technique has been used in sweden for some time now. the country pays to be one of the stroller the uk fuel industry has been watching closely. one crematorium that also adopted for . so i was in t bills rising. the green debate raging. this is what my day seems to be a roaring success it starts haunting stockholm sweden. break the look of the problems of racial profiling by canadian police in montreal. stay with us during our dinner. i know the room. ill people always say democracy should mean how or why the peopl

morals. there ought to be a sense of morality and ethics.nd business is there to make money but to do it in the right way so it is a fair exchange in the marketplace. thank you very much for being here. great to have you. >> general motors accused of epidangering the lives ofxÑÑ+t customers. and they did that because of buying cheap parts. it goes beyond the families in the lawsuit. more families lost family >> general motors ceo mary berra talked about a defect that affects their vehicles over a defect. it has gm 73sing a class action lawsuit from 13 families who lost a loved one dow to a faulty part. >> we are the people left behind and a loved one got into what was supposed to be a safe guard. gm anyhow it was dangerous and detective. >> it caused ignition co to suddenly switch to off and cutting off power steering and braking and disabli+e bags. early as 2002, gm approved the switch design despite being told it did not meet speciction. gm rejected a proposal to fix the problem and now it affects fev more models and claiming it would be t