this concern was morally virtuous. he reentered politics and 1850's because, as he put it, he was roused as never before to oppose the expansion of slavery. lincoln's racial attitudes changed during his presidency, and by the end of his life, it is no longer clear that he was a racist according to either definition five or six. he came to respect the sacrifices and valor of black soldiers who fought for the union. he came to greatly respect and admire a number of well educated black leaders he met towards the end of the war. at the end of his life, lincoln care greatly about the welfare of african-americans, and on several important respects, he did not favor the interests of whites over those of blacks. despite intense public criticism based on concern for the suffering of union prisoners of war, lincoln halted the exchange of prisoners with confederates until they agree to exchange black prisoners of war in january 1865. the lincoln administration's willingness to halt prisoner exchanges to protect black pows was den

he said, "they may not be inferior to whites in terms of intellect or morale of the. -- or morality. in terms offailure their color and their right to earn the bread that equality."m >> his courtroom technique, where he would concede something to the other side, which i always felt in the old days before computers, if a student turned in a particularly bad paper, you had to have some thing positive to say. this paper is very neatly typed. lincoln was doing that. to ber thing that needs pointed out about the 1815 campaign, lincoln began in july of 1915 eight giving a speech in chicago hard on the heels of a speech douglas gave the day before. conclusion, lincoln said let's stop all this quibbling about this race being superior and let's it -- and let's unite behind the declaration of independence. [applause] forget that he consistently advocated that blacks would not have the same political and civil rights as whites. i don't think there is anything getting around that. >> he never repeat that because reckless hammers him again and again. how can you vote for somebody to be u.s. edito

moral virtuelient was magnanimity. to be magnanimous means to be generous and overlooking injury and insult. alternatively, that means generous disregard to slights. theoln possessed the for -- virtue of magnanimity to an extraordinary degree. seward said his magnanimity was superhuman. he did not hold grudges, even when he was insulted and treated badly. and edward, lincoln stanton were members of a legal team who worked on a case involving the mccormick reaper several years before the civil war. stanford -- stanton treated lincoln badly, refused to talk to him. contemptuous of lincoln. at their initial meeting, lincoln wanted to discuss ideas for the case. stanton walked away, muttering to another companion, "why did you bring that guy? he does not go any -- know anything and can do you no good." stanton.dmired when he had to find a successor to simon cameron, secretary of war, lincoln consulted george hardy, who he had met at the trial. thought stanton would be the best person for the job, but he said, i know you co

it is a moral question that's a moral choice that is quite clearly debatable. it is not self-evident. we've been debating it for the last 50 or 60 years without a conclusion. even if individuals, such as two of the panelist and some 'ers on the panel, may have moral opinions of which they are certain other people have contrary opinions of which they are certain. so to say that because the woman, the mother disagrees with your personal conclusion, or the personal moral view of some church, therefore you will take away -- we should table away her moral right to make the choice on donation of fetal tissue is an abortion of absolute moral arrogance which you have no right to make and we have no right to make. it is her decision. not ours and not yours. it is her moral decision. not ours and not yours. just a second. would like to ask dr. schmainda. you said that the use of -- we've all agreed that the use of fetal tissue derived not from an abortion is ethical. the question is: is the use of fetal tissue derived from an abortion. you said the that use of such tissu

they have no moral claim to donate or assign her body or moral tissues to others. others should not profit from this wrongful act for monetary gain, scientific repetition, better health or even to claim, these cures are so wonderful, how could anyone oppose this research? get protection for human subjects of medical research have continued to expand protection for research subjects to ensure the participation is voluntary and fully informed, and that the research is for their benefit or that it causes no more than minimal harm and that they may have access to the benefits of the research. protections have been extended to the most vulnerable populations but not to the aborted. if she were being treated in there would utero be heightened protection for her well-being. the same policy provides special protection for prisoners but not to the fetus to be aborted. some have argued that we all share a moral obligation to contribute our organs or bodies after death for the good of society. others claimed the principle of proximity, the view that we would want to help thos

these are women who feel women's moral goodness, women's moral virtue are especially important qualities for women to have and to cultivate. so i think she sort of suspects that these are women who put a very high premium on that, which is why, to get back to the first point, she's apologizing so much. okay. so just to kind of pursue then -- i think we talked quite a bit about one. but in terms of two, the sort of different options she has in terms of how she's going to write about her experience and whether she's going to follow the male slave narrative or whether she's going to follow the sentimental model. if anybody read anything else about slave narratives by men, erin, this is all going to fall on you but maybe somebody else has also. so for example, like frederick douglass, how you might compare harriet jacobs' account to things that happened to frederick douglass. if you can sort of remember -- >> it was years ago. but i don't think he placed as much emphasis on like the female aspect of it for obvious reasons. there are a lot of things that stood out to me about what she had to

in order to make moral judgments we would have to be clear on the moral status of the fetus. obviously this is an area in which society has not reached consensus. that doesn't mean we cannot make sound judgments on the topic. in a question of biomedical ethics it's good to start with solid science. what do we know about the phoenix with certainty? it's alive. it represents growing developing cells, tissues and/ organs whic develop increasing complexity and sophistication resulting in an i intact organism, a human baby. of course this growth and development doesn't cease with the production of the baby. but continues for years afterwards. as can be seen by this description the fetus is not only alive but is human. i'm not talking about a potential human in the way some parents talk about their teenagers as potential adults. i am refer ing to the scientific fact that a fetus constitutes a live human, typically 46 xx or 46 xy fully and genetically human. in fact, it is the i are refutable humanness of the tissues and organs that made them be of interest to research rs and scient

he said, "they may not be inferior to whites in terms of intellect or morale of the. -- or morality. in terms offailure their color and their right to earn the bread that equality."m >> his courtroom technique, where he would concede something to the other side, which i always felt in the old days before computers, if a student turned in a particularly bad paper, you had to have some thing positive to say. this paper is very neatly typed. lincoln was doing that. to ber thing that needs pointed out about the 1815 campaign, lincoln began in july of 1915 eight giving a speech in chicago hard on the heels of a speech douglas gave the day before. conclusion, lincoln said let's stop all this quibbling about this race being superior and let's it -- and let's unite behind the declaration of independence. [applause] forget that he consistently advocated that blacks would not have the same political and civil rights as whites. i don't think there is anything getting around that. >> he never repeat that because reckless hammers him again and again. how can you vote for somebody to be u.s. edito

i go back to morales versus morals. host: morals and trustworthiness, how it is factoring into voters. guest: a lot of assumptions about how these primaries are going to play out have been turned on their head, not all of them but a lot of them. certainly a lot of political analysts would have thought going into the presidential race that any republican candidate with a personal background of the business with background, would not necessarily have been a selling point with evangelical voters and voters who consider themselves very conservative, but he sold very well with them and i think that one of the things that is happening on the republican side is this desire for strong leadership and worrying about the details, later and i think one of the reasons donald trump has been successful in the primary so far is because you have seen on the right side of the voting letter, a -- you've also seen this on the left with a strong bernie sanders -- how strong bernie sanders has been and how much money he has raised, a real lo

in order to make any moral judgments we would have to be clear on the moral status of the fetus.bviously this is an area in which society has not reached a consensus. but that does not mean we cannot make sound judgments on the topic. in a question of biomedical ethics, it is good to start with solid science. what do we know about the fetus with certainty? well, first of all we know that it is alive, that it represents growing, developing cells, tissues and organs, all of in fact, it is the irrefutable humanness of these tissues an organs that have made them be of interest to researchers and scientists. so, if a fetus is clearly both alive and human, can we justify taking these tissues and organs for scientific experimentation. if so, under what circumstances and what sort of concept or authorization should be required. in the past century, medicine has made incredible progress resulting from scientific studies involving human tissues and organs resulting in the development of medications, vaccines and the entire field of transplantation medicine. is there any difference between

when he says morales walked in with a handgun and demanded cash. deputies say morales was able to get away... but dropped his cell phone. deputies used that phone to track him down. they say morales has a heroin addiction... and spent a thousand dollars a day on drugs. investigators say.. he was using the stolen money to buy more drugs. morales' arrest county's "heroin task force" announced it is making major progress in its battle against the epidemic. the number of heroin-related overdoses and deaths are down from this time last year. we are told a recent bust put more than 220 people behind bars... and pulled more than eight kilos of heroin off the streets-- that is almost 18 pounds. orange county is also working to increase bond amounts for anyone arrested on heroin-related charges. super tuesday is here... and all the candidates have their eyes on the prize. they will be fighting coast to coast for delegates... in 12 different contests. qthe crown jewels are... texas... georgia... massachusetts and virginia. on the republican side... 595 deleg

is that moral? yes or no? >> most ethical and moral questions are not yes-and-no questions. >> well, we've been asking question-and-no questions this morning. >> i've noticed that. i've noticed that. it doesn't always help one unpeel the onion in order to get to the truth, so if you want a yes or no, i'm not quite sure how to agnswer that as a yes-and-no. where is the greater damage? i'm not an expert on journalistic ethics and i'm certainly not an expert on the law, i am glad that carrying -- >> let me ask you -- >> carrying a false driver's license isn't a felony everywhere or many college students would end up in jail. >> do you think committing fraud is ethical? >> of course. fraud is not ethical -- >> all right. >> -- neither what was being investigated. >> ms. cunningham, is -- >> the specific question? >> -- committing fraud ethical? >> as a broad statement one would say it is not ethical, but i'm not asking the specific question about the conduct of david dalideon. >> so you think mr. dalideon is ethic

the morale is bad. >> if there is a connection between low morale and the city , is one a product of the other? >> i noticed one of the people being arrested . they are resisting because they don't think guys give them more lip and they are always flexing in front of the cops. they get in their face. >> that did not happen under giuliani and bill bratton when he used to be rough and tough. shootings over the weekend yet again. guns are being taken off the street . >> you are the one that pointed that out. >> he does give you credit. >> even i wasn't hip to it's about what you said. >> it's about the slashing and stabbings. >> please rewrite it . >> give you a little bit of credit? >> a lot of credit! >> w abc at noon/3:00. curtis from 5/6. >> you never will. >> will see my name and ben, back me up, my name. >> you get no street credit . >> that is outrageous.>> >> will be right back. welcome back. 4:55 am. duke will be in later. the next play the lakers. this is colby's last name game against the next. phil jackson is watching them play and they won five >> kobe bryant gets the fadea

is that moral? i didn yes or no? >> most ethical and moral questions are not yes or no questions. >> we've been asking yes or no questions this morning. >> i've noticed that. it doesn't always help one unpeel the onion in order to get to the truth. so if you want a yes or no, i'm not quite sure how to answer that as a yes and no. you know where is the greater damage? i'm not an expert on journalistic ethics and i'm certainly not an expert on the law. i am glad that -- >> well -- >> the preparing of false driver's licenses isn't a felony, or many college students would end up in jail. >> do you think committing fraud is ethical? >> of course, fraud is not ethical. neither is what was being investigated. >> ms. cunning harjs is committing fraud ethical? >> as a broad statement, one would say it's not ethical but i'm not answering the specific question about the conduct of mr. delyden. >> you think mr. delyden is ethical? >> i can't answer it in the way that you're asking. >> professor charro? >> i think the attempt to

you might remember reagan's culture war along with the moral majority against the moral relativism of the bad '60s, as he he called them. but these had an analog and a precursor in the attacks on the moral relativism of the roaring '20s. the 1928 election featured anti-catholicism aimed at the new york governor, al smith. but that anti-catholicism was a recycling of sorts of 19th century smears on catholics as traitors to to god and country alike. but the culture wars are not just enduring, they're also expanding their footprint. in recent years the modus operandi of the culture wars has spread from cultural politics to politics in general. the term "culture wars" hinges on a distinction between cultural politics and ordinary politics where cultural politics is about religious and moral questions that stand on matters of absolute morality and biblical truth. so negotiation and compromise are difficult or maybe impossible, but ordinary politics is supposed to be the stuff of taxing and spending and horse trading. in recent years, as you may have noticed, this distinction has broken dow

this is a moral question, it's a moral choice, that is quite clearly debatable. it's not self-evident. it's clearly debatable since we've been debating it for the last 50 or 60 years without a conclusion. even if individuals such as two of our panelists and some others on this panel may have moral opinions of which they are certain other people have contrary opinions of which they are certain. so, to say that because the woman, the mother, disagrees with your personal conclusion or the personal moral view of some church, therefore, you will take away -- we should take away her moral right to make the choice on donation of fetal tissue is an assertion of absolute moral arrogance which you have no right to make and we have no right to make. it's her decision, not ours and not yours, and it's her moral decision, not ours and not yours. second, i'd like to ask dr. schmainda i hope is the correct name. >> shmain da. >> dr. shmachmainda, we've agre that the use of fetal tissue not derived from abortion is ethical. the question is the use of fetal tissue derived from an

and it's a very clear moral disagreement. and i hope you will not try to impose your moral view on the rest of us. third, everyone -- i shouldn't say everyone. there's been a number of questions asked about the consent form to donate tissues. are any of you in clinic settings where such consents might be sought? dr. lee, dr. schmanda, dr. go goldstein? >> yes. >> you are? >> which kind of consents? you mean for fetal tissue? >> yes. fetal tissue from specific abortion to be used for research or whatever. >> no. >> no. >> so you're not there. you don't really see what's going on. sort of a red herring because what i think some of the members of this panel are really concerned about is that the underlying abortion decision, not the separate donation decision, i think you're concerned about that because you said abortion is always morally wrong and any mother who so morally depraved as to consent to an abortion should be deprived of the right to consent to -- >> the basis for that -- my argument was not that she was deprived bec

the moral dilemma, the moral conflict and pressure is at an agency to get to the point. we picked up someone, actually the macedonians picked up someone, he looked suspicious. we did our check. we thought an analyst but added to the best of her ability, decided this is somebody we really need to talk to you. he was interrogated. the agency was actually slow and not gain after it realized this is not -- this is not what we were looking for. it took several months to finally release them and send him on his way. that part of the story actually theories because how can he did not do more quickly and so on. the inspector general asked me to focus on the animals who had made the decision we need to talk to this person and take custody. they wanted me to form an accountability board, kind of a jury of your peers to make a judgment. i got absolutely not. is the direct their, you are responsible for the overall health of the agent he and success of the mission. i said if i've been an analyst for creating a false positive, i will be teaching every analyst in this agency that the

the suspect morales liked to complain about his car. my wife was a great, great mother, grandmother. begun to set in here for tony penya. both his wife and son their apartment. authorities believe this man, anthony morales is the one responsible. they say morales also shot and wounded another man because he was angry over damage to his car. witnesses who ran on to the block stumbled upon the campage just -- carnage just after 6:00 last night. >> i'm like oh my god, are you okay. i thought something fell on his face and then i someone anthony's mother, idel rivera who ran out to help her son was shot in the head and killed. >> the mother came down to defend her son and she got shot too. reporter: this morning, police continue to search for morales. the rivera family and friends continue to plead. for answers. >> don't be a coward, come forward because you're going to get caught. reporter: and we're back here live now. police have been in and out of this building this morning looking for anthony morales. he is the suspect in this case tha

that gave it cops everything here he is juan carlos moral morales. >> i didn't realize what was going on at first. michael le grand was washing dirk around 10:30 when deputies say morales struck for the last time using a handgun. le grand was look for an opening to grab the gun. he saw the robber hesitate. >> he starts to put his gun away. sow i start running at him. me and my friend chase him out. he hopped a fence but dropped his cell phone. deputies found the phone which he has a heroin addiction of $1,000 a day. >> they love the drugs more than eating food or doing some other basic life things. they have chase this drug on a day-to-day basis. reporter: the sheriff's office plans to charge morales with five cases where where he's accused of using a gun to steal money. deputies arrested him this morning in a car in east orange county. the nine crimes he's suspected in, nobody got hurt. bob: we have a news alert. a central florida family remembering a young father and pizza deliveryman killed this past weekend. he was on his last delivery of the night when a woman ran car and killing

there is moral suasion that counts on that very act all the time. that is what i am disk -- suggesting to. but they may not think that. what does that mean for gentry quality? the opening story is based on research is the story of orchestra. with this innovation. and have them addition behind the screens. the interesting back story that they were not convinced that the time of all people they thought they caught -- cared about the music that they played now you have almost 40 percent. that is powerful. it demonstrates how deeply held it is that clearly in the last care about politics and music. it is important to see ample by the power of design. not the mindset but the technology to the encounter management and was somebody looks like. what color their skin is. and a number of organizations do that already. nizolek companies could introduce quite literally. may be at the entry-level received we down to the fiber than finalist. so first and will start with some bad news. probably the most overrated to evaluate the future performance. had with others

in contrast to the american culture which is based on what is morally right or morally wrong.how would you contrast the shameful culture created in the middle east to primarily muslim faith to do political correctness now create in a shameful culture to those who don't adhere. it's a next line comparison and you're right there is a degree of commonality with both encouraging shame. both seek to remove confidence. mold seek to remove freedom, so the objective of radical islam and the objectives of political credits alone and they are commence early in their danger. i would submit-- i think that our war is against those that brought down the buildings of the world trade center as much as it is with those that have continually run defense for these guys. they are just as culpable, just as guilty and we have to be as strong with them as we should be in dealing with this enemy that like i say is growing. i mean, this is not something that's going away. this is not something where they are on the run. they are not on the run. this is spreading right at us and them as we put out the

because it suggests a moral dilemma and conflicting pressures and we get to the point. the macedonians picked up someone. they said that we thought he was someone we were chasing. an analyst with data to the best of her ability and decided yes, this is someone that we needed to talk to. he was taken to a site and was interrogated. they realized us is not what we were looking for. it took several months but he finally released them and they sent him on his way. that part of the story airs this. but the inspector general asked me to focus on this with what actually made the decision, we need to talk to this person. and so we had kind of and accountability board and i thought, absolutely not. as a director you are responsible for the overall health of the agencies and the success of the mission. so if i have created a false positive, i will be teaching every analyst in the agency that the one thing that you have to really make sure that you avoid is any false positive which would then mean that they would be part of their analytical judgment to be safe and we would probabl

michael graham was washing dishes when he said morales used a handgun. he was look for an opening to grab the gun. >> he started to put his gun away. both then chase morale less behind the restaurant. he hopped a finds but dropped his cell phone. morale else has a $1,000 a day heroin addiction, a problem that can cause people almost anything to get the drug. >> we have a significant issue in this community with heroin addicts. this is one way even though we are working on the prevention and intervention side. enforcement has to be part of the overall strategy. reporter: the sheriff's office plans to charge morale less with five of the 10 cases. le grand said he would try to grab that gun again if he had 237 deputies arrested -- deputies arrested moral less in a car in east orange county. 1. reporter: family members are grieving the death of a young father and pizza deliveryman. he was on the last delivery of the night when a woman ran a red light, hitting his car and killing him. he leaves behind a 3-year-old daughter. >> i can't live without him. >> sho

there has to be moral clarity of political correctness removes that moral clarity. 75 years ago your country and my country in turd japanese americans and italians and germans. there is no proof that they're ready think that patriotic. approved at all that they were in the way colluding with what was going on the outside. but the thinking back then was we don't want to risk it. we want to win. contrast to today. we have people of the islamic faith in countries all round the world are prepared to blow us up and shoot us up in chop off our heads yet if anybody today would raise the interest rate camps it would be completely crazy and this is a to advocate but you telluride our thinking has changed the ways that we do things there may come today that we have to win kill them before he kills us. make a list take it is real. the politically correct to put their heads in the sand. and i talk about the islamic threat to. this is a new. and it was ongoing. we need to do something about it. that is why we need to get rid of the political correctness. >> will this destroy ourselves? what are y

come a morally untenable in the united states. it's morally untenable in the united states because the medical profession not only agrees to first do no harm but if you read closely, the hippocratic oath talks about justice. it talks about being a provider and h. reader of an entire patient, a whole patient in context. and when that is not the case, then an implicit biases change the way that people are treated. let me turn now to the content of the book that institute of medicine study that was done in 2003, positive that it's possible that the physician bias may have a causal relationship with health disparities that because physicians themselves as individuals were bias on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic, gender, sexual orientation and other grounds that might actually influence their treatment decisions but at the same time, the institute of medicine said we don't know how those mechanisms work. the plaintiff by both was to come up with in understanding how it is the physician bias translates into poor health outcomes for peopl

it shows that morale is very low. the police officers feel that the city is less safe than it was a few years ago. rosanna: good morning to both of you. morale was found to be extremely low. morale was ranked by these officers at 2.49. 80% of officers say they believe the city has become less safe enough past few years. perhaps burrell hit all-time low when officers turn their backs on their de blasio. regarding comments the mayor had made on instructing his son how to deal with police. these findings are highly suspect and flight in the face of the truth. the department has not yet reviewed these findings. a news conference will take waste tomorrow. greg and rosanna, back to you. >> it is tough to talk to the cops. >> yes. no comment from the cops. greg: okay. what else is going on? rosanna: high school students are giving us a clips of the future with technology. listen to this. >> pretty exhilarating. a lot of things owing on. >> coming up at 9:00 o'clock. we will talk to some of those students. >> anyway. they wou

>> plus, how high is morale among new york cops? the better question according to the police union, how low is morale? a startling new study tonight. >> and a subject its never had before. its first invitation to the ncaa basketball tournament. >> as always, march madness in the weather office as well. no more 80s or even the 60s of yesterday. last monday of winter and it feels like it. drizzle. 30-mile-per-hour winds. feels like we're in the 30s. look at the radar. lightning offshore. a little concerned that a few >>> a bizarre mystery tonight involving a mother who dodged death last year. somebody tried to assassinate tyrita julius. she was shot eight times last fall, in the hospital for months. but last week she suddenly vanished. tim fleischer with the story in linden. >> as you point out, a baffling mystery. this new jersey mother with two teenagers never showed up at home here in linden, now her family is extremely upset. >> i know sooner or later she's >> reporter: queen julius refuses to give up hope. she knows her daughter

doesn't make them make better choices, morality is morality.e'll be back, >> armstrong: were it not for millennials voting for obama overwhelmingly, also safe to say millennials found themselves as a result of president obama moving to the left. who represents them in this pantry of political candidates, left? right? what is promised and their vote for president obama. who represents their voices, talk about the politics and millennials. there is no question obama, everyone moved to the left. >> absolutely we are growing more independent. we overwhelmingly swept obama into office. two million young people sat out second election. harvard university polled millennials found they would recall the president. hope and change was a great banner and mantra. nothing was delivered. when you look at the state of millennials, we are not that much better. it is stark when you look at unemployment, lack of wealth compared to other generation and still falling behind where we should be compared to baby boomers and gen xers, almost buyer's >> millennials don

: are they wrong moral choices or his moral choices. >> oh, nobody's other hand, i think he's funny. i think he's hardworking. he's entrepreneurial. he represents what is best about the welfare system. i like the guy, personally, yeah. >> stephen: yeah, yeah. i like him too. >> yeah. how much-- how close is he to you? friend, i would say. >> stephen: do you ever feel like when you're playing a character with a questionable moral exas, is it ever in anyway a confession for you? would like to be able to live? >> well, that's well put. i mean it's refreshing to get to be so wrong on such a regularean we did one-- i stole this little girl's leg, her prosthetic leg. and i mean she had no i-- . >> stephen: yeah, yeah. >> i don't know where they cast this young girl, and she has got it and pulling it saying give me my leg, miss ter. it and dragging her across the floor. that was fun. that was fun. >> stephen: well, we have a clip here. and is he becoming intimate spirit allly and physically with some of the women there. >> oh yeah, yeah, it's a cometephen: here say clip of them just having

>> i accept my church's teaching on moral issues. i concur with the moral position. >> let me ask you, but what do you say about -- >> it's not funny. >> your church? it's not funny. what do you say about your church. >> the churches make your moral judgments. you running for president will the chief executive of the united states. do you believe in punishment for abortion, yes or no, as a principle. >> the answer is there has to be some form of punishment. >> for the woman? >> yes. there has to be some form. >> ten years? >> i don't know. >> why not? you take positions in everything else. >> i do take positions in everything else, it's a very complicated position. >> you tell me what the law should be. you say you're pro life. >> i am pro life. >> what's that mean? >> i am pro life. i have not determined what the punishment will be. >> why not? >> because i haven't determined it. >> by saying you're pro life. you want to ban abortion. how do you ban abortion without a sanction. then you get into the tricky point about sanction. a fi

but i'm glad to have the support of all the morally driven people. but, yeah, to win. >> right. >> and so you have the american businessmen and essentially what they're saying, and they're saying this, do not give us the right to discriminate. you are giving me something i didn't ask for. because if a business has the legal and moral obligation to serve everybody, no controversy. but if you say to them, okay, you can pick and choose, then once they start picking and choosing, somebody is going to be mad at them. either they'll be too kind to gay people or not kind enough. >> in either case they'll be boycotted. >> yeah, so the good of the properly understood and there's a great legal distinction. i don't like metaphors, generally. but between the shield and the sword, a shield is a legal concept that protects you from other people intruding on your life. >> right. >> so that i can wear a yarmulke if i want to. the native americans can smoke peyote. although as far as i'm concerned anybody who wants to smoke peyote ought to smoke it. [laughter]. >> bu

it's false on the moral argument.the best thing can you do for the rest of the world is not steal their most talented people into your economy. right? if you want to help sub-saharan after t africa, et cetera, don't take the few people they have, it is to help their countries grow and to learn what markets are just as we did after world war ii to our arch enemies, japan and germany. that's the united states i know. >> gentleman, time. >> sorry. inthought thought i had a minute. >> gentleman from kentucky is recognized for one minute to close. >> some of these arguments truly baffle me. i agree with mr. mcclintock, there are a lot of problems with our immigration system. he mentioned a lot of them. that's what comprehensive immigration reform is designed to do, to fix those problems so people aren't coming here illegally, so people aren't working here illegally, so they are on the books paying taxes and working on the record. we are trying to fix those problems. we have a system that's broken. i agree totally with you.

said that morales was able to get away and then dropped his cellphone in the process. he has a heroin addiction and spends $1,000 a day to buy drugs. and he was using the stolen money to buy the drugs. >> john: a man was hit and killed after a driver outran authorities. a pizza delivery driver making his last delivery for the day. a woman ran a red light at americana boulevard and killed him. he leaves behind a 3-year-old daughter. woman is being held without bond right now. >> amy: a basketball coach is wanted on child molestation charges. they believe that will he was trying to get to mexico after white was accused of molesting a bow in malabar. they said they listened in. he denied everything. he worried that the allegations would ruin his reputation. some neighbors were already concerned. >> kids were here all the time, constantly. months ago about being in charge of the team, the league. something was very off. and it always has been. >> amy: a few days after the allegation surfed, they got a call from white's wife. his husband confessed to her. they received simi

the kind of moral judgments that we often make in wartime. and as an historian, the kind of judgments that we do make. and that was the genesis of the interesting ine the moral judgments that union officers and soldiers made towards southern civilians in the past of war during the american civil war. so that is where that came from. having written that book, i have formed an apparently career-long association with william t sherman. people zynga think i am an expert on sherman, as well. and i have come to learn a fair amount about sherman, two, mostly in self-defense. [laughter] but i can to you that times are changing regard to sherman. and as with many things. 2014, anmmer of organization called public asking fora poll, the opinions on william t. sherman. you might imagine they would have opinions on the subject, given his famous urban renewal project. [applause] [laughter] in 1864. 56% had no opinion in georgia. 63% reported that y disliked reality tv star honey boo-boo. [laughter] apparently, the image of sherman have shifted over time. s

new york's finest have a case of the nypd blues, low morale according to a new survey by their union, the pba. on a scale of one to ten, officers who took the survey rated their morale at a 2.5. 87% said the city has become less safe in the two years since mayor de blasio took office. the mayor insists overall crime is down almost 6%. he's begin his officers new bulletproof vests and better technology technology. >> they're continuing to drive down crime. they are working aggressively to get guns off our streets. they have a lot to be proud of and we're very proud of them. >> but when new yorkers hear police don't feel safe, they sure don't even. >> it's not good. >> the overwhelming majority of officers surveyed said they 96% of officers said the relationship between police and the public has gotten worse and that more new yorkers are resisting arrest. according to the pba, 6,000 of its 24,000 members responded to the survey. mayor de blasio has had a rocky relationship with police, some of whom feel he does not have their backs and turned their backs on him after two officers were k

it is a moral imperative. in their world neocons see the us as the ultimate white hat or as elliott abrams once put it, the united states is the greatest force for good among the nations of the earth. this conviction helps explain paul wolfowitz's call for amounted to a unilaterally enforced pax americana in his famous 1992 defense policy guidance as well as bob kagan's and bill kristol's 1996 appeal to an increasingly anti- interventionist republican party to return to what they called a neo- reaganite policy of benevolent global hegemony. that manifesto set the stage for the project of the new american century his associates said so much to coordinate the march to war in iraq inside and outside the bush administration and which created so much consternation in beijing. so how did israel fit in? in my view and that of other observers, but offensive israel has been a central pillar of the neoconservative worldview from the outset. the fact that neoconservatism began as and remains a largely jewish movement is

questions the stand on matters of absolute morality in biblical truth. so negotiation and compromise are difficult but ordinary compromise shouldn't me and in recent years this has broken down. as moderates were purged from both major parties in the institutions that benefit from political polarization became more influential. those left behind fought life and death battles over to be resolved unanimously. they operate reserved for disputes over family values led to debates over marginal tax rates. this expansion of the footprint of the culture wars, has made politics even more polarized and more partisan. why liberals win is an effort of religions to make some sense of this. first things first what is a culture war? they have four features. public disputes as a presidential speeches, a presidential record not just a private argument at the dinner table. second to extend beyond economic questions of taxing and spending with the religious concerns federal less amenable to negotiation and compromise and give rise to the meaning of america and who was not a

police still searching for morales around the area.

i go back to morales versus morals. host: morals and trustworthiness, how it is factoring into voters. guest: a lot of assumptions about how these primaries are going to play out have been turned on their head, not all of them but a lot of them. lieutenant happening on the republican side is this desire for strong leadership and worrying about the details, later and i think one of the reasons donald trump has been successful in the primary so far is because you have seen on the right side of the voting letter, a -- you've also seen this on the left with a strong bernie sanders -- how strong bernie sanders has been and how much money he has raised, a real loss of trust in government and institution. when people argue that this one is not really a democrat in this one is not really a republican -- maybe all of the ways in which i just candidates before aren't -- haven't been so helpful and i should try something different and for some people, it is that sort of speculation and for some people, they are worried on the dire

the effect on morale is beyond description. and that's the turning point. >> rose: and then you can go through the presidency to the fact that he does not want to be king and pulls the country together. >> like franklin roosevelt who went through two crises during our lifetime during the depression and the most horrible war in history, washington leaves the country in two testing times, the revolution and then this period after the revolution where we're trying to form a government, we have these disparate forces of the states pulling apart from each other over all kinds of issues including slavery, and the only thing holding it together is the universal regard everywhere in the colonies and the new states for george washington. >> rose: are you in the process of writing a book about george washington? >> charlie, i can't say a word yet. (laughter) i'm really convinced we can't know enough about those people and one of the reasons adams is such a joyous subject -- i had a wonderful time writing on him -- is he is a window on al

it is important because of the moral power of it.t is the crime of crimes, the most heinous of all human rights crimes. this is reflected in the fact that it gives a moral boost to the people that have been designated, christians, ethnic shia, and yazidis. today, i received a video thanking the united states from the father and children in his camp. it was wonderful to see that. they are following very closely. they feel, until now, forgotten. here is their christian civilization that was 2000 years old wiped out by a force of hatred that hasn't been seen before. every trace of their civilization is being systematically destroyed by isis. these are churches and monasteries that have withstood 1300 years, the invasions of the romans, mongols, arabs, turks, and so forth. they cannot withstand this alone. this needs to be recognized. it can be of utmost significance, this designation, if there's a policy roadmap adopted by the administration. it has to be put into place now. not only is the situation dire on the ground in syria and iraq

it's important because of the moral power of it. >> it really gives a moral boost to the people who have been designated, the christians, yazidis, ethnic shiite. today i received a video thanking the united states and it was quite wonderful to receive that. they feel until now forgotten. here is their christian civilization, 2,000 years old, wiped out by a force of hatred that has not been seen before. every church, every trace of their civil station is being systemically destroyed by isis. these are churches who have withstood the invasions of the romans, mongols, turks, persians and so forth. this needs to be recognized. this designation is the utmost significance if there is a policy road map adopted by the these accomplices could someday be caught and tried. there is also military action. secretary kerry alludes to that as well, and talks about how they have an eye to the protection of the minority communities that have been named the victims of genocide by liberating their occupied territory and freeing them of isis. he names none of the -- nineveh in iraq in particular. there are o

we need to think about, like if you want to talk about moral clarity, the moral clarity is we need to save lives. if we need to -- it's metadata. >> first and foremost, that's what we need. >> we've done far more authoritarian things than having apple help catch terrorists. i'm not saying i agree with those authoritarian things. this is just low-hanging fruit, for them to be doing this, the only thing i can be thinking of is tim cook is looking for a cheap marketing ploy. >> let me bring adam in here for one second. >> i just want to point out, again, i'm not 100% on their side at all, but they have said, if this was in the cloud, we've answered many of these requests, we've helped out law enforcement many times, we can do that. but we created the phone in such a way that the bad guys can't get into it, now you're asking us to devote our resources, it's a bad precedent. >> they're one of the biggest companies in the world. >> it's a principle. >> of course they can do it. >> adam, if the richest company in the world wants to, they can throw a few bucks at this thing. >> i get that. so