here's morales' cameo. >> a bulldog named armando "mousey" morales. >> reporter: back in 2006, moralessharing a federal prison cell for separate crimes. now on the stand, morales makes a stunning allegation -- guandique made a detailed confession to the levy murder. >> his testimony was convincing. he knew certain things. >> reporter: after morales' testimony, guandique is found guilty and sentenced to 60 years in prison. >> the result of this verdict may be guilty, but i have a life sentence of a lost limb missing from our family tree. >> reporter: one of the country's longest ongoing murder mysteries is finally over. or is it? the conviction starts to wobble two years later when the defense discovers that the snitch morales concealed a crucial fact from the jury. he had a history of working with law enforcement. >> knowing those prosecutors, my guess is they had no idea until after the fact about mr. morales' prior cooperation, maybe they should have. >> reporter: honest mistake or not, it's a big enough deal to make some very big news. >> the accused killer is getting a new trial. >

we must understand what we mean by moral. he moved to the level of moral judgment, we are moving radically away from the statements of personal feelings, private taste, and we speak about things in a general universal, right or wrong, just or unjust, which is to say good or bad, just or unjust for others as well as ourselves. you think it is wrong? sometimes this team seems like bloomingdale's on a saturday. if you think it is wrong for parents to torture a child, or one man to hold another as a slave, we say whom does it wrong ? the answer is, it could be wrong for anyone, forever. if we come to the judgment it is wrong for parents to torture their child, the next line is not, we would give people tax .ncentives to stop this if we come to the judgment that is wrong, the logic of moral judgment in joins us to forbid that wrong to whom, to anyone, to everyone and forbid it by the force of law. mean -- it now may mean everything is illegal that we regard as wrong and hold back from pressing policies to the very limit of this lo

those -- moral agents. who took reason over matters of right and wrong. why do you justify this ruling over me? that gives us a sense of where we begin, where this case for governed by consent or natural equality begins. it begins with the founding, with any quality that exists in -- inequality that exists in nature. it went this way. that no man is by nature the ruler of other men in the way that god is by nature the ruler of men, and men are by nature the ruler of horses and cows. therefore you find in the world a state of affairs which some men are in the position of ruling over others, that state of affairs could not have a -- could not have arisen from nature. arisen from the alternative. convention, arrangement, consent. here is what it sounded like with john locke. he said, commanding all the workmanship of one wise maker and being furnished with like faculties, showing all one community of nature but cannot be supposed any such subordination among us that they authorize us to destroy one another as

morality, it's interesting that you posed this as evolving morality, because does morally really evolve. >> guest: no. >> guest: or ethics evolve? i think we need to distinguish between the two. i would give you push back, because you said that i don't determine morality. in some ways we do. the choices that we make that dictate the lives that we live. based on our choices it's grounded in something in some biblical truth, some religious truth, some universal truth and that's important to the discussion. >> armstrong: so what about where we live in a world today, especially among the young generation, where what he just said would be totally rejected. >> guest: uh-huh. >> armstrong: that we cannot say that abortion is wrong. we sex is wrong, we cannot say that homosexuallity is wrong. we cannot say lying is wrong. as long as i'm not harming anyone, where is the issue of sin? >> guest: we can say all of those things. i think it's important to lead with love and good lodge ic. it's important, jesus said honor god with all of your heart, soul and all of your mind, it's really important to

morales explai morales explains he's the key witness in the upcoming retrial of ingmar guandique. while preparing to testify, the government has put him up in the hotel with a cell phone, a room key, and some cash, and strict orders not to blow his cover. what did you think? >> reporter: she's intrigued enough to continue the odd friendship, but also scared that the criminal could hurt her or those close to her. so she makes a fateful decision. babs says that, for her own protection, she begins recording her conversations with morales in the hotel, in the car, even in this storage locker where he's helping her organize her things. this is where you recorded it all, mostly. >> i did. >> reporter: next, the secret recording that will rock the levy case, and get a convicted killer out of prison. >> he told me he didn't know he killed her. >> what started as a circus ended as a circus. before his mom earned 1% cash back everywhere, every time. [ dinosaur growls ] and his dad earned 2% back at grocery stores and wholesale clubs. danny's parents used their bankamericard cash rewards cre

bob has said that realism is a kind of species of moral indifference, to care about morality is to lead yourself. i think we're disagreeing not all about adams but this word, and i want to say why i think the word is relevant and also i want to bring it up today. adams was a completely, morally driven person. have foundwouldn't him such a compelling figure. there was an element of realism. donations are not driven by moral principles but objective interests. premise of the munro doctrine is there are competing political systems in the world. this idea that being a republican means you are going to have the same foreign policy similarly situated authoritarian countries. i would say he's a realist in some meaningful sense. this question of whether it is in america's interests to pursue, to seek to have its ,alues replicated abroad whether it is possible to have it replicated abroad, this is a burning question today. when we talk about realism, not in the academic sense but in the newspaper sense, the question often arises to what extent can't united states and should seek to engagees in d

you know, evolving morality. you know, for me, it's always best to start with yourself, put yourself in the microscope. >> right. >> armstrong: i know immediately when i'm wrong, when i shouldn't have spoken in that a way, when i did not do full disclosure, and it haunts me. and so i go inward and i ask myself, do i determine that rock -- no, it comes from my study of scripture. it comes from watching my parents example, watching teacher, watching sometime watching people who don't think they're the best people in the world. i learn from everybody. it's interesting when you read something like the bible and it's reinforced and you know, it's like it's edge in your soul, if you never read it. right and wrong doesn't come from me. it's something i don't have control over it, but i know it my soul. i know it in how i communicate know. but we live in a society where people think that they get to decide when they're right or wrong and god needs to be updated. all of this god is too restrictive and there needs to be a

when you make yourself the moral authority, the minute you're the moral authority you leave yourself open to charges so the whole moral question, in my lifetime, has always been wide open. so i would be very welcoming and inclusive of countries that would like to step up to the plate and play a moral humanitarian role. most americans would welcome that involvement and not feel we have to go it alone when there's a humanitarian crisis. i think we'd like that. i hope that happens. >> forrest, in asia, china has been acting as a regional hegemon really and the united states has tried to coalesce allies around china to counterbalance in the pacific. but america's withdrawal or america's focus on itself, would that just open up things for china, and must other asian nations hedge against what america may or may not do? >> yeah, i think the challenge for the president-elect trump is that, is he going to continue obama's rebalancing towards asia? and getting the u.s. military forces, particularly navy, into the south china sea and strike alliances with the surrounding countries like philipp

i'm natalie morales. and today we're going to share some amazing stories that are sure to warm your heart. we're also sitting down with some famous faces and the shelter pets that have changed their lives forever. plus we'll introduce you to two brothers who say adopting their rescue has helped bring their family together. i too have had my own life changed. meet zara. our family rescued her five years ago. have celebrated clear the shelters, an amazing initiative to help animals across the country find new homes by cutting the costs of adoptions. here are some of the highlights of the incredible day. narrator: it was a day filled with so much love. that's puppy kisses, right? yeah. narrator: for the third year in a row, shelters across the country joined forces to literally clear the shelters. but there's nothing cooler than adopting a shelter pet like aurora who's looking for a forever home. i'm hetty chang at the long beach animal shelter. this is utah. and he is going home today. narrator: with over 4

they have to win a football game soon to keep the moral up i think. >> trying to keep your morale up.thanks. >> nbc bay area 9enews is next. huh, i wonder if my mother would like to stay with us... here's what i'm thinking-brunch. all day, every day. should we get started? who wants coffee? introducing my new brunchfast menu. with 10 delicious items like my bacon and egg chicken sandwich, southwest scrambler plate, a sparkling blood orange cooler, and homestyle potatoes. served all day, every day. only at jack in the box. sitti out.the ection >>> you know i think it would be hypocritical for me to vote. >> right now sitting out the election. colin kaepernick talking about his decision to not vote at the polls. >> plus in the chaos following the election of donald trump, look at this. a more peaceful demonstration in oakland stay, how holding be hands went a long way. >> but first the president-elect gives first extensive interview since the election, talking about top priorities for the nation. news starts now. good evening and thanks for joining us for this special prime time edition

maybe we're going about this whole morality thing the wrong way. hmm. (projector and camera shutter clicking) (sighs) we have nothing on these guys. doesn't matter. what if they call our bluff? they won't. r stock prices... don't worry, gentlemen. we're not here to occupy you. who the hell-- relax. we just need a couple minutes of your time. we know you're about to fire sarah stanner for violating the morality clause of her contract. that's a big decision. huge! i'll get security. go ahead, larry. it's larry, right? before you have security set their tasers to stun, let me just say that in this box my colleague is holding is dirt. all the dirt we spent the past week digging up on every single one of you. dirty dirt. filthy dirt. some of it is illegal, and some of it's just downright disgusting. i'm talking "no amount of lysol's gonna clean you know what he's talking about, right? actually, i don't. oh, soon you will. and so will your families. so will america. we wouldn't put a morality clause in our contracts if any of us had anything to worry about. w

it began to reshape the contours of global politics and morality. the rise of an emergent holocaust consciousness and its insistence on the power of individual witness and testimony, i think, was critical to the rise of this new structure and feeling in the 1970's. it was the trial of enough inhmann -- adolf eichmann israel in 1962 in which the global testimonial turn seemed to first emerge. livingn with the ss under a false identity and argentina had been captured two years earlier and brought to israel to stand trial for his role in organizing the mass deportation of european jews into nazi extermination camps in such as auschwitz during world war ii. coverage of this trial not only put the holocaust on the front page of world newspapers, but the decision by the israeli government to call so many survivors as witnesses was unprecedented. in the nurnberg trials, in the 1940's, perpetrators and written documentation had been the focal point. victims left to the side. now, the victims and lived experience were at the center of the trial. one might sa

the governor also talks about morality in foreign policy. the foreign policy of the united states meets the highest standards of morality. what is more moral than peace. and the united states is at peace today. what is more moral in foreign policy than the administration to take the lead in the world food conference in rome in 19734. when the united states committed 6 million metric tons of food. over 60% of the food committed for the disadvantaged and underdeveloped nations of the world. the ford administration wants to eradicate hunger and disease in our underdeveloped countries throughout the world. what is more moral than for the united states under the ford administration to take the lead in southern south africa, in the middle east. those are initiatives in foreign policy which are of the highest moral standard. and that is indicative of the foreign policy of this country. >> mr. frankel, a question for president ford. >> mr. president, can we stick with morality. for a lot of people it seems to cover a bunch of sins. mr. nixon and mr.

morally good.braham, moses, jesus, gandhi, any tradition, agustÍn, mohamed, et cetera, no where in that line you find someone saying capitalism or free markets or economics is morally good. it's something that you put up but we changed thelingo and the problematic thing is the thesis is reversible. right now you ask what are we teaching our kids in school, k-12, are we teaching that business and free capitalism is morally good and it's kind of corrupt and business wall street is nasty and unfortunately there are a few bad apples but the predominant of people are basically good, every small business person wants to give their employees health care. that's one thing i learned. teaching economics i didn't get out and knocked doors enough. i learned real economics. people are very good and helped employees. we have to reverse the moral language and teach kids that it's not just work, it's a calling and you better be happy and passionate about what you do every waking hour of your life otherwise you wil

the governor also talks about morality in foreign policy. the foreign policy of the united states meets the highest standards of morality. what is more moral than peace. and the united states is at peace today. what is more moral in foreign policy than the administration to take the lead in the world food conference in rome in 19734. when the united states committed 6 million metric tons of food. over 60% of the food committed for the disadvantaged and underdeveloped nations of the world. the ford administration wants to eradicate hunger and disease in our underdeveloped countries throughout the world. what is more moral than for the united states under the ford administration to take the lead in southern south africa, in the middle east. those are initiatives in foreign policy which are of the highest moral standard. and that is indicative of the foreign policy of this country. >> mr. frankel, a question for president ford. >> mr. president, can we stick with morality. for a lot of people it seems to cover a bunch of sins. mr. nixon and mr.

and for wall street, that is the moral of the story. tisha black: it's the morality. there is no morality. they don't answer to anybody, really. they might get hauled in front of congress for an embarrassing three hour session and they're done. a lot of people would deal with that for the meltdown, some bank presidents were given fat raises. altogether, big banks have paid $200 billion in fines since the financial collapse, for fraud, for money laundering, for other criminal schemes, but the fines are often paid by banks insurance companies, and they're tax deductible, a cost of doing business. wells fargo, the largest bank in nevada, was creating millions of unauthorized credit card accounts. bank executives know the benefits outweigh the risks. tisha: it's the carrot and the stick. the carrot is huge and the stick is small. heather: we haven't changed the culture of the banks and i think what we're seeeing with wells fargo is very symptomatic of the fact that if nobody gets in trouble for anything at a high level, then ultimately people's behaviors don;t change. mur

what you can do is tell -- is make the moral case that it gives us a moral case to resist. that's what you to with it. you take it to the higher ground, and you tell people that they're ignoring your vote. you tell people that when we oppose and we're not doing this just for the sake of doing it, we're doing it because we have been instructed by voters to do this. when you have the high ground, take it. we have the high ground. thank you. very good. and it was a question, and i appreciate that. [laughter] >> hello. honored to see you. i'm a bernie delegate, and i was just wondering how you think the bernie candidate -- candidacy would have looked like and what would have happened, how would it have gone? >> you know, truth of the matter is i don't know, and anybody that supposes they should have, but i would think that any sane person, the prospect of a trump presidency should scared the bejesus out of them. and i just don't really -- you were for bernie in the primaries? that's your right. he's -- that's good. he had a case to make. but what is happening here is an outrage

that come again, back to three of moral impediments, that's a moral concept.re going to b get it right to use our public rights of way, give something back and that's c-span. c-span is a great piece of our democracy, our small d democracy. thanks a lot again. >> the tom harkin radio program is syndicated weekdays actually knew it until three. it re- airs live on the c-span networks. network. you can find it online on our website today at c-span.org. >> all week on c-span2 we're showing live simulcast of political greater talk shows. >> congress returns for a lame-duck session on tuesday november 14 previous house on my dinner from 14. the house returns an essay on c-span2 on tuesday november 15 your

[laughter] but this is a very different moral question to vote monday limited government in the same way for a quicker or someone else. so if there would be a road here with broad overlap that is a very different question. someone to get to my question first of all, i don't vote ignorantly if i am going to vote i will research it and make a decision. if i just say that then i did not call the debate i did not score around telling people not to vote, usually. [laughter] and making a big deal out of it. if they ask i will tell them or i will say i bouquet. >> i would also say that the liberty is undermined at first with me the go team for your side would not impact one way or another and second that be living out the principles of justice to believe him libertarian is some two not legitimize the of the illegitimate powers of thought government to move the world in a right direction and compared to voting and have dedicated my career and all sorts of ways other more effective piece of that's what matters i think i am doing okay. >> with that i would like to open the floor to questions f

nobody in that part of the world thinks it's a moral actor.that's something we have to come to terms with i think i think we imagine this world without us leadership, i the us leadership role has since world war ii played such an important function in maintaining the absence of global war and as we look at the 19, is it 1993 when the united states first invaded to wait, i mean rack and imagine that the united states did not go in there. to drive saddam hussein from kuwait. who's going to do that? and i often ask these questions when i give lectures in china that with the chinese government do it? would russia do it? i don't think so. this world, despite the united nations and all these regional arrangements, still is in need of leadership. this leadership not only in terms of playing a police role but also in other areas, whether it's humanitarian or the rule of economic growth. the us to is the largest democracy in the world and without us markets, a lot of countries including china will not necessarily see what they've achieved so far. and c

it began to reshape the contours of global politics and morality. the rise in the emerging holocaust survivor testimony was critical to the rise of this new structure and feeling in the 1970's. in israel inial 1962 in which the global firstonial turn seemed to emerge. former ss living in argentina undercover. he was brought to israel to stand trial to organize the mass deportation of european jews into nazi extermination camps in world war ii. not onlyof this trial put the holocaust on the front page of world needs papers -- world newspapers, but the decision by the israeli government to call so many survivors as witnesses was unprecedented. in the nurnberg trials, perpetrators and written documentation has been the focal point. the voices of the victims had been left to the side. the victims and lived experience were at the center of the trial. one might say that the testimony onlye first witness not represent a rupture in the trial but also in broader, popular understandings of the holocaust. she opted to speak in you dish shther than hebrew -- yi

failing and you need moral redemption. you have had a lapse of willpower and need to get your willpower together. you and a higher power working together can get you out of this. there is deep truth in that and people who can give testimony about the power of that approach. the challenge is, 50 years later, 60 years later, when you are not merely talking about alcohol but these very complex substances, it just turns out that that is passed. on the others -- that is about half. on the other side, until we get to the point where we see the biological side of it as shame-free, stigma-free, so that we can act intelligently, we are going to continue to stumble. i remember back in the 1980's during the hiv/aids crisis, the government, we knew that this was a medical emergency, millions of people affected, but there was a slowness to response. public concerns were going up, up, up, but there was a stigma associated with hiv and aids that was rooted in homophobia primarily, but also just a lot fear and ignorance. and the lad time

so this was a huge moral event. no question about it. >> how much of it, though, was the inevitable backlash to the kind of changes you describe in your book? >> my book basically argues we're actually in the middle of three nonlinear axle rations with the three largest forces on the planet which i call says, mother nature, that's climate change bio diversity and moore's law and those have touched the two most neuralgic things that basically define us as people, our home and workplace. let's look at it. the acceleration in immigration that are going on. there are a lot of people out there in middle america that go to the grocery store now the cashier is speaking spanish. that's fine by me. i love a pluralistic society but i can understand why that makes them feel less at home and go to the men's room and there's someone that looks like a woman that may be a man. that's totally fine by me and glad lgbt people have their rights but i think that change came too fast and go to the office and now there's a robot next to

the two things a woman did before hosting a thanksgiving jags morales could not wait a minute longer. castanza is a rushed over and single handedly delivered morales' little boy haven. >> i showed her my hospital band and said i'm a patient here soon. >> reporter: she wasn't finished. dinner to 16 guests. >> you know what, what a great day. what a wonderful life i lead. travel, deliver baby, cook dinner, have time with family and friends. >> reporter: castanza is a and morales reunited with a photo. everybody is doing great just taking it easy after a hectic holiday. >> two super women right there. that was ted land reporting. >>> coming up, losing ground, why u.w. madison dropped off highly sought-after list of best in the country. >>> and the badger fan who got international attention for wearing an offensives could type at camp randall is making a injured a correctional officer at the la pond correctional institution. it happened thursday. the department of corrections wouldn't comment on the severity of the attack but released a statement saying the institution is on temporary loc

we have to reverse the moral language.t's not just a calling, you better be happy and passionate about what you do in every waking hour of your life otherwise you will have a miserable life. you're telling the kids the truth. the left is critical. i think we have a theme there. >> you're talking about young people, your obviously a college professor and you love being a teacher. >> yeah. >> not just a professor but a teacher. >> yeah. >> would you encouraging your students to get involved in politics? i do. do math till your 30 and philosophy near death. you're done with wine, women and song and you instill wisdom in yourself. make sure you're done with that deal. >> yeah. >> so get in politics, do internships on capitol hill. >> go knock doors. >> you learn. >> go into a vocation first. i thought you were going to ask about going into the teaching too. the same thing. always major in your passion. i was an adviser too for 18 years. make sure you do what you love, but minor in accounting. minor in science or accounting or

tisha black: it's the morality. there is no morality. they don't answer to anybody, really. they might get hauled in front of congress for an embarrassing three hour session and they're done. a lot of people would deal with that for a 30 million dollar paycheck. after paying the huge fines for the meltdown, some bank presidents were given fat raises. altogether, big banks have paid financial collapse, for fraud, for money laundering, for other criminal schemes, but the fines are often paid by banks insurance companies, and they're tax deductible, a cost of doing business. wells fargo, the largest bank in nevada, was recently caught red-handed creating millions of unauthorized credit card accounts. bank executives know the benefits outweigh the risks. tisha: it's the carrot and the stick. the carrot is huge and the stick is small. heather: the culture of the banks and i think what we're seeeing with wells fargo is very symptomatic of the fact that if nobody gets in trouble for anything at a high level, then ultimately people's behaviors don;t change. murren thinks new regulat

and for wall street, that is the moral of the story. tisha black: it's the morality. there is no morality. they don't answer to anybody, really. they might get hauled in front of congress for an embarrassing three hour session and they're done. a lot of people would deal with that for a 30 million dollar paycheck. the meltdown, some bank presidents were given fat raises. altogether, big banks have paid $200 billion in fines since the financial collapse, for fraud, for money laundering, for other criminal schemes, but the fines are often paid by banks insurance companies, and they're tax deductible, a cost of doing business. wells fargo, the largest bank in creating millions of unauthorized credit card accounts. bank executives know the benefits outweigh the risks. tisha: it's the carrot and the stick. the carrot is huge and the stick is small. heather: we haven't changed the culture of the banks and i think what we're seeeing with wells fargo is very symptomatic of the fact that if nobody gets in trouble for anything at a high level, then ultimately people's behaviors

go ahead. ng, no happy ending-- but it points a moral, major, a moral that could benefit you. to you, and the nation, the war's end was a moment of triumph. to the police, it was just another problem. the whirlpool of battle had cast up a backwash of scum. in boston, it clung to the waterfront. returned soldiers, shirkeke, deserters, cheap bravos from a dozen states, all without visible means of support, save for raw whiskey and a marked deck. some, the dregs of the city; others, the proverbial black sheep-- weak, vicious, depraved, already hopelesslylyired in the muck of vice and crime and violence. as inspector-in-charge, i ordered special patrols to maintain a 24-hour watch over the docks and warehouses on which the commerce of the city depended. it was over by the time i arrived. two of the robbers had gotten what they deserved... have a look. yes, sir. the other one. yes, sir. what's your name? your name. daly. jack daly. you know who i am? and you're alive. that's lucky, isn't it? lucky for you. yes, sir... i guess so. on the other hand, maybe they're the luckckones. tak

the jerry falwell junior featured falwell senior was important that the reagan coalition and the moral majority in 1979 and he made it onto the cover of "time" magazine at least twice i believe. his son now who is president of liberty university in lynchburg, virginia has been one of the most outspoken evangelicals and taken a lot of criticism for it for backing donald trump and that trump raises a whole interesting set of questions that evangelicals in politics. someone else who has emerged of late is eric tok says. i don't know how much people knew him as an evangelical for an evangelical per se, certainly conservative. he seems to have inherited the mantle of chuck colson who was in the nixon white house, spent time in prison after watergate, they came back, was involved in prison reform. he made alliances with richard john neuhaus, editor of first things magazine. they set up something called evangelicals and catholics together. i was kind of a basis for evangelicals and that's actually forming a coalition pretty much of the republican fold. but i still think there's kind of a back

if he fails some of these moral tests -- >> there will be political -- accountable. one of the reasons he one was he wanted to drain the swamp, right, of corruption inside the beltway. no more dealmaking. his transition committee on ethics is a rogue's gallery of lobbyists. that is a transpartisan movement. it's not left or right. it's human beings versus physics but i'm just saying we got to hold him accountable. i too many rallies where you saw tree rope journalist. >> oh! >> i'm not saying we don't try to find a way -- >> how can you say -- >> moral and political costs. >> trump is more important than all of us. >> i disagree. >> personally and morally i agree with van. if he disassociates with him with forces he coddled and campaign and is responsible about policy initiatives and obamacare, trade and other areas he has a huge opportunity. the truth is that a lot of this stuff -- >> he doesn't coddle them. he repudiated them. >> he's got to be better -- >> don't you think president trump has to be better than candidate trump? >> i mean -- >> yes, okay. >> well, wa

but churchill never forgot that while the mystical unify moral and impaired functions of the monarch were important, the whole tenor and tone and dynamic of english history have been to bring about a state of affairs with the kings government was carried on by ministers who were primarily answerable to parliament rather than to the ground. he insisted in 1909 is always advise on the advice of ministers, and ministers not the crown are responsible. and criticism of all debatable acts of policy should be directed to ministers, not to the monarch. so those were churchill's general views about monarchy which remained pretty much unchanged for the whole of his life. but how in practice to the interact with particular monarchs, and how far did those views that he had about the balance of power between the monarchy and the politicians in form and in certain cases antagonized his selection with the -- boom at the end of his life he felt proud and rightly so to have served. edward the seventh was the first monarch with whom churchill came into contact as an active and engaged in as he was in