that is an example of moral inequality. in a very similar where there is a drone operator i write about that comes from a small town, is poor she ends up enlisting in the air force to get out. to travel and to hopefully get some opportunities which face it that's a big reason people join the military in the country especially since we have eliminated the draft. it's a voluntary but it's voluntary under what i refer to is from the philosopher it's a choice made under the pressure of economic necessity both in her case and in many cases. she goes in becomes an analysis. at first is fine with it. and then starts to not be fine with it. and really doubt who are these killed in the strikes what are the points of them? she is watching areas of afghanistan war soldiers are dying, no progress needs to be made. very much we just heard in the news. she comes out of the base there actually are some protesters there. they are saying don't be involved in this killing. some are with graphic designs and images what infuriates her as i thi

that is really what moral hazard is. go ahead and land.on't pay you back, i will pay you back. eliminating moral hazard really means changing the structure of the entire credit market. the way that the credit market has been built up on this basis. but, more importantly, it needs undermining the growth model. the only way you're able to get these high levels of growth is because a lot of this investment that is underpinned by moral hazard. everyone agrees that moral hazard is a bad thing but it is difficult to get rid of but it is a slow process in china. as we saw happened with evergrande, it can get out of control quickly in unexpected ways. >> it can get out of control in unexpected ways. the complex web of obligations this company has to its suppliers, employees, owners of wealth management product, how difficult does it make it that there will not be spread beyond evergrande? >> there are the interconnections through the financial system, and i think a lot of people understood that and regulators were ready to step in quickly and reso

samuel: this later period was pivotal for the morality of how war is fought around the world.e all kinds of new states after decolonization, and they were made up of people's who had been the victims of brutal american and european wars for centuries, and they demanded more humanity. europeans had stopped their empires and relied on the united states to protect them, and so they were in position to ask for more humane wars now that they were no longer fighting them. americans, including in the military understood that military force had to be inflicted in a more ethical or at least more optically humane way, because -- was such a public relations disaster for the military. people were shocked before it was permissible to inflict the most kind -- the kind of most brutal violence on their enemies, especially if they were nonwhite enemies, around the world and americans celebrated when that violence was perpetrated. after milai, understood had to accept some nstraints on the way it fights in the name of being ab to claim that it was it was a moral force. -- focinon how was ught,

as much to do with the morale and keeping advisors with them and having the morale of the afghan security forces demonstrating confidence in the government. going to zero, it is clear to me one of the big lessons we have to unpack is the mirror imaging in the development of the afghan military. they became dependent upon our presence. >> i apologize, time has expired. >> thank you, mr. chairman it is imperative we have this hearing today because the botched withdrawal from afghanistan is the most significant foreign policy failure in a generation and it will have ramifications for years to come. so we need to get to the bottom of this and first i want to start off to general milley a question that you made a comment earlier that you would be -- i wanted to ask you did you tell general lee when you talked to him on the phone if we would attack china that you would let him know ahead of time? >> [no audio] >> could you get the microphone a little more in front of you there and make sure it's on? >> it is a longer conversation. a vtc with general lee and there is a body of intelligence that

morales couldn't believe it. he was convinced brittani's attacker had to be a repeat offender. >> you'd have to figure that somebody that's done something in that extreme has done -- done something like that before. >> brittani's attacker, basically, vanished into thin air. >> yes. >> so now morales'investigation went from the lab to the street. he'd heard brittani was seeing someone, kind of a boyfriend. >> was he a potential suspect? >> absolutely. >> did you do a dna test on her s -- sort of boyfriend? >> yes. he was cleared. his dna did not match that. >> police didn't have to rely on just hard evidence, though. they had an eyewitness to the attack. >> i could see his height. brittani's mom had actually seen the guy. >> i saw he had jeans on. he had a long-sleeved shirt on, >> and what does he look like? >> either a dark caucasian man or a light hispanic with brown hair, kinda spiky. >> police created a composite sketch and spread the word across the rio grande valley. >> there was both billboards, rewards, c

and so the problem is when the united states considers its violence more moral and just moral in general, it allows it to justify and legitimize massive state, violet. ok mama, i'm going to share the conversation with you with your, your cope. harness. kimberly, go ahead. well i, i fully agree, i mean, and this was to the point i was making earlier. is that what we've seen the war on terror due by the united states going in with, you know, with murdering with impunity? it's, we've seen the rise of other types of extremist groups. for example, in iraq, we saw the rise of islamic state, and the united states continues even as joe biden has just said that afghan stan has wrapped up. it hasn't wrapped up because what still going are the draw strikes that have been killing that not just the so called terrorist which by the way, you know, never how to trial. we're never properly charged for never afforded the, the rights that the us constitution affords to american citizens just just killed with impunity, almost like an extra judicial killing. you know, this is the kind of thing that the unite

if you are hardworking, if you are capable, if you were of a good moral standard, you should be able to find a job. the thing was, they had never encountered a depression this deep. the were no jobs. it didn't matter if you are morally upright, it didn't matter if you worked hard, it didn't matter if you went to church on sunday. there were no jobs to be had in many communities. so a lot of people felt terribly ashamed. they felt like they had. failed they felt like this problem was personal to them. and that too was going to have a serious impact on their experience of the 1930s, because they are going to be resistant to asking for help. they are ashamed to ask for help. and there are many people who went through this experience who never got over it. who spend the rest of their lives feeling terribly ashamed about having been without a job in the thirties. for no reason at all. they had no reason to be ashamed. but we do not always think in these logical ways when we are faced with a crisis like this. now, if you are a part of a family that was facing a situation like this, you hav

on —- a morally bankrupt person? i explained, i did not write that letter. i did sign it. i read it quickly and i signed it. >> did youll really say that justice kavanaugh if confirmed would cause people to die? >> as i stated, senator. understood those statements wereto overheated rhetoric. but i understood them. >> but you said that. >> yes. do you believe that brett kavanaugh is a morally bankrupt person quick. >> senator, sitting here as a judicial nominee it is not appropriate for me to comment. >> you said it. odo you believe he is a morally bankrupt person quick. >> senator is not appropriate for me. >> why not? you said it. >> i'm giving you extra time but can she be allowed to answer quick. >> i just want an answer. i agree she should answer. you will not answer my questions. >> i believe i have answered it to the best of my ability. honestly, senator i respect completely the confirmation process and the authority of justice kavanaugh and every supreme court justice. >> this is simple. you said just a few ye

but it is a moral issue most of all. if we are going to create a more beloved community, how do we treat our children? children who live in poverty literally have physical effects. poverty is violence. study after study shows that the brain development of children in poverty is inhibited. literally the stress hormones, the cortisol, it is akin to an adult having a traffic accident every single day. it is an indicator of childhood trauma. poverty is a moral obscenity, and we, the richest nation on the planet that year after year are getting richer, our children are getting poorer. who are we? when we pledge allegiance to a flag and say liberty and justice for all, who are we? we don't even know the demographic changes in our country. we have cities across america where one out of every ten child is being raised by a grandparent and so here we're discussing childhood poverty, and some people are talking about work requirements when we know from the data, from conservative think tanks to what we see in other nations like ca

rather than standing on moral consistency they offer shameless excuses for hypocrisy. rather than peace they embrace the deathdealing agenda of the nra. rather than spreading the gospel of affection they demonize muslims and liberals and accuse those who question them as being part of the absurd murderous conspiracy. because the spirit of antichrist dominated american society more important to right wing evangelical maintaining integrity the gospel more important honesty, loving care for those for truthful guidance and nurture. god's name have visited upon our nation late harvest of hate on corruption moral failure on leasing levels on total numbers of lovers of god and vanity waiver never again see the light of day, not socially inclusive, the notion of religion freedom then started right wing evangelicals and their moral authority? that is hard to say. they do not seem to realize they have lost their moral bearing therefore making no effort to regain it. one thing they should seek to become truly worthy of the entity they claim, consult the insidious evil of the root

not just protestant morality, either. the catholic hierarchy in america which of course was more and more powerful because there were more and more catholics in america, irish, hungarian, polls, latin american catholics, they decided that figures like this, people like valentino who at lease nominally is a catholic, they were being imitated and being seen by catholic boys and girls in the cities who were making them into heroes, and this couldn't do. so the archbishops, the bishops of america decided we have to do something about this. so they went to hollywood and said, look, we're not against movies themselves, you know, they're here to stay, but we'd like you to adopt a certain morality, what's called the production code which would make sure that a couple was never shown in bed together, make sure this kind of shot would not be shown again on screen. make sure all you see between a man and a woman was a kiss, nothing more. and that as much as possible gangster films would end with the gangster being killed in a bloody

imprisonment or both for whoever with intent to interfere with, impair or influence the loyalty, moralef the military advises, counsels, urges or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or refusal of duty by any member of the military. distribution of offensive literature with the same intent is also a violation. the statute has been held to be applicable in peacetime as well as when a state of war exists. additionally, willfully making a false report or statements with the intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or to promote the success of enemies of the united states during wartime is punishable by a fine of $10,000 and or imprisonment for 20 years. same punishments are applicable to causing or attempt to go cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny or or refusal of duty in the armed forces when the united states is at war. these wartime provision right side presently applicable by virtue of chapter 18, united states code section 2391. finally, any person who knowingly counsels, aids or abets another to refuse or evade registration or service i

it's a moral obligation., we have a sacred duty to make sure that all of our american citizens who are still in afghanistan are brought out immediately. the biden administration has proven to be incompetent. with the biden administration is doing is they are trying to slow the process of getting folks into the country because initially those 124 or 127,000 people that they evacuated, they do that so president biden could read it off a card come he could see a really big number in the united states was so great for pulling all these people out. 5% of those people were american citizens. i have no idea of the percentage. so now the state department has realized they've imported people into the united states who should not be here. the congressman. hit the nail on the head. state department is trying to corrective galactic wrong. they are so far down the road here with his disastrous operation. it's going to be very difficult to extradite from there. i want to be very, very clear. we have a moral obligation to h

do you believe he is a morally bankrupt person? >> senator, it's not appropriate for me -- >> why not come you said it? >> i understand. >> senator, i'm giving you extra time i can she be allowed to answer? >> sure. i just want an answer. i agree that she should answer. you're not going to answer my question? >> i believe i've answered it to the best of my ability. honestly, senator, i respect completely the confirmation process and the authority of justice kavanaugh and every supreme court justice. >> but do you come this is real simple. you said just a few years ago, you were not in law school, you're not in college. you said that kavanaugh is a morally bankrupt person. it's clear as thunder on a summer night. now, you are under oath. do you believe he is or not? how hard is that? you have much harder question asked a federal judge eq you make it that far. >> i appreciate the question, senator. as i stated, those statements were rhetorical advocacy and i signed as an alum addressing my law school alma mater. i did not -- >> let m

let's have some moral clarity here. host: let her finish her comment. caller: the intent is what is important. we understand what was the intent of those people at the capital that day. you cannot say people who marched around and got in the way of the other police department trying to get rid of the violent ones are innocent. host: we will let matt braynard respond. guest: i give you a very realistic scenario. you do not know the details of the case yet you say you know the intent of these people. the intent is their first amendment rights. i agree they should not have been in the building it was naivete on their part. this stood in rope lines, they did not destroy stuff. they walk in, take a few pictures, get a selfie with a capitol police officer and walk out. not even convicted, do you think these individuals should be in solitary confinement? d believe the people who stormed the offices of alexandria ocasio-cortez were terrorists? they were just expressing their rights in the same way as a citizen. host: david, good morning. caller: good morning. t

do you believe justice is, quote, intellectually and morally bankrupt?he question, senator. as i stated i recognize -- it was very recently you sign your name to the statement and i'm askingng simply today do you believe the justice is, quote, intellectually and morally bankrupt. >> thank you for the question, senator. as i stated that was rhetorical advocacy only that i find in my personal capacity as a private citizen addressing and throughout my legal career as a litigator and at adjudicator i have followed all of the court's precedents. >> and you refuse to answer the question. it's a simple yes or no and you have refused to answer. >> i would ask all the nominees who come before any of the committees the following questions which i will ask both of you. since you became a legal adult have you ever made unwanted requests for favors or committed any verbal -- >> g?no, senator. >> have you ever faced discipline or entered a settlement related to this kind of conduct? >> no, senator. >> in the past you have discussed how courts don't live in a vacuum an

the only addition i would make is that we have so many clandestine moralism.o you are more enlightened person if you are not addicted or habitually doing things are substances that somehow that make sure better person. >> you could be lowered god ass hole but if you don't have sticky ties to substances you have to prove it just front it. so my years so it comes in all shapes and sizes. it has nothing to do whether or not you use are not. so that is what i would like to see more separated. people need to be accountable for acyl behavior. people who use them people who don't use. but instead we can inflate all that stuff when we say the problem is you are using. no. actually. >> so the idea obviously in the 12 steps now we could all benefit from that model. >> yes. absolutely. >> if we're honest people with addiction problems uniquely are especially moral. >> that's what i propose the twelve-step so that could be perfectly wonderful thing to help people with self-help but it should never be mandatory or part of the curriculum because for one thing you can get it

through spanish, through the spanish court, where morales has been on trial. and those files also tell the story, these are text messages, emails of plans to kidnap assassinate assange and, and torment, and rob his associates. it just pulls back the curtain, doesn't it? on, on this? what has to be a lie that things like the rule of law, that the truth, morality and decency, they mean nothing. when it comes to your own personal political interests? well, you see what julian assigned was up against. he was up against the most powerful intelligence agencies and when he said, even to his own lawyers were being spied on everyone around us is working for the cia at the time. they didn't even believe him. and you had figures like james ball, former wiki weeks associate now at the bureau. busy of investigative journalism st julian assault has nothing to fear by leaving the embassy, he should just come out. and now we see julian assange was right all along at this the cia was planning to kill him. and now it's very clear that the entire case against julian, his size, h

injury or moral regret.s for real. amy: eyal, if you could talk about what you decided to include chris, a drone operator for the cia, in your profiling of essential workers. in your book you say "the truth is, the drone program doesn't just serve the interests of military contractors." talk about who it serves. >> well, i think it is so appropriate that chris began with that moving apology. and he made a collective. he wasn't just saying he is sorry, that he is part of the society that has chosen to fight wars this way. that is why i have focused on him and other people in the drone program. after iraq and afghanistan, the ground invasions, america was exhausted by those wars, disillusioned, and did not like the price tag -- both in terms of casualties and resources. and so what happen? well, under obama first, then under trump, drones -- fighting from a distance without any physical to our site. keeping the same right to target and kill people even in countries which were not formally at war, but doing it

that is a policy question but the question before us is a moral one.ords are not enough we should show the child tax credit the truth of the policy what we do with our budgets and the best leading indicator will always be the most vulnerable of our society is doing with their elderly and in this case how we care for our children and i am honored now to come to the floor senator from georgia. and senator from colorado the senator from georgia has a much better haircut. i yield the floor. >> . >> thank you. senator booker and i joined my friend to talk about this senator booker with the leadership the most important thing in done in my eiyears in public office with the child tax credit and to get across the finish line sorry for the sports metaphor but how important this is that but raising children is work at least one of my colleagues side of the aisle said something about a work requirement of the child tax credit and i don't understand that i see how hard my daughter's work raising children and our son works raising children and then to release the a

morally reprehensible. um, then it's not acceptable. um, and this is what need to argue about. let us take the argument in a slightly different direction where you talk about the issue of law jurispute prudence and the doctrine of originalism. right. can you? explain what the argument is between the the founders and how does that affect today? what? where do you where do you see? we've got quite a conversation about you know is a supreme court overreaching underreaching, you know, all that play. the doctrine of originalism trades along the reputation of the founders as special group of people in its purest form. it seems the doctor of original is and argues that all supreme court decisions and federal court decisions should be made based on what would they originally said was the original intent of the framers and the founders or later said the original meaning of the words the founders used in 1787 and ratification process in 1788. so this is a doctrine of jurisprudence that is originally developed by bork

what has to be a lie that things like the rule of law, that the truth, morality and decency, they mean nothing. when it comes to your own personal political interests. where you see what julian assigns was up against. he was up against the most powerful intelligence agencies. and when he said, even to his own lawyers were being spied on everyone around us is working for the cia at the time. they didn't even believe him and you had figures like james ball, former wiki weeks associate now at the bureau. busy of investigative journalism st julian assange has nothing to fear, by leaving the embassy, he should just come out. and now we see julian assange was right all along at this the c i was planning to kill him. we have a former associate of the ca asset. the ve morales in this spanish court in the files, in emails, in text messages saying, there were, there was a standing plot to poison julian assigned, or to leave a door open at the embassy and to come in and snatch him. we have clear evidence that every journalist, every lawyer that went to visit assange was spied on their devices wer

health care, jobs, security and morality. if you believe that this planet is god's creation then we have a moral responsibility but even. if you don't share that religious we have a moral responsibility to our children to pass on this planet in the most responsible way possible in the president has laid out serious goals in terms of emissions and the rest and we plan to honor that in the reconciliation bill as we go forward. so it's about the future. it's about eldon back better, not reinforcing the past but taking us into the future for the children. on another note, we see the wildfires in the west. it's so devastating. as you see the floods of ida in the south and the northeast, mother nature is not happy with us in terms of how we recognize the challenges that face us. climate crisis is real. human behavior has an impact on it and we have public policy proposals that i hope would be bipartisan. the fossil fuel industry ways and heavily, some of the people on the other side of the aisle. you think they would have taken the

this was the mother of moral hazards. everything congress had ever done i think this is one of the 10 most weirdest things congress has ever done. think about this. yes who owns sallie mae west and mark banks and schools. so it's like the fox living in the henhouse. the institutions that needed to make money and wanted to make money only have access to all this treasury department money. no risk whatsoever. through this odd piece called sally may. so i'll stop there because it's just a long story and i'm curious what you want to know more about 's we're talking moral hazards and the consequences so just to catch us up the federal government wants to pay for it, doesn't want to be seen paying for it . it's a little bit of a shell game so they're putting the money up but they're not, it's not on their books and then sally may gets created to basically their profits or losses are raised and they have every power of the federal government has on federal government rates. a new kind of hazard comes in and these are the college

i know my morals. i know my faith. you don't come telling me and threaten me and everyone else as if we're the demons. >> last i checked, contracting covid had nothing to do with faith or morals. but what is moral is trying to protect the health of your fellow man, woman and child by getting vaccinated. and what seems rather immoral is that 666,000 americans have died during the pandemic, meaning one in every 500 americans has perished from the virus. they're still dying after a vaccine came to exist that could have kept them alive. if members of america's new death cult, these hard-core anti-vaxxers don't check their morals and do the right thing, that number will continue to rise. we continue to see devastating and tragic real-world consequences. an unvaccinated mother who died before even getting to hold her infant son. she thought covid wasn't that real of a virus. a texas 4-year-old who died after contracting covid from her unvaccinated mom. heartbreaking stories that underscore the reality that this is a pandemic