morally blind. lewis does not try to prove the vadity of natural law, but rather, he appeals to our capacity to reason to illustrate the alternatives to fundamental principles. lewis hopes to awaken a realization in his readers that they do, after all, belief in natural law. he does this differently in each of the three chapters, laying out a platonic and aristotelian image of the person, as was the high stakes for moral education. in the second chapter, the way lewis dissects any attempt to extract one isolated component of the natural law, and build a new ethic around that, well, getting rid of all the others. in the last chapter of the abolition of man, does not present the positive case for natural law, as it does reveal the horrific alternative. we have been through a brief survey of some of lewis's thoughts about law and liberty. we glanced quickly at his biography and his thinking about criminal justice and the welfare state. we have touched briefly on looses work defending natural law, and p

their moral ground is taken away. lewis drew the same conclusion from this state of affairs that locke did. when the state can not or will not protect, lewis warns nature. is come again. and the right of self-protection reverts to the individual. i share this reflection of lewis's not only as an excuse to tell that story about joy lewis and her shotgun, but because it illustrates well the libertarian leaning. leave me alone. literally. get off my lawn. side of lewis's personality in most of his public writings, he was very careful not to appear too partizan. politically, one way or another, going so far as to turn down a winston churchill's proposal to honor lewis by making him a commander of the british empire. lewis feared that would be used by some of his critics to paint him as a political conservative. but we do see here in this episode and the piece that resulted from it a little bit of lewis's views, he had a deep distrust of government power, whether it was misused in foreign wars or not, used properly enough

their moral ground is taken away. lewis drew the same conclusion from this state of affairs that locke did. when the state can not or will not protect, lewis warns nature. is come again. and the right of self-protection reverts to the individual. i share this reflection of lewis's not only as an excuse to tell that story about joy lewis and her shotgun, but because it illustrates well the libertarian leaning. leave me alone. literally. get off my lawn. side of lewis's personality in most of his public writings, he was very careful not to appear too partizan. politically, one way or another, going so far as to turn down a winston churchill's proposal to honor lewis by making him a commander of the british empire. lewis feared that would be used by some of his critics to paint him as a political conservative. but we do see here in this episode and the piece that resulted from it a little bit of lewis's views, he had a deep distrust of government power, whether it was misused in foreign wars or not, used properly enough

to not see that morally blind.lewis does not attempt to prove the validity of natural law, a quixotic task. but rather he appeals to our capacity to reason to illustrate the alternatives to a belief in fundamental moral principles. lewis hopes to awaken a realization in his readers that they do, after all, believe in natural law. he does this differently in each of the three chapters laying out in men without chess, a platonic and aristotelian picture of the human person, as well as the high stakes for moral education and the political community. in the second chapter, the way lewis dissects any attempt to extract one isolated component of the natural law and build a new ethic just about around that, while getting rid of all the others and the last chapter, or the abolition of does not so much present the positive case for natural law, as it does reveal the stark and to a minimally decent moral person horrific alternative. what we have been through a brief survey of some of lewis's thoughts about law and liberty. g

own moral laces.you are right. how did, when lewis looked at the world, he's got this kind of self-reliance that affords them a kind of liberty. when he looks at the world and he sees -- did you call the bungles a barge? when he sees people that are broken, struggling, can't put their own laces together, does he ever talk about that, about the element of society that just doesn't have the benefits of this education, thinking? >> yeah. he does. you would find that more in his letters. there's two ways to answer that. one is once lewis became as popular as it was, he got a lot of letters, and he wrote peabody back. towards the end of his life, his brother would help him but he was felt it was a duty. he hated christmas, in part, because it felt like this categorical imperative to write everybody back. he does write about that. so, he got to know people and their problems. they would write to him about the problems. they would also send him stuff. americans, in particular, lewis had a really funny relati

i am confident, and all our people are confident that the marters give us great moral strength, evenh they're no longer with us and no longer on the battlefield, but it is something to be expected, and as long as it is always expected, we always have more people to take their place, the assistance of the leaders or those know the... operations, their positions are filled directly despite the sadness which we have for their loss, which does not break the resistance, and the resistance continues. i want to talk about the morale part, because you said it's natural to lose the marters, explain to our international audience, what is the... motivating factor, what gives you that um that energy to continue when you're losing fighters and losing leaders, what is key here? the palestinian people have lived a great injustice, and the level of awareness in the minds of the palestinian people is very good, and since this injustice fell upon the palestinian people, were expelled from their land, their homes were confiscated or destroyed, their women and children were killed. this in itself is a b

of course, will we support you morally?ou from protecting borders of your country? of course not, and even more. let's say, in certain cases that serve us interests, we can provide weapons. we cannot do this for everyone , it would be a zero-sum game to provide weapons to everyone, israel, ukraine, then taiwan, but in some cases, when it serves the interests of the united states, only this way and not otherwise. and another thing that allies do is learn from each other. i believe it is critically important to share intelligence with allies with israel. i believe that we can learn from both successes and failures of our ally like this. for example, we have a very unsecured border, even israel, with such a secure border, faced such horror, so we here may encounter something similar or even worse, and there is something else tucker that no one is talking about, it’s not only at the border, our country does not have an iron dome , we are completely vulnerable to nuclear missile attacks, and we are rapidly approaching nuclear co

you there are no moral duties other than to protect the interests of the american people.ur system. this was obvious before, but now it’s worth mentioning. remember, as the conflict between israel and hamas could escalate into a war between iran and its allies against the west. and if such a war begins, then one can easily imagine the use of nuclear weapons and everything that will happen next: millions of deaths and the collapse of the world economy, at a minimum we may face an unprecedented energy crisis here. at one of the gas stations on the coast, gasoline over this weekend has already reached seven dollars 29 cents per gallon, and if this trend continues to intensify, then the united states, like... already technically bankrupt , will plunge into depression, and no, it will not be like in the thirties, over the past 3 years from the poorest places on earth, about 10 million people came here, and most of them live on government support in one form or another, and the question is what will happen to them when the us government runs out of money, so the question of our

it shows a moral image of itself. even the regime itself tried to separate the civilians from the military by saying that i separate them, they say they have a special interpretation we are the most moral army in the world, that's exactly why they are raising this issue, and by the way, they also have a ministry of public diplomacy , so that the image of the zionists can best dominate the people of the world . he used to reduce the costs of your service to support the regime , which had gone too high for america, by portraying and creating a moral image of itself in the world. well, usually when people are in the middle of work zeolitic strengthening social forces. against the nation-state or against, for example, the issue of global sovereignty that the united states is responsible for, it increases its weight, and this causes the equations to increase a bit in complexity, and the variables that exist greatly affect the results, for example, assuming the same change. the view of the public opinion on the israeli-pale

there simply is no moral equivalence . and in the moral equivalence. and in the light of all this, we'll be discussing what one of my panellists has called the deadly interaction between islamism and the woke. the first claims the legitimacy of theocracy and the other claims, the illegitimacy of western liberal democracy. so is there a tension in multiculturalism ? meanwhile, the multiculturalism? meanwhile, the tories are in a torpor not seen since henry the sixth 18 month long catatonic state in the 15th century labour party has secured two new mps in two by—election wins mid—bedfordshire and tamworth. the conservative party doesn't wake up last week's by—election results will simply be an early taste of the bitter outcome of next year's general election. state of the nation starts now . starts now. i'll also be joined by sarah oral panel this evening. the editor of conservative home, paul goodman, and gb news senior political commentator nigel nelson. as always , i want to nelson. as always, i want to hear from you. it's a crucial part of the progra

benefit of his loved ones, to protect. to support, please, help, teach, these are the sources of morality, culture, and as a consequence of human progress, because a society in which traditions and mutual social responsibility are strong, such a society can be broken it is impossible to defeat or destroy it, you need to dissuade people from the veracity of this truth, and then... there will be chaos, which will be replaced by emptiness, but i would like to return to the question: what is family for you, for me this concept is inextricably linked with the homeland , the place where i was born and raised, this is my parents’ home, where they are always waiting for me, and for you, remember the warm care of your mother’s hands, her sad eyes, her tears of worry when you got sick or in trouble, or tears of joy for your first baby steps and first victories and achievements. remember your dad, who with trepidation taught you to be strong and not to be afraid of anything, to protect yourself, your mother, your brothers and sisters, who, rejoicing at your successes, proudly told your friends, this

we are the chosen people. moral people, and i grew up on this, the most moral army in the world, andlly their project of zionism has a problem, it's a tragedy in a sense, jews had to escape from europe to find a safe haven, but you cannot create a safe haven by. creating a catastrophe for other people. all the villages we fought with, we fought with him, all along the road to haifa, all the villages fought with us, so there was a goal to fight them in all these villages, because they yestelkoko so they ran away without a fight, without a fight, they ran away without a fight, without a fight, they entered the villages, there were even pitots of the mother-in-law, to get away, we didn't fight, we didn't go back, but the conquest of the galilee was a little later, there are two arab villages. do you remember who is the druze and who is the arab? noah and segor, so in one of them we made pharaohs and in the other we didn't hurt, we didn't protect our hair. what are you doing? help, leave? it was at the time when gurion said that he needed to do everything that the people would be ignoran

the answer to that kind of dangerous speech is speech with moral purpose, language with moral clarity. that is not us that is not the united states of america and that is what we are doing right here right now on this floor today.

moral damage, well, in some case, so the right to compensation for moral damage does not pass by inheritance in this compensation as part of the inheritance, such is the position of the experts, associated with the person, it is not inherited, you will not be able to prove the level of your suffering, to the point of your testator , according to the current wording, the heirs have no right to expect compensation, but the potential right to money already awarded must be inherited, it happens that the moral the harm was caused by lawful actions, for example, they detained a famous person, handcuffed him, took him to the police station, he didn’t have a passport there, no one recognized him, they sorted it out, established his identity, and released him. of course he is unhappy, he suffered, but the law enforcement officers acted lawfully, they had the right to establish his identity and detain him there for up to 3 hours. moral damage caused by lawful actions is not subject to compensation under criminal law, if a citizen was illegally convicted, prosecuted, taken into custody or issued a subs

the common spiritual and moral principles that underlie the union of states play no less a role thancommon approaches to economic development and security. we can state with satisfaction that the moral and ethical principles that are embedded in the constitutions of belarus and russia are almost identical. in these matters, we have taken the path of defense. and civilizationally close to us values: traditional family, priority of spiritual and moral education, preserving the memory of the great exploits of our ancestors, first of all, the feat of our peoples during the great patriotic war. this distinguishes us favorably from countries representing the so-called western civilization. the civilized west allows itself to respond to the address. nazi criminals, conducts corrupt training of minors, encourages immoral relationships. citizens of the union state must clearly understand what kind of union we are building, how do we see our future and what is the conceptual goal of our development? maintaining a balance of interests and the mutual benefit of the union participants allows us t

thank you very much, erin del moral, you were in. much, erin del moral, you were in court yesterday andday as we get further evidence. the financial crime agency in india has arrested a chinese national. he works for the company vivo, which has denied any wrongdoing. we spoke to a colleague earlier who has more from mumbai. the to a colleague earlier who has more from mumbai-— to a colleague earlier who has more from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo emlo ee from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is — from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is just _ from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is just the _ from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is just the latest - from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is just the latest in - from mumbai. the arrest of the vivo employee is just the latest in a - employee is just the latest in a spate of controversies that have dogged the chinese companies in india in recent years. vivo has said it is deeply concerned in exercising legal options. 0ne it is deeply concerned in exercising legal options. one of the lawyers i spoke wit

in a sense, we have a common system of moral values., painted in some cultural, religious tones, but. should not serve the cause of hatred, calls, calls that are heard today, unfortunately, sometimes, including including in radical religious groups, i think that all the spiritual leaders present here will agree with the statement that the ideas of a person of hatred cannot in any way be associated with religion, moreover, the product of the enemy of the human race, the devil, these ideas are undoubtedly the inner nature of which hates the good, we leaders of traditional religions in russia are well aware of the tragedy of what is happening today in the middle east, and therefore we have no right to allow in our country a call for hostility and manifestation hate on religious grounds, thank god, with the exception of some very marginal groups, nothing like that happens in russia. the conflict in the holy land should not affect relations between religious communities, including in russia. our fellow believers see us sitting at the same ta

moral damage, or necessarily receive money.e right, and this is the law, to agree to compensate, compensate for moral damage, both in money and in some other form, well, as an option, the harm-doer will look after the victim, free of charge, provide a certain service or transfer it to the account payment for some property, a car, a musical instrument, maybe even an apartment, such an agreement can be concluded both in writing and orally, of course, such an agreement does not exclude the possibility of the victim filing a claim in court for recovery and compensation for moral damages, but the court can... satisfy such a requirement if it decides that the amount received under the agreement, well, some other form of calculation did not allow full compensation for the physical or moral suffering caused. does the financial condition of the defendant affect compensation for moral damage? this is where the court can, of course, deviate from what i proposed the universal principle of returning a smile to the face and resolving a dispu

so it's the same moral principle it's just a difference of how that principle was applied. so are we still the first wave with what with it coming over to america in the early 20th century or if we moved into the second wave, this is all this is all what call first wave libertarianism. second wave of libertarianism doesn't really start until about the 1930s. and now we're talking primarily about the united states. so whereas britain and france were kind of hotbeds of libertarian theory in the 19th century, by the 20th century, all the action is really in the united states. most of the major libertarian thinkers are either born in the united states or they migrate the united states. so you get people like ayn rand, for instance, coming from the soviet union. you get people like ludwig von mises and friedrich hayek coming from austria. but all the action here is centered in the united states. and what sparks this kind of and reshaping of libertarian thought in the 20th century is essentially a new wave of. fear of socialism. it starts with the new deal, united states, because

these crimes have not been accepted by anyone from a moral perspective. let the crime be confirmed, but the american government and its allies know that this is a complete moral scandal for the american government, which is forced to side with a regime that is using all its military capabilities against its citizens in an unequal war. on america other allies the zionist regime is also recording this moral scandal for themselves. today i actually read a strange sentence from the media, with the position of the immigration minister of the british government, who points out that we condemn the israeli regime in connection with the attacks it is carrying out. we don't do it. we consider this israel's right and we do not condemn this in any way. this is really a moral scandal for the western regimes, the american regime and the western governments, which are involved in this great human tragedy that, from everyone's point of view, is actually jurist monsaf is committing a full-scale war crime and gross violation of human rights human rights are friendly. the a

. or its absence, this is moral, and this is immoral, that is, in essence, this is the meaning of double and arabs, of course, it is very difficult for many to maintain a balanced view, a cold mind i can’t keep someone, nikolay, don’t offend me, a little bit between the israelis and the arabs, here between the arabs and israelis yes, because firstly, not all israelis are jews. and not all jews are israelis, of course, the amendment is absolutely fair, some cannot even maintain neutrality, well , the situation is really very complicated, some do not try to be neutral at all, look, turkey completely sides with palestine, well, we it’s clear why, but there are no questions here, the united states of america completely immediately sides with israel, why? well , because israel is a kind of protectorate the united states of america, their outpost in the middle east, they finance it, they naturally don’t want it... they support it immediately, for example, other countries demonstrate, but i would say such a rare immoral position of theirs, here is the immoral position of france, macron comes an

the moral — then the moral compass...ur colleagues in the palestinian liberation organisation chose to make a two—state solution peace with israel. so let's not get stuck on 1917. no, no, no, no. if you want to talk history, it's more useful, surely, to talk about the history of the last 30 years? don't strip it of context, and don't strip the uk of its own responsibility — historic and legal and moral — and the international community. what i want is a fruitful discussion, which may yield some clues as to where we go from here. you are part of a group, the palestinian liberation organisation, but particularly yasser arafat, fatah, what became the palestinian authority, took a key, strategic decision in the early 1990s to pursue a two—state negotiated solution with israel, right? true, accurate. and right through the early 1990s, you got the oslo accords. it appeared that that peace might be achieved. the organisation most determined to destroy that peace was hamas, started letting off the suicide bombs in israel, which r

left in the leaderships of the western elite and indeed, are all morally bankrupt and and sorry, i also need to add, it's not just the morally bankrupt, but they're bankrupt even trying to resolve the situation or be realistic that to resolve the issue, you need to address the needs and aspiration of the palestinians, because if you don't do that, the you are only going to get the continuation of same thing that we have. seeing and we are seeing right now. mr. shajaro, i'm sure you've been covering, you've been following the daily uh demonstrations that have been taking place in cities across the world. we saw bulk of the pro-palestian demonstrations occurring today, various cities around the world, uh, we saw um people gathering in the solidarity with palestinians and condemning the israeli attack attack. basically on uh on the besieged and defenseless people of gaza, how overwhelming and how impressive basically is it to see such global awareness when it comes to the issue of palestine now, well i've been an activist for most of my life and palestinian supporter, supporting the cause

in general , the diplomacy of the united states in the 20th century is a moral diplomacy the moral image is showing itself, even the regime itself tried, although by saying that i separate the civilians from the military , they have a special interpretation, they say that we are the most moral army in the world. they bring up this debate and by the way, they also have the ministry of public diplomacy , because yes, zionists, because of the image they should be able to dominate the people of the world in the best possible way. now, in this situation, the issue of the moral empire of america was trying to increase the cost of your service to support the regime, which was too high for america, by creating an image and creating a moral image . he should reduce those costs by himself in the world. now, with the conditions that have arisen, this image has been severely distorted, and when people are in the middle of work and geopolitics, social forces are strengthened against the nation-state or against , for example, the issue of global governance. the united states claims that it will lift i

you know, you can having a moral can talk about having a moral crusade. mean you're actually wanting to the actually wanting to slit the throats of muslims. and equally, that the shaheed flag, that flag, the shaheed flag, looks like isis flag, looks very like the isis flag, but contains holy texts. but it contains holy texts. so i suppose the other thing the police had to bear in mind is that in the realm of that they were in the realm of religious and for religious expression. and for that reason they felt they had to very gently and then to tread very gently and then come out and say that it's all the politicians fault in the end, which seems a bit of a wet response. well, i think i should say i've got great respect for mark rowley. i had a lot to do with him aftermath of the with him in the aftermath of the manchester attack and the london attacks he was in attacks of 2017 when he was in charge counter—terrorism. and charge of counter—terrorism. and when he stopped doing that job, charge of counter—terrorism. and when he he pped doing that job, charge

the moral moral vacuum. principle, the moral principle is othennise a moral principle is othennise a moral principle is that we're obliged to do the best to respond to it. >> excuse me . you cannot do >> excuse me. you cannot do talking over on this program because no one can hear you. >> i'm trying to respond. >> i'm trying to respond. >> go on. cannot be a moral >> go on. you cannot be a moral vacuum , least if you want vacuum, at least not if you want to maintain credibility and integrity on the international stage and in fact, on the domestic stage as well. >> if you get a prime minister stand up one moment and say you know, chinese authorities know, the chinese authorities are absolutely wicked, at are absolutely wicked, look at what doing to the uyghur what they're doing to the uyghur muslims, for example. look at what doing women in what they're doing to women in iran. look these rights iran. look at these human rights abuses. then says, oh, abuses. but then says, oh, actually, know, with saudi actual

theology at the university of oxford and author moral author of colonialism a moral reckoning , authorral reckoning , and professor reckoning, and professor biggar's recent book addresses some of the key questions surrounding british history. was the british empire driven primarily by greed and the lust to dominate? and was the empire essentially racist , as to dominate? and was the empire essentially racist, as nigel, your book covers a vast swathe of history. it's a huge scale. inevitably in something that lasts for many hundreds of years. there will be good things and bad things . how do you try. and bad things. how do you try. and judge over such a period and over such different behaviours in different places ? in different places? >> so the first thing, jacob, is simply to explain that there was good as well as bad because the story being put about it by lots of folk now and being being absorbed is that the british empire was nothing but a litany of racism and oppression and cultural repression . and so cultural repression. and so i just wanted to say, look, there was good as well

the 1st morales, the morals are an important thing. it's, it's, it's part of the culture, it's embedded in you. so the morals is the 1st thing in the tradition. the knowledge that the people that were taken away last and when you see people they, you know, daily routines and practices away from them or you basically killed them. i believe our futures in all past in the sense that in order to actually evolve and live and see our future, you have to know what happened in the past. in the dashboard, a lot of these people were taken away from spiritual homes. and whether they liked it or not, it could be 50000 years. the beloved line remains the same. and so if you're suppose to be a priestess, when that time comes for the calling, you can't run from it. there is no such thing as shame in our culture which colonization that came a lot of self. hey, a lot of it. so it's something that's new and it's for like a virus and that's where the problem always starts. the 1749 does arose with cold, lesser on the blind to the use of those who can see

i am grateful that there is moral clarity in the white house. it is a resource that is in short supply in washington these days, and i was glad to see him stand unequivocally with israel and to condemn the barbarity. i criticize the biden administration 'cause i want it to do better but i am rooting for its success. sending an aircraft carrier to the eastern mediterranean is the right thing to do. expediting a thousand smart bombs for the israeli air force is the right thing to do. the kind of statement the president made in the white house, lighting up the white house in blue and white, these are the right things to do. so at moments like this, i think we have to take a bit of a step back from kind of the nonstop criticism machine. you should have done it this way. you shouldn't have done it that way. simply appreciate an administration that at least has its moral bearings and understands just how serious this is, not just for israel, but for anyone who cares about terrorism and the threat it poses to their own people. - benjamin netanyahu was

compases and somehow i have deficient moral compass, somehow i a moral monster. what's true is i am not the people that have shown a cold difference to the ethnically cleansed palestinian dispossessed one in three every refugee in the world is palestinian they are the largest refugee population those who have turned a blind eye to their suffering are those that need to be seriously interrogated about their moral compass and i would ask you, i would ask you before we end the show, i would ask you that i able to read out the names of the 20 palestinian journalists that have been killed in two more guests. this badge, this badge, zoom on this badge, this badge was given to me by an employee of this building who said they were told they could not wear this badge because it was the palestinian flag, you talk about uncensored, this is censored, this badge was banned in this building people, so that's a ridiculous thing to say, i'm in new york, but good to see you lokey, i appreciate you coming on the program. no es religión es humanidad, no es religión, es humanidad, no es religión, hey,

quandary in are caught in a difficult moral nuanda , , are caught in a difficult moral i uanda a , .his area where the mind is being dug — quandary in this area where the mind is being dug no _ quandary in this area where the mind is being dug no at — quandary in this area where the mind is being dug up at the _ quandary in this area where the mind is being dug up at the moment - quandary in this area where the mind is being dug up at the moment and i is being dug up at the moment and people were massacred. it is a tragedy and should be deemed as a historical site but unfortunately, the corporations did not hear that. protested for years, trying to stop what they see as a site where their ancestors are murdered. and the diggers moved and. this could be one of the biggest lithium deposits in the world. this in march, work began on getting it out of the ground. but this is different and because the support his claim to be environmentalists say the mind can play some role in tackling climate change. global leaders across the road committed to an electric vehicle which lithium is essenti

this is just such an idol and a sign of today’s time, the most important thing is that there is moralityike seryozha badrov we are a whole film we did, i say, about a month and a half on the line film, of course, and lyosha balabanov supervised this project, and bodrov and i often met with balabanov there on vasily island in the apartment, balabanov, that means he he taught how to make a movie, how it was in the sverdovsk ruklub, what the atmosphere was like, in general , he uttered almost the same words that we have said many times here today, it was a very good, good time, and of course, the charm of sergei’s smog, being a superstar how we walked the streets with him, easily, very simply, with normalcy in the world, he was, so to speak, sociable in the world, he kept his distance, i spied a lot of things from him... for the future in the sense of he with what dignity, openness communicates with fans with restraint, yeah, and as an actor he has very modest facial expressions, but at the same time he exudes a very warm charm, yes, i was also lucky enough to communicate with him and someh

and it will definitely strengthen our morale . in fact, the zionist regime will have its usual creditor positions and reactions. we can interpret the news so far that they are in shock that, as i said, a country like france is a permanent member of the security council, which had voted in favor of this regime in all the recent meetings of the security council. here, along with 120 countries, 19 other countries, in fact, and even england and the country itself that i mentioned, whose amendment was rejected , canada is not among the opponents of this resolution. now canada, along with england, is among the countries that voted gratefully for this resolution. well, this is definitely strengthening the morale of the zionist regime, just as the representative of the palestinian authority said it was a morale booster for him. i am definitely grateful, mr. rajabi. i will say goodbye to you . we will go to gaza in a few moments. we will see the pictures in full frame. the zionist regime continues to bomb gaza. as we have informed you sinc

there is no moral equivalency. we cannot both sides the israeli-hamas conflict, not when one with is a sovereign democracy that guarantees freedom of religion and the other is a designated terrorist group hellbent on killing jews and destroying the israeli people. we cannot both sides the conflict when for decades one has shouldered the heavy costs of war, terrorism, and unjustified boycotts and the other has diverted humanitarian aid towards weapons designed to kill as many as possible. we cannot both sides the conflict in light of the steps taken by israel to limit civilian casualties. no nation but israel actively takes steps to warning of impending attacks -- none. no other nation drops leaflets and makes phone calls to it alert residents that they may be in danger's way. only israel waits to begin its military offenses, even when it means losing the element of surprise and putting it at a tactical disadvantage. compare that to the barbaric steps taken by hamas. when israel voluntarily and unilaterally withdrew

nikolai spoke about the morality of the position, vladimir vladimirovich putin has already spoken aboutea of ​​what is good and what is bad. we are all anxiously following with pain in our hearts the tragic situation in the holy land, which has sacred significance for christians, muslims, jews, and followers the world's largest traditional religions, and a new round of the palestinian-israeli conflict has already claimed thousands of lives, thousands that russia has experienced firsthand. and knows what international terrorism is, we know what it is, we will always feel the bitterness of the irreparable losses suffered by the country during the years of the fight against international terrorism, i sincerely want to express my condolences to the families of israelis, citizens of other countries, whose loved ones were killed or injured during the attack of 7 this year, but it is also obvious to us that crimes committed by others should not innocent people are responsible, the fight against terrorism cannot be carried out according to the notorious principle of collective responsibility, w

from some it is taken away by an evil horn, from others baseness of feelings and morality, and someonehearts we look into the eyes of children who are left without parents, into the eyes of lonely old people, in these eyes there is sadness, melancholy, resentment, misunderstanding, emptiness, and if the evil horn does not subject to victory, then morality and traditions are in our hands, it depends on you and me whether we betray them, along with them our loved ones or not, whether we destroy that hearth, home, where there is joy, laughter, support, love, care, unbridled fun and when it seems to us that everyone around you is your friends forever, no, it’s love and joy may be a little naive, but also sincere, selfless, and therefore priceless. many will say that a family is strong even when there is wealth in it, this is also one of the components, but it should not become dominant, because a moment may come when a person simply has no one to try to live for, and it will come when a person has there will be no family, in addition to the pursuit of material wealth... today we are faced

ones for themselves, treat this as an institution of morality, first of all, how i came to understand theory, at some point i had an understanding that all this is not just alive, but that all this is the result of a creative plan, there is all life in this, there is life in everything, this is... nomadism of a person - you know, makes us think that everything that does not have a brain, like the one in our head, is all inanimate, mineral, life has completely different forms, and a person must understand this in order to move on, all the commandments, they fit into one phrase: do not do this to others the way you don’t want them to treat you, that’s it, all these kidnappers of goa and bali, they’re all the same, they’re all underneath it, they ’ll do anything, just love, love is not something abstract, that’s... they all say, the world is about love, there, love is what you should feel for the world, yes, thank you, albert, what kind of view do you have on me, in fact, i will say that i look at the world from the point from the prism of creativity, i believe that any creativity unites

and i think that that's why they don't, in my opinion, they do not hold the moral high ground at this point. i think that we have seen the support for is real. i think that they're very cynical campaign of labeling any criticism of the as really government is anti semitic. think of that is very much loss. it's effectiveness and i think people are starting to see through that charade. and i think since the internet burst onto the scene in particular, i think since social media really became a galvanizing force, i think that we have started to see public opinion shift on this issue in a huge way. and i think that the protests that we've, we've seen over the course of the past week, are certainly indicative of that. i think that around the world, i think of the people recognize who the oppressor is, who the oppressed is, regardless of what the current situation is. and i think that that's, i think, i think that's why we're starting to see a little bit of desperation. in my opinion, from is the israel. i think they realize they're starting to lose that information more. and i think that t

there is no moral equivalency. we cannot both sides and one isa sovereign democracy that ioguarantees the other is a designated terrorist group hell-bent on killing jews both sides of the conflict for decades when his shoulder the heavy cost of war, terrorism and unjustified boycotts the other has divertedes humanitarian aid towards weapons designed to kill as many as possible. steps taken by israel to limit civilian casualties. no nation but israel actively take steps to warn of impending attacks, none. no other nation dropped leaflets and makes phone call to alert presidents they may be an dangerous way. only israel was to begin its military offenses. even when it means losing the element of surprise i'm putting at a tactical disadvantage. compare that to the barbaric sets taken by hamas. when israel voluntarily and unilaterally withdrew from gaza in 2005 dead hamas moderate it actions question it didn't take the opportunity to build peace and create prosperity for the palestinian people? no. instead instigated w

their contribution to raising our morale and morale is very great, even to people who are far from religion they help a lot. there are no atheists at the front, believes gennady, according to him, after the first battle, everyone remembers god. lyudmila pavlenko, andriy khrustalov, vlada matviychuk and. dmytro bondarenko, social news. a representative of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate was among the detainees who illegally took the skivsk gold out of ukraine. this was reported by sbu spokesman artem dekhtyarenko. the operation was carried out by the security service together with the spanish law enforcement officers. there are five suspects, 11 gold items were seized from them. eighth-9th century bc. among them are earrings, a pendant and a pectoral. in 2013, these items were exhibited in one of the kyiv museums, the suspects were taken to madrid jewelry, allegedly the property of the ukrainian orthodox church. the rights to them were issued by a priest who lives in the spanish capital. they tried to sell them for the first time two years ago. poachers tried to lega