are we in a moratoria? is it a special delay of its own? if that is the case and as i understand your comments at the time this moratoria was put in place, alaska was being viewed differently. but what we had asked for was that there be a press that would ensure that permits didn't lapse, leases didn't toll and shell would be able to have sufficient photos to do the redeployment, to make sure that all those assets that they're counting on for any knd of a response are able to be deployable. so if we're kind of in this limbo where we don't know when if, it's going to be very difficult to re-engage any level of operation offshore. so i'must looking for some clarification as to our status. the 600 people who are not working this summer as they had hoped are looking for some clarification of status. and we're hopeful that with all the work that shell has done, all the scrutiny that they have received, not only from mms and every agency from the coast guard to the epa, through every level of the judicial process, that the plan that they have pro