mary ann morrissey, on the other hand, is charged with a few traffic violations.gers shackled together by a pair of handcuffs. they're led to the bus in the loading area. >> when the line of prisoners was getting on the bus, tracy and mary were the last two prisoners of a long line of prisoners. >> and that's when they make their move. >> they were sitting fairly low to the ground. you have to be pretty small to be able to crawl under this bus and then maneuver yourself around so that you're hanging on that train. >> but watch closely. initially they were not last in line. mobley waits for the perfect moment to switch positions. >> tracy mobley was the ring leader in this. there was no doubt she was the one who came up with the idea because she had a felony hanging over her head. and mary morrissey was just here for misdemeanor traffic things for which she probably would have gotten a fine. >> after their disappearing act, a full five seconds ticked by before a sheriff's deputy appears in the loading area, but he doesn't seem to notice anything's amis. >> doesn't

i love radiohead and morrissey. all-time. yeah. but i'm not a tommy or a quadrophenia guy. i'm a three-minute, four-minute rock song guy. i don't like -- when progressive rock was happening in the '70s, it drove me crazy. the ramones kind of saved me. i love radiohead, but when they start to get a little pretentious -- >> jimmy: long form. >> yeah, and morrissey i love and he gets a little bit, you can't have meat? at madison square garden? i can't have a hot dog, i paid $300 to see you? know what i mean? come on. let me have a hot dog. rub it on my face. so that's where i draw the line. >> jimmy: who's your all-time favorite? >> rolling stones. hands down. [ cheers and applause ] >> rolling stones, the who, david bowie. >> jimmy: have you met these guys? >> i have met mick jagger and the guys from the who. david bowie, i don't know why, but david bowie to me is kind of like a god. i don't know why. there's something about him, and i met him when i was first getting famous, i was doing this show. tv show. and you ha

. >> a local tv station's camera catches deputy nicole morrissey o'donald immediately chasing after trent as he runs down the steps. >> my thought was, if he were able to get down the stairs, there might be possible weapons that he could access at the bottom of the stairs. >> the deputy steadily fires her taser gun at trent, who's about 20 yards away. he doesn't get very far. >> he stayed on the stairway. i got on my radio and called for assistance. about four deputies came down the stairs and we handcuffed him. >> the taser gun is what stops trent in his class. >> we just had taser recertification class two days before. so, all the training was fresh in my mind. >> after 13 years at the multnomah county sheriff's office, this is the first time morrissey o'donald uses any of the weapons on her belt. >> he didn't say anything. when we walked him back to the courtroom, he was completely silent. >> the judge orders him into custody, again. he increases trent's bail $500,000. >> under oregon law, what mr. trent did after he knew he was going into custody is no different than if he would have

after morrissey was ousted, the opportunity was golden to expand. we have seen almost to the day, one year ago, we have seen them carry out operations in the western desert checkpoint and the government. american oilled an worker in the same area. there seems to be a residual presence for sinai province operatives who may be in connection with over -- with other operatives in libya. of the men responsible for the previous attacks defected and created his own group. qaeda's presence in egypt, as a force, is not as significant as i.s.. al qaeda has a message that might be more appealing to the recruits. it is more domestic and local focused. is in the sinai is a transnational phenomenon. instead of focusing on cairo, they are focused on mosul. women an example for prisoners to be released? what about that? stunt.s a my heart goes out to the victims of this group and the tamil's of this man. this is a propaganda stunt. they are trying to appeal to nonviolent ones, to try to hijack their cause and to say that we are willing to kill this man to achieve d

patrick morrissey is the state's attorney general and i spoke with him this afternoon. welcome, mr.ney general. we appreciate your joining us. the president says these tougher environmental standards are necessary not just to protect the next generation but this one. how do you see them? >> well i think everyone supports policies that would promote clean air and clean water burks when -- water but when you put something forth of this magnitude, it has to be legal, and this administration has probably gone further than we've ever seen in pushing forth a radical, illegal proposal by lilt will withstand scrutiny in the court. you have to make sure you do this the right way and they're taking the clean air act and e.p.a. which are environmental regulators and turning them into central energy planners. that's not allowed under the statute and the constitution which is why we plan to challenge it. >> woodruff: all the reporting we have been reading this morning says that the administration has gone the extra mile in the last month or two to try to make sure that these new rules do comply

attorney general morrissey, you got some backing from the "wall street journal's" lead editorial todayut this as a complete abuse of power, saying without a vote in congress or even much public debate, mr. obama is using his last 18 months to dictate u.s. energy choices for the next 20 or 30 years. pretty amazing. >> yeah. it's truly unbelievable. i think it's important for people to see just how unprecedented this proposal is. first, they didn't go through congress the way any major initiative typically does. second, what they're doing here is they're taking the clean air act which is supposed to regulate in the environmental area and they're radically transforming it. they're trying to help manage state's energy portfolios. that's one of the major reasons why i think this ultimately will fall in the courts. this administration knows that and they roll these proposals out knowing that the court cases may take some time to work their way through, but meanwhile they think they can claim a victory. we're hopeful we can change that because their legal theories are flimsy and while they've

now to the aforementioned west virginia attorney general, patrick morrissey. general, what do you think of this? >> well, obviously, the details are still coming out, but we think that this administration is pushing a radical and illegal proposal, and west virginia and a whole coalition of states and many other entities including miners and businesses are getting prepared to sue. neil: what i don't understand, general, when the supreme court slapped down the epa in a recent decision saying, you know, you have to consider the costs of whatever recommendations you have, and then i see something like this, now, the cost to the industry, all of these affected industries is going to be substantial. just capital improvements and the like are going to be better than $100 billion next year. so has anyone thought of that here? >> well, i think people have. and most folks are focusing on the fact that the epa releases these rules, that they know may ultimately not get upheld in the courts, but in order to force states and utilities to come in compliance with it knowing

patrick morrissey is the state's attorney general and i spoke with him this afternoon. welcome, mr.ey general. we appreciate your joining us. the president says these tougher environmental standards are necessary not just to protect the next generation but this one. how do you see them?k critical is that the e.p.a. and the clean air act, they're designed to regulate the coal fire power plants. they can't force or try to incentivize states in order to put form other forms of energy and to force states to no longer manage their energy portfolios. this is a real problem. they're on very thin legal ice. i think that the statute the very clear. the federal government has a role to regulate power plants. the states typically manage their energy portfolios. >> let me ask you about some of the substance of this. as of two years ago, it's my understanding power plants across the country were responsible for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions. that being case, shouldn't they be targeted for significant cuts? >> i think anytime you talked about whether there was a policy goal to target a particul

we'll be hearing from patrick morrissey, the west virginia attorney general, who says this is way overboardks that have since this first came up been tanking on the news that this is going to hit them further. you might recall that a number of these coal industry ceos have been saying we give up,