considered er, the same public discussions, because when terekhov offered four options for renaming moskovsky prospectd these four options, none of which personally suited me, but technically the vote took place, this is a separate resolution that regulates the holding of such of public discussions, the cabinet of ministers also approved, and the problem and fatigue is that i am in solidarity with you here, son, that i also did not like any of the proposed options, in the sense that it did not reflect the specifics of kharkiv history. it is difficult for me to say where these options came from, who generated them, but if this we don't feel that there was an approach, that is, if there was definitely a historian there, there would be some kind of izyum or chuguyiv road, tract or avenue, whatever you like, but it was definitely there, that's why i'm asking about the strategy. do you have one? it is a good opportunity for sen to offer his work to be included in this process. well , first of all, i don’t see the process yet. we were talking about processes back in may. they would have asked me to create s

any point of bryansk according to the ministry of emergency situations , not at the base on moskovsky prospecteverything caught fire around two o'clock in the morning . they bombarded there with explosions so far , that's why, dear screamers in ukraine, sooner or later nuclear weapons will be renamed, just understand one simple thing, there will be a symmetrical answer to everything, although in general we can understand wet fantasies judge a propagandist by the nose. when things are bad at the front, you have to somehow calm yourself down and while they arrange brain masturbation sessions with the participation of some poplar, they can notice one weapon and not the birth of a bluff . well, they say that ukraine is winning. this is somehow understandable. i even have illustrations of how ukraine is winning. she is so interesting, you know. the territory means which ukraine, which wins , has already lost, say, we took 20% of the territory of ukraine, what kind of defeat is this 108,844 m², you know, ukraine, which wins, loses just grandiose grandiose from kharkiv, yes, by the middle of march, t